- 11 2月, 2020 40 次提交
-
-
由 Jens Axboe 提交于
commit fcb323cc53e29d9cc696d606bb42736b32dd9825 upstream. This is in preparation for adding opcodes that need to add new files in a process file table, system calls like open(2) or accept4(2). If an opcode needs this, it must set IO_WQ_WORK_NEEDS_FILES in the work item. If work that needs to get punted to async context have this set, the async worker will assume the original task file table before executing the work. Note that opcodes that need access to the current files of an application cannot be done through IORING_SETUP_SQPOLL. Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Signed-off-by: NJoseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com> Reviewed-by: NXiaoguang Wang <xiaoguang.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
-
由 Jens Axboe 提交于
commit 561fb04a6a2257716738dac2ed812f377c2634c2 upstream. Drop various work-arounds we have for workqueues: - We no longer need the async_list for tracking sequential IO. - We don't have to maintain our own mm tracking/setting. - We don't need a separate workqueue for buffered writes. This didn't even work that well to begin with, as it was suboptimal for multiple buffered writers on multiple files. - We can properly cancel pending interruptible work. This fixes deadlocks with particularly socket IO, where we cannot cancel them when the io_uring is closed. Hence the ring will wait forever for these requests to complete, which may never happen. This is different from disk IO where we know requests will complete in a finite amount of time. - Due to being able to cancel work interruptible work that is already running, we can implement file table support for work. We need that for supporting system calls that add to a process file table. - It gets us one step closer to adding async support for any system call. Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Signed-off-by: NJoseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com> Reviewed-by: NXiaoguang Wang <xiaoguang.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
-
由 Jens Axboe 提交于
commit 771b53d033e8663abdf59704806aa856b236dcdb upstream. This adds support for io-wq, a smaller and specialized thread pool implementation. This is meant to replace workqueues for io_uring. Among the reasons for this addition are: - We can assign memory context smarter and more persistently if we manage the life time of threads. - We can drop various work-arounds we have in io_uring, like the async_list. - We can implement hashed work insertion, to manage concurrency of buffered writes without needing a) an extra workqueue, or b) needlessly making the concurrency of said workqueue very low which hurts performance of multiple buffered file writers. - We can implement cancel through signals, for cancelling interruptible work like read/write (or send/recv) to/from sockets. - We need the above cancel for being able to assign and use file tables from a process. - We can implement a more thorough cancel operation in general. - We need it to move towards a syslet/threadlet model for even faster async execution. For that we need to take ownership of the used threads. This list is just off the top of my head. Performance should be the same, or better, at least that's what I've seen in my testing. io-wq supports basic NUMA functionality, setting up a pool per node. io-wq hooks up to the scheduler schedule in/out just like workqueue and uses that to drive the need for more/less workers. Acked-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> [Joseph: Cherry-pick allow_kernel_signal() from upstream commit 33da8e7c814f] Signed-off-by: NJoseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com> Reviewed-by: NXiaoguang Wang <xiaoguang.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
-
由 Thomas Gleixner 提交于
commit 6d25be5782e482eb93e3de0c94d0a517879377d0 upstream. The worker accounting for CPU bound workers is plugged into the core scheduler code and the wakeup code. This is not a hard requirement and can be avoided by keeping track of the state in the workqueue code itself. Keep track of the sleeping state in the worker itself and call the notifier before entering the core scheduler. There might be false positives when the task is woken between that call and actually scheduling, but that's not really different from scheduling and being woken immediately after switching away. When nr_running is updated when the task is retunrning from schedule() then it is later compared when it is done from ttwu(). [ bigeasy: preempt_disable() around wq_worker_sleeping() by Daniel Bristot de Oliveira ] Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: NSebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Acked-by: NTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Cc: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com> Cc: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/ad2b29b5715f970bffc1a7026cabd6ff0b24076a.1532952814.git.bristot@redhat.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NJoseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com> Reviewed-by: NXiaoguang Wang <xiaoguang.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
-
由 Thomas Gleixner 提交于
