1. 01 7月, 2015 1 次提交
    • J
      nfs: take extra reference to fl->fl_file when running a LOCKU operation · db2efec0
      Jeff Layton 提交于
      Jean reported another crash, similar to the one fixed by feaff8e5:
      
          BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000148
          IP: [<ffffffff8124ef7f>] locks_get_lock_context+0xf/0xa0
          PGD 0
          Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP
          Modules linked in: nfsv3 nfs_layout_flexfiles rpcsec_gss_krb5 nfsv4 dns_resolver nfs fscache vmw_vsock_vmci_transport vsock cfg80211 rfkill coretemp crct10dif_pclmul ppdev vmw_balloon crc32_pclmul crc32c_intel ghash_clmulni_intel pcspkr vmxnet3 parport_pc i2c_piix4 microcode serio_raw parport nfsd floppy vmw_vmci acpi_cpufreq auth_rpcgss shpchp nfs_acl lockd grace sunrpc vmwgfx drm_kms_helper ttm drm mptspi scsi_transport_spi mptscsih ata_generic mptbase i2c_core pata_acpi
          CPU: 0 PID: 329 Comm: kworker/0:1H Not tainted 4.1.0-rc7+ #2
          Hardware name: VMware, Inc. VMware Virtual Platform/440BX Desktop Reference Platform, BIOS 6.00 07/30/2013
          Workqueue: rpciod rpc_async_schedule [sunrpc]
          30ec000
          RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff8124ef7f>]  [<ffffffff8124ef7f>] locks_get_lock_context+0xf/0xa0
          RSP: 0018:ffff8802330efc08  EFLAGS: 00010296
          RAX: ffff8802330efc58 RBX: ffff880097187c80 RCX: 0000000000000000
          RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000002 RDI: 0000000000000000
          RBP: ffff8802330efc18 R08: ffff88023fc173d8 R09: 3038b7bf00000000
          R10: 00002f1a02000000 R11: 3038b7bf00000000 R12: 0000000000000000
          R13: 0000000000000000 R14: ffff8802337a2300 R15: 0000000000000020
          FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88023fc00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
          CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
          CR2: 0000000000000148 CR3: 000000003680f000 CR4: 00000000001407f0
          Stack:
           ffff880097187c80 ffff880097187cd8 ffff8802330efc98 ffffffff81250281
           ffff8802330efc68 ffffffffa013e7df ffff8802330efc98 0000000000000246
           ffff8801f6901c00 ffff880233d2b8d8 ffff8802330efc58 ffff8802330efc58
          Call Trace:
           [<ffffffff81250281>] __posix_lock_file+0x31/0x5e0
           [<ffffffffa013e7df>] ? rpc_wake_up_task_queue_locked.part.35+0xcf/0x240 [sunrpc]
           [<ffffffff8125088b>] posix_lock_file_wait+0x3b/0xd0
           [<ffffffffa03890b2>] ? nfs41_wake_and_assign_slot+0x32/0x40 [nfsv4]
           [<ffffffffa0365808>] ? nfs41_sequence_done+0xd8/0x300 [nfsv4]
           [<ffffffffa0367525>] do_vfs_lock+0x35/0x40 [nfsv4]
           [<ffffffffa03690c1>] nfs4_locku_done+0x81/0x120 [nfsv4]
           [<ffffffffa013e310>] ? rpc_destroy_wait_queue+0x20/0x20 [sunrpc]
           [<ffffffffa013e310>] ? rpc_destroy_wait_queue+0x20/0x20 [sunrpc]
           [<ffffffffa013e33c>] rpc_exit_task+0x2c/0x90 [sunrpc]
           [<ffffffffa0134400>] ? call_refreshresult+0x170/0x170 [sunrpc]
           [<ffffffffa013ece4>] __rpc_execute+0x84/0x410 [sunrpc]
           [<ffffffffa013f085>] rpc_async_schedule+0x15/0x20 [sunrpc]
           [<ffffffff810add67>] process_one_work+0x147/0x400
           [<ffffffff810ae42b>] worker_thread+0x11b/0x460
           [<ffffffff810ae310>] ? rescuer_thread+0x2f0/0x2f0
           [<ffffffff810b35d9>] kthread+0xc9/0xe0
           [<ffffffff81010000>] ? perf_trace_xen_mmu_set_pmd+0xa0/0x160
           [<ffffffff810b3510>] ? kthread_create_on_node+0x170/0x170
           [<ffffffff8173c222>] ret_from_fork+0x42/0x70
           [<ffffffff810b3510>] ? kthread_create_on_node+0x170/0x170
          Code: a5 81 e8 85 75 e4 ff c6 05 31 ee aa 00 01 eb 98 66 66 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 0f 1f 44 00 00 55 48 89 e5 41 54 49 89 fc 53 <48> 8b 9f 48 01 00 00 48 85 db 74 08 48 89 d8 5b 41 5c 5d c3 83
          RIP  [<ffffffff8124ef7f>] locks_get_lock_context+0xf/0xa0
           RSP <ffff8802330efc08>
          CR2: 0000000000000148
          ---[ end trace 64484f16250de7ef ]---
      
      The problem is almost exactly the same as the one fixed by feaff8e5.
      We must take a reference to the struct file when running the LOCKU
      compound to prevent the final fput from running until the operation is
      complete.
      Reported-by: NJean Spector <jean@primarydata.com>
      Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jeff.layton@primarydata.com>
      Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
      Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
      db2efec0
  2. 29 6月, 2015 1 次提交
    • N
      NFSv4: When returning a delegation, don't reclaim an incompatible open mode. · 39f897fd
      NeilBrown 提交于
      It is possible to have an active open with one mode, and a delegation
      for the same file with a different mode.
      In particular, a WR_ONLY open and an RD_ONLY delegation.
      This happens if a WR_ONLY open is followed by a RD_ONLY open which
      provides a delegation, but is then close.
      
      When returning the delegation, we currently try to claim opens for
      every open type (n_rdwr, n_rdonly, n_wronly).  As there is no harm
      in claiming an open for a mode that we already have, this is often
      simplest.
      
      However if the delegation only provides a subset of the modes that we
      currently have open, this will produce an error from the server.
      
      So when claiming open modes prior to returning a delegation, skip the
      open request if the mode is not covered by the delegation - the open_stateid
      must already cover that mode, so there is nothing to do.
      Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
      Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
      39f897fd
  3. 27 6月, 2015 7 次提交
  4. 26 6月, 2015 3 次提交
  5. 24 6月, 2015 10 次提交
  6. 22 6月, 2015 1 次提交
    • T
      Merge branch 'bugfixes' · 1372a313
      Trond Myklebust 提交于
      * bugfixes:
        NFS: Ensure we set NFS_CONTEXT_RESEND_WRITES when requeuing writes
        pNFS: Fix a memory leak when attempted pnfs fails
        NFS: Ensure that we update the sequence id under the slot table lock
        nfs: Initialize cb_sequenceres information before validate_seqid()
        nfs: Only update callback sequnce id when CB_SEQUENCE success
        NFSv4: nfs4_handle_delegation_recall_error should ignore EAGAIN
      1372a313
  7. 21 6月, 2015 1 次提交
  8. 20 6月, 2015 2 次提交
  9. 18 6月, 2015 4 次提交
  10. 16 6月, 2015 10 次提交