- 02 10月, 2012 6 次提交
-
-
由 Stanislav Kinsbursky 提交于
This function creates service if it's not exist, or increase usage counter of the existent, and returns pointer to it. Usage counter will be droppepd by svc_destroy() later in nfs_callback_up(). Signed-off-by: NStanislav Kinsbursky <skinsbursky@parallels.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Stanislav Kinsbursky 提交于
Signed-off-by: NStanislav Kinsbursky <skinsbursky@parallels.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Weston Andros Adamson 提交于
The OPEN operation has no way to differentiate an open for read and an open for execution - both look like read to the server. This allowed users to read files that didn't have READ access but did have EXEC access, which is obviously wrong. This patch adds an ACCESS call to the OPEN compound to handle the difference between OPENs for reading and execution. Since we're going through the trouble of calling ACCESS, we check all possible access bits and cache the results hopefully avoiding an ACCESS call in the future. Signed-off-by: NWeston Andros Adamson <dros@netapp.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Bryan Schumaker 提交于
This will allocate memory that has already been zeroed, allowing us to remove the memset later on. Signed-off-by: NBryan Schumaker <bjchuma@netapp.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Bryan Schumaker 提交于
I put the client into an open recovery loop by: Client: Open file read half Server: Expire client (echo 0 > /sys/kernel/debug/nfsd/forget_clients) Client: Drop vm cache (echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches) finish reading file This causes a loop because the client never updates the nfs4_state after discovering that the delegation is invalid. This means it will keep trying to read using the bad delegation rather than attempting to re-open the file. Signed-off-by: NBryan Schumaker <bjschuma@netapp.com> CC: stable@vger.kernel.org [3.4+] Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Bryan Schumaker 提交于
If we are reading through a delegation, and the delegation is OK then state->stateid will still point to a delegation stateid and not an open stateid. Signed-off-by: NBryan Schumaker <bjschuma@netapp.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
- 29 9月, 2012 34 次提交
-
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
We shouldn't need more than 1 worker thread per cpu, since rpciod is designed to run without sleeping in most cases. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Currently it does not do so if the RPC call failed to start. Fix is to move the decrement of plh_block_lgets into nfs4_layoutreturn_release. Also remove a redundant test of task->tk_status in nfs4_layoutreturn_done: if lrp->res.lrs_present is set, then obviously the RPC call succeeded. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Failure of the layoutreturn allocation fails is not a good reason to mark the pnfs_layout_hdr as having failed a layoutget or i/o. Just exit cleanly. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
It serves no purpose that the test for whether or not we have valid layout segments doesn't already serve. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Once all the affected layout segments have been freed up, clear the NFS_LAYOUT_BULK_RECALL flag so that we can reuse the pnfs_layout_hdr Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
We already have a mechanism for blocking LAYOUTGET by means of the plh_block_lgets counter. The only "service" that NFS_LAYOUT_DESTROYED provides at this point is to block layoutget once the layout segment list is empty, which basically means that you have to wait until the pnfs_layout_hdr is destroyed before you can do pNFS on that file again. This patch enables the reuse of the pnfs_layout_hdr if the layout segment list is empty. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
...and ditto for pnfs_free_layout_hdr() Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
These are all in static declared functions that are called only once. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Ensure that the reference count for pnfs_layout_hdr reverts to the original value after a call to pnfs_layout_remove_lseg(). Note that the caller is expected to hold a reference to the struct pnfs_layout_hdr. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
There is no longer a need to use pnfs_free_lseg_list(). Just call pnfs_free_lseg() directly. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Move the code into pnfs_free_layout_hdr(), and add checks to get_layout_by_fh_locked to ensure that they don't reference a layout that is being freed. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
None of the existing pNFS layout drivers seem to require the inode to be locked while they free the layout header. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Each layout segment already holds a reference to the pnfs_layout_hdr, so there is no need to hold an extra reference that is released once the last layout segment is freed. Ensure that pnfs_find_alloc_layout() always returns a reference to the pnfs_layout_hdr, which will be matched by the final call to pnfs_put_layout_hdr() in pnfs_update_layout(). Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
The latter name is more descriptive of the actual function. Also rename pnfs_insert_layout to pnfs_layout_insert_lseg. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Instead of resetting the inode MDS threshold counters when we mark the layout for destruction, do it as part of freeing the layout. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
In all cases where we set NFS_LAYOUT_INVALID, we also set NFS_LAYOUT_DESTROYED. Furthermore, in all cases where we test for NFS_LAYOUT_INVALID, we should also be testing for NFS_LAYOUT_DESTROYED, since the latter means that we hold no valid layout segments. Ergo the two are redundant. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Confine it to the nfs4_do_close() code. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
If we sleep after dropping the inode->i_lock, then we are no longer atomic with respect to the rpc_wake_up() call in pnfs_layout_remove_lseg(). Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
If pnfs_layout_io_test_failed() authorises a retry of the failed layoutgets, we should clear the existing layout segments so that we start afresh. Do this in pnfs_layout_io_set_failed(). Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
We want to cache the pnfs_layout_hdr after a layoutget or i/o failure so that pnfs_update_layout() can find it and know when it is time to retry. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
If we exit after the call to pnfs_find_alloc_layout(), we have to ensure that we put the struct pnfs_layout_hdr. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
In cases where the pNFS data server is just temporarily out of service, we want to mark it as such, and then try again later. Typically that will be in cases of network connection errors etc. This patch allows us to mark the devices as being "unavailable" for such transient errors, and will make them available for retries after a 2 minute timeout period. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
If we had to fall back to read/write through MDS, then assume that we should retry pNFS after a suitable timeout period. The following patch sets a timeout of 2 minutes. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
...and make them local to the pnfs.c file. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Dereferencing nfsi->layout in order to read plh_flags without holding a spin lock is bug prone. Furthermore, the dprintk() tells you nothing about whether or not the call succeeded. Replace it with something that tells you about whether or not a valid layout segment was returned for the inode in question. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Fix the namespace pollution issue. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Ensure that we do return errors from nfs4_proc_layoutget() and that we don't mark the layout as having failed if the error was due to a signal or resource problem on the client side. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
It is only set after everyone has dereferenced the transport, and serves no useful purpose: setting it is racy, so all the socket code, etc still needs to be able to cope with the cases where they miss reading it. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
This is to ensure that we don't clear the NFS_CONTEXT_RESEND_WRITES flag while there are still writes that haven't been resent. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
If the server reboots before it can commit the unstable writes to disk, then nfs_commit_release_pages() will detect this when it compares the verifier returned by COMMIT to the one returned by WRITE. When this happens, the client needs to resend those writes in order to guarantee that they make it to stable storage. This patch adds a signalling mechanism to notify fsync() that it needs to retry all writes before it can exit. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-