commit 15917dc02841862840efcbfe1da0830f88078b5c upstream. The RTMUTEX tester was removed long ago but the PF bit stayed around. Remove it and free up the space. Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: NJoseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com> Reviewed-by: NXiaoguang Wang <xiaoguang.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
-
由 Pavel Begunkov 提交于
commit 95a1b3ff9a3e4ea2f26c4e802067d58831f415db upstream. Commit fb5ccc98782f ("io_uring: Fix broken links with offloading") introduced a potential performance regression with unconditionally taking mm even for READ/WRITE_FIXED operations. Return the logic handling it back. mm-faulted requests will go through the generic submission path, so honoring links and drains, but will fail further on req->has_user check. Fixes: fb5ccc98782f ("io_uring: Fix broken links with offloading") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v5.4 Signed-off-by: NPavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Signed-off-by: NJoseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com> Reviewed-by: NXiaoguang Wang <xiaoguang.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
-
由 Pavel Begunkov 提交于
commit fa4562280889ad372dfb1413833a8b8675721b17 upstream. submit->index is used only for inbound check in submission path (i.e. head < ctx->sq_entries). However, it always will be true, as 1. it's already validated by io_get_sqring() 2. ctx->sq_entries can't be changedd in between, because of held ctx->uring_lock and ctx->refs. Signed-off-by: NPavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Signed-off-by: NJoseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com> Reviewed-by: NXiaoguang Wang <xiaoguang.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
-
由 Dmitrii Dolgov 提交于
commit c826bd7a743f275e2b68c16d595534063b400deb upstream. To trace io_uring activity one can get an information from workqueue and io trace events, but looks like some parts could be hard to identify via this approach. Making what happens inside io_uring more transparent is important to be able to reason about many aspects of it, hence introduce the set of tracing events. All such events could be roughly divided into two categories: * those, that are helping to understand correctness (from both kernel and an application point of view). E.g. a ring creation, file registration, or waiting for available CQE. Proposed approach is to get a pointer to an original structure of interest (ring context, or request), and then find relevant events. io_uring_queue_async_work also exposes a pointer to work_struct, to be able to track down corresponding workqueue events. * those, that provide performance related information. Mostly it's about events that change the flow of requests, e.g. whether an async work was queued, or delayed due to some dependencies. Another important case is how io_uring optimizations (e.g. registered files) are utilized. Signed-off-by: NDmitrii Dolgov <9erthalion6@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Signed-off-by: NJoseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com> Reviewed-by: NXiaoguang Wang <xiaoguang.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
-
由 Jens Axboe 提交于
commit 11365043e5271fea4c92189a976833da477a3a44 upstream. We might have cases where the need for a specific timeout is gone, add support for canceling an existing timeout operation. This works like the POLL_REMOVE command, where the application passes in the user_data of the timeout it wishes to cancel in the sqe->addr field. Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Signed-off-by: NJoseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com> Reviewed-by: NXiaoguang Wang <xiaoguang.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
-
由 Jens Axboe 提交于
commit a41525ab2e75987e809926352ebc6f1397da900e upstream. This is a pretty trivial addition on top of the relative timeouts we have now, but it's handy for ensuring tighter timing for those that are building scheduling primitives on top of io_uring. Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Signed-off-by: NJoseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com> Reviewed-by: NXiaoguang Wang <xiaoguang.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
-
由 Jackie Liu 提交于
commit ba5290ccb6b57fc5e274ae46d051fba1f0ece262 upstream. There is no function change, just to clean up the code, use s->in_async to make the code know where it is. Signed-off-by: NJackie Liu <liuyun01@kylinos.cn> Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Signed-off-by: NJoseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com> Reviewed-by: NXiaoguang Wang <xiaoguang.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
-
由 Jens Axboe 提交于
