The numa mask subset check can often lead to system hang or crash during
CPU hotplug and system suspend operation if NUMA is disabled. This is
mostly observed on HMP systems where the CPU compute capacities are
different and ends up in different scheduler domains. Since
cpumask_of_node is returned instead core_sibling, the scheduler is
confused with incorrect cpumasks(e.g. one CPU in two different sched
domains at the same time) on CPU hotplug.

Lets disable the NUMA siblings checks for the time being, as NUMA in
socket machines have LLC's that will assure that the scheduler topology
isn't "borken".

The NUMA check exists to assure that if a LLC within a socket crosses
NUMA nodes/chiplets the scheduler domains remain consistent. This code will
likely have to be re-enabled in the near future once the NUMA mask story
is sorted.  At the moment its not necessary because the NUMA in socket
machines LLC's are contained within the NUMA domains.

Further, as a defensive mechanism during hot-plug, lets assure that the
LLC siblings are also masked.
Reported-by: NGeert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Reviewed-by: NSudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Tested-by: NGeert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
Signed-off-by: NJeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>

Though CONFIG_ACPI_PPTT is selected by platforms and nor user visible,
it may be useful to support the build with CONFIG_ACPI_PPTT disabled.

This patch adds the missing dummy/boiler plate implementation to fix
the build.
Acked-by: N"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Signed-off-by: NSudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>

Without including psci.h and arm-smccc.h, we now get a build failure in
some configurations:

arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c: In function 'arm64_update_smccc_conduit':
arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c:278:10: error: 'psci_ops' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'sysfs_ops'?

arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c: In function 'arm64_set_ssbd_mitigation':
arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c:311:3: error: implicit declaration of function 'arm_smccc_1_1_hvc' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
   arm_smccc_1_1_hvc(ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_WORKAROUND_2, state, NULL);
Signed-off-by: NArnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Signed-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>

This is to avoid potential merging conflicts between commit 55e3748e
("arm64: KVM: Add ARCH_WORKAROUND_2 support for guests") and the KVM
tree.
Signed-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>

Stateful CPU architecture extensions may require the signal frame
to grow to a size that exceeds the arch's MINSIGSTKSZ #define.
However, changing this #define is an ABI break.

To allow userspace the option of determining the signal frame size
in a more forwards-compatible way, this patch adds a new auxv entry
tagged with AT_MINSIGSTKSZ, which provides the maximum signal frame
size that the process can observe during its lifetime.

If AT_MINSIGSTKSZ is absent from the aux vector, the caller can
assume that the MINSIGSTKSZ #define is sufficient.  This allows for
a consistent interface with older kernels that do not provide
AT_MINSIGSTKSZ.

The idea is that libc could expose this via sysconf() or some
similar mechanism.

There is deliberately no AT_SIGSTKSZ.  The kernel knows nothing
about userspace's own stack overheads and should not pretend to
know.

For arm64:

The primary motivation for this interface is the Scalable Vector
Extension, which can require at least 4KB or so of extra space
in the signal frame for the largest hardware implementations.

To determine the correct value, a "Christmas tree" mode (via the
add_all argument) is added to setup_sigframe_layout(), to simulate
addition of all possible records to the signal frame at maximum
possible size.

If this procedure goes wrong somehow, resulting in a stupidly large
frame layout and hence failure of sigframe_alloc() to allocate a
record to the frame, then this is indicative of a kernel bug.  In
this case, we WARN() and no attempt is made to populate
AT_MINSIGSTKSZ for userspace.

For arm64 SVE:

The SVE context block in the signal frame needs to be considered
too when computing the maximum possible signal frame size.

