- 05 9月, 2009 6 次提交
-
-
由 Joel Becker 提交于
One more generic btree function that is isolated from struct inode. Signed-off-by: NJoel Becker <joel.becker@oracle.com>
-
由 Joel Becker 提交于
One more function that doesn't need a struct inode to pass to its children. Signed-off-by: NJoel Becker <joel.becker@oracle.com>
-
由 Joel Becker 提交于
One more function down, no inode in the entire insert-extent chain. Signed-off-by: NJoel Becker <joel.becker@oracle.com>
-
由 Joel Becker 提交于
ocfs2_find_path and ocfs2_find_leaf() walk our btrees, reading extent blocks. They need struct ocfs2_caching_info for that, but not struct inode. Signed-off-by: NJoel Becker <joel.becker@oracle.com>
-
由 Joel Becker 提交于
The next step in divorcing metadata I/O management from struct inode is to pass struct ocfs2_caching_info to the journal functions. Thus the journal locks a metadata cache with the cache io_lock function. It also can compare ci_last_trans and ci_created_trans directly. This is a large patch because of all the places we change ocfs2_journal_access..(handle, inode, ...) to ocfs2_journal_access..(handle, INODE_CACHE(inode), ...). Signed-off-by: NJoel Becker <joel.becker@oracle.com>
-
由 Joel Becker 提交于
We are really passing the inode into the ocfs2_read/write_blocks() functions to get at the metadata cache. This commit passes the cache directly into the metadata block functions, divorcing them from the inode. Signed-off-by: NJoel Becker <joel.becker@oracle.com>
-
- 21 7月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Subrata Modak 提交于
gcc 4.4.1 generates the following build warning on i386: CC [M] fs/ocfs2/xattr.o fs/ocfs2/xattr.c: In function ‘ocfs2_xattr_block_get’: fs/ocfs2/xattr.c:1055: warning: ‘block_off’ may be used uninitialized in this function The following fix is based on a similar approach by David Howells few days back: http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/7/9/109, Signed-off-by: Subrata Modak<subrata@linux.vnet.ibm.com>, Signed-off-by: NJoel Becker <joel.becker@oracle.com>
-
- 06 5月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Tao Ma 提交于
Currently the kernel defines XATTR_LIST_MAX as 65536 in include/linux/limits.h. This is the largest buffer that is used for listing xattrs. But with ocfs2 xattr tree, we actually have no limit for the number. If filesystem has more names than can fit in the buffer, the kernel logs will be pollluted with something like this when listing: (27738,0):ocfs2_iterate_xattr_buckets:3158 ERROR: status = -34 (27738,0):ocfs2_xattr_tree_list_index_block:3264 ERROR: status = -34 So don't print "ERROR" message as this is not an ocfs2 error. Signed-off-by: NTao Ma <tao.ma@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NJoel Becker <joel.becker@oracle.com>
-
- 04 4月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Mark Fasheh 提交于
This patch makes use of Ocfs2's flexible btree code to add an additional tree to directory inodes. The new tree stores an array of small, fixed-length records in each leaf block. Each record stores a hash value, and pointer to a block in the traditional (unindexed) directory tree where a dirent with the given name hash resides. Lookup exclusively uses this tree to find dirents, thus providing us with constant time name lookups. Some of the hashing code was copied from ext3. Unfortunately, it has lots of unfixed checkpatch errors. I left that as-is so that tracking changes would be easier. Signed-off-by: NMark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.com> Acked-by: NJoel Becker <joel.becker@oracle.com>
-
- 13 3月, 2009 2 次提交
-
-
由 Tao Ma 提交于
A long time ago, xs->base is allocated a 4K size and all the contents in the bucket are copied to the it. Now we use ocfs2_xattr_bucket to abstract xattr bucket and xs->base is initialized to the start of the bu_bhs[0]. So xs->base + offset will overflow when the value root is stored outside the first block. Then why we can survive the xattr test by now? It is because we always read the bucket contiguously now and kernel mm allocate continguous memory for us. We are lucky, but we should fix it. So just get the right value root as other callers do. Signed-off-by: NTao Ma <tao.ma@oracle.com> Acked-by: NJoel Becker <joel.becker@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NMark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.com>
-
由 Tiger Yang 提交于
If this is a new directory with inline data, we choose to reserve the entire inline area for directory contents and force an external xattr block. Signed-off-by: NTiger Yang <tiger.yang@oracle.com> Acked-by: NJoel Becker <joel.becker@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NMark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.com>
-
- 27 2月, 2009 3 次提交
-
-
由 Tiger Yang 提交于
This patch set a gap (4 bytes) between xattr entry and name/value when xattr in bucket. This gap use to seperate entry and name/value when a bucket is full. It had already been set when xattr in inode/block. Signed-off-by: NTiger Yang <tiger.yang@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NMark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.com>
-
由 Tao Ma 提交于
For other metadata in ocfs2, metaecc is checked in ocfs2_read_blocks with io_mutex held. While for xattr bucket, it is calculated by the whole buckets. So we have to add a spin_lock to prevent multiple processes calculating metaecc. Signed-off-by: NTao Ma <tao.ma@oracle.com> Tested-by: NTristan Ye <tristan.ye@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NMark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.com>
-
由 Tao Ma 提交于
