- 17 9月, 2009 2 次提交
-
-
由 Peter Zijlstra 提交于
Clear buddies more agressively. The (theoretical, haven't actually observed any of this) problem is that when we do not select either buddy in pick_next_entity() because they are too far ahead of the left-most task, we do not clear the buddies. This means that as soon as we service the left-most task, these same buddies will be tried again on the next schedule. Now if the left-most task was a pure hog, it wouldn't have done any wakeups and it wouldn't have set buddies of its own. That leads to the old buddies dominating, which would lead to bad latencies. Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> LKML-Reference: <new-submission> Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
-
由 Peter Zijlstra 提交于
Create a new wakeup preemption mode, preempt towards tasks that run shorter on avg. It sets next buddy to be sure we actually run the task we preempted for. Test results: root@twins:~# while :; do :; done & [1] 6537 root@twins:~# while :; do :; done & [2] 6538 root@twins:~# while :; do :; done & [3] 6539 root@twins:~# while :; do :; done & [4] 6540 root@twins:/home/peter# ./latt -c4 sleep 4 Entries: 48 (clients=4) Averages: ------------------------------ Max 4750 usec Avg 497 usec Stdev 737 usec root@twins:/home/peter# echo WAKEUP_RUNNING > /debug/sched_features root@twins:/home/peter# ./latt -c4 sleep 4 Entries: 48 (clients=4) Averages: ------------------------------ Max 14 usec Avg 5 usec Stdev 3 usec Disabled by default - needs more testing. Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Acked-by: NMike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> LKML-Reference: <new-submission>
-
- 16 9月, 2009 6 次提交
-
-
由 Peter Zijlstra 提交于
For consistencies sake, rename the argument (again). Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> LKML-Reference: <new-submission> Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
-
由 Peter Zijlstra 提交于
Clean up the code a little. Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> LKML-Reference: <new-submission> Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
-
由 Peter Zijlstra 提交于
We don't need to call update_shares() for each domain we iterate, just got the largets one. However, we should call it before wake_affine() as well, so that that can use up-to-date values too. Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> LKML-Reference: <new-submission> Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
-
由 Ingo Molnar 提交于
Add back FAIR_SLEEPERS and GENTLE_FAIR_SLEEPERS. FAIR_SLEEPERS is the old logic: credit sleepers with their sleep time. GENTLE_FAIR_SLEEPERS dampens this a bit: 50% of their sleep time gets credited. The hope here is to still give the benefits of fair-sleepers logic (quick wakeups, etc.) while not allow them to have 100% of their sleep time as if they were running. Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> LKML-Reference: <new-submission> Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
-
由 Peter Zijlstra 提交于
And turn it on for NUMA and MC domains. This improves locality in balancing decisions by keeping up to capacity amount of tasks local before looking for idle CPUs. (and twice the capacity if SD_POWERSAVINGS_BALANCE is set.) Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> LKML-Reference: <new-submission> Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
-
由 Peter Zijlstra 提交于
Currently we use overlap to weaken the SYNC hint, but allow it to set the hint as well. echo NO_SYNC_WAKEUP > /debug/sched_features echo SYNC_MORE > /debug/sched_features preserves pipe-test behaviour without using the WF_SYNC hint. Worth playing with on more workloads... Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> LKML-Reference: <new-submission> Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
-
- 15 9月, 2009 12 次提交
-
-
由 Peter Zijlstra 提交于
Avoid the cache buddies from biasing the time distribution away from fork()ers. Normally the next buddy will be the preferred scheduling target, but this makes fork()s prefer to run the new child, whereas we prefer to run the parent, since that will generate more work. Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> LKML-Reference: <new-submission> Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
-
由 Peter Zijlstra 提交于
In order to extend the functions to have more than 1 flag (sync), rename the argument to flags, and explicitly define a WF_ space for individual flags. Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> LKML-Reference: <new-submission> Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
-
由 Peter Zijlstra 提交于
In order to be able to rename the sync argument, we need to rename the current flag argument. Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> LKML-Reference: <new-submission> Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