Because the size of this block depends on the vector length, this
patch computes the size based not on the thread's current vector
length but instead on the maximum possible vector length: this
determines the maximum size of SVE context block that can be
observed in any signal frame for the lifetime of the process.
Signed-off-by: NDave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>
Acked-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Cc: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>

Now that the kernel SVE support is reasonably mature, it is
excessive to default sve_max_vl to the invalid value -1 and then
sprinkle WARN_ON()s around the place to make sure it has been
initialised before use.  The cpufeatures code already runs pretty
early, and will ensure sve_max_vl gets initialised.

This patch initialises sve_max_vl to something sane that will be
supported by every SVE implementation, and removes most of the
sanity checks.

The checks in find_supported_vector_length() are retained for now.
If anything goes horribly wrong, we are likely to trip a check here
sooner or later.
Signed-off-by: NDave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>
Acked-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>

- perf/arm-cci: allow building as module

- perf/arm-ccn: demote dev_warn() to dev_dbg() in event_init()

- miscellaneous perf/arm cleanups

* 'for-next/perf' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/will/linux:
  ARM: mcpm, perf/arm-cci: export mcpm_is_available
  drivers/bus: arm-cci: fix build warnings
  drivers/perf: Remove ARM_SPE_PMU explicit PERF_EVENTS dependency
  drivers/perf: arm-ccn: don't log to dmesg in event_init
  perf/arm-cci: Allow building as a module
  perf/arm-cci: Remove pointless PMU disabling
  perf/arm-cc*: Fix MODULE_LICENSE() tags
  arm_pmu: simplify arm_pmu::handle_irq
  perf/arm-cci: Remove unnecessary period adjustment
  perf: simplify getting .drvdata

Now that all our infrastructure is in place, let's expose the
availability of ARCH_WORKAROUND_2 to guests. We take this opportunity
to tidy up a couple of SMCCC constants.
Acked-by: NChristoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: NMark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>

In order to forward the guest's ARCH_WORKAROUND_2 calls to EL3,
add a small(-ish) sequence to handle it at EL2. Special care must
be taken to track the state of the guest itself by updating the
workaround flags. We also rely on patching to enable calls into
the firmware.

Note that since we need to execute branches, this always executes
after the Spectre-v2 mitigation has been applied.
Reviewed-by: NMark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>

In order to offer ARCH_WORKAROUND_2 support to guests, we need
a bit of infrastructure.

Let's add a flag indicating whether or not the guest uses
SSBD mitigation. Depending on the state of this flag, allow
KVM to disable ARCH_WORKAROUND_2 before entering the guest,
and enable it when exiting it.
Reviewed-by: NChristoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: NMark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>

As we're going to require to access per-cpu variables at EL2,
let's craft the minimum set of accessors required to implement
reading a per-cpu variable, relying on tpidr_el2 to contain the
per-cpu offset.
Reviewed-by: NChristoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: NMark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>

If running on a system that performs dynamic SSBD mitigation, allow
userspace to request the mitigation for itself. This is implemented
as a prctl call, allowing the mitigation to be enabled or disabled at
will for this particular thread.
Acked-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>

In order to allow userspace to be mitigated on demand, let's
introduce a new thread flag that prevents the mitigation from
being turned off when exiting to userspace, and doesn't turn
it on on entry into the kernel (with the assumption that the
mitigation is always enabled in the kernel itself).

This will be used by a prctl interface introduced in a later
patch.
Reviewed-by: NMark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Acked-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>

On a system where firmware can dynamically change the state of the
mitigation, the CPU will always come up with the mitigation enabled,
including when coming back from suspend.

If the user has requested "no mitigation" via a command line option,
let's enforce it by calling into the firmware again to disable it.

Similarily, for a resume from hibernate, the mitigation could have
been disabled by the boot kernel. Let's ensure that it is set
back on in that case.
Acked-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: NMark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>

In order to avoid checking arm64_ssbd_callback_required on each
kernel entry/exit even if no mitigation is required, let's
add yet another alternative that by default jumps over the mitigation,
and that gets nop'ed out if we're doing dynamic mitigation.

