The next_cp_seq field is useless, remove it.
Signed-off-by: NJackieLiu <liuyun01@kylinos.cn>
Signed-off-by: NShaohua Li <shli@fb.com>

If we released the 'stripe_head' in r5c_recovery_flush_log,
ctx->cached_list will both release the data-parity stripes and
data-only stripes, which will become empty.
And we also need to use the data-only stripes in
r5c_recovery_rewrite_data_only_stripes, so we should wait util rewrite
data-only stripes is done before releasing them.
Reviewed-by: NZhengyuan Liu <liuzhengyuan@kylinos.cn>
Reviewed-by: NSong Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NJackieLiu <liuyun01@kylinos.cn>
Signed-off-by: NShaohua Li <shli@fb.com>

'write_pos' must be protected with 'r5l_ring_add', or it may overflow
Signed-off-by: NJackieLiu <liuyun01@kylinos.cn>
Reviewed-by: NSong Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NShaohua Li <shli@fb.com>

The function parameter 'recovery_list' is not used in
body, we can delete it
Signed-off-by: NJackieLiu <liuyun01@kylinos.cn>
Reviewed-by: NSong Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NShaohua Li <shli@fb.com>

r5c_recovery_load_one_stripe should not set STRIPE_R5C_PARTIAL_STRIPE flag,as
the data-only stripe may be STRIPE_R5C_FULL_STRIPE stripe. The state machine
would release the stripe later and add it into neither r5c_cached_full_stripes
list or r5c_cached_partial_stripes list and set correct flag.
Reviewed-by: NJackieLiu <liuyun01@kylinos.cn>
Signed-off-by: NZhengyuan Liu <liuzhengyuan@kylinos.cn>
Signed-off-by: NShaohua Li <shli@fb.com>

New stripe that was just allocated has no STRIPE_R5C_CACHING state too,
add this check condition could avoid unnecessary replaying for empty stripe.

r5l_recovery_replay_one_stripe would reset stripe for any case, delete it
to make code more clean.
Signed-off-by: NZhengyuan Liu <liuzhengyuan@kylinos.cn>
Signed-off-by: NShaohua Li <shli@fb.com>

We need to re-enable the IRQs here before returning.

Fixes: a39f7afd ("md/r5cache: write-out phase and reclaim support")
Signed-off-by: NDan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NShaohua Li <shli@fb.com>

RMW of r5c write back cache uses an extra page to store old data for
prexor. handle_stripe_dirtying() allocates this page by calling
alloc_page(). However, alloc_page() may fail.

To handle alloc_page() failures, this patch adds an extra page to
disk_info. When alloc_page fails, handle_stripe() trys to use these
pages. When these pages are used by other stripe (R5C_EXTRA_PAGE_IN_USE),
the stripe is added to delayed_list.
Signed-off-by: NSong Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NShaohua Li <shli@fb.com>

There is mechanism to suspend a kernel thread. Use it instead of playing
create/destroy game.
Signed-off-by: NShaohua Li <shli@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Cc: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>

With raid5 cache, we committing data from journal device. When
there is flush request, we need to flush journal device's cache.
This was not needed in raid5 journal, because we will flush the
journal before committing data to raid disks.

This is similar to FUA, except that we also need flush journal for
FUA. Otherwise, corruptions in earlier meta data will stop recovery
from reaching FUA data.

slightly changed the code by Shaohua
Signed-off-by: NSong Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NShaohua Li <shli@fb.com>

1. In previous patch, we:
      - add new data to r5l_recovery_ctx
      - add new functions to recovery write-back cache
   The new functions are not used in this patch, so this patch does not
   change the behavior of recovery.

2. In this patchpatch, we:
      - modify main recovery procedure r5l_recovery_log() to call new
        functions
      - remove old functions
Signed-off-by: NSong Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NShaohua Li <shli@fb.com>

Recovery of write-back cache has different logic to write-through only
cache. Specifically, for write-back cache, the recovery need to scan
through all active journal entries before flushing data out. Therefore,
large portion of the recovery logic is rewritten here.

To make the diffs cleaner, we split the rewrite as follows:

1. In this patch, we:
      - add new data to r5l_recovery_ctx
      - add new functions to recovery write-back cache
   The new functions are not used in this patch, so this patch does not
   change the behavior of recovery.