-
由 Peter Zijlstra 提交于
When merging select_task_rq_fair() and sched_balance_self() we lost the use of wake_idx, restore that and set them to 0 to make wake balancing more aggressive. Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> LKML-Reference: <new-submission> Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
-
由 Peter Zijlstra 提交于
While merging select_task_rq_fair() and sched_balance_self() I made a mistake that leads to testing the wrong task affinty. Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> LKML-Reference: <new-submission> Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
-
由 Peter Zijlstra 提交于
for_each_domain() uses RCU to serialize the sched_domains, except it doesn't actually use rcu_read_lock() and instead relies on disabling preemption -> FAIL. XXX: audit other sched_domain code. Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> LKML-Reference: <new-submission> Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
-
由 Peter Zijlstra 提交于
One of the problems of power-saving balancing is that under certain scenarios it is too slow and allows tons of real work to pile up. Avoid this by ignoring the powersave stuff when there's real work to be done. Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> LKML-Reference: <new-submission> Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
-
由 Peter Zijlstra 提交于
The problem with wake_idle() is that is doesn't respect things like cpu_power, which means it doesn't deal well with SMT nor the recent RT interaction. To cure this, it needs to do what sched_balance_self() does, which leads to the possibility of merging select_task_rq_fair() and sched_balance_self(). Modify sched_balance_self() to: - update_shares() when walking up the domain tree, (it only called it for the top domain, but it should have done this anyway), which allows us to remove this ugly bit from try_to_wake_up(). - do wake_affine() on the smallest domain that contains both this (the waking) and the prev (the wakee) cpu for WAKE invocations. Then use the top-down balance steps it had to replace wake_idle(). This leads to the dissapearance of SD_WAKE_BALANCE and SD_WAKE_IDLE_FAR, with SD_WAKE_IDLE replaced with SD_BALANCE_WAKE. SD_WAKE_AFFINE needs SD_BALANCE_WAKE to be effective. Touch all topology bits to replace the old with new SD flags -- platforms might need re-tuning, enabling SD_BALANCE_WAKE conditionally on a NUMA distance seems like a good additional feature, magny-core and small nehalem systems would want this enabled, systems with slow interconnects would not. Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> LKML-Reference: <new-submission> Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
-
由 Peter Zijlstra 提交于
Rather ugly patch to fully place the sched_balance_self() code inside the fair class. Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> LKML-Reference: <new-submission> Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
-
由 Peter Zijlstra 提交于
Move the sched_balance_self() code into sched_fair.c This facilitates the merger of sched_balance_self() and sched_fair::select_task_rq(). Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> LKML-Reference: <new-submission> Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
-
由 Mike Galbraith 提交于
Add a NEXT_BUDDY feature flag to aid in debugging. Signed-off-by: NMike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> LKML-Reference: <new-submission> Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
-
由 Peter Zijlstra 提交于
It consists of two conditions, split them out in separate toggles so we can test them independently. Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> LKML-Reference: <new-submission> Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
-
- 11 9月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Ingo Molnar 提交于
This weird perf trace output: cc1-9943 [001] 2802.059479616: sched_stat_wait: task: as:9944 wait: 2801938766276 [ns] Is caused by setting one component field of the delta to zero a bit too early. Move it to later. ( Note, this does not affect the NEW_FAIR_SLEEPERS interactivity bug, it's just a reporting bug in essence. ) Acked-by: NPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Cc: Nikos Chantziaras <realnc@arcor.de> Cc: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> LKML-Reference: <4AA93D34.8040500@arcor.de> Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
-
- 09 9月, 2009 2 次提交
-
-
由 Mike Galbraith 提交于
Reduce the latency target from 20 msecs to 5 msecs. Why? Larger latencies increase spread, which is good for scaling, but bad for worst case latency. We still have the ilog(nr_cpus) rule to scale up on bigger server boxes. Signed-off-by: NMike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Acked-by: NPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> LKML-Reference: <1252486344.28645.18.camel@marge.simson.net> Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