Think of it as a poor man's static key...
Reviewed-by: NJulien Grall <julien.grall@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: NMark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Acked-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>

We're about to need the mitigation state in various parts of the
kernel in order to do the right thing for userspace and guests.

Let's expose an accessor that will let other subsystems know
about the state.
Reviewed-by: NJulien Grall <julien.grall@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: NMark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Acked-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>

On a system where the firmware implements ARCH_WORKAROUND_2,
it may be useful to either permanently enable or disable the
workaround for cases where the user decides that they'd rather
not get a trap overhead, and keep the mitigation permanently
on or off instead of switching it on exception entry/exit.

In any case, default to the mitigation being enabled.
Reviewed-by: NJulien Grall <julien.grall@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: NMark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Acked-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>

As for Spectre variant-2, we rely on SMCCC 1.1 to provide the
discovery mechanism for detecting the SSBD mitigation.

A new capability is also allocated for that purpose, and a
config option.
Reviewed-by: NJulien Grall <julien.grall@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: NMark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Acked-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: NSuzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>

In a heterogeneous system, we can end up with both affected and
unaffected CPUs. Let's check their status before calling into the
firmware.
Reviewed-by: NJulien Grall <julien.grall@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: NMark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Acked-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>

In order for the kernel to protect itself, let's call the SSBD mitigation
implemented by the higher exception level (either hypervisor or firmware)
on each transition between userspace and kernel.

We must take the PSCI conduit into account in order to target the
right exception level, hence the introduction of a runtime patching
callback.
Reviewed-by: NMark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: NJulien Grall <julien.grall@arm.com>
Acked-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>

We've so far used the PSCI return codes for SMCCC because they
were extremely similar. But with the new ARM DEN 0070A specification,
"NOT_REQUIRED" (-2) is clashing with PSCI's "PSCI_RET_INVALID_PARAMS".

Let's bite the bullet and add SMCCC specific return codes. Users
can be repainted as and when required.
Acked-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: NMark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>

Now that the ARM CCI PMU driver can be built as a loadable module,
we get a link failure when MCPM is enabled:

ERROR: "mcpm_is_available" [drivers/perf/arm-cci.ko] undefined!

The simplest fix is to export that helper function.

Fixes: 8b0c93c2 ("perf/arm-cci: Allow building as a module")
Acked-by: NNicolas Pitre <nico@linaro.org>
Acked-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: NArnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>

When the arm-cci driver is enabled, but both CONFIG_ARM_CCI5xx_PMU and
CONFIG_ARM_CCI400_PMU are not, we get a warning about how parts of
the driver are never used:

drivers/perf/arm-cci.c:1454:29: error: 'cci_pmu_models' defined but not used [-Werror=unused-variable]
drivers/perf/arm-cci.c:693:16: error: 'cci_pmu_event_show' defined but not used [-Werror=unused-function]
drivers/perf/arm-cci.c:685:16: error: 'cci_pmu_format_show' defined but not used [-Werror=unused-function]

Marking all three functions as __maybe_unused avoids the warnings in
randconfig builds. I'm doing this lacking any ideas for a better fix.

Fixes: 3de6be7a ("drivers/bus: Split Arm CCI driver")
Reviewed-by: NRobin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NArnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>

In do_page_fault(), we handle some kernel faults early, and simply
die() with a message. For faults handled later, we dump the faulting
address, decode the ESR, walk the page tables, and perform a number of
steps to ensure that this data is reported.

Let's unify the handling of fatal kernel faults with a new
die_kernel_fault() helper, handling all of these details. This is
largely the same as the existing logic in __do_kernel_fault(), except
that addresses are consistently padded to 16 hex characters, as would be
expected for a 64-bit address.

The messages currently logged in do_page_fault are adjusted to fit into
the die_kernel_fault() message template.
Acked-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NMark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>

The naming of is_permission_fault() makes it sound like it should return
true for permission faults from EL0, but by design, it only does so for
faults from EL1.

