Technically speaking, the context size is per engine class, not per
instance.

v2: Add MISSING_CASE (Tvrtko)

v3: Rebased

v4: Restore the interface back to hiding the class lookup (Chris)

Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: NDaniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NOscar Mateo <oscar.mateo@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1491905472-16189-1-git-send-email-oscar.mateo@intel.comReviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>

In places, we assume that RCS exists. This has been true forever, but
let us catch this failure during bringup by adding an explicit check
that we do have an RCS engine.

v2: Make use of HAS_ENGINE (Tvrtko)
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20170411165658.23828-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

Don't clobber intel_dp->sink_count with the raw value.
Suggested-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/37d3222115172922fcd5ab038238359935bd561f.1491485983.git.jani.nikula@intel.com

This is what we have the readb and writeb variants for. Do some minor
return value and variable cleanup while at it.

Cc: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NManasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/fd8a8f110bcfdc73a8c9241e5f9d61f7dd7c9677.1491485983.git.jani.nikula@intel.com

Localize link_rate_index to the if block, and rename to just index to
reduce indent.

Cc: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NManasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/d348d990c96705427b93c1cac8c3e4447d06eebf.1491485983.git.jani.nikula@intel.com

The source might not support as many lanes as the sink, or the link
training might have failed at higher lane counts. Take these into
account.

Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Cc: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NManasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/cf59530acafaf9258fb643d321ad251b44f34e29.1491485983.git.jani.nikula@intel.com

These are the theoretical maximums common for source and sink. These are
the maximums we should start with. They may be degraded in case of link
training failures, and the dynamic link values are stored separately.

Cc: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NManasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/5088aca253c47dfa18251e1adb976aca1718f083.1491485983.git.jani.nikula@intel.com

If we modify these on the fly depending on the link conditions, don't
pretend they are sink properties.

Some link vs. sink confusion still remains, but we'll take care of them
in follow-up patches.

Cc: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NManasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/3739b4fac502ebd1c6e075a62c1a195e4094eb16.1491485983.git.jani.nikula@intel.com

In link training fallback, we're trying to find a rate that we know is
in a sorted array of common link rates. We don't need to limit the array
using the max rate. For test request, the DP CTS doesn't say we should
limit the rate based on earlier fallback. This lets us get rid of
intel_dp_link_rate_index() and use intel_dp_rate_index() instead.

Cc: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NManasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/33cab481a3228f31e938b5891a6285d892dcf272.1491485983.git.jani.nikula@intel.com

Now that source rates are static and sink rates are updated whenever
DPCD is updated, we can do and cache the intersection of them whenever
sink rates are updated. This reduces code complexity, as we don't have
to keep calling the functions to intersect. We also get rid of several
common rates arrays on stack.

Limiting the common rates by a max link rate can be done by picking the
first N elements of the cached common rates.

v2: get rid of the local common_rates variable (Manasi)
v3: don't clobber cached eDP rates on short pulse (Ville)

Cc: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NManasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/e3b287e8cb6559b1f8fd4e80b78a8d22f1802eb7.1491485983.git.jani.nikula@intel.com

Looking at DPCD DP_MAX_LINK_RATE may be completely bogus for eDP 1.4
which is allowed to use link rate select method and have 0 in max link
rate. With this change, it makes sense to store the max rate as the
actual rate rather than as a bw code.

Cc: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/3e8baadb406d59f414cab36fed9f0b35d207fde5.1491485983.git.jani.nikula@intel.com

We want to refer to the index of the engine consistently throughout the
userspace ABI. We already have such an index through the execbuffer
engine specifier, that needs to be able to refer to each engine
specifically, so rename it the index to uabi_id to reflect its
generality beyond execbuf.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20170411124306.15448-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

There are some properties that logically belong to the engine class, and some
that belong to the engine instance. Make it explicit.

v2: Commit message (Tvrtko)

v3:
  - Rebased
  - Exec/uabi id should be per instance (Chris)

v4:
  - Rebased
  - Avoid re-ordering fields for smaller diff (Tvrtko)
  - Bug on oob access to the class array (Michal)

v5: Bug on the right thing (Michal)

v6: Rebased

Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NMichal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NOscar Mateo <oscar.mateo@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1491834873-9345-5-git-send-email-oscar.mateo@intel.comReviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>

Not really needed, but makes the next change a little bit more compact.

v2:
  - Use zero-based numbering for engine names: xcs0, xcs1.. xcsN (Tvrtko, Chris)
  - Make sure the mock engine name is null-terminated (Tvrtko, Chris)

v3: Because I'm stupid (Chris)

v4: Verify engine name wasn't truncated (Michal)

v5:
  - Kill the warning in mock engine (Chris)

Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NMichal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NOscar Mateo <oscar.mateo@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1491834873-9345-4-git-send-email-oscar.mateo@intel.comReviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>

If we needed to do something different for the init functions, we could
always look at the engine instance to make the distinction. But, in any
case, the two functions are virtually identical already (please notice
that BSD2_RING is only used from gen8 onwards).

