I don't see a reason to touch VDD when we're disabling the panel:
since the panel is enabled, we don't need VDD. This saves a few sleep
calls from the vdd_on and vdd_off functions at every modeset.

Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=69693Reviewed-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
[danvet: Fix the patch mangle wiggle has done ... Spotted by Paulo.
Also drop the runtime_pm_put call which now has to go due to different
patch ordering. Also from Paul.]
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

We just don't need this. This saves 250ms from every modeset on my
machine.
Reviewed-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

The code to enable/disable PC8 already takes care of saving and
restoring all the registers we need to save/restore, so do a put()
call when we enable PC8 and a get() call when we disable it.

Ideally, in order to make it easier to add runtime PM support to other
platforms, we should move some things from the PC8 code to the runtime
PM code, but let's do this later, since we can make Haswell work right
now.

V2: - Rebase
Signed-off-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@gmail.com>
[danvet: Don't actually enable runtime pm since I didn't merge all
patches.]
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

The plan is to merge PC8 and D3 into a single feature, and when we're
in D3 we won't get any hotplug interrupt anyway, so leaving them
enable doesn't make sense, and it also brings us a problem. The
problem is that we get a hotplug interrupt right when we we wake up
from D3, when we're still waking up everything. If we fully disable
interrupts we won't get this hotplug interrupt, so we won't have
problems.
Signed-off-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

The current code was checking if all bits of "val" were enabled and
DE_PCH_EVENT_IVB was disabled. The new code doesn't care about the
state of DE_PCH_EVENT_IVB: it just checks if everything else is 1.

The goal is that future patches may completely disable interrupts, and
the LCPLL-disabling code shouldn't care about the state of
DE_PCH_EVENT_IVB.
Signed-off-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@gmail.com>
[danvet: I think the commit message is actually wrong in it's
description of what the old test checked, but the new one seems sane.
So meh.]
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

And put it when it's off. Otherwise, when you run pm_pc8 from
intel-gpu-tools, and the delayed function that disables VDD runs,
we'll get some messages saying we're touching registers while the HW
is suspended.
Signed-off-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

These are needed when we cat the debugfs and sysfs files.

V2: - Rebase
V3: - Rebase
V4: - Rebase
Signed-off-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

If I add code to enable runtime PM on my Haswell machine, start a
desktop environment, then enable runtime PM, these functions will
complain that they're trying to read/write registers while the
graphics card is suspended.

v2: - Simplify i915_gem_fault changes.
Signed-off-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@gmail.com>
[danvet: Drop the hunk in i915_hangcheck_elapsed, it's the wrong thing
to do.]
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

Now that we are actually setting the device to the D3 state, we should
issue the notification.

The opregion spec says we should send the message before the adapter
is about to be placed in a lower power state, and after the adapter is
placed in a higher power state.

Jani originally wrote a similar patch for PC8, but then we discovered
that we were not really changing the PCI D states when
enabling/disabling PC8, so we had to postpone his patch.

v2: - Improve commit message, explaining the expected state.

v3: - Rebase.

Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Credits-to: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@gmail.com> (v2)
Signed-off-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

This patch adds the initial infrastructure to allow a Runtime PM
implementation that sets the device to its D3 state. The patch just
adds the necessary callbacks and the initial infrastructure.

We still don't have any platform that actually uses this
infrastructure, we still don't call get/put in all the places we need
to, and we don't have any function to save/restore the state of the
registers. This is not a problem since no platform uses the code added
by this patch. We have a few people simultaneously working on runtime
PM, so this initial code could help everybody make their plans.

V2: - Move some functions to intel_pm.c
    - Remove useless pm_runtime_allow() call at init
    - Remove useless pm_runtime_mark_last_busy() call at get
    - Use pm_runtime_get_sync() instead of 2 calls
    - Add a WARN to check if we're really awake

V3: - Rebase.

V4: - Don't need to call pci_{save,restore}_state and
      pci_set_power_sate, since they're already called by the PCI
      layer
    - Remove wrong pm_runtime_enable() call at init_runtime_pm
Signed-off-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

In the current code, at haswell_modeset_global_resources, first we
decide if we want to enable/disable the power well, then we decide if
we want to enable/disable PC8. On the case where we're enabling PC8
this works fine, but on the case where we disable PC8 due to a non-eDP
monitor being enabled, we first enable the power well and then disable
PC8. Although wrong, this doesn't seem to be causing any problems now,
and we don't even see anything in dmesg. But the patches for runtime
D3 turn this problem into a real bug, so we need to fix it.

