- 28 5月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Valentin Longchamp 提交于
Some kirkwood variants (for instance present in the prestera SoCs) do not have all the peripherals whose nodes are declared in kirkwood.dtsi. These missing peripherals are SATA, SDIO, and RTC. As discussed in [1], to avoid that these missing peripherals get initialized which could result in system hangs when accessing undocumented/not present HW registers, their corresponding OF nodes should not get declared at all for some kirkwood variants. The corresponding OF nodes of these peripherals thus are moved from kirkwood.dtsi to the kirkwood-628x.dtsi files so that they still are initialized for these variants where they are present. [1] http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2013-May/167154.htmlSigned-off-by: NValentin Longchamp <valentin.longchamp@keymile.com> Signed-off-by: NJason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>
-
- 27 5月, 2013 21 次提交
-
-
由 Thomas Petazzoni 提交于
The Kirkwood-based PlatHome OpenBlocks A6 board has an Init button connected to MPP pin 38. This commit adds support for this button. Signed-off-by: NThomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com> Acked-by: NAndrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> Tested-by: NAtsushi Yamagata <yamagata@plathome.co.jp> Signed-off-by: NJason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>
-
由 Thomas Petazzoni 提交于
Instead of having one separate pinmux configuration for each LED, for each GPIO of the GPIO header, for each DIP switch, this patch groups them together in configurations that make sense together: LEDs on one side, GPIOs of the GPIO header on another side, and DIP switches on yet another side. Signed-off-by: NThomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com> Acked-by: NAndrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> Tested-by: NAtsushi Yamagata <yamagata@plathome.co.jp> Signed-off-by: NJason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>
-
由 Thomas Petazzoni 提交于
When the pinmux mechanism was added in Kirkwood, the device driver core was not yet providing the possibility of attaching pinmux configurations to all devices, drivers had to do it explicitly, and not all drivers were doing this. Now that the driver core does that in a generic way, it makes sense to attach the pinmux configuration to their corresponding devices. This allows the pinctrl subsystem to show in debugfs to which device is related which pins, for example: pin 41 (PIN41): gpio-leds.1 mvebu-gpio:41 function gpio group mpp41 pin 42 (PIN42): gpio-leds.1 mvebu-gpio:42 function gpio group mpp42 pin 43 (PIN43): gpio-leds.1 mvebu-gpio:43 function gpio group mpp43 Signed-off-by: NThomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com> Acked-by: NAndrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> Tested-By: NAndrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> Signed-off-by: NJason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>
-
由 Thomas Petazzoni 提交于
When the pinmux mechanism was added in Kirkwood, the device driver core was not yet providing the possibility of attaching pinmux configurations to all devices, drivers had to do it explicitly, and not all drivers were doing this. Now that the driver core does that in a generic way, it makes sense to attach the pinmux configuration to their corresponding devices. This allows the pinctrl subsystem to show in debugfs to which device is related which pins, for example: pin 41 (PIN41): gpio-leds.1 mvebu-gpio:41 function gpio group mpp41 pin 42 (PIN42): gpio-leds.1 mvebu-gpio:42 function gpio group mpp42 pin 43 (PIN43): gpio-leds.1 mvebu-gpio:43 function gpio group mpp43 Signed-off-by: NThomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com> Acked-by: NAndrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> Tested-By: NAndrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> Signed-off-by: NJason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>
-
由 Thomas Petazzoni 提交于
When the pinmux mechanism was added in Kirkwood, the device driver core was not yet providing the possibility of attaching pinmux configurations to all devices, drivers had to do it explicitly, and not all drivers were doing this. Now that the driver core does that in a generic way, it makes sense to attach the pinmux configuration to their corresponding devices. This allows the pinctrl subsystem to show in debugfs to which device is related which pins, for example: pin 41 (PIN41): gpio-leds.1 mvebu-gpio:41 function gpio group mpp41 pin 42 (PIN42): gpio-leds.1 mvebu-gpio:42 function gpio group mpp42 pin 43 (PIN43): gpio-leds.1 mvebu-gpio:43 function gpio group mpp43 Signed-off-by: NThomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com> Acked-by: NAndrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> Tested-by: NAtsushi Yamagata <yamagata@plathome.co.jp> Signed-off-by: NJason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>
