- 15 8月, 2012 2 次提交
-
-
由 Eric W. Biederman 提交于
Signed-off-by: N"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Eric W. Biederman 提交于
This trickles up through sctp_sm_lookup_event up to sctp_do_sm and up further into sctp_primitiv_NAME before the code reaches places where struct net can be reliably found. Signed-off-by: N"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 08 7月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Thomas Graf 提交于
When initiating a graceful shutdown while having data chunks on the retransmission queue with a peer which is in zero window mode the shutdown is never completed because the retransmission error count is reset periodically by the following two rules: - Do not timeout association while doing zero window probe. - Reset overall error count when a heartbeat request has been acknowledged. The graceful shutdown will wait for all outstanding TSN to be acknowledged before sending the SHUTDOWN request. This never happens due to the peer's zero window not acknowledging the continuously retransmitted data chunks. Although the error counter is incremented for each failed retransmission, the receiving of the SACK announcing the zero window clears the error count again immediately. Also heartbeat requests continue to be sent periodically. The peer acknowledges these requests causing the error counter to be reset as well. This patch changes behaviour to only reset the overall error counter for the above rules while not in shutdown. After reaching the maximum number of retransmission attempts, the T5 shutdown guard timer is scheduled to give the receiver some additional time to recover. The timer is stopped as soon as the receiver acknowledges any data. The issue can be easily reproduced by establishing a sctp association over the loopback device, constantly queueing data at the sender while not reading any at the receiver. Wait for the window to reach zero, then initiate a shutdown by killing both processes simultaneously. The association will never be freed and the chunks on the retransmission queue will be retransmitted indefinitely. Signed-off-by: NThomas Graf <tgraf@infradead.org> Acked-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 22 4月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Wei Yongjun 提交于
This patch implement event notification SCTP_SENDER_DRY_EVENT. SCTP Socket API Extensions: 6.1.9. SCTP_SENDER_DRY_EVENT When the SCTP stack has no more user data to send or retransmit, this notification is given to the user. Also, at the time when a user app subscribes to this event, if there is no data to be sent or retransmit, the stack will immediately send up this notification. Signed-off-by: NWei Yongjun <yjwei@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 20 4月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Vlad Yasevich 提交于
SCTP does not SCTP_STATE_EMPTY and we can never be in that state. Remove useless code. Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NWei Yongjun <yjwei@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 27 8月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Joe Perches 提交于
Change SCTP_DEBUG_PRINTK and SCTP_DEBUG_PRINTK_IPADDR to use do { print } while (0) guards. Add SCTP_DEBUG_PRINTK_CONT to fix errors in log when lines were continued. Add #define pr_fmt(fmt) KBUILD_MODNAME ": " fmt Add a missing newline in "Failed bind hash alloc" Signed-off-by: NJoe Perches <joe@perches.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 03 6月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Wei Yongjun 提交于
Just fix a typo in net/sctp/sm_statetable.c. Signed-off-by: NWei Yongjun <yjwei@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
-
- 23 10月, 2008 2 次提交
-
-
由 Wei Yongjun 提交于
Once an endpoint has reached the SHUTDOWN-RECEIVED state, it MUST NOT send a SHUTDOWN in response to a ULP request. The Cumulative TSN Ack of the received SHUTDOWN chunk MUST be processed. This patch fix to process Cumulative TSN Ack of the received SHUTDOWN chunk in SHUTDOWN_RECEIVED state. Signed-off-by: NWei Yongjun <yjwei@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Wei Yongjun 提交于
If SHUTDOWN is received in SHUTDOWN-PENDING state, enpoint should enter the SHUTDOWN-RECEIVED state and check the Cumulative TSN Ack field of the SHUTDOWN chunk (RFC 4960 Section 9.2). If the SHUTDOWN chunk can acknowledge all of the send DATA chunks, SHUTDOWN-ACK should be sent. But now endpoint just silently discarded the SHUTDOWN chunk. SHUTDOWN received in SHUTDOWN-PENDING state can happend when the last SACK is lost by network, or the SHUTDOWN chunk can acknowledge all of the received DATA chunks. The packet sequence(SACK lost) is like this: Endpoint A Endpoint B ULP (ESTABLISHED) (ESTABLISHED) <----------- DATA <--- shutdown Enter SHUTDOWN-PENDING state SACK ----lost----> SHUTDOWN(*1) ------------> <----------- SHUTDOWN-ACK (*1) silently discarded now. This patch fix to handle SHUTDOWN in SHUTDOWN-PENDING state as the same as ESTABLISHED state. Signed-off-by: NWei Yongjun <yjwei@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 01 10月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Wei Yongjun 提交于