This fixes the "modeset-non-lpsp" subtest from the "pm_pc8" test from
intel-gpu-tools.

v2: - Rebase (i915_disable_power_well).
v3: - More reabase.
Signed-off-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

We already have some checks and shouldn't be reaching these places on
!HAS_PC8 platforms, but add a WARN,  just in case.
Signed-off-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

The CRI clock is related to the display PHY, so the setup belongs
in intel_init_dpio().
Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

We don't modify the packed infoframe data, so we should keep the
const qualifier in place. Just pass the buffer as 'const void *'
instead of 'const uint8_t *' and we can drop the cast entirely.

v2: Do intel_sdvo_write_infoframe() as well
Reviewed-by: NDamien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

If one mode of a internal panel has more than one refresh rate, then a reduced
clock is found for the LFP (LVDS/eDP). This enables switching between low
and high frequency dynamically. Moving downclock calculation to intel_panel
so that it is common for LVDS and eDP.
Signed-off-by: NVandana Kannan <vandana.kannan@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NPradeep Bhat <pradeep.bhat@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

Since early sanitize and uncore sanitize are called one after the other,
I think, we can remove second forcewake reset which was are calling
twice in both the functions.

Note that this is merge fallout between

commit ef46e0d2
Author: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Date:   Sat Nov 16 16:00:09 2013 +0100

    drm/i915: restore the early forcewake cleanup

and

commit 521198a2
Author: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Fri Aug 23 16:52:30 2013 +0300

    drm/i915: sanitize forcewake registers on reset
Signed-off-by: NDeepak S <deepak.s@intel.com>
[danvet: Explain how this came to be.]
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

Currently, PC8 is enabled at modeset_global_resources, which is called
after intel_modeset_update_state. Due to this, there's a small race
condition on the case where we start enabling PC8, then do a modeset
while PC8 is still being enabled. The racing condition triggers a WARN
because intel_modeset_update_state will mark the CRTC as enabled, then
the thread that's still enabling PC8 might look at the data structure
and think that PC8 is being enabled while a pipe is enabled. Despite
the WARN, this is not really a bug since we'll wait for the
PC8-enabling thread to finish when we call modeset_global_resources.

The spec says the CRTC cannot be enabled when we disable LCPLL, so we
had a check for crtc->base.enabled. If we change to crtc->active we
will still prevent disabling LCPLL while the CRTC is enabled, and we
will also prevent the WARN above.

This is a replacement for the previous patch named
    "drm/i915: get/put PC8 when we get/put a CRTC"

Testcase: igt/pm_pc8/modeset-lpsp-stress-no-wait
Signed-off-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

If we force the hw to idle as our first step during unload, we can abort
the unload upon failure. Later we can probe whether the hardware remain
active even after we try to shut it down.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

Doing it early prevents moving and relocating objects in vain
for contexts that won't get any GPU time.
Reported-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

It is useful to assert that if the object is bound, then it must have
its pages pinned to prevent the shrinker from reaping its backing store.
This is even more useful with the introduction of real-ppgtt whereupon
we may have the object bound into several vma, with each instance
pinning the backing store. This assertion breaks down during unbind
where we unpinned the backing store before decoupling the vma binding.
This can be fixed with a trivial reording of the unbind sequence, which
reinforces the

   pin pages
   bind to vma
   ...
   unbind from vma
   unpin pages

concept.

v2: Bonus comment
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
Reviewed-by: NBen Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
Tested-by: NBen Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

On VLV, FIFO will be shared by both SW and HW. So, we read the
free entries through register and update dev_priv variable
and wait for only 20 entries to be free

From Deepak's follow-up mail explaining why vlv is special:

"On SB, Out of 64 FIFO Entries, 20 Entries will be used by HW and
remaining 44 will be used by the SW,. I think due to this reason, we
have a threshold of 20 Entries."