-
由 Thomas Petazzoni 提交于
When the pinmux mechanism was added in Kirkwood, the device driver core was not yet providing the possibility of attaching pinmux configurations to all devices, drivers had to do it explicitly, and not all drivers were doing this. Now that the driver core does that in a generic way, it makes sense to attach the pinmux configuration to their corresponding devices. This allows the pinctrl subsystem to show in debugfs to which device is related which pins, for example: pin 41 (PIN41): gpio-leds.1 mvebu-gpio:41 function gpio group mpp41 pin 42 (PIN42): gpio-leds.1 mvebu-gpio:42 function gpio group mpp42 pin 43 (PIN43): gpio-leds.1 mvebu-gpio:43 function gpio group mpp43 Signed-off-by: NThomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com> Acked-by: NAndrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> Signed-off-by: NJason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>
-
由 Thomas Petazzoni 提交于
When the pinmux mechanism was added in Kirkwood, the device driver core was not yet providing the possibility of attaching pinmux configurations to all devices, drivers had to do it explicitly, and not all drivers were doing this. Now that the driver core does that in a generic way, it makes sense to attach the pinmux configuration to their corresponding devices. This allows the pinctrl subsystem to show in debugfs to which device is related which pins, for example: pin 41 (PIN41): gpio-leds.1 mvebu-gpio:41 function gpio group mpp41 pin 42 (PIN42): gpio-leds.1 mvebu-gpio:42 function gpio group mpp42 pin 43 (PIN43): gpio-leds.1 mvebu-gpio:43 function gpio group mpp43 Signed-off-by: NThomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com> Acked-by: NAndrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> Signed-off-by: NJason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>
-
由 Thomas Petazzoni 提交于
When the pinmux mechanism was added in Kirkwood, the device driver core was not yet providing the possibility of attaching pinmux configurations to all devices, drivers had to do it explicitly, and not all drivers were doing this. Now that the driver core does that in a generic way, it makes sense to attach the pinmux configuration to their corresponding devices. This allows the pinctrl subsystem to show in debugfs to which device is related which pins, for example: pin 41 (PIN41): gpio-leds.1 mvebu-gpio:41 function gpio group mpp41 pin 42 (PIN42): gpio-leds.1 mvebu-gpio:42 function gpio group mpp42 pin 43 (PIN43): gpio-leds.1 mvebu-gpio:43 function gpio group mpp43 Signed-off-by: NThomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com> Acked-by: NAndrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> Signed-off-by: NJason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>
-
由 Thomas Petazzoni 提交于
When the pinmux mechanism was added in Kirkwood, the device driver core was not yet providing the possibility of attaching pinmux configurations to all devices, drivers had to do it explicitly, and not all drivers were doing this. Now that the driver core does that in a generic way, it makes sense to attach the pinmux configuration to their corresponding devices. This allows the pinctrl subsystem to show in debugfs to which device is related which pins, for example: pin 41 (PIN41): gpio-leds.1 mvebu-gpio:41 function gpio group mpp41 pin 42 (PIN42): gpio-leds.1 mvebu-gpio:42 function gpio group mpp42 pin 43 (PIN43): gpio-leds.1 mvebu-gpio:43 function gpio group mpp43 Signed-off-by: NThomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com> Acked-by: NAndrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> Signed-off-by: NJason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>
-
由 Thomas Petazzoni 提交于
When the pinmux mechanism was added in Kirkwood, the device driver core was not yet providing the possibility of attaching pinmux configurations to all devices, drivers had to do it explicitly, and not all drivers were doing this. Now that the driver core does that in a generic way, it makes sense to attach the pinmux configuration to their corresponding devices. This allows the pinctrl subsystem to show in debugfs to which device is related which pins, for example: pin 41 (PIN41): gpio-leds.1 mvebu-gpio:41 function gpio group mpp41 pin 42 (PIN42): gpio-leds.1 mvebu-gpio:42 function gpio group mpp42 pin 43 (PIN43): gpio-leds.1 mvebu-gpio:43 function gpio group mpp43 Signed-off-by: NThomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com> Acked-by: NAndrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> Signed-off-by: NJason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>
-
由 Thomas Petazzoni 提交于
