- 09 6月, 2015 4 次提交
-
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
jbd2_journal_get_write_access() and jbd2_journal_get_create_access() are frequently called for buffers that are already part of the running transaction - most frequently it is the case for bitmaps, inode table blocks, and superblock. Since in such cases we have nothing to do, it is unfortunate we still grab reference to journal head, lock the bh, lock bh_state only to find out there's nothing to do. Improving this is a bit subtle though since until we find out journal head is attached to the running transaction, it can disappear from under us because checkpointing / commit decided it's no longer needed. We deal with this by protecting journal_head slab with RCU. We still have to be careful about journal head being freed & reallocated within slab and about exposing journal head in consistent state (in particular b_modified and b_frozen_data must be in correct state before we allow user to touch the buffer). Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
Check for the simple case of unjournaled buffer first, handle it and bail out. This allows us to remove one if and unindent the difficult case by one tab. The result is easier to read. Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
We were acquiring bh_state_lock when allocation of buffer failed in do_get_write_access() only to be able to jump to a label that releases the lock and does all other checks that don't make sense for this error path. Just jump into the right label instead. Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
needs_copy is set only in one place in do_get_write_access(), just move the frozen buffer copying into that place and factor it out to a separate function to make do_get_write_access() slightly more readable. Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 08 6月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Michal Hocko 提交于
This basically reverts 47def826 (jbd2: Remove __GFP_NOFAIL from jbd2 layer). The deprecation of __GFP_NOFAIL was a bad choice because it led to open coding the endless loop around the allocator rather than removing the dependency on the non failing allocation. So the deprecation was a clear failure and the reality tells us that __GFP_NOFAIL is not even close to go away. It is still true that __GFP_NOFAIL allocations are generally discouraged and new uses should be evaluated and an alternative (pre-allocations or reservations) should be considered but it doesn't make any sense to lie the allocator about the requirements. Allocator can take steps to help making a progress if it knows the requirements. Signed-off-by: NMichal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Acked-by: NDavid Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
-
- 15 5月, 2015 2 次提交
-
-
由 Darrick J. Wong 提交于
The journal revoke block recovery code does not check r_count for sanity, which means that an evil value of r_count could result in the kernel reading off the end of the revoke table and into whatever garbage lies beyond. This could crash the kernel, so fix that. However, in testing this fix, I discovered that the code to write out the revoke tables also was not correctly checking to see if the block was full -- the current offset check is fine so long as the revoke table space size is a multiple of the record size, but this is not true when either journal_csum_v[23] are set. Signed-off-by: NDarrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Reviewed-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
-
由 Lukas Czerner 提交于
Currently when journal restart fails, we'll have the h_transaction of the handle set to NULL to indicate that the handle has been effectively aborted. We handle this situation quietly in the jbd2_journal_stop() and just free the handle and exit because everything else has been done before we attempted (and failed) to restart the journal. Unfortunately there are a number of problems with that approach introduced with commit 41a5b913 "jbd2: invalidate handle if jbd2_journal_restart() fails" First of all in ext4 jbd2_journal_stop() will be called through __ext4_journal_stop() where we would try to get a hold of the superblock by dereferencing h_transaction which in this case would lead to NULL pointer dereference and crash. In addition we're going to free the handle regardless of the refcount which is bad as well, because others up the call chain will still reference the handle so we might potentially reference already freed memory. Moreover it's expected that we'll get aborted handle as well as detached handle in some of the journalling function as the error propagates up the stack, so it's unnecessary to call WARN_ON every time we get detached handle. And finally we might leak some memory by forgetting to free reserved handle in jbd2_journal_stop() in the case where handle was detached from the transaction (h_transaction is NULL). Fix the NULL pointer dereference in __ext4_journal_stop() by just calling jbd2_journal_stop() quietly as suggested by Jan Kara. Also fix the potential memory leak in jbd2_journal_stop() and use proper handle refcounting before we attempt to free it to avoid use-after-free issues. And finally remove all WARN_ON(!transaction) from the code so that we do not get random traces when something goes wrong because when journal restart fails we will get to some of those functions. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: NLukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Reviewed-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
-
- 20 1月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Darrick J. Wong 提交于
We should complain in dmesg when journal recovery fails on account of the descriptor block being corrupt, so that the diagnostic data can be recovered. Signed-off-by: NDarrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 02 12月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Darrick J. Wong 提交于
When we're enabling journal features, we cannot use the predicate jbd2_journal_has_csum_v2or3() because we haven't yet set the sb feature flag fields! Moreover, we just finished loading the shash driver, so the test is unnecessary; calculate the seed always. Without this patch, we fail to initialize the checksum seed the first time we turn on journal_checksum, which means that all journal blocks written during that first mount are corrupt. Transactions written after the second mount will be fine, since the feature flag will be set in the journal superblock. xfstests generic/{034,321,322} are the regression tests. (This is important for 3.18.) Signed-off-by: NDarrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.coM> Reported-by: NEric Whitney <enwlinux@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 26 11月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 30 10月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
The old hash function didn't work well for 64-bit block numbers, and used undefined (negative) shift right behavior. Use the generic 64-bit hash function instead. Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Reported-by: NAndrey Ryabinin <a.ryabinin@samsung.com>
-
- 18 9月, 2014 2 次提交
-
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
__jbd2_journal_clean_checkpoint_list() returns number of buffers it freed but noone was using the value so just stop doing that. This also allows for simplifying the calling convention for journal_clean_once_cp_list(). Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
Yuanhan has reported that when he is running fsync(2) heavy workload creating new files over ramdisk, significant amount of time is spent in __jbd2_journal_clean_checkpoint_list() trying to clean old transactions (but they cannot be cleaned up because flusher hasn't yet checkpointed those buffers). The workload can be generated by: fs_mark -d /fs/ram0/1 -D 2 -N 2560 -n 1000000 -L 1 -S 1 -s 4096 Reduce the amount of scanning by stopping to scan the transaction list once we find a transaction that cannot be checkpointed. Note that this way of cleaning is still enough to keep freeing space in the journal after fully checkpointed transactions. Reported-and-tested-by: NYuanhan Liu <yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 17 9月, 2014 2 次提交
-
-
由 Dmitry Monakhov 提交于
If EIO happens after we have dropped j_state_lock, we won't notice that the journal has been aborted. So it is reasonable to move this check after we have grabbed the j_checkpoint_mutex and re-grabbed the j_state_lock. This patch helps to prevent false positive complain after EIO. #DMESG: __jbd2_log_wait_for_space: needed 8448 blocks and only had 8386 space available __jbd2_log_wait_for_space: no way to get more journal space in ram1-8 ------------[ cut here ]------------ WARNING: CPU: 15 PID: 6739 at fs/jbd2/checkpoint.c:168 __jbd2_log_wait_for_space+0x188/0x200() Modules linked in: brd iTCO_wdt lpc_ich mfd_core igb ptp dm_mirror dm_region_hash dm_log dm_mod CPU: 15 PID: 6739 Comm: fsstress Tainted: G W 3.17.0-rc2-00429-g684de574 #139 Hardware name: Intel Corporation W2600CR/W2600CR, BIOS SE5C600.86B.99.99.x028.061320111235 06/13/2011 00000000000000a8 ffff88077aaab878 ffffffff815c1a8c 00000000000000a8 0000000000000000 ffff88077aaab8b8 ffffffff8106ce8c ffff88077aaab898 ffff8807c57e6000 ffff8807c57e6028 0000000000002100 ffff8807c57e62f0 Call Trace: [<ffffffff815c1a8c>] dump_stack+0x51/0x6d [<ffffffff8106ce8c>] warn_slowpath_common+0x8c/0xc0 [<ffffffff8106ceda>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1a/0x20 [<ffffffff812419f8>] __jbd2_log_wait_for_space+0x188/0x200 [<ffffffff8123be9a>] start_this_handle+0x4da/0x7b0 [<ffffffff810990e5>] ? local_clock+0x25/0x30 [<ffffffff810aba87>] ? lockdep_init_map+0xe7/0x180 [<ffffffff8123c5bc>] jbd2__journal_start+0xdc/0x1d0 [<ffffffff811f2414>] ? __ext4_new_inode+0x7f4/0x1330 [<ffffffff81222a38>] __ext4_journal_start_sb+0xf8/0x110 [<ffffffff811f2414>] __ext4_new_inode+0x7f4/0x1330 [<ffffffff810ac359>] ? lock_release_holdtime+0x29/0x190 [<ffffffff812025bb>] ext4_create+0x8b/0x150 [<ffffffff8117fe3b>] vfs_create+0x7b/0xb0 [<ffffffff8118097b>] do_last+0x7db/0xcf0 [<ffffffff8117e31d>] ? inode_permission+0x4d/0x50 [<ffffffff811845d2>] path_openat+0x242/0x590 [<ffffffff81191a76>] ? __alloc_fd+0x36/0x140 [<ffffffff81184a6a>] do_filp_open+0x4a/0xb0 [<ffffffff81191b61>] ? __alloc_fd+0x121/0x140 [<ffffffff81172f20>] do_sys_open+0x170/0x220 [<ffffffff8117300e>] SyS_open+0x1e/0x20 [<ffffffff811715d6>] SyS_creat+0x16/0x20 [<ffffffff815c7e12>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b ---[ end trace cd71c831f82059db ]--- Signed-off-by: NDmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@openvz.org> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Darrick J. Wong 提交于
Free the buffer head if the journal descriptor block fails checksum verification. This is the jbd2 port of the e2fsprogs patch "e2fsck: free bh on csum verify error in do_one_pass". Signed-off-by: NDarrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Reviewed-by: NEric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
-
- 11 9月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Darrick J. Wong 提交于
Clear all three journal checksum feature flags before turning on whichever journal checksum options we want. Rearrange the error checking so that newer flags get complained about first. Reported-by: NTR Reardon <thomas_reardon@hotmail.com> Signed-off-by: NDarrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 05 9月, 2014 3 次提交
-
-
由 Gioh Kim 提交于
Sicne the jbd/jbd2 superblock is not released until the file system is unmounted, allocate the buffer cache from the non-moveable area to allow page migration and CMA allocations to more easily succeed. Signed-off-by: NGioh Kim <gioh.kim@lge.com> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Reviewed-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
When we discover written out buffer in transaction checkpoint list we don't have to recheck validity of a transaction. Either this is the last buffer in a transaction - and then we are done - or this isn't and then we can just take another buffer from the checkpoint list without dropping j_list_lock. Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
The __jbd2_journal_remove_checkpoint() doesn't require an elevated b_count; indeed, until the jh structure gets released by the call to jbd2_journal_put_journal_head(), the bh's b_count is elevated by virtue of the existence of the jh structure. Suggested-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Reviewed-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 02 9月, 2014 2 次提交
-
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
__wait_cp_io() is only called by jbd2_log_do_checkpoint(). Fold it in to make it a bit easier to understand. Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
__process_buffer() is only called by jbd2_log_do_checkpoint(), and it had a very complex locking protocol where it would be called with the j_list_lock, and sometimes exit with the lock held (if the return code was 0), or release the lock. This was confusing both to humans and to smatch (which erronously complained that the lock was taken twice). Folding __process_buffer() to the caller allows us to simplify the control flow, making the resulting function easier to read and reason about, and dropping the compiled size of fs/jbd2/checkpoint.c by 150 bytes (over 4% of the text size). Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Reviewed-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
-
- 29 8月, 2014 2 次提交
-
-
由 Darrick J. Wong 提交于
It turns out that there are some serious problems with the on-disk format of journal checksum v2. The foremost is that the function to calculate descriptor tag size returns sizes that are too big. This causes alignment issues on some architectures and is compounded by the fact that some parts of jbd2 use the structure size (incorrectly) to determine the presence of a 64bit journal instead of checking the feature flags. Therefore, introduce journal checksum v3, which enlarges the descriptor block tag format to allow for full 32-bit checksums of journal blocks, fix the journal tag function to return the correct sizes, and fix the jbd2 recovery code to use feature flags to determine 64bitness. Add a few function helpers so we don't have to open-code quite so many pieces. Switching to a 16-byte block size was found to increase journal size overhead by a maximum of 0.1%, to convert a 32-bit journal with no checksumming to a 32-bit journal with checksum v3 enabled. Signed-off-by: NDarrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com> Reported-by: NTR Reardon <thomas_reardon@hotmail.com> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