-
由 Mike Galbraith 提交于
Set child_runs_first default to off. It hurts 'optimal' make -j<NR_CPUS> workloads as make jobs get preempted by child tasks, reducing parallelism. Note, this patch might make existing races in user applications more prominent than before - so breakages might be bisected to this commit. Child-runs-first is broken on SMP to begin with, and we already had it off briefly in v2.6.23 so most of the offenders ought to be fixed. Would be nice not to revert this commit but fix those apps finally ... Signed-off-by: NMike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Acked-by: NPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> LKML-Reference: <1252486344.28645.18.camel@marge.simson.net> [ made the sysctl independent of CONFIG_SCHED_DEBUG, in case people want to work around broken apps. ] Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
-
- 08 9月, 2009 3 次提交
-
-
由 Mike Galbraith 提交于
A fork/exec load is usually "pass the baton", so the child should never be placed behind the parent. With START_DEBIT we make room for the new task, but with child_runs_first, that room comes out of the _parent's_ hide. There's nothing to say that the parent wasn't ahead of min_vruntime at fork() time, which means that the "baton carrier", who is essentially the parent in drag, can gain time and increase scheduling latencies for waiters. With NEW_FAIR_SLEEPERS + START_DEBIT + child_runs_first enabled, we essentially pass the sleeper fairness off to the child, which is fine, but if we don't base placement on the parent's updated vruntime, we can end up compounding latency woes if the child itself then does fork/exec. The debit incurred at fork doesn't hurt the parent who is then going to sleep and maybe exit, but the child who acquires the error harms all comers. This improves latencies of make -j<n> kernel build workloads. Reported-by: NJens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NMike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Acked-by: NPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> LKML-Reference: <new-submission> Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
-
由 Peter Zijlstra 提交于
wake_affine() would always fail under low-load situations where both prev and this were idle, because adding a single task will always be a significant imbalance, even if there's nothing around that could balance it. Deal with this by allowing imbalance when there's nothing you can do about it. Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> LKML-Reference: <new-submission> Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
-
由 Peter Zijlstra 提交于
select_task_rq_fair() incorrectly skips the wake_affine() logic, remove this. When prev_cpu == this_cpu, the code jumps straight to the wake_idle() logic, this doesn't give the wake_affine() logic the chance to pin the task to this cpu. Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> LKML-Reference: <new-submission> Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
-
- 02 9月, 2009 2 次提交
-
-
由 Peter Zijlstra 提交于
Add 3 schedstat tracepoints to help account for wait-time, sleep-time and iowait-time. They can also be used as a perf-counter source to profile tasks on these clocks. Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com> LKML-Reference: <new-submission> [ build fix for the !CONFIG_SCHEDSTATS case ] Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
-
由 Arjan van de Ven 提交于
For counting how long an application has been waiting for (disk) IO, there currently is only the HZ sample driven information available, while for all other counters in this class, a high resolution version is available via CONFIG_SCHEDSTATS. In order to make an improved bootchart tool possible, we also need a higher resolution version of the iowait time. This patch below adds this scheduler statistic to the kernel. Signed-off-by: NArjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> LKML-Reference: <4A64B813.1080506@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
-
- 02 8月, 2009 3 次提交
-
-
由 Peter Zijlstra 提交于
A frequent mistake appears to be to call task_of() on a scheduler entity that is not actually a task, which can result in a wild pointer. Add a check to catch these mistakes. Suggested-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> LKML-Reference: <new-submission> Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
-
由 Gregory Haskins 提交于