When the pinmux mechanism was added in Kirkwood, the device driver core was not yet providing the possibility of attaching pinmux configurations to all devices, drivers had to do it explicitly, and not all drivers were doing this. Now that the driver core does that in a generic way, it makes sense to attach the pinmux configuration to their corresponding devices. This allows the pinctrl subsystem to show in debugfs to which device is related which pins, for example: pin 41 (PIN41): gpio-leds.1 mvebu-gpio:41 function gpio group mpp41 pin 42 (PIN42): gpio-leds.1 mvebu-gpio:42 function gpio group mpp42 pin 43 (PIN43): gpio-leds.1 mvebu-gpio:43 function gpio group mpp43 Signed-off-by: NThomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com> Acked-by: NAndrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> Signed-off-by: NJason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>
-
由 Thomas Petazzoni 提交于
When the pinmux mechanism was added in Kirkwood, the device driver core was not yet providing the possibility of attaching pinmux configurations to all devices, drivers had to do it explicitly, and not all drivers were doing this. Now that the driver core does that in a generic way, it makes sense to attach the pinmux configuration to their corresponding devices. Note that some of the LEDs pinmux configurations are kept in the pinctrl node, because they are not used by the gpio-leds driver. This allows the pinctrl subsystem to show in debugfs to which device is related which pins, for example: pin 41 (PIN41): gpio-leds.1 mvebu-gpio:41 function gpio group mpp41 pin 42 (PIN42): gpio-leds.1 mvebu-gpio:42 function gpio group mpp42 pin 43 (PIN43): gpio-leds.1 mvebu-gpio:43 function gpio group mpp43 Signed-off-by: NThomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com> Acked-by: NAndrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> Signed-off-by: NJason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>
-
由 Thomas Petazzoni 提交于
When the pinmux mechanism was added in Kirkwood, the device driver core was not yet providing the possibility of attaching pinmux configurations to all devices, drivers had to do it explicitly, and not all drivers were doing this. Now that the driver core does that in a generic way, it makes sense to attach the pinmux configuration to their corresponding devices. This allows the pinctrl subsystem to show in debugfs to which device is related which pins, for example: pin 41 (PIN41): gpio-leds.1 mvebu-gpio:41 function gpio group mpp41 pin 42 (PIN42): gpio-leds.1 mvebu-gpio:42 function gpio group mpp42 pin 43 (PIN43): gpio-leds.1 mvebu-gpio:43 function gpio group mpp43 Signed-off-by: NThomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com> Acked-by: NAndrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> Signed-off-by: NJason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>
-
由 Thomas Petazzoni 提交于
The Kirkwood iConnect Device Tree is currently using totally meaningless names for the pinmux configuration: pmx_gpio_XY. This patch fixes that by using some more meaningful names such as pmx_button_power. Signed-off-by: NThomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com> Acked-by: NAndrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> Signed-off-by: NJason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>
-
由 Thomas Petazzoni 提交于
When the pinmux mechanism was added in Kirkwood, the device driver core was not yet providing the possibility of attaching pinmux configurations to all devices, drivers had to do it explicitly, and not all drivers were doing this. Now that the driver core does that in a generic way, it makes sense to attach the pinmux configuration to their corresponding devices. This allows the pinctrl subsystem to show in debugfs to which device is related which pins, for example: pin 41 (PIN41): gpio-leds.1 mvebu-gpio:41 function gpio group mpp41 pin 42 (PIN42): gpio-leds.1 mvebu-gpio:42 function gpio group mpp42 pin 43 (PIN43): gpio-leds.1 mvebu-gpio:43 function gpio group mpp43 Signed-off-by: NThomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com> Acked-by: NAndrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> Signed-off-by: NJason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>
-
由 Thomas Petazzoni 提交于
When the pinmux mechanism was added in Kirkwood, the device driver core was not yet providing the possibility of attaching pinmux configurations to all devices, drivers had to do it explicitly, and not all drivers were doing this. Now that the driver core does that in a generic way, it makes sense to attach the pinmux configuration to their corresponding devices. This allows the pinctrl subsystem to show in debugfs to which device is related which pins, for example: pin 41 (PIN41): gpio-leds.1 mvebu-gpio:41 function gpio group mpp41 pin 42 (PIN42): gpio-leds.1 mvebu-gpio:42 function gpio group mpp42 pin 43 (PIN43): gpio-leds.1 mvebu-gpio:43 function gpio group mpp43 Signed-off-by: NThomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com> Acked-by: NAndrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> Signed-off-by: NJason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>
-
由 Thomas Petazzoni 提交于