Let's make this clear by dropping el1 in the name, as we do for
is_el1_instruction_abort().
Acked-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NMark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>

Now that we're seeing CPUs shipping with LSE atomics, default them to
'on' in Kconfig. CPUs without the instructions will continue to use
LDXR/STXR-based sequences, but they will be placed out-of-line by the
compiler.
Acked-by: NMark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Acked-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>

Since commit bddb9b68 ("drivers/perf: commonise PERF_EVENTS
dependency"), all perf drivers depend on PERF_EVENTS config under a
common menu.

Config ARM_SPE_PMU still declares explicitly a dependency on
PERF_EVENTS, which is unneeded, so remove it.
Acked-by: NMark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>

The ARM CCN PMU driver uses dev_warn() to complain about parameters in
the user-provided perf_event_attr. This means that under normal
operation (e.g. a single invocation of the perf tool), a number of
messages warnings may be logged to dmesg.

Tools may issue multiple syscalls to probe for feature support, and
multiple applications (from multiple users) can attempt to open events
simultaneously, so this is not very helpful, even if a user happens to
have access to dmesg. Worse, this can push important information out of
the dmesg ring buffer, and can significantly slow down syscall fuzzers,
vastly increasing the time it takes to find critical bugs.

Demote the dev_warn() instances to dev_dbg(), as is the case for all
other PMU drivers under drivers/perf/. Users who wish to debug PMU event
initialisation can enable dynamic debug to receive these messages.
Signed-off-by: NMark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>

Fill in the few extra bits and annotations needed to make the driver
work properly as a module, and jiggle the Kconfig to expose the
driver-level ARM_CCI_PMU option.
Signed-off-by: NRobin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>

The CCI PMU driver bears some legacy remnants of the arm_pmu framework
from when it was split in c6f85cb4 ("bus: cci: move away from
arm_pmu framework"). In particular this perf_pmu_{dis,en}able() dance
around pmu->add which was fixed for arm_pmu in a9e469d1
("drivers/perf: arm_pmu: remove pointless PMU disabling").

For the exact same reasons (i.e. perf core already does this around the
call anyway), give cci_pmu_add() the exact same change, which also
prevents having to export those core functions to build it as a module.
Acked-by: NMark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NRobin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>

The CCI/CCN drivers are licensed under GPLv2, but the MODULE_LICENSE()
tags are using the bare "GPL" string implying GPLv2 or later. Fix them
to match their actual file license.
Acked-by: NPawel Moll <pawel.moll@arm.com>
Acked-by: NSuzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NRobin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>

The arm_pmu::handle_irq() callback has the same prototype as a generic
IRQ handler, taking the IRQ number and a void pointer argument which it
must convert to an arm_pmu pointer.

This means that all arm_pmu::handle_irq() take an IRQ number they never
use, and all must explicitly cast the void pointer to an arm_pmu
pointer.

Instead, let's change arm_pmu::handle_irq to take an arm_pmu pointer,
allowing these casts to be removed. The redundant IRQ number parameter
is also removed.
Suggested-by: NHoeun Ryu <hoeun.ryu@lge.com>
Signed-off-by: NMark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>

Since sampling events are rejected up-front by cci_pmu_event_init(), it
doesn't make much sense to go fiddling with the sampling period later.
This would seem to be just another leftover artefact of the arm_pmu
framwork, and as such can go.
Acked-by: NMark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NRobin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>

We should get drvdata from struct device directly. Going via
platform_device is an unneeded step back and forth.
Signed-off-by: NWolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>

Writes to ZCR_EL1 are self-synchronising, and so may be expensive
in typical implementations.

This patch adopts the approach used for costly system register
writes elsewhere in the kernel: the system register write is
suppressed if it would not change the stored value.