With this, the init functions depends excusively on the engine class
(a fact that we will use soon).

v2: Commit message

Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NOscar Mateo <oscar.mateo@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1491834873-9345-3-git-send-email-oscar.mateo@intel.comReviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>

In such a way that vcs and vcs2 are just two different instances (0 and 1)
of the same engine class (VIDEO_DECODE_CLASS).

v2: Align the instance types (Tvrtko)

v3: Don't use enums for bspec-defined stuff (Michal)

Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: NDaniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NMichal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NOscar Mateo <oscar.mateo@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1491834873-9345-2-git-send-email-oscar.mateo@intel.comReviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>

While we do hold the forcewake for legacy ringbuffer initialisation, we
don't guard our access with the uncore.lock spinlock. In theory, we only
initialise when no others should be accessing the same mmio cachelines,
but in practice be safe as this is an infrequently used path and not
worth risky micro-optimisations.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20170411101340.31994-5-chris@chris-wilson.co.ukReviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>

Since the sandybridge_pcode_read() may be called from
skl_pcode_request() inside an atomic context (with preempt disabled), we
should avoid hitting any sleeping paths. Currently is being called with
a 500ms timeout, irrespective of being inside an atomic context or not.
This is reduced down to 500us to play nice with the atomic context, and
that appears to be sufficient to keep BAT happy (we have a DRM_ERROR
should it timeout), i.e. we do not see any 500us pcode timeouts for
normal use. So leave it as a pure spin without having to introduce new
code paths to separate atomic/normal contexts.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20170411101340.31994-4-chris@chris-wilson.co.ukReviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>

We acquire the forcewake and use I915_READ_FW instead for the atomic
wait within intel_uncore_wait_for_register. However, this still leaves
us vulnerable to concurrent mmio access to the register, which can cause
system hangs on gen7. The protection is to acquire uncore.lock around
each register, so lets add it back.

v2: Wrap __intel_wait_for_register_fw() to re-use its atomic wait_for
loop and spare adding another for ourselves.
v3: Add might_sleep() annotation
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20170411101340.31994-3-chris@chris-wilson.co.ukReviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>

submit_request() is called from an atomic context, it's not allowed to
sleep. We have to be careful in our parameters to
intel_uncore_wait_for_register() to limit ourselves to the atomic wait
loop and not incur the wrath of our warnings.

Fixes: 6976e74b ("drm/i915: Don't allow overuse of __intel_wait_for_register_fw()")
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20170410143807.22725-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20170411101340.31994-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.ukReviewed-by: NMichal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>

Allow the caller to use the fast_timeout_us to specify how long to wait
within the atomic section, rather than transparently switching to a
sleeping loop for larger values. This is required as some callsites may
need a long wait and are in an atomic section.

v2: Reinforce kerneldoc fast_timeout_us limit with a GEM_BUG_ON
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20170411112705.12656-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.ukReviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>

This function should not be called with long timeouts in atomic context.
Annotate it as might_sleep if timeout is longer than 10us.

v2: fix comment (Michal)
Signed-off-by: NMichal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Suggested-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20170410121747.209200-1-michal.wajdeczko@intel.comReviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>

These params are passed by value, const qualifiers are ignored any way.
While around, unify timeout_ms type from long to int.
Signed-off-by: NMichal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Suggested-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20170410093817.151280-1-michal.wajdeczko@intel.comReviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>

The void *data passed to debugfs callbacks is actually the
drm_i915_private pointer, so use it thusly and avoid the to_i915(dev)
indirection.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20170407194220.821-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.ukReviewed-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>

Waiting for the response status in scratch register can be done
using our generic function. Let's use it.

v2: rebased
Signed-off-by: NMichal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Suggested-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20170407160145.181328-2-michal.wajdeczko@intel.comReviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>

In some cases we may want to spend more time in atomic wait than
hardcoded 2us. Let's add additional fast timeout parameter to allow
flexible configuration of atomic timeout before switching into heavy wait.
Add also possibility to return registry value to avoid extra read.

v2: use explicit fast timeout (Tvrtko/Chris)
    allow returning register value (Chris)
Signed-off-by: NMichal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Suggested-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20170407160145.181328-1-michal.wajdeczko@intel.comReviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>