When the pinmux mechanism was added in Kirkwood, the device driver core was not yet providing the possibility of attaching pinmux configurations to all devices, drivers had to do it explicitly, and not all drivers were doing this. Now that the driver core does that in a generic way, it makes sense to attach the pinmux configuration to their corresponding devices. This allows the pinctrl subsystem to show in debugfs to which device is related which pins, for example: pin 41 (PIN41): gpio-leds.1 mvebu-gpio:41 function gpio group mpp41 pin 42 (PIN42): gpio-leds.1 mvebu-gpio:42 function gpio group mpp42 pin 43 (PIN43): gpio-leds.1 mvebu-gpio:43 function gpio group mpp43 Signed-off-by: NThomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com> Acked-by: NAndrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> Signed-off-by: NJason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>
-
由 Thomas Petazzoni 提交于
When the pinmux mechanism was added in Kirkwood, the device driver core was not yet providing the possibility of attaching pinmux configurations to all devices, drivers had to do it explicitly, and not all drivers were doing this. Now that the driver core does that in a generic way, it makes sense to attach the pinmux configuration to their corresponding devices. This allows the pinctrl subsystem to show in debugfs to which device is related which pins, for example: pin 41 (PIN41): gpio-leds.1 mvebu-gpio:41 function gpio group mpp41 pin 42 (PIN42): gpio-leds.1 mvebu-gpio:42 function gpio group mpp42 pin 43 (PIN43): gpio-leds.1 mvebu-gpio:43 function gpio group mpp43 Signed-off-by: NThomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com> Acked-by: NAndrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> Signed-off-by: NJason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>
-
由 Thomas Petazzoni 提交于
When the pinmux mechanism was added in Kirkwood, the device driver core was not yet providing the possibility of attaching pinmux configurations to all devices, drivers had to do it explicitly, and not all drivers were doing this. Now that the driver core does that in a generic way, it makes sense to attach the pinmux configuration to their corresponding devices. This allows the pinctrl subsystem to show in debugfs to which device is related which pins, for example: pin 41 (PIN41): gpio-leds.1 mvebu-gpio:41 function gpio group mpp41 pin 42 (PIN42): gpio-leds.1 mvebu-gpio:42 function gpio group mpp42 pin 43 (PIN43): gpio-leds.1 mvebu-gpio:43 function gpio group mpp43 Signed-off-by: NThomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com> Acked-by: NAndrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> Signed-off-by: NJason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>
-
由 Thomas Petazzoni 提交于
When the pinmux mechanism was added in Kirkwood, the device driver core was not yet providing the possibility of attaching pinmux configurations to all devices, drivers had to do it explicitly, and not all drivers were doing this. Now that the driver core does that in a generic way, it makes sense to attach the pinmux configuration to their corresponding devices. This allows the pinctrl subsystem to show in debugfs to which device is related which pins, for example: pin 41 (PIN41): gpio-leds.1 mvebu-gpio:41 function gpio group mpp41 pin 42 (PIN42): gpio-leds.1 mvebu-gpio:42 function gpio group mpp42 pin 43 (PIN43): gpio-leds.1 mvebu-gpio:43 function gpio group mpp43 Signed-off-by: NThomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com> Acked-by: NAndrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> Signed-off-by: NJason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>
-
由 Thomas Petazzoni 提交于
When the pinmux mechanism was added in Kirkwood, the device driver core was not yet providing the possibility of attaching pinmux configurations to all devices, drivers had to do it explicitly, and not all drivers were doing this. Now that the driver core does that in a generic way, it makes sense to attach the pinmux configuration to their corresponding devices. This allows the pinctrl subsystem to show in debugfs to which device is related which pins, for example: pin 41 (PIN41): gpio-leds.1 mvebu-gpio:41 function gpio group mpp41 pin 42 (PIN42): gpio-leds.1 mvebu-gpio:42 function gpio group mpp42 pin 43 (PIN43): gpio-leds.1 mvebu-gpio:43 function gpio group mpp43 Signed-off-by: NThomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com> Acked-by: NAndrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> Signed-off-by: NJason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>
-
- 22 5月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Thomas Petazzoni 提交于
The Armada XP GP board has two USB slots: one on the front side and one on the back side. This commit enables the two USB host controllers that correspond to those wo USB slots. Signed-off-by: NThomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com> Signed-off-by: NJason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>
-