2. In next patch, we:
      - modify main recovery procedure r5l_recovery_log() to call new
        functions
      - remove old functions

With cache feature, there are 2 different scenarios of recovery:
1. Data-Parity stripe: a stripe with complete parity in journal.
2. Data-Only stripe: a stripe with only data in journal (or partial
   parity).

The code differentiate Data-Parity stripe from Data-Only stripe with
flag STRIPE_R5C_CACHING.

For Data-Parity stripes, we use the same procedure as raid5 journal,
where all the data and parity are replayed to the RAID devices.

For Data-Only strips, we need to finish complete calculate parity and
finish the full reconstruct write or RMW write. For simplicity, in
the recovery, we load the stripe to stripe cache. Once the array is
started, the stripe cache state machine will handle these stripes
through normal write path.

r5c_recovery_flush_log contains the main procedure of recovery. The
recovery code first scans through the journal and loads data to
stripe cache. The code keeps tracks of all these stripes in a list
(use sh->lru and ctx->cached_list), stripes in the list are
organized in the order of its first appearance on the journal.
During the scan, the recovery code assesses each stripe as
Data-Parity or Data-Only.

During scan, the array may run out of stripe cache. In these cases,
the recovery code will also call raid5_set_cache_size to increase
stripe cache size. If the array still runs out of stripe cache
because there isn't enough memory, the array will not assemble.

At the end of scan, the recovery code replays all Data-Parity
stripes, and sets proper states for Data-Only stripes. The recovery
code also increases seq number by 10 and rewrites all Data-Only
stripes to journal. This is to avoid confusion after repeated
crashes. More details is explained in raid5-cache.c before
r5c_recovery_rewrite_data_only_stripes().
Signed-off-by: NSong Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NShaohua Li <shli@fb.com>

1. rename r5l_read_meta_block() as r5l_recovery_read_meta_block();
2. pull the code that initialize r5l_meta_block from
   r5l_log_write_empty_meta_block() to a separate function
   r5l_recovery_create_empty_meta_block(), so that we can reuse this
   piece of code.
Signed-off-by: NSong Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NShaohua Li <shli@fb.com>

With write cache, journal_mode is the knob to switch between
write-back and write-through.

Below is an example:

root@virt-test:~/# cat /sys/block/md0/md/journal_mode
[write-through] write-back
root@virt-test:~/# echo write-back > /sys/block/md0/md/journal_mode
root@virt-test:~/# cat /sys/block/md0/md/journal_mode
write-through [write-back]
Signed-off-by: NSong Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NShaohua Li <shli@fb.com>

There are two limited resources, stripe cache and journal disk space.
For better performance, we priotize reclaim of full stripe writes.
To free up more journal space, we free earliest data on the journal.

In current implementation, reclaim happens when:
1. Periodically (every R5C_RECLAIM_WAKEUP_INTERVAL, 30 seconds) reclaim
   if there is no reclaim in the past 5 seconds.
2. when there are R5C_FULL_STRIPE_FLUSH_BATCH (256) cached full stripes,
   or cached stripes is enough for a full stripe (chunk size / 4k)
   (r5c_check_cached_full_stripe)
3. when there is pressure on stripe cache (r5c_check_stripe_cache_usage)
4. when there is pressure on journal space (r5l_write_stripe, r5c_cache_data)

r5c_do_reclaim() contains new logic of reclaim.

For stripe cache:

When stripe cache pressure is high (more than 3/4 stripes are cached,
or there is empty inactive lists), flush all full stripe. If fewer
than R5C_RECLAIM_STRIPE_GROUP (NR_STRIPE_HASH_LOCKS * 2) full stripes
are flushed, flush some paritial stripes. When stripe cache pressure
is moderate (1/2 to 3/4 of stripes are cached), flush all full stripes.

For log space:

To avoid deadlock due to log space, we need to reserve enough space
to flush cached data. The size of required log space depends on total
number of cached stripes (stripe_in_journal_count). In current
implementation, the writing-out phase automatically include pending
data writes with parity writes (similar to write through case).
Therefore, we need up to (conf->raid_disks + 1) pages for each cached
stripe (1 page for meta data, raid_disks pages for all data and
parity). r5c_log_required_to_flush_cache() calculates log space
required to flush cache. In the following, we refer to the space
calculated by r5c_log_required_to_flush_cache() as
reclaim_required_space.