-
由 Darrick J. Wong 提交于
When recovering the journal, don't fall into an infinite loop if we encounter a corrupt journal block. Instead, just skip the block and return an error, which fails the mount and thus forces the user to run a full filesystem fsck. Signed-off-by: NDarrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
-
- 16 7月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 NeilBrown 提交于
The current "wait_on_bit" interface requires an 'action' function to be provided which does the actual waiting. There are over 20 such functions, many of them identical. Most cases can be satisfied by one of just two functions, one which uses io_schedule() and one which just uses schedule(). So: Rename wait_on_bit and wait_on_bit_lock to wait_on_bit_action and wait_on_bit_lock_action to make it explicit that they need an action function. Introduce new wait_on_bit{,_lock} and wait_on_bit{,_lock}_io which are *not* given an action function but implicitly use a standard one. The decision to error-out if a signal is pending is now made based on the 'mode' argument rather than being encoded in the action function. All instances of the old wait_on_bit and wait_on_bit_lock which can use the new version have been changed accordingly and their action functions have been discarded. wait_on_bit{_lock} does not return any specific error code in the event of a signal so the caller must check for non-zero and interpolate their own error code as appropriate. The wait_on_bit() call in __fscache_wait_on_invalidate() was ambiguous as it specified TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE but used fscache_wait_bit_interruptible as an action function. David Howells confirms this should be uniformly "uninterruptible" The main remaining user of wait_on_bit{,_lock}_action is NFS which needs to use a freezer-aware schedule() call. A comment in fs/gfs2/glock.c notes that having multiple 'action' functions is useful as they display differently in the 'wchan' field of 'ps'. (and /proc/$PID/wchan). As the new bit_wait{,_io} functions are tagged "__sched", they will not show up at all, but something higher in the stack. So the distinction will still be visible, only with different function names (gds2_glock_wait versus gfs2_glock_dq_wait in the gfs2/glock.c case). Since first version of this patch (against 3.15) two new action functions appeared, on in NFS and one in CIFS. CIFS also now uses an action function that makes the same freezer aware schedule call as NFS. Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Acked-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> (fscache, keys) Acked-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com> (gfs2) Acked-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Cc: Steve French <sfrench@samba.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20140707051603.28027.72349.stgit@notabene.brownSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
- 06 7月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Eric Sandeen 提交于
The mount manpage says of the max_batch_time option, This optimization can be turned off entirely by setting max_batch_time to 0. But the code doesn't do that. So fix the code to do that. Signed-off-by: NEric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
-
- 18 4月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Peter Zijlstra 提交于
Mostly scripted conversion of the smp_mb__* barriers. Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Acked-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-55dhyhocezdw1dg7u19hmh1u@git.kernel.org Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
- 13 3月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
Fix up error messages printed when the transaction pointers in a journal head are inconsistent. This improves the error messages which are printed when running xfstests generic/068 in data=journal mode. See the bug report at: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60786Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 09 3月, 2014 7 次提交
-
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
It's not needed until we start trying to modifying fields in the journal_head which are protected by j_list_lock. Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
It's not needed until we start trying to modifying fields in the journal_head which are protected by j_list_lock. Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