- 21 5月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Thomas Petazzoni 提交于
Besides the two "classic" USB interfaces with normal USB ports on the front side, the PlatHome OpenBlocks AX3 uses the third USB interface of the Marvell SoC in the mini-PCIe connector. This allows certain mini-PCIe cards to expose parts of their functionality as a USB peripheral. This commit enables this third USB interface in the OpenBlocks AX3 Device Tree, and also adds comments on top of the two other USB interfaces so that the Device Tree makes it clear which USB interface at the SoC level matches which USB interface visible on the board. Signed-off-by: NThomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com> Tested-by: NAtsushi Yamagata <yamagata@plathome.co.jp> Tested-by: NWilly Tarreau <w@1wt.eu> Signed-off-by: NJason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>
-
- 20 5月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Ezequiel Garcia 提交于
The Armada XP Development Board (DB-78460-BP) has a NOR flash device connected to the Device Bus. This commit adds the device tree node to support this device. This SoC supports a flexible and dynamic decoding window allocation scheme; but since this feature is still not implemented we need to specify the window base address in the device tree node itself. This base address has been selected in a completely arbitrary fashion. Signed-off-by: NEzequiel Garcia <ezequiel.garcia@free-electrons.com> Signed-off-by: NThomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com> Signed-off-by: NJason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>
-
- 15 5月, 2013 2 次提交
-
-
由 Simon Baatz 提交于
Signed-off-by: NSimon Baatz <gmbnomis@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>
-
由 Simon Baatz 提交于
In order to prepare the switch to the standard MMC device tree parser for mvsdio, adapt all current uses of mvsdio in the dts files to the standard format. Signed-off-by: NSimon Baatz <gmbnomis@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>
-
- 14 5月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Sebastian Hesselbarth 提交于
This patch adds the device tree node for si5351 clock generator and the corresponding oscillator connected to it. It also limits i2c frequency to 100kHz as there are bus locks reported on higher frequencies. Signed-off-by: NSebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>
-
- 10 5月, 2013 9 次提交
-
-
由 Doug Anderson 提交于
The 'samsung,vbus-gpio' was submitted before pinmux landed for exynos5250 and uses the old-style gpio specifier. Fix the two exynos5250 boards that use it. Signed-off-by: NDoug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: NOlof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
-
由 Inderpal Singh 提交于
The kernel crashes while resuming from AFTR idle mode. It happens because L2 cache was not going into retention state. This patch configures the USE_RETENTION bit of ARM_L2_OPTION register so that it does not depend on MANUAL_L2RSTDISABLE_CONTROL of ARM_COMMON_OPTION register for L2RSTDISABLE signal. Signed-off-by: NInderpal Singh <inderpal.singh@linaro.org> Tested-by: NChander Kashyap <chander.kashyap@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NOlof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
-
由 Lee Jones 提交于
arch/arm/mach-ux500/board-mop500.c: In function ‘mop500_prox_activate’: arch/arm/mach-ux500/board-mop500.c:406:18: warning: ignoring return value of ‘regulator_enable’, declared with attribute warn_unused_result [-Wunused-result] Signed-off-by: NLee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NOlof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
-
由 Fabio Baltieri 提交于
Fix db8500_read_soc_id() to read all five soc_id number locations instead of repeating the second one two times. Signed-off-by: NFabio Baltieri <fabio.baltieri@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NOlof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
-
由 Olof Johansson 提交于
Trivial patch, adding the i2c Cypress trackpad used on Snow. Signed-off-by: NOlof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> Reviewed-by: NDoug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> Acked-by: NKukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
-
由 Fabio Estevam 提交于
Since commit 657eee7d (media: coda: use genalloc API) the following build error happens with imx_v4_v5_defconfig: drivers/built-in.o: In function 'coda_remove': clk-composite.c:(.text+0x112180): undefined reference to 'gen_pool_free' drivers/built-in.o: In function 'coda_probe': clk-composite.c:(.text+0x112310): undefined reference to 'of_get_named_gen_pool' clk-composite.c:(.text+0x1123f4): undefined reference to 'gen_pool_alloc' clk-composite.c:(.text+0x11240c): undefined reference to 'gen_pool_virt_to_phys' clk-composite.c:(.text+0x112458): undefined reference to 'dev_get_gen_pool' Select GENERIC_ALLOCATOR and get rid of the custom IRAM_ALLOC. Signed-off-by: NFabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@freescale.com> Signed-off-by: NShawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NOlof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