Two flags are added to r5conf->cache_state: R5C_LOG_TIGHT and
R5C_LOG_CRITICAL. R5C_LOG_TIGHT is set when free space on the log
device is less than 3x of reclaim_required_space. R5C_LOG_CRITICAL
is set when free space on the log device is less than 2x of
reclaim_required_space.

r5c_cache keeps all data in cache (not fully committed to RAID) in
a list (stripe_in_journal_list). These stripes are in the order of their
first appearance on the journal. So the log tail (last_checkpoint)
should point to the journal_start of the first item in the list.

When R5C_LOG_TIGHT is set, r5l_reclaim_thread starts flushing out
stripes at the head of stripe_in_journal. When R5C_LOG_CRITICAL is
set, the state machine only writes data that are already in the
log device (in stripe_in_journal_list).

This patch includes a fix to improve performance by
Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com>.
Signed-off-by: NSong Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NShaohua Li <shli@fb.com>

As described in previous patch, write back cache operates in two
phases: caching and writing-out. The caching phase works as:
1. write data to journal
   (r5c_handle_stripe_dirtying, r5c_cache_data)
2. call bio_endio
   (r5c_handle_data_cached, r5c_return_dev_pending_writes).

Then the writing-out phase is as:
1. Mark the stripe as write-out (r5c_make_stripe_write_out)
2. Calcualte parity (reconstruct or RMW)
3. Write parity (and maybe some other data) to journal device
4. Write data and parity to RAID disks

This patch implements caching phase. The cache is integrated with
stripe cache of raid456. It leverages code of r5l_log to write
data to journal device.

Writing-out phase of the cache is implemented in the next patch.

With r5cache, write operation does not wait for parity calculation
and write out, so the write latency is lower (1 write to journal
device vs. read and then write to raid disks). Also, r5cache will
reduce RAID overhead (multipile IO due to read-modify-write of
parity) and provide more opportunities of full stripe writes.

This patch adds 2 flags to stripe_head.state:
 - STRIPE_R5C_PARTIAL_STRIPE,
 - STRIPE_R5C_FULL_STRIPE,

Instead of inactive_list, stripes with cached data are tracked in
r5conf->r5c_full_stripe_list and r5conf->r5c_partial_stripe_list.
STRIPE_R5C_FULL_STRIPE and STRIPE_R5C_PARTIAL_STRIPE are flags for
stripes in these lists. Note: stripes in r5c_full/partial_stripe_list
are not considered as "active".

For RMW, the code allocates an extra page for each data block
being updated.  This is stored in r5dev->orig_page and the old data
is read into it.  Then the prexor calculation subtracts ->orig_page
from the parity block, and the reconstruct calculation adds the
->page data back into the parity block.

r5cache naturally excludes SkipCopy. When the array has write back
cache, async_copy_data() will not skip copy.

There are some known limitations of the cache implementation:

1. Write cache only covers full page writes (R5_OVERWRITE). Writes
   of smaller granularity are write through.
2. Only one log io (sh->log_io) for each stripe at anytime. Later
   writes for the same stripe have to wait. This can be improved by
   moving log_io to r5dev.
3. With writeback cache, read path must enter state machine, which
   is a significant bottleneck for some workloads.
4. There is no per stripe checkpoint (with r5l_payload_flush) in
   the log, so recovery code has to replay more than necessary data
   (sometimes all the log from last_checkpoint). This reduces
   availability of the array.

This patch includes a fix proposed by ZhengYuan Liu
<liuzhengyuan@kylinos.cn>
Signed-off-by: NSong Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NShaohua Li <shli@fb.com>

This patch adds state machine for raid5-cache. With log device, the
raid456 array could operate in two different modes (r5c_journal_mode):
  - write-back (R5C_MODE_WRITE_BACK)
  - write-through (R5C_MODE_WRITE_THROUGH)

Existing code of raid5-cache only has write-through mode. For write-back
cache, it is necessary to extend the state machine.

With write-back cache, every stripe could operate in two different
phases:
  - caching
  - writing-out

In caching phase, the stripe handles writes as:
  - write to journal
  - return IO

In writing-out phase, the stripe behaviors as a stripe in write through
mode R5C_MODE_WRITE_THROUGH.

STRIPE_R5C_CACHING is added to sh->state to differentiate caching and
writing-out phase.

Please note: this is a "no-op" patch for raid5-cache write-through
mode.