"On VLV, HW and SW can access all 64 fifo entries, I don't think
having a threshold of 20 Entries is mandatory on VLV. Also, since both
SW and HW can access all 64 Entries. I think on VLV, we need to update
the fifo_count before waiting for the FIFO."

v2: Apply mask when we read the number of free FIFO entries (Ville).

v3: Mask applied after reading the register (Deepak).
Signed-off-by: NDeepak S <deepak.s@intel.com>
[danvet: Add further explanation from Deepak to commit message.]
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

Only plane A is FBC capable on gen2 (like gen3), but the panel fitter
is hooked up to pipe B, so we want to prefer pipe B + plane A.
Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
[danvet: Add the code comment Chris requested in his review.]
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

Initialize the FBC vfuncs on gen2 and gen3 chipsets. Also make
a clean split for gen7+ vs. gen5+ vfunc initialization.
Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

On gen2 and gen3 chipsets FBC is supported only on plane A. Fix (and
simplify) the plane checks in intel_update_fbc() accordingly.
Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NChris Wilons <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

Add a REG_WRITE_FOOTER macro as a counterpart to the REG_WRITE_HEADER.
The current code has the spin_lock() in the HEADER, but the
spin_unlock() is open coded, which looks rather confusing on the first
glance. A bit of additional symmetry might help.
Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

When inspecting reports that boot/suspend/resume times are unusual it
would be useful to clearly identify the time we must spend waiting for
the hardware to complete its task. In this case we have a notification
before we start waiting for the panel to change state, but none
afterwards - which would be useful.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

Checkpatch tells me

WARNING: __packed is preferred over __attribute__((packed))

so switch over to __packed across the driver before adding new packed
structs.
Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: NDamien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

Check that the N and P dividers don't cause a divide by zero.

This shouldn't happen under normal circumstances, but can
happen eg. under simulation.
Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

Sweeping some dead code away.
Signed-off-by: NDamien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

It's all about tiny details.
Signed-off-by: NDamien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

It's a pain for two reasons:
- The vga plane redisablign requires actual legacy vgao i/o to pull
  of. The hw engineers really botched this one here :(
- There seem to be some BIOS out there which send out lid events when
  unplugging. Together with our broken DP code, which disables the
  port when the cable is lost, this results in an immediate modeset
  call, which can hang on the wait for outstanding flips.
- Also we don't want to force a modeset on machines where it's not
  really needed, see the referenced bug.

We might want to extend this in general to also all machines that
support opregion, since there the BIOS supposedly should manage the
gfx hardware more cooperatively.

v2: Pimp commit message a bit.

Cc: Roland Dreier <roland@kernel.org>
References: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65486Acked-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

We're currently misprinting the port name when vlv_wait_port_ready()
times out. Fix it by using port_name().
Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

wow no idea how I got this far without seeing this,
leaking the entries in the list makes kmalloc-64 slab grow.

References: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65121
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Reported-by: NMatthew Stapleton <matthew4196@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NDave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>

We had some mode_valid() vfuncs returning an int, others the enum. Let's
use the latter everywhere.
Signed-off-by: NDamien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

Atm we call intel_display_power_enabled() from
i915_capture_error_state() in IRQ context and then take a mutex. To fix
this add a new intel_display_power_enabled_sw() which returns the domain
state based on software tracking as opposed to reading the actual HW
state.

Since we use domain_use_count for this without locking on the reader
side make sure we increase the counter only after enabling all required
power wells and decrease it before disabling any of these power wells.

Regression introduced in
commit 1b02383464b4a915627ef3b8fd0ad7f07168c54c
Author: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Date:   Tue Sep 24 16:17:09 2013 +0300

    drm/i915: support for multiple power wells

Note that atm we depend on the value returned by
intel_display_power_enabled_sw() in i915_capture_error_state() to avoid
unclaimed register access reports. This was never guaranteed though,
since another thread can disable the power concurrently. If this is a
problem we need another explicit way to disable the reporting during
error captures.

v2:
- remove barriers as the caller can't depend on the value
  returned from i915_capture_error_state_sw() anyway (Ville)
- dump the state of pipe/transcoder power domain state (Daniel)
Reported-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

This should just be a debug.  Add another debug msg to the inherit path
while we're at it.
Signed-off-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Reviewed-by: NDamien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=72098Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

Setting this bit restores all ring contexts in parallel rather than
serially.  Matches current BWG recommendations.
Tested-by: N"Meng, Mengmeng" <mengmeng.meng@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Reviewed-by: NDeepak S <deepak.s@inel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

We use timeout mode, and we need to lower the timeout to get good RC6
residency when loads are running.  This gets me from 0% residency during
glxgears to 77%, which is a pretty good improvement.  This value also
matches the current BWG recommentations.
Tested-by: N"Meng, Mengmeng" <mengmeng.meng@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Reviewed-by: NDeepak S <deepak.s@inel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

It leads to a big mess when stuff interleaves. Especially with the new
patch I've submitted for the drm core to no longer artificially split
up debug messages.

v2: The size parameter to snprintf includes the terminating 0, but the
return value does not. Adjust the logic accordingly. Spotted by Mika.

Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>