-
由 Shawn Guo 提交于
Commit bca7a5a0 (ARM: cpu hotplug: remove majority of cache flushing from platforms) removes include of <asm/cacheflush.h> and hence discovers a few indirect inclusion and declaration problems as below. CC arch/arm/mach-imx/hotplug.o In file included from arch/arm/mach-imx/hotplug.c:16:0: arch/arm/mach-imx/common.h:100:29: warning: ‘struct pt_regs’ declared inside parameter list [enabled by default] arch/arm/mach-imx/common.h:100:29: warning: its scope is only this definition or declaration, which is probably not what you want [enabled by default] arch/arm/mach-imx/common.h:101:29: warning: ‘struct pt_regs’ declared inside parameter list [enabled by default] arch/arm/mach-imx/hotplug.c: In function ‘imx_cpu_die’: arch/arm/mach-imx/hotplug.c:53:2: error: implicit declaration of function ‘cpu_do_idle’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] arch/arm/mach-imx/hotplug.c: In function ‘imx_cpu_kill’: arch/arm/mach-imx/hotplug.c:58:26: error: ‘jiffies’ undeclared (first use in this function) arch/arm/mach-imx/hotplug.c:58:26: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in arch/arm/mach-imx/hotplug.c:58:2: error: implicit declaration of function ‘msecs_to_jiffies’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] arch/arm/mach-imx/hotplug.c:61:3: error: implicit declaration of function ‘time_after’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] Fix them by adding the needed inclusion and declaration. Signed-off-by: NShawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org> Acked-by: NArnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Acked-by: NUwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> Signed-off-by: NOlof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
-
由 Jason Cooper 提交于
If a board isn't using twl4030, then dtc will complain about the missing phandle (which is in twl4030.dtsi). Move the phy declaration to the dts files. Signed-off-by: NJason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net> Signed-off-by: NTony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
-
由 Tony Lindgren 提交于
Commit 6770b211 (ARM: OMAP2+: Export SoC information to userspace) had some broken return value handling as noted by Russell King: + soc_dev = soc_device_register(soc_dev_attr); + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(soc_dev)) { + kfree(soc_dev_attr); + return; + } + + parent = soc_device_to_device(soc_dev); + if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(parent)) + device_create_file(parent, &omap_soc_attr); This is nonsense. For the first, IS_ERR() is sufficient. For the second, tell me what error checking is required in the return value of this function: struct device *soc_device_to_device(struct soc_device *soc_dev) { return &soc_dev->dev; } when you've already determined that the passed soc_dev is a valid pointer. If you read the comments against the prototype: /** * soc_device_to_device - helper function to fetch struct device * @soc: Previously registered SoC device container */ struct device *soc_device_to_device(struct soc_device *soc); if "soc" is valid, it means the "previously registered SoC device container" must have succeeded and that can only happen if the struct device has been registered. Ergo, there will always be a valid struct device pointer for any registered SoC device container. Therefore, if soc_device_register() succeeds, then the return value from soc_device_to_device() will always be valid and no error checking of it is required. Simples. The rule as ever applies here: get to know the APIs your using and don't fumble around in the dark hoping that you'll get this stuff right. Fix it as noted by Russell. Reported-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: NTony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
-
- 09 5月, 2013 3 次提交
-
-
由 Tony Lindgren 提交于
The bootloader configures the pins, but has pull bits set without pull enable bits. While this is harmless, and won't do anything, it seems to cause confusion at least for me every time looking at the pin configuration. Fix it for DT based boot. Signed-off-by: NTony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
-
由 Philip Avinash 提交于
Add GPMC data node to AM33XX device tree file. Signed-off-by: NPhilip Avinash <avinashphilip@ti.com> Acked-by: NPeter Korsgaard <jacmet@sunsite.dk> Signed-off-by: NPekon Gupta <pekon@ti.com> Signed-off-by: NTony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
-
由 Nishanth Menon 提交于
commit d16fb25d (ARM: dts: OMAP4460: Add CPU OPP table) introduced wrong OPP voltages per OPP by mistake. Sync the OPP tables with existing OMAP4460 OPP data in arch/arm/mach-omap2/opp4xxx_data.c Signed-off-by: NNishanth Menon <nm@ti.com> Signed-off-by: NTony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
-