commit 33a107f0a1b8df0ad925e39d8afc97bb78e0cec1 upstream. We currently size the CQ ring as twice the SQ ring, to allow some flexibility in not overflowing the CQ ring. This is done because the SQE life time is different than that of the IO request itself, the SQE is consumed as soon as the kernel has seen the entry. Certain application don't need a huge SQ ring size, since they just submit IO in batches. But they may have a lot of requests pending, and hence need a big CQ ring to hold them all. By allowing the application to control the CQ ring size multiplier, we can cater to those applications more efficiently. If an application wants to define its own CQ ring size, it must set IORING_SETUP_CQSIZE in the setup flags, and fill out io_uring_params->cq_entries. The value must be a power of two. Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Signed-off-by: NJoseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com> Reviewed-by: NXiaoguang Wang <xiaoguang.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
-
由 Jens Axboe 提交于
commit c3a31e605620c279163c14068a60869ea3fda203 upstream. Allows the application to remove/replace/add files to/from a file set. Passes in a struct: struct io_uring_files_update { __u32 offset; __s32 *fds; }; that holds an array of fds, size of array passed in through the usual nr_args part of the io_uring_register() system call. The logic is as follows: 1) If ->fds[i] is -1, the existing file at i + ->offset is removed from the set. 2) If ->fds[i] is a valid fd, the existing file at i + ->offset is replaced with ->fds[i]. For case #2, is the existing file is currently empty (fd == -1), the new fd is simply added to the array. Reviewed-by: NJeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Signed-off-by: NJoseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com> Reviewed-by: NXiaoguang Wang <xiaoguang.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
-
由 Jens Axboe 提交于
commit 08a451739a9b5783f67de51e84cb6d9559bb9dc4 upstream. This is in preparation for allowing updates to fixed file sets without requiring a full unregister+register. Reviewed-by: NJeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Signed-off-by: NJoseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com> Reviewed-by: NXiaoguang Wang <xiaoguang.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
-
由 Jens Axboe 提交于
commit ba816ad61fdf31f59f423a773b00bfa2ed38243a upstream. Currently any dependent link is executed from a new workqueue context, which means that we'll be doing a context switch per link in the chain. If we are running the completion of the current request from our async workqueue and find that the next request is a link, then run it directly from the workqueue context instead of forcing another switch. This improves the performance of linked SQEs, and reduces the CPU overhead. Reviewed-by: NJackie Liu <liuyun01@kylinos.cn> Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Signed-off-by: NJoseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com> Reviewed-by: NXiaoguang Wang <xiaoguang.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
-
由 Jens Axboe 提交于
commit 044c1ab399afbe9f2ebef49a3204ef1509826dc7 upstream. syzkaller reported an issue where it looks like a malicious app can trigger a use-after-free of reading the ctx ->sq_array and ->rings value right after having installed the ring fd in the process file table. Defer ring fd installation until after we're done reading those values. Fixes: 75b28affdd6a ("io_uring: allocate the two rings together") Reported-by: syzbot+6f03d895a6cd0d06187f@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Signed-off-by: NJoseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com> Reviewed-by: NXiaoguang Wang <xiaoguang.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
-
由 Pavel Begunkov 提交于
commit 7b20238d28da46f394d37d4d51cc420e1ff9414a upstream. io_queue_link_head() owns shadow_req after taking it as an argument. By not freeing it in case of an error, it can leak the request along with taken ctx->refs. Reviewed-by: NJackie Liu <liuyun01@kylinos.cn> Signed-off-by: NPavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Signed-off-by: NJoseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com> Reviewed-by: NXiaoguang Wang <xiaoguang.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
-
由 Jens Axboe 提交于
commit 2b2ed9750fc9d040b9f6d076afcef6f00b6f1f7c upstream. We currently assume that submissions from the sqthread are successful, and if IO polling is enabled, we use that value for knowing how many completions to look for. But if we overflowed the CQ ring or some requests simply got errored and already completed, they won't be available for polling. For the case of IO polling and SQTHREAD usage, look at the pending poll list. If it ever hits empty then we know that we don't have anymore pollable requests inflight. For that case, simply reset the inflight count to zero. Reported-by: NPavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: NPavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Signed-off-by: NJoseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com> Reviewed-by: NXiaoguang Wang <xiaoguang.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
-
由 Jens Axboe 提交于
commit 498ccd9eda49117c34e0041563d0da6ac40e52b8 upstream. We currently use the ring values directly, but that can lead to issues if the application is malicious and changes these values on our behalf. Created in-kernel cached versions of them, and just overwrite the user side when we update them. This is similar to how we treat the sq/cq ring tail/head updates. Reported-by: NPavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: NPavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Signed-off-by: NJoseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com> Reviewed-by: NXiaoguang Wang <xiaoguang.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