There is no need to specify timeout as unsigned long since this parameter
will be consumed by usecs_to_jiffies() which expects unsigned int only.
Signed-off-by: NMichal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20170407133212.174608-1-michal.wajdeczko@intel.comReviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>

As we may have very many objects to free, check to see if the task needs
to be rescheduled whilst freeing them.
Suggested-by: NAndrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20170407102552.5781-4-chris@chris-wilson.co.ukReviewed-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>

Before freeing the next batch of objects from the worker, check if the
worker's timeslice has expired and if so, defer the next batch to the
next invocation of the worker.
Suggested-by: NAndrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20170407102552.5781-3-chris@chris-wilson.co.ukReviewed-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>

By using the same structure for both interruptible and
uninterruptible locking in shrinker code, combined with the
information that mm.interruptible is only being written to, the
code can be greatly simplified.

Also removing the i915_gem_ prefix from the locking functions so
that nobody in their wildest dreams considers exporting them.
Signed-off-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1491562175-27680-1-git-send-email-joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com

Only call synchronize_rcu_expedited after unlocking struct_mutex to
avoid deadlock because the workqueues depend on struct_mutex.

>From original patch by Andrea:

synchronize_rcu/synchronize_sched/synchronize_rcu_expedited() will
hang until its own workqueues are run. The i915 gem workqueues will
wait on the struct_mutex to be released. So we cannot wait for a
quiescent state using those rcu primitives while holding the
struct_mutex or it creates a circular lock dependency resulting in
kernel hangs (which is reproducible but goes undetected by lockdep).

kswapd0         D    0   700      2 0x00000000
Call Trace:
? __schedule+0x1a5/0x660
? schedule+0x36/0x80
? _synchronize_rcu_expedited.constprop.65+0x2ef/0x300
? wake_up_bit+0x20/0x20
? rcu_stall_kick_kthreads.part.54+0xc0/0xc0
? rcu_exp_wait_wake+0x530/0x530
? i915_gem_shrink+0x34b/0x4b0
? i915_gem_shrinker_scan+0x7c/0x90
? i915_gem_shrinker_scan+0x7c/0x90
? shrink_slab.part.61.constprop.72+0x1c1/0x3a0
? shrink_zone+0x154/0x160
? kswapd+0x40a/0x720
? kthread+0xf4/0x130
? try_to_free_pages+0x450/0x450
? kthread_create_on_node+0x40/0x40
? ret_from_fork+0x23/0x30
plasmashell     D    0  4657   4614 0x00000000
Call Trace:
? __schedule+0x1a5/0x660
? schedule+0x36/0x80
? schedule_preempt_disabled+0xe/0x10
? __mutex_lock.isra.4+0x1c9/0x790
? i915_gem_close_object+0x26/0xc0
? i915_gem_close_object+0x26/0xc0
? drm_gem_object_release_handle+0x48/0x90
? drm_gem_handle_delete+0x50/0x80
? drm_ioctl+0x1fa/0x420
? drm_gem_handle_create+0x40/0x40
? pipe_write+0x391/0x410
? __vfs_write+0xc6/0x120
? do_vfs_ioctl+0x8b/0x5d0
? SyS_ioctl+0x3b/0x70
? entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x13/0x94
kworker/0:0     D    0 29186      2 0x00000000
Workqueue: events __i915_gem_free_work
Call Trace:
? __schedule+0x1a5/0x660
? schedule+0x36/0x80
? schedule_preempt_disabled+0xe/0x10
? __mutex_lock.isra.4+0x1c9/0x790
? del_timer_sync+0x44/0x50
? update_curr+0x57/0x110
? __i915_gem_free_objects+0x31/0x300
? __i915_gem_free_objects+0x31/0x300
? __i915_gem_free_work+0x2d/0x40
? process_one_work+0x13a/0x3b0
? worker_thread+0x4a/0x460
? kthread+0xf4/0x130
? process_one_work+0x3b0/0x3b0
? kthread_create_on_node+0x40/0x40
? ret_from_fork+0x23/0x30

Fixes: 3d3d18f0 ("drm/i915: Avoid rcu_barrier() from reclaim paths (shrinker)")
Reported-by: NAndrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>

As we call into the shrinker during freeze, we may have freed more
objects since we idled during i915_gem_suspend. Make sure we flush the
i915_gem_free_objects worker prior to saving the unwanted pages into the
hibernation image.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20170407102552.5781-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.ukReviewed-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>

The shrinker is prepared to be called unlocked (and at other times with
struct_mutex held for DIRECT_RECLAIM) so we can skip acquiring the
struct_mutex prior to calling the shrinker during freeze. This improves
our ability to shrink as we can be more aggressive when we know the
caller isn't holding struct_mutex.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20170407102552.5781-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.ukReviewed-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>