The following detailed explanation is copied from the raid5-cache.c:

/*
 * raid5 cache state machine
 *
 * With rhe RAID cache, each stripe works in two phases:
 *      - caching phase
 *      - writing-out phase
 *
 * These two phases are controlled by bit STRIPE_R5C_CACHING:
 *   if STRIPE_R5C_CACHING == 0, the stripe is in writing-out phase
 *   if STRIPE_R5C_CACHING == 1, the stripe is in caching phase
 *
 * When there is no journal, or the journal is in write-through mode,
 * the stripe is always in writing-out phase.
 *
 * For write-back journal, the stripe is sent to caching phase on write
 * (r5c_handle_stripe_dirtying). r5c_make_stripe_write_out() kicks off
 * the write-out phase by clearing STRIPE_R5C_CACHING.
 *
 * Stripes in caching phase do not write the raid disks. Instead, all
 * writes are committed from the log device. Therefore, a stripe in
 * caching phase handles writes as:
 *      - write to log device
 *      - return IO
 *
 * Stripes in writing-out phase handle writes as:
 *      - calculate parity
 *      - write pending data and parity to journal
 *      - write data and parity to raid disks
 *      - return IO for pending writes
 */
Signed-off-by: NSong Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NShaohua Li <shli@fb.com>

Currently, r5l_write_stripe checks meta size for each stripe write,
which is not necessary.

With this patch, r5l_init_log checks maximal meta size of the array,
which is (r5l_meta_block + raid_disks x r5l_payload_data_parity).
If this is too big to fit in one page, r5l_init_log aborts.

With current meta data, r5l_log support raid_disks up to 203.
Signed-off-by: NSong Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NShaohua Li <shli@fb.com>

lockdep reports warning of the rcu_dereference usage. Using normal rdev
access pattern to avoid the warning.
Signed-off-by: NShaohua Li <shli@fb.com>

We can calculate this offset by using ctx->meta_total_blocks,
without passing in from the function
Signed-off-by: NJackieLiu <liuyun01@kylinos.cn>
Signed-off-by: NShaohua Li <shli@fb.com>

As long as we recover one metadata block, we should write the empty metadata
write. The original code could make recovery corrupted if only one meta is
valid.
Reported-by: NZhengyuan Liu <liuzhengyuan@kylinos.cn>
Signed-off-by: NShaohua Li <shli@fb.com>

If superblock points to an invalid meta block, r5l_load_log will set
create_super with true and create an new superblock, this runtime path
would always happen if we do no writing I/O to this array since it was
created. Writing an empty meta block could avoid this unnecessary
action at the first time we created log superblock.

Another reason is for the corretness of log recovery. Currently we have
bellow code to guarantee log revocery to be correct.

        if (ctx.seq > log->last_cp_seq + 1) {
                int ret;

                ret = r5l_log_write_empty_meta_block(log, ctx.pos, ctx.seq + 10);
                if (ret)
                        return ret;
                log->seq = ctx.seq + 11;
                log->log_start = r5l_ring_add(log, ctx.pos, BLOCK_SECTORS);
                r5l_write_super(log, ctx.pos);
        } else {
                log->log_start = ctx.pos;
                log->seq = ctx.seq;
        }

If we just created a array with a journal device, log->log_start and
log->last_checkpoint should all be 0, then we write three meta block
which are valid except mid one and supposed crash happened. The ctx.seq
would equal to log->last_cp_seq + 1 and log->log_start would be set to
position of mid invalid meta block after we did a recovery, this will
lead to problems which could be avoided with this patch.
Signed-off-by: NZhengyuan Liu <liuzhengyuan@kylinos.cn>
Signed-off-by: NShaohua Li <shli@fb.com>

No initial operation was done to this field when we
load/recovery the log, it got assignment only when IO
to raid disk was finished. So r5l_quiesce may use wrong
next_checkpoint to reclaim log space, that would make
reclaimable space calculation confused.
Signed-off-by: NZhengyuan Liu <liuzhengyuan@kylinos.cn>
Signed-off-by: NShaohua Li <shli@fb.com>

There is a potential deadlock in superblock write. Discard could zero data, so
before discard we must make sure superblock is updated to new log tail.
Updating superblock (either directly call md_update_sb() or depend on md
thread) must hold reconfig mutex. On the other hand, raid5_quiesce is called
with reconfig_mutex hold. The first step of raid5_quiesce() is waitting for all
IO finish, hence waitting for reclaim thread, while reclaim thread is calling
this function and waitting for reconfig mutex. So there is a deadlock. We
workaround this issue with a trylock. The downside of the solution is we could
miss discard if we can't take reconfig mutex. But this should happen rarely
(mainly in raid array stop), so miss discard shouldn't be a big problem.