-
由 Pavel Begunkov 提交于
commit 935d1e45908afb8853c497f2c2bbbb685dec51dc upstream. io_ring_submit() finalises with 1. io_commit_sqring(), which releases sqes to the userspace 2. Then calls to io_queue_link_head(), accessing released head's sqe Reorder them. Signed-off-by: NPavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Signed-off-by: NJoseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com> Reviewed-by: NXiaoguang Wang <xiaoguang.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
-
由 Pavel Begunkov 提交于
commit fb5ccc98782f654778cb8d96ba8a998304f9a51f upstream. io_sq_thread() processes sqes by 8 without considering links. As a result, links will be randomely subdivided. The easiest way to fix it is to call io_get_sqring() inside io_submit_sqes() as do io_ring_submit(). Downsides: 1. This removes optimisation of not grabbing mm_struct for fixed files 2. It submitting all sqes in one go, without finer-grained sheduling with cq processing. Signed-off-by: NPavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Signed-off-by: NJoseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com> Reviewed-by: NXiaoguang Wang <xiaoguang.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
-
由 Pavel Begunkov 提交于
commit 84d55dc5b9e57b513a702fbc358e1b5489651590 upstream. There is a bug, where failed linked requests are returned not with specified @user_data, but with garbage from a kernel stack. The reason is that io_fail_links() uses req->user_data, which is uninitialised when called from io_queue_sqe() on fail path. Signed-off-by: NPavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Signed-off-by: NJoseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com> Reviewed-by: NXiaoguang Wang <xiaoguang.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
-
由 zhangyi (F) 提交于
commit a1f58ba46f794b1168d1107befcf3d4b9f9fd453 upstream. The sequence number of the timeout req (req->sequence) indicate the expected completion request. Because of each timeout req consume a sequence number, so the sequence of each timeout req on the timeout list shouldn't be the same. But now, we may get the same number (also incorrect) if we insert a new entry before the last one, such as submit such two timeout reqs on a new ring instance below. req->sequence req_1 (count = 2): 2 req_2 (count = 1): 2 Then, if we submit a nop req, req_2 will still timeout even the nop req finished. This patch fix this problem by adjust the sequence number of each reordered reqs when inserting a new entry. Signed-off-by: Nzhangyi (F) <yi.zhang@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Signed-off-by: NJoseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com> Reviewed-by: NXiaoguang Wang <xiaoguang.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
-
由 zhangyi (F) 提交于
commit ef03681ae8df770745978148a7fb84796ae99cba upstream. The sequence number of reqs on the timeout_list before the timeout req should be adjusted in io_timeout_fn(), because the current timeout req will consumes a slot in the cq_ring and cq_tail pointer will be increased, otherwise other timeout reqs may return in advance without waiting for enough wait_nr. Signed-off-by: Nzhangyi (F) <yi.zhang@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Signed-off-by: NJoseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com> Reviewed-by: NXiaoguang Wang <xiaoguang.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
-
由 Jens Axboe 提交于
commit bc808bced39f4e4b626c5ea8c63d5e41fce7205a upstream. There are cases where it isn't always safe to block for submission, even if the caller asked to wait for events as well. Revert the previous optimization of doing that. This reverts two commits: bf7ec93c644cb c576666863b78 Fixes: c576666863b78 ("io_uring: optimize submit_and_wait API") Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Signed-off-by: NJoseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com> Reviewed-by: NXiaoguang Wang <xiaoguang.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
-
由 yangerkun 提交于
commit 8b07a65ad30e5612d9590fb50468ff4fa314cfc7 upstream. If ctx->cached_sq_head < nxt_sq_head, we should add UINT_MAX to tmp, not tmp_nxt. Fixes: 5da0fb1ab34c ("io_uring: consider the overflow of sequence for timeout req") Signed-off-by: Nyangerkun <yangerkun@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Signed-off-by: NJoseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com> Reviewed-by: NXiaoguang Wang <xiaoguang.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
-
由 Jens Axboe 提交于