In ctime updating of xattr, it use the wrong type of access for inode, so use ocfs2_journal_access_di instead. Reported-and-Tested-by: NTristan Ye <tristan.ye@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NTao Ma <tao.ma@oracle.com> Acked-by: NJoel Becker <joel.becker@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NMark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.com>
-
- 03 2月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Tao Ma 提交于
In ocfs2_xattr_value_truncate, we may call b-tree codes which will extend the journal transaction. It has a potential problem that it may let the already-accessed-but-not-dirtied buffers gone. So we'd better access the bucket after we call ocfs2_xattr_value_truncate. And as for the root buffer for the xattr value, b-tree code will acess and dirty it, so we don't need to worry about it. Signed-off-by: NTao Ma <tao.ma@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NMark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.com>
-
- 06 1月, 2009 25 次提交
-
-
由 Tiger Yang 提交于
We must check whether ocfs2 volume support xattr in init_security, if not support xattr and security is enable, would cause failure of mknod. Signed-off-by: NTiger Yang <tiger.yang@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NMark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.com>
-
由 Tiger Yang 提交于
In extreme situation, may need xattr bucket for setting security entry and acl entries during mknod. This only happens when block size is too small. Signed-off-by: NTiger Yang <tiger.yang@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NMark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.com>
-
由 Tiger Yang 提交于
We extend the credits for xattr's large value in set_value_outside before, this can give rise to a credits issue when we set one security entry and two acl entries duing mknod. As we remove extend_trans form set_value_outside, we must calculate and reserve the credits for xattr's large value in mknod. Signed-off-by: NTiger Yang <tiger.yang@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NMark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.com>
-
由 Tao Ma 提交于
When creating a xattr index block, the old calculation forget to add credits for the meta change of the alloc file. So add more credits and more comments to explain it. Signed-off-by: NTao Ma <tao.ma@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NMark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.com>
-
由 Tao Ma 提交于
In xattr set, we should always update ctime if the operation goes sucessfully. The old one mistakenly put it in ocfs2_xattr_set_entry which is only called when we set xattr in inode or xattr block. The side benefit is that it resolve the bug 1052 since in that scenario, ocfs2_calc_xattr_set_need only calc out the xattr set credits while ocfs2_xattr_set_entry update the inode also which isn't concerned with the process of xattr set. Signed-off-by: NTao Ma <tao.ma@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NMark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.com>
-
由 Tao Ma 提交于
Actually, when setting a new xattr value, we know it from the very beginning, and it isn't like the extension of bucket in which case we can't figure it out. So remove ocfs2_extend_trans in that function and calculate it before the transaction. It also relieve acl operation from the worry about the side effect of ocfs2_extend_trans. Signed-off-by: NTao Ma <tao.ma@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NMark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.com>
-
由 Joel Becker 提交于
Change the rest of the naked ocfs2_journal_access() calls in fs/ocfs2/xattr.c to use the appropriate ocfs2_journal_access_*() call for their metadata type. Signed-off-by: NJoel Becker <joel.becker@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NMark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.com>
-
由 Joel Becker 提交于
ocfs2_remove_value_outside() needs to know the type of buffer it is looking at. Pass in an ocfs2_xattr_value_buf. Signed-off-by: NJoel Becker <joel.becker@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NMark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.com>
-
由 Joel Becker 提交于
ocfs2_xattr_set_entry is the function that knows what type of block it is setting into. This is what we wanted from ocfs2_xattr_value_buf. Plus, moving the value buf up into ocfs2_xattr_set_entry() allows us to pass it into ocfs2_xattr_set_value_outside() and ocfs2_xattr_cleanup(). Signed-off-by: NJoel Becker <joel.becker@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NMark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.com>
-
由 Joel Becker 提交于
ocfs2_xattr_update_entry() updates the entry portion of an xattr buffer. This can be part of multiple metadata block types, so pass the buffer in via an ocfs2_xattr_value_buf. Signed-off-by: NJoel Becker <joel.becker@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NMark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.com>
-
由 Joel Becker 提交于
The callers of ocfs2_xattr_value_truncate() now pass in ocfs2_xattr_value_bufs. These callers are the ones that calculated the xv location, so they are the right starting point. Signed-off-by: NJoel Becker <joel.becker@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NMark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.com>
-
由 Joel Becker 提交于
Place an ocfs2_xattr_value_buf in ocfs2_xattr_value_truncate() and pass it down to ocfs2_xattr_shrink_size(). We can also pass it into ocfs2_xattr_extend_allocation(), replacing its ocfs2_xattr_value_buf. Signed-off-by: NJoel Becker <joel.becker@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NMark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.com>