Reflect "active" cpus in the rq->rd->online field, instead of the online_map. The motivation is that things that use the root-domain code (such as cpupri) only care about cpus classified as "active" anyway. By synchronizing the root-domain state with the active map, we allow several optimizations. For instance, we can remove an extra cpumask_and from the scheduler hotpath by utilizing rq->rd->online (since it is now a cached version of cpu_active_map & rq->rd->span). Signed-off-by: NGregory Haskins <ghaskins@novell.com> Acked-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Acked-by: NMax Krasnyansky <maxk@qualcomm.com> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> LKML-Reference: <20090730145723.25226.24493.stgit@dev.haskins.net> Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
-
由 Peter Zijlstra 提交于
The latencytop and sleep accounting code assumes that any scheduler entity represents a task, this is not so. Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
-
- 18 7月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Fabio Checconi 提交于
I spotted two sites that didn't take vruntime wrap-around into account. Fix these by creating a comparison helper that does do so. Signed-off-by: NFabio Checconi <fabio@gandalf.sssup.it> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> LKML-Reference: <new-submission> Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
-
- 11 7月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Paul Turner 提交于
One of the isolation modifications for SCHED_IDLE is the unitization of sleeper credit. However the check for this assumes that the sched_entity we're placing always belongs to a task. This is potentially not true with group scheduling and leaves us rummaging randomly when we try to pull the policy. Signed-off-by: NPaul Turner <pjt@google.com> Cc: peterz@infradead.org LKML-Reference: <alpine.DEB.1.00.0907101649570.29914@kitami.corp.google.com> Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
-
- 18 6月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Christian Engelmayer 提交于
Access to local variable lw is aliased by usage of pointer load. Access to pointer load in calc_delta_mine() happens when lw is already out of scope. [ Reported by static code analysis. ] Signed-off-by: NChristian Engelmayer <christian.engelmayer@frequentis.com> LKML-Reference: <20090616103512.0c846e51@frequentis.com> Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
-
- 09 4月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Paul Turner 提交于
Impact: micro-optimization Under group scheduling we traverse up until we are at common siblings to make the wakeup comparison on. At this point however, they should have the same parent so continuing to check up the tree is redundant. Signed-off-by: NPaul Turner <pjt@google.com> Acked-by: NPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> LKML-Reference: <alpine.DEB.1.00.0904081520320.30317@kitami.corp.google.com> Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
-
- 11 2月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Peter Zijlstra 提交于
Intel reported a 10% regression (mysql+sysbench) on a 16-way machine with these patches: 1596e297: sched: symmetric sync vs avg_overlap d942fb6c: sched: fix sync wakeups Revert them. Reported-by: N"Zhang, Yanmin" <yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com> Bisected-by: NLin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
-
- 01 2月, 2009 3 次提交
-
-
由 Peter Zijlstra 提交于
Similar to the previous patch, by not clearing buddies we can select entities past their run quota, which can increase latency. This means we have to clear group buddies as well. Do not use the group clear for pick_next_task(), otherwise that'll get O(n^2). Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
-
由 Mike Galbraith 提交于
It was noticed that a task could get re-elected past its run quota due to buddy affinities. This could increase latency a little. Cure it by more aggresively clearing buddy state. We do so in two situations: - when we force preempt - when we select a buddy to run Signed-off-by: NMike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
-
由 Peter Zijlstra 提交于
Pawel Dziekonski reported that the openssl benchmark and his quantum chemistry application both show slowdowns due to the scheduler under-parallelizing execution. The reason are pipe wakeups still doing 'sync' wakeups which overrides the normal buddy wakeup logic - even if waker and wakee are loosely coupled. Fix an inversion of logic in the buddy wakeup code. Reported-by: NPawel Dziekonski <dzieko@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
-
- 16 1月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Lin Ming 提交于
Mike's change: 0a582440 "sched: fix sched_slice())" broke group scheduling by forgetting to reload cfs_rq on each loop. This patch fixes aim7 regression and specjbb2005 regression becomes less than 1.5% on 8-core stokley. Signed-off-by: NLin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Tested-by: NJayson King <dev@jaysonking.com> Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
-