commit 491381ce07ca57f68c49c79a8a43da5b60749e32 upstream. We've got two issues with the non-regular file handling for non-blocking IO: 1) We don't want to re-do a short read in full for a non-regular file, as we can't just read the data again. 2) For non-regular files that don't support non-blocking IO attempts, we need to punt to async context even if the file is opened as non-blocking. Otherwise the caller always gets -EAGAIN. Add two new request flags to handle these cases. One is just a cache of the inode S_ISREG() status, the other tells io_uring that we always need to punt this request to async context, even if REQ_F_NOWAIT is set. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Reported-by: NHrvoje Zeba <zeba.hrvoje@gmail.com> Tested-by: NHrvoje Zeba <zeba.hrvoje@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Signed-off-by: NJoseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com> Reviewed-by: NXiaoguang Wang <xiaoguang.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
-
由 yangerkun 提交于
commit 5da0fb1ab34ccfe6d49210b4f5a739c59fcbf25e upstream. Now we recalculate the sequence of timeout with 'req->sequence = ctx->cached_sq_head + count - 1', judge the right place to insert for timeout_list by compare the number of request we still expected for completion. But we have not consider about the situation of overflow: 1. ctx->cached_sq_head + count - 1 may overflow. And a bigger count for the new timeout req can have a small req->sequence. 2. cached_sq_head of now may overflow compare with before req. And it will lead the timeout req with small req->sequence. This overflow will lead to the misorder of timeout_list, which can lead to the wrong order of the completion of timeout_list. Fix it by reuse req->submit.sequence to store the count, and change the logic of inserting sort in io_timeout. Signed-off-by: Nyangerkun <yangerkun@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Signed-off-by: NJoseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com> Reviewed-by: NXiaoguang Wang <xiaoguang.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
-
由 Jens Axboe 提交于
commit 7adf4eaf60f3d8c3584bed51fe7066d4dfc2cbe1 upstream. We have two ways a request can be deferred: 1) It's a regular request that depends on another one 2) It's a timeout that tracks completions We have a shared helper to determine whether to defer, and that attempts to make the right decision based on the request. But we only have some of this information in the caller. Un-share the two timeout/defer helpers so the caller can use the right one. Fixes: 5262f567987d ("io_uring: IORING_OP_TIMEOUT support") Reported-by: Nyangerkun <yangerkun@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: NJackie Liu <liuyun01@kylinos.cn> Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Signed-off-by: NJoseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com> Reviewed-by: NXiaoguang Wang <xiaoguang.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
-
由 Jens Axboe 提交于
commit 8a99734081775c012a4a6c442fdef0379fe52bdf upstream. We should not remove the workqueue, we just need to ensure that the workqueues are synced. The workqueues are torn down on ctx removal. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Fixes: 6b06314c47e1 ("io_uring: add file set registration") Reported-by: NStefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Signed-off-by: NJoseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com> Reviewed-by: NXiaoguang Wang <xiaoguang.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
-
由 Pavel Begunkov 提交于
commit 6805b32ec2b0897eb180295385efe306e5ac3b3d upstream. Any changes interesting to tasks waiting in io_cqring_wait() are commited with io_cqring_ev_posted(). However, io_ring_drop_ctx_refs() also tries to do that but with no reason, that means spurious wakeups every io_free_req() and io_uring_enter(). Just use percpu_ref_put() instead. Signed-off-by: NPavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Signed-off-by: NJoseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com> Reviewed-by: NXiaoguang Wang <xiaoguang.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
-
由 Pavel Begunkov 提交于
commit bf7ec93c644cb0064ba7d2fc40d4841c5ba382ab upstream. io_queue_link_head() accepts @force_nonblock flag, but io_ring_submit() passes something opposite. Fixes: c576666863b78 ("io_uring: optimize submit_and_wait API") Reported-by: Nkbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NPavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Signed-off-by: NJoseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com> Reviewed-by: NXiaoguang Wang <xiaoguang.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
-
由 Arnd Bergmann 提交于
commit bdf200731145f07a6127cb16753e2e8fdc159cf4 upstream. All system calls use struct __kernel_timespec instead of the old struct timespec, but this one was just added with the old-style ABI. Change it now to enforce the use of __kernel_timespec, avoiding ABI confusion and the need for compat handlers on 32-bit architectures. Any user space caller will have to use __kernel_timespec now, but this is unambiguous and works for any C library regardless of the time_t definition. A nicer way to specify the timeout would have been a less ambiguous 64-bit nanosecond value, but I suppose it's too late now to change that as this would impact both 32-bit and 64-bit users. Fixes: 5262f567987d ("io_uring: IORING_OP_TIMEOUT support") Signed-off-by: NArnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Signed-off-by: NJoseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com> Reviewed-by: NXiaoguang Wang <xiaoguang.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