Cc: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NShaohua Li <shli@fb.com>

Since commit 63a4cc24, bio->bi_rw contains flags in the lower
portion and the op code in the higher portions. This means that
old code that relies on manually setting bi_rw is most likely
going to be broken. Instead of letting that brokeness linger,
rename the member, to force old and out-of-tree code to break
at compile time instead of at runtime.

No intended functional changes in this commit.
Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>

To avoid confusion between REQ_OP_FLUSH, which is handled by
request_fn drivers, and upper layers requesting the block layer
perform a flush sequence along with possibly a WRITE, this patch
renames REQ_FLUSH to REQ_PREFLUSH.
Signed-off-by: NMike Christie <mchristi@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: NHannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>

Separate the op from the rq_flag_bits and have md
set/get the bio using bio_set_op_attrs/bio_op.
Signed-off-by: NMike Christie <mchristi@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: NHannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>

This has callers of submit_bio/submit_bio_wait set the bio->bi_rw
instead of passing it in. This makes that use the same as
generic_make_request and how we set the other bio fields.
Signed-off-by: NMike Christie <mchristi@redhat.com>

Fixed up fs/ext4/crypto.c
Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>

Some code waits for a metadata update by:

1. flagging that it is needed (MD_CHANGE_DEVS or MD_CHANGE_CLEAN)
2. setting MD_CHANGE_PENDING and waking the management thread
3. waiting for MD_CHANGE_PENDING to be cleared

If the first two are done without locking, the code in md_update_sb()
which checks if it needs to repeat might test if an update is needed
before step 1, then clear MD_CHANGE_PENDING after step 2, resulting
in the wait returning early.

So make sure all places that set MD_CHANGE_PENDING are atomicial, and
bit_clear_unless (suggested by Neil) is introduced for the purpose.

Cc: Martin Kepplinger <martink@posteo.de>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>
Cc: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NGuoqing Jiang <gqjiang@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NShaohua Li <shli@fb.com>

Now that we converted everything to the newer block write cache
interface, kill off the queue flush_flags and queueable flush
entries.
Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>

Handle journal hotadd in quiesce to avoid creating duplicated threads.
Signed-off-by: NShaohua Li <shli@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>

Set MD_HAS_JOURNAL when a array is loaded or journal is initialized.
This is to avoid the flags set too early in journal disk hotadd.
Signed-off-by: NShaohua Li <shli@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>

And propagate the error up the stack so we can add the stripe
to no_stripes_list and retry our log operation later.  This avoids
blocking raid5d due to reclaim, an it allows to get rid of the
deadlock-prone GFP_NOFAIL allocation.

shli: add missing mempool_destroy()
Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>

We only have a limited number in flight, so use a page based mempool.
Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>

This allows us to make guaranteed forward progress.
Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>

Add support for journal disk hot add/remove. Mostly trival checks in md
part. The raid5 part is a little tricky. For hot-remove, we can't wait
pending write as it's called from raid5d. The wait will cause deadlock.
We simplily fail the hot-remove. A hot-remove retry can success
eventually since if journal disk is faulty all pending write will be
failed and finish. For hot-add, since an array supporting journal but
without journal disk will be marked read-only, we are safe to hot add
journal without stopping IO (should be read IO, while journal only
handles write IO).
Signed-off-by: NShaohua Li <shli@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>

Once the I/O completed we don't need the meta page anymore.  As the iounits
can live on for a long time this reduces memory pressure a bit.
Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: NShaohua Li <shli@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>

It's only used for one kind of move, so make that explicit.  Also clean
up the code a bit by using list_for_each_safe.
Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: NShaohua Li <shli@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>

If raid array is expected to have journal (eg, journal is set in MD
superblock feature map) and the array is started without journal disk,
start the array readonly.
Signed-off-by: NShaohua Li <shli@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>

There are 3 places the raid5-cache dispatches IO. The discard IO error
doesn't matter, so we ignore it. The superblock write IO error can be
handled in MD core. The remaining are log write and flush. When the IO
error happens, we mark log disk faulty and fail all write IO. Read IO is
still allowed to run. Userspace will get a notification too and
corresponding daemon can choose setting raid array readonly for example.
Signed-off-by: NShaohua Li <shli@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>