Since the common case will be that of switching between tasks that
use the same vector length as one another, prediction hit rates on
the conditional branch should be reasonably good, with lower
expected amortised cost than the unconditional execution of a
heavyweight self-synchronising instruction.
Signed-off-by: NDave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>

Now that we have an accurate view of the physical topology
we need to represent it correctly to the scheduler. Generally MC
should equal the LLC in the system, but there are a number of
special cases that need to be dealt with.

In the case of NUMA in socket, we need to assure that the sched
domain we build for the MC layer isn't larger than the DIE above it.
Similarly for LLC's that might exist in cross socket interconnect or
directory hardware we need to assure that MC is shrunk to the socket
or NUMA node.

This patch builds a sibling mask for the LLC, and then picks the
smallest of LLC, socket siblings, or NUMA node siblings, which
gives us the behavior described above. This is ever so slightly
different than the similar alternative where we look for a cache
layer less than or equal to the socket/NUMA siblings.

The logic to pick the MC layer affects all arm64 machines, but
only changes the behavior for DT/MPIDR systems if the NUMA domain
is smaller than the core siblings (generally set to the cluster).
Potentially this fixes a possible bug in DT systems, but really
it only affects ACPI systems where the core siblings is correctly
set to the socket siblings. Thus all currently available ACPI
systems should have MC equal to LLC, including the NUMA in socket
machines where the LLC is partitioned between the NUMA nodes.
Tested-by: NArd Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Tested-by: NVijaya Kumar K <vkilari@codeaurora.org>
Tested-by: NXiongfeng Wang <wangxiongfeng2@huawei.com>
Tested-by: NTomasz Nowicki <Tomasz.Nowicki@cavium.com>
Acked-by: NSudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Acked-by: NArd Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Acked-by: NMorten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NJeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>

Add ACPI_SIG_PPTT to the table so initrd's can override the
system topology.
Tested-by: NArd Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Tested-by: NVijaya Kumar K <vkilari@codeaurora.org>
Tested-by: NXiongfeng Wang <wangxiongfeng2@huawei.com>
Tested-by: NTomasz Nowicki <Tomasz.Nowicki@cavium.com>
Acked-by: NArd Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Acked-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NGeoffrey Blake <geoffrey.blake@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NJeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>

Propagate the topology information from the PPTT tree to the
cpu_topology array. We can get the thread id and core_id by assuming
certain levels of the PPTT tree correspond to those concepts.
The package_id is flagged in the tree and can be found by calling
find_acpi_cpu_topology_package() which terminates
its search when it finds an ACPI node flagged as the physical
package. If the tree doesn't contain enough levels to represent
all of the requested levels then the root node will be returned
for all subsequent levels.
Tested-by: NArd Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Tested-by: NVijaya Kumar K <vkilari@codeaurora.org>
Tested-by: NXiongfeng Wang <wangxiongfeng2@huawei.com>
Tested-by: NTomasz Nowicki <Tomasz.Nowicki@cavium.com>
Acked-by: NSudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Acked-by: NArd Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Acked-by: NMorten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NJeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>

The cluster concept isn't architecturally defined for arm64.
Lets match the name of the arm64 topology field to the kernel macro
that uses it.
Tested-by: NArd Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Tested-by: NVijaya Kumar K <vkilari@codeaurora.org>
Tested-by: NXiongfeng Wang <wangxiongfeng2@huawei.com>
Tested-by: NTomasz Nowicki <Tomasz.Nowicki@cavium.com>
Acked-by: NSudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Acked-by: NArd Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Acked-by: NMorten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NJeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>

The /sys cache entries should support ACPI/PPTT generated cache
topology information.  For arm64, if ACPI is enabled, determine
the max number of cache levels and populate them using the PPTT
table if one is available.
Tested-by: NArd Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Tested-by: NVijaya Kumar K <vkilari@codeaurora.org>
Tested-by: NXiongfeng Wang <wangxiongfeng2@huawei.com>
Tested-by: NTomasz Nowicki <Tomasz.Nowicki@cavium.com>
Reviewed-by: NSudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Acked-by: NArd Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NJeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>