-
由 Jens Axboe 提交于
commit bda521624e75c665c407b3d9cece6e7a28178cd8 upstream. For batched IO, it's not uncommon for waiters to ask for more than 1 IO to complete before being woken up. This is a problem with wait_event() since tasks will get woken for every IO that completes, re-check condition, then go back to sleep. For batch counts on the order of what you do for high IOPS, that can result in 10s of extra wakeups for the waiting task. Add a private wake function that checks for the wake up count criteria being met before calling autoremove_wake_function(). Pavel reports that one test case he has runs 40% faster with proper batching of wakeups. Reported-by: NPavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com> Tested-by: NPavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: NPavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Signed-off-by: NJoseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com> Reviewed-by: NXiaoguang Wang <xiaoguang.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
-
由 yangerkun 提交于
commit daa5de5415849b9a53056ec1e1e88fe4c5c9aa2b upstream. After 75b28af("io_uring: allocate the two rings together"), we compare sq.head with cached_cq_tail to determine does there any cq invalid. Actually, we should use cq.head. Fixes: 75b28affdd6a ("io_uring: allocate the two rings together") Signed-off-by: Nyangerkun <yangerkun@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Signed-off-by: NJoseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com> Reviewed-by: NXiaoguang Wang <xiaoguang.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
-
由 Jens Axboe 提交于
commit 32960613b7c3352ddf38c42596e28a16ae36335e upstream. Currently we just -EINVAL a read or write to an fd that isn't backed by ->read_iter() or ->write_iter(). But we can handle them just fine, as long as we punt fo async context first. Implement a simple loop function for doing ->read() or ->write() instead, and ensure we call it appropriately. Reported-by: N李通洲 <carter.li@eoitek.com> Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Signed-off-by: NJoseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com> Reviewed-by: NXiaoguang Wang <xiaoguang.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
-
由 Jens Axboe 提交于
commit 5262f567987d3c30052b22e78c35c2313d07b230 upstream. There's been a few requests for functionality similar to io_getevents() and epoll_wait(), where the user can specify a timeout for waiting on events. I deliberately did not add support for this through the system call initially to avoid overloading the args, but I can see that the use cases for this are valid. This adds support for IORING_OP_TIMEOUT. If a user wants to get woken when waiting for events, simply submit one of these timeout commands with your wait call (or before). This ensures that the application sleeping on the CQ ring waiting for events will get woken. The timeout command is passed in as a pointer to a struct timespec. Timeouts are relative. The timeout command also includes a way to auto-cancel after N events has passed. Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Signed-off-by: NJoseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com> Reviewed-by: NXiaoguang Wang <xiaoguang.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
-
由 Jens Axboe 提交于
commit 9831a90ce64362f8429e8fd23838a9db2cdf7803 upstream. If preempt isn't enabled in the kernel, we can run into hang issues with sqthread submissions. Use cond_resched() to play nice instead of cpu_relax(), if we end up starting the loop and not having any events pending for submissions. Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Signed-off-by: NJoseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com> Reviewed-by: NXiaoguang Wang <xiaoguang.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
-
由 Jackie Liu 提交于
commit a1041c27b64ce744632147e19701c95fed14fab1 upstream. Sometimes io_get_req will return a NUL, then we need to do the correct error handling, otherwise it will cause the kernel null pointer exception. Fixes: 4fe2c963154c ("io_uring: add support for link with drain") Signed-off-by: NJackie Liu <liuyun01@kylinos.cn> Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Signed-off-by: NJoseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com> Reviewed-by: NXiaoguang Wang <xiaoguang.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
-
由 Jens Axboe 提交于
commit 6cc47d1d2a9b631f62405f56df651975c7587a97 upstream. If we end up getting woken in poll (due to a signal), then we may need to punt the poll request to an async worker. When we do that, we look up the list to queue at, deferefencing req->submit.sqe, however that is only set for requests we initially decided to queue async. This fixes a crash with poll command usage and wakeups that need to punt to async context. Fixes: 54a91f3bb9b9 ("io_uring: limit parallelism of buffered writes") Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Signed-off-by: NJoseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com> Reviewed-by: NXiaoguang Wang <xiaoguang.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
-