RFC 4960: Section 9.2 The sender of the SHUTDOWN MAY also start an overall guard timer 'T5-shutdown-guard' to bound the overall time for the shutdown sequence. At the expiration of this timer, the sender SHOULD abort the association by sending an ABORT chunk. If the 'T5-shutdown- guard' timer is used, it SHOULD be set to the recommended value of 5 times 'RTO.Max'. The timer 'T5-shutdown-guard' is used to counter the overall time for shutdown sequence, and it's start by the sender of the SHUTDOWN. So timer 'T5-shutdown-guard' should be start when we send the first SHUTDOWN chunk and enter the SHUTDOWN-SENT state, not start when we receipt of the SHUTDOWN primitive and enter SHUTDOWN-PENDING state. If 'T5-shutdown-guard' timer is start at SHUTDOWN-PENDING state, the association may be ABORT while data is still transmitting. Signed-off-by: NWei Yongjun <yjwei@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
-
- 05 2月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Vlad Yasevich 提交于
I was notified by Randy Stewart that lksctp claims to be "the reference implementation". First of all, "the refrence implementation" was the original implementation of SCTP in usersapce written ty Randy and a few others. Second, after looking at the definiton of 'reference implementation', we don't really meet the requirements. Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
-
- 29 1月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Vlad Yasevich 提交于
C4) Both ASCONF and ASCONF-ACK Chunks MUST NOT be sent in any SCTP state except ESTABLISHED, SHUTDOWN-PENDING, SHUTDOWN-RECEIVED, and SHUTDOWN-SENT. Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 11 10月, 2007 1 次提交
-
-
由 Vlad Yasevich 提交于
This patch implements the receive path needed to process authenticated chunks. Add ability to process the AUTH chunk and handle edge cases for authenticated COOKIE-ECHO as well. Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 26 9月, 2007 1 次提交
-
-
由 Vlad Yasevich 提交于
While processing OOTB chunks as well as chunks with an invalid length of 0, it was possible to SCTP to get wedged inside an infinite loop because we didn't catch the condition correctly, or didn't mark the packet for discard correctly. This work is based on original findings and work by Wei Yongjun <yjwei@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
-
- 04 6月, 2007 1 次提交
-
-
由 Bill Nottingham 提交于
Recent gcc versions emit warnings when unsigned variables are compared < 0 or >= 0. Signed-off-by: NBill Nottingham <notting@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 26 4月, 2007 1 次提交
-
-
由 Stephen Hemminger 提交于
Spring cleaning time... There seems to be a lot of places in the network code that have extra bogus semicolons after conditionals. Most commonly is a bogus semicolon after: switch() { } Signed-off-by: NStephen Hemminger <shemminger@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 11 2月, 2007 1 次提交
-
-
由 YOSHIFUJI Hideaki 提交于
Signed-off-by: NYOSHIFUJI Hideaki <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 24 1月, 2007 1 次提交
-
-
由 Vlad Yasevich 提交于
Consider the chunk as Out-of-the-Blue if we don't have an endpoint. Otherwise discard it as before. Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NSridhar Samudrala <sri@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 03 12月, 2006 1 次提交
-
-
由 Peter Zijlstra 提交于
I noticed an insane high density of repeated characters fixable by a simple regular expression: % s/{.fn = \([^,]*\),[[:space:]]\+\(\\\n[[:space:]]\+\)\?.name = "\1"}/TYPE_SCTP_FUNC(\1)/g (NOTE: the .name for .fn = sctp_sf_do_9_2_start_shutdown didn't match) Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 06 5月, 2006 1 次提交
-
-
由 Sridhar Samudrala 提交于
Discard an unexpected chunk in CLOSED state rather can calling BUG(). Signed-off-by: NSridhar Samudrala <sri@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 21 6月, 2005 1 次提交
-
-
由 Frank Filz 提交于
Implements sctp_connectx() as defined in the SCTP sockets API draft by tunneling the request through a setsockopt(). Signed-off-by: NFrank Filz <ffilzlnx@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NSridhar Samudrala <sri@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 17 4月, 2005 1 次提交
-
-
由 Linus Torvalds 提交于
Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
-