1. 24 5月, 2011 2 次提交
  2. 25 3月, 2011 1 次提交
    • G
      m68k: merge m68k and m68knommu arch directories · 66d857b0
      Greg Ungerer 提交于
      There is a lot of common code that could be shared between the m68k
      and m68knommu arch branches. It makes sense to merge the two branches
      into a single directory structure so that we can more easily share
      that common code.
      
      This is a brute force merge, based on a script from Stephen King
      <sfking@fdwdc.com>, which was originally written by Arnd Bergmann
      <arnd@arndb.de>.
      
      > The script was inspired by the script Sam Ravnborg used to merge the
      > includes from m68knommu. For those files common to both arches but
      > differing in content, the m68k version of the file is renamed to
      > <file>_mm.<ext> and the m68knommu version of the file is moved into the
      > corresponding m68k directory and renamed <file>_no.<ext> and a small
      > wrapper file <file>.<ext> is used to select between the two version. Files
      > that are common to both but don't differ are removed from the m68knommu
      > tree and files and directories that are unique to the m68knommu tree are
      > moved to the m68k tree. Finally, the arch/m68knommu tree is removed.
      >
      > To select between the the versions of the files, the wrapper uses
      >
      > #ifdef CONFIG_MMU
      > #include <file>_mm.<ext>
      > #else
      > #include <file>_no.<ext>
      > #endif
      
      On top of this file merge I have done a simplistic merge of m68k and
      m68knommu Kconfig, which primarily attempts to keep existing options and
      menus in place. Other than a handful of options being moved it produces
      identical .config outputs on m68k and m68knommu targets I tested it on.
      
      With this in place there is now quite a bit of scope for merge cleanups
      in future patches.
      Signed-off-by: NGreg Ungerer <gerg@uclinux.org>
      66d857b0
  3. 18 11月, 2010 1 次提交
  4. 18 8月, 2010 2 次提交
  5. 14 8月, 2010 1 次提交
  6. 30 3月, 2010 1 次提交
    • T
      include cleanup: Update gfp.h and slab.h includes to prepare for breaking... · 5a0e3ad6
      Tejun Heo 提交于
      include cleanup: Update gfp.h and slab.h includes to prepare for breaking implicit slab.h inclusion from percpu.h
      
      percpu.h is included by sched.h and module.h and thus ends up being
      included when building most .c files.  percpu.h includes slab.h which
      in turn includes gfp.h making everything defined by the two files
      universally available and complicating inclusion dependencies.
      
      percpu.h -> slab.h dependency is about to be removed.  Prepare for
      this change by updating users of gfp and slab facilities include those
      headers directly instead of assuming availability.  As this conversion
      needs to touch large number of source files, the following script is
      used as the basis of conversion.
      
        http://userweb.kernel.org/~tj/misc/slabh-sweep.py
      
      The script does the followings.
      
      * Scan files for gfp and slab usages and update includes such that
        only the necessary includes are there.  ie. if only gfp is used,
        gfp.h, if slab is used, slab.h.
      
      * When the script inserts a new include, it looks at the include
        blocks and try to put the new include such that its order conforms
        to its surrounding.  It's put in the include block which contains
        core kernel includes, in the same order that the rest are ordered -
        alphabetical, Christmas tree, rev-Xmas-tree or at the end if there
        doesn't seem to be any matching order.
      
      * If the script can't find a place to put a new include (mostly
        because the file doesn't have fitting include block), it prints out
        an error message indicating which .h file needs to be added to the
        file.
      
      The conversion was done in the following steps.
      
      1. The initial automatic conversion of all .c files updated slightly
         over 4000 files, deleting around 700 includes and adding ~480 gfp.h
         and ~3000 slab.h inclusions.  The script emitted errors for ~400
         files.
      
      2. Each error was manually checked.  Some didn't need the inclusion,
         some needed manual addition while adding it to implementation .h or
         embedding .c file was more appropriate for others.  This step added
         inclusions to around 150 files.
      
      3. The script was run again and the output was compared to the edits
         from #2 to make sure no file was left behind.
      
      4. Several build tests were done and a couple of problems were fixed.
         e.g. lib/decompress_*.c used malloc/free() wrappers around slab
         APIs requiring slab.h to be added manually.
      
      5. The script was run on all .h files but without automatically
         editing them as sprinkling gfp.h and slab.h inclusions around .h
         files could easily lead to inclusion dependency hell.  Most gfp.h
         inclusion directives were ignored as stuff from gfp.h was usually
         wildly available and often used in preprocessor macros.  Each
         slab.h inclusion directive was examined and added manually as
         necessary.
      
      6. percpu.h was updated not to include slab.h.
      
      7. Build test were done on the following configurations and failures
         were fixed.  CONFIG_GCOV_KERNEL was turned off for all tests (as my
         distributed build env didn't work with gcov compiles) and a few
         more options had to be turned off depending on archs to make things
         build (like ipr on powerpc/64 which failed due to missing writeq).
      
         * x86 and x86_64 UP and SMP allmodconfig and a custom test config.
         * powerpc and powerpc64 SMP allmodconfig
         * sparc and sparc64 SMP allmodconfig
         * ia64 SMP allmodconfig
         * s390 SMP allmodconfig
         * alpha SMP allmodconfig
         * um on x86_64 SMP allmodconfig
      
      8. percpu.h modifications were reverted so that it could be applied as
         a separate patch and serve as bisection point.
      
      Given the fact that I had only a couple of failures from tests on step
      6, I'm fairly confident about the coverage of this conversion patch.
      If there is a breakage, it's likely to be something in one of the arch
      headers which should be easily discoverable easily on most builds of
      the specific arch.
      Signed-off-by: NTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
      Guess-its-ok-by: NChristoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>
      Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
      Cc: Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com>
      5a0e3ad6
  7. 28 2月, 2010 1 次提交
  8. 14 10月, 2009 1 次提交
  9. 09 7月, 2009 1 次提交
  10. 03 4月, 2009 1 次提交
  11. 07 9月, 2008 1 次提交
  12. 24 8月, 2007 1 次提交
  13. 17 7月, 2007 1 次提交
  14. 05 12月, 2006 1 次提交
  15. 01 7月, 2006 1 次提交
  16. 24 3月, 2006 1 次提交
  17. 08 2月, 2006 1 次提交
  18. 13 1月, 2006 1 次提交
  19. 11 1月, 2006 1 次提交
  20. 27 7月, 2005 1 次提交
  21. 03 6月, 2005 1 次提交
    • G
      [PATCH] m68knommu: fix scheduling and race problems in idle loop · b05a720b
      Greg Ungerer 提交于
      Re-work the m68knommu specific idle code according to suggestions
      from Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>.
      
      A couple of rules that we need to follow:
      
      1. Preempt should now disabled over idle routines. Should only be enabled
      to call schedule() then disabled again.
      
      3. When cpu_idle finds (need_resched() == 'true'), it should call schedule().
      It should not call schedule() otherwise.
      
      Also fix interrupt locking around the need_resched() and cpu stop state
      so that there is no race condition.
      Signed-off-by: NGreg Ungerer <gerg@snapgear.com>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
      b05a720b
  22. 17 4月, 2005 1 次提交
    • L
      Linux-2.6.12-rc2 · 1da177e4
      Linus Torvalds 提交于
      Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history,
      even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git
      archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about
      3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early
      git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good
      infrastructure for it.
      
      Let it rip!
      1da177e4