jh->b_transaction is adequately protected for reading by the jbd_lock_bh_state(bh), so we don't need to take j_list_lock in __journal_try_to_free_buffer(). Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
We don't otherwise need j_list_lock during the rest of commit phase #7, so add the transaction to the checkpoint list at the very end of commit phase #6. This allows us to drop j_list_lock earlier, which is a good thing since it is a super hot lock. Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
The two hottest locks, and thus the biggest scalability bottlenecks, in the jbd2 layer, are the j_list_lock and j_state_lock. This has inspired some people to do some truly unnatural things[1]. [1] https://www.usenix.org/system/files/conference/fast14/fast14-paper_kang.pdf We don't need to be holding both j_state_lock and j_list_lock while calculating the journal statistics, so move those calculations to the very end of jbd2_journal_commit_transaction. Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
The j_state_lock is one of the hottest locks in the jbd2 layer and thus one of its scalability bottlenecks. We don't need to be holding the j_state_lock while we are calling wake_up(&journal->j_wait_commit), so release the lock a little bit earlier. Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
During commit process, keep the block device plugged after we are done writing the revoke records, until we are finished writing the rest of the commit records in the journal. This will allow most of the journal blocks to be written in a single I/O operation, instead of separating the the revoke blocks from the rest of the journal blocks. Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 18 2月, 2014 2 次提交
-
-
由 Rashika Kheria 提交于
Mark functions as static in jbd2/journal.c because they are not used outside this file. This eliminates the following warning in jbd2/journal.c: fs/jbd2/journal.c:125:5: warning: no previous prototype for ‘jbd2_verify_csum_type’ [-Wmissing-prototypes] fs/jbd2/journal.c:146:5: warning: no previous prototype for ‘jbd2_superblock_csum_verify’ [-Wmissing-prototypes] fs/jbd2/journal.c:154:6: warning: no previous prototype for ‘jbd2_superblock_csum_set’ [-Wmissing-prototypes] Signed-off-by: NRashika Kheria <rashika.kheria@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Reviewed-by: NJosh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org> Reviewed-by: NDarrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
-
由 Dan Carpenter 提交于
If start_this_handle() fails then it leads to a use after free of "handle". Signed-off-by: NDan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
-
- 09 12月, 2013 3 次提交
-
-
由 Dmitry Monakhov 提交于
Rename performed via: perl -pi -e 's/JBD:/JBD2:/g' fs/jbd2/*.c Signed-off-by: NDmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@openvz.org> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Reviewed-by: NCarlos Maiolino <cmaiolino@redhat.com>
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
Some of KERN_EMERG printk messages do not really deserve this log level and the one in log_wait_commit() is even rather useless (the journal has been previously aborted and *that* is where we should have been complaining). So make some messages just KERN_ERR and remove the useless message. Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
If a handle runs out of space, we currently stop the kernel with a BUG in jbd2_journal_dirty_metadata(). This makes it hard to figure out what might be going on. So return an error of ENOSPC, so we can let the file system layer figure out what is going on, to make it more likely we can get useful debugging information). This should make it easier to debug problems such as the one which was reported by: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44731 The only two callers of this function are ext4_handle_dirty_metadata() and ocfs2_journal_dirty(). The ocfs2 function will trigger a BUG_ON(), which means there will be no change in behavior. The ext4 function will call ext4_error_inode() which will print the useful debugging information and then handle the situation using ext4's error handling mechanisms (i.e., which might mean halting the kernel or remounting the file system read-only). Also, since both file systems already call WARN_ON(), drop the WARN_ON from jbd2_journal_dirty_metadata() to avoid two stack traces from being displayed. Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com Acked-by: NJoel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org>
-
- 29 8月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Darrick J. Wong 提交于
In the jbd2 checksumming code, explicitly declare separate variables with endianness information so that we don't get confused and screw things up again. Also fixes sparse warnings. Signed-off-by: NDarrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-