-
由 Joel Becker 提交于
Place an ocfs2_xattr_value_buf in __ocfs2_xattr_shrink_size() and pass it down to __ocfs2_remove_xattr_range(). Signed-off-by: NJoel Becker <joel.becker@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NMark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.com>
-
由 Joel Becker 提交于
When an ocfs2 extended attribute is large enough to require its own allocation tree, we root it with an ocfs2_xattr_value_root. However, these roots can be a part of inodes, xattr blocks, or xattr buckets. Thus, they need a different journal access function for each container. We wrap the bh, its journal access function, and the value root (xv) in a structure called ocfs2_xattr_valu_buf. This is a package that can be passed around. In this first pass, we simply pass it to the extent tree code. Signed-off-by: NJoel Becker <joel.becker@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NMark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.com>
-
由 Joel Becker 提交于
The xattr bucket can span multiple blocks on disk. We have wrappers for this structure in the code. We use the new multi-block ecc calls to calculate and validate the bucket. Signed-off-by: NJoel Becker <joel.becker@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NMark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.com>
-
由 Joel Becker 提交于
Add block check calls to the read_block validate functions. This is the almost all of the read-side checking of metaecc. xattr buckets are not checked yet. Writes are also unchecked, and so a read-write mount will quickly fail. Signed-off-by: NJoel Becker <joel.becker@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NMark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.com>
-
由 Joel Becker 提交于
Pass the actual target bucket for insert through to ocfs2_add_new_xattr_bucket(). Now growing a bucket has no buffer_head knowledge. ocfs2_add_new_xattr_bucket() leavs xs->bucket in the proper state for insert. However, it doesn't update the rest of the search fields in xs, so we still have to relse() and re-find. That's OK, because everything is cached. Signed-off-by: NJoel Becker <joel.becker@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NMark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.com>
-
由 Joel Becker 提交于
Lift the buckets from ocfs2_add_new_xattr_cluster() up into ocfs2_add_new_xattr_bucket(). Now ocfs2_add_new_xattr_cluster() doesn't deal with buffer_heads. In fact, we no longer have to play get_bh() tricks at all. Signed-off-by: NJoel Becker <joel.becker@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NMark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.com>
-
由 Joel Becker 提交于
Lift the buckets from ocfs2_adjust_xattr_cross_cluster() up into ocfs2_add_new_xattr_cluster(). Now ocfs2_adjust_xattr_cross_cluster() doesn't deal with buffer_heads. Signed-off-by: NJoel Becker <joel.becker@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NMark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.com>
-
由 Joel Becker 提交于
Now that ocfs2_adjust_xattr_cross_cluster() has buckets, it can pass them into ocfs2_mv_xattr_bucket_cross_cluster(). It no longer has to care about buffer_heads. The manipulation of first_bh and header_bh moves up to ocfs2_adjust_xattr_cross_cluster(). Signed-off-by: NJoel Becker <joel.becker@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NMark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.com>
-
由 Joel Becker 提交于
We want to be passing around buckets instead of buffer_heads. Let's get them into ocfs2_adjust_xattr_cross_cluster. Signed-off-by: NJoel Becker <joel.becker@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NMark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.com>
-
由 Joel Becker 提交于
Now that ocfs2_mv_xattr_buckets() can move a partial cluster's worth of buckets, ocfs2_mv_xattr_bucket_cross_cluster() can use it. Signed-off-by: NJoel Becker <joel.becker@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NMark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.com>
-
由 Joel Becker 提交于
If you look at ocfs2_mv_xattr_bucket_cross_cluster(), you'll notice that two-thirds of the code is almost identical to ocfs2_mv_xattr_buckets(). The only difference is that ocfs2_mv_xattr_buckets() moves a whole cluster's worth, while ocfs2_mv_xattr_bucket_cross_cluster() moves half the cluster. We change ocfs2_mv_xattr_buckets() to allow moving partial clusters. The original caller of ocfs2_mv_xattr_buckets() still moves the whole cluster's worth - it just passes a start_bucket of 0. Signed-off-by: NJoel Becker <joel.becker@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NMark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.com>
-
由 Joel Becker 提交于
ocfs2_cp_xattr_cluster() takes the last cluster of an xattr extent, copies its buckets to the front of a new extent, and then shrinks the bucket count of the original extent. So it's really moving the data, not copying it. While we're here, the function doesn't need a buffer_head for the old extent, just the block number. Signed-off-by: NJoel Becker <joel.becker@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NMark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.com>
-
由 Joel Becker 提交于
The buffer copy loop of ocfs2_mv_xattr_bucket_cross_cluster() actually looks a lot like ocfs2_cp_xattr_bucket(). Let's just use that instead. We also use bucket operations to update the buckets at the start of each extent. Signed-off-by: NJoel Becker <joel.becker@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NMark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.com>
-