Just in case the llist model changes and NULL isn't valid
initialization.
Signed-off-by: NAndrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20170406232347.988-4-aarcange@redhat.comReviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>

When we retire the last request on the ring, before we ever access that
ring again we know it will be completely idle and so we can advance the
ring->head fully to the end (i.e. ring->tail) and not just to the start
of the breadcrumb. This allows us to skip re-emitting the breadcrumb
after resetting the GPU if the ring was entirely idle. This prevents us
from overwriting a seqno wraparound by re-executing a stale breadcrumb,
i.e.
	submit_request(1)
	intel_engine_init_global_seqno(0)
	i915_reset()
would then leave 1 in the HWS, but the next request to execute would
also be with seqno 1. The sanity checks upon submission detect this as a
timewarp and explode. By setting the ring as empty, upon reset the HWS
is left as 0, leaving it consistent with the timeline.

v2: Fix check for deleting last element of list. We know that this
request is always the first element of the ring, so only if next
points back to the start will this be the only request in flight.
v3: Remove opencoding of list_is_last()
v4: Move the block to its own function for some clarity.

Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100144
Testcase: igt/gem_exec_whisper/hang-*
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20170406170028.26871-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.ukReviewed-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>

When we update the global seqno (on the engine timeline), we modify HW
state (both registers and mapped pages). As we do this, we should be
sure that the HW is idle and we are not causing a conflict. The caller
is supposed to wait_for_idle before calling us to update the seqno, so
let's assert they have and the engine is indeed idle.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20170405153055.28123-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.ukReviewed-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>

Load HuC version 1.07.1748 on GLK.

v2: rebased.
v3: Use name of the right platform(John Spotswood)
v4: rebased.

Cc: Jeff Mcgee <jeff.mcgee@intel.com>
Cc: John Spotswood <john.a.spotswood@intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NAnusha Srivatsa <anusha.srivatsa@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NJohn Spotswood <john.a.spotswood@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NAnder Conselvan de Oliveira <ander.conselvan.de.oliveira@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1490905447-15815-2-git-send-email-anusha.srivatsa@intel.com

Load GuC 10.56 on GLK. Work on firmware is still
in progress. Testing has not been done yet.
This patch addresses the initial need to load the GuC
firmware for HuC authentication

v2: rebased.

Cc: Jeff mcgee <jeff.mcgee@intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: John Spotswood <john.a.spotswood@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NAnusha Srivatsa <anusha.srivatsa@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NJohn Spotswood <john.a.spotswood@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NAnder Conselvan de Oliveira <ander.conselvan.de.oliveira@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1490905447-15815-1-git-send-email-anusha.srivatsa@intel.com

Many sightings report the greater prevalence of allocation failures.
This is all due to the incorrect use of mapping_gfp_constraint(), so
remove it in favour of just querying the mapping_gfp_mask() which are
the exact gfp_t we wanted in the first place.

We still do expect a higher chance of reporting ENOMEM, as that is the
intention of using __GFP_NORETRY -- to fail rather than oom after having
reclaimed from our bo caches, and having done a direct|kswapd reclaim
pass.
Reported-by: NJason Ekstrand <jason.ekstrand@intel.com>
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100594
Fixes: 24f8e00a ("drm/i915: Prefer to report ENOMEM rather than incur the oom for gfx allocations")
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20170405221514.23251-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.ukReviewed-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>

As per BSPEC, valid cdclk values for glk are 79.2, 158.4, 316.8 Mhz.
Practically we can achive only 99% of these cdclk values (HW team
checking on this). So cdclk should be calculated for the given pixclk as
per that otherwise it may lead to screen corruption, explained below:
1. For DSI AUO panel(1920x1200 @60) required pixclk is 157100 KHZ
2. glk_calc_cdclk returns 79200 KHZ for this pixclk, For 2PPC it
   will be 158400 KHZ
3. Practically 100% of the cdclk can’t be achieved, so 99% of 158400
   KHZ  = 156816 which is less than the desired pixlclk and causes
   panel corruption.

v2: Rebased to new CDLCK code framework
v3: Addressed review comments from Ander/Jani
    - Add comment in code about 99% usage of CDCLK
    - Calculate max dot clock as well with 99% limit
v4 by Jani:
    - drop superfluous whitespace change
    - rewrite code comments to clarify
v5: Added details of non-working scenario in commit message

Cc: Ander Conselvan de Oliveira <ander.conselvan.de.oliveira@intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NMadhav Chauhan <madhav.chauhan@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NAnder Conselvan de Oliveira <conselvan2@gmail.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1491397463-13637-1-git-send-email-madhav.chauhan@intel.com