Skip to content

cloud-kernel
cloud-kernel

openanolis / cloud-kernel
1 年多 前同步成功

通知 160
Star 36
Fork 7
cloud-kernel
cloud-kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 26 3月, 2020 1 次提交
  3. 25 3月, 2020 5 次提交
  5. 20 3月, 2020 2 次提交
    • A
      vfs: fix do_last() regression · 6073719d
      由 Al Viro 提交于 
      commit 6404674acd596de41fd3ad5f267b4525494a891a upstream

Brown paperbag time: fetching ->i_uid/->i_mode really should've been
done from nd->inode.  I even suggested that, but the reason for that has
slipped through the cracks and I went for dir->d_inode instead - made
for more "obvious" patch.

Analysis:

 - at the entry into do_last() and all the way to step_into(): dir (aka
   nd->path.dentry) is known not to have been freed; so's nd->inode and
   it's equal to dir->d_inode unless we are already doomed to -ECHILD.
   inode of the file to get opened is not known.

 - after step_into(): inode of the file to get opened is known; dir
   might be pointing to freed memory/be negative/etc.

 - at the call of may_create_in_sticky(): guaranteed to be out of RCU
   mode; inode of the file to get opened is known and pinned; dir might
   be garbage.

The last was the reason for the original patch.  Except that at the
do_last() entry we can be in RCU mode and it is possible that
nd->path.dentry->d_inode has already changed under us.

In that case we are going to fail with -ECHILD, but we need to be
careful; nd->inode is pointing to valid struct inode and it's the same
as nd->path.dentry->d_inode in "won't fail with -ECHILD" case, so we
should use that.
Reported-by: N"Rantala, Tommi T. (Nokia - FI/Espoo)" <tommi.t.rantala@nokia.com>
Reported-by: syzbot+190005201ced78a74ad6@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Wearing-brown-paperbag: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Fixes: d0cb50185ae9 ("do_last(): fetch directory ->i_mode and ->i_uid before it's too late")
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NXiaoguang Wang <xiaoguang.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
Acked-by: NJoseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com>
      6073719d
    • J
      io-wq: wait for io_wq_create() to setup necessary workers · 4c628e9d
      由 Jens Axboe 提交于 
      commit b60fda6000a99a7ccac36005ab78b14b47c06de3 upstream

We currently have a race where if setup is really slow, we can be
calling io_wq_destroy() before we're done setting up. This will cause
the caller to get stuck waiting for the manager to set things up, but
the manager already exited.

Fix this by doing a sync setup of the manager. This also fixes the case
where if we failed creating workers, we'd also get stuck.

In practice this race window was really small, as we already wait for
the manager to start. Hence someone would have to call io_wq_destroy()
after the task has started, but before it started the first loop. The
reported test case forked tons of these, which is why it became an
issue.

Reported-by: syzbot+0f1cc17f85154f400465@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Fixes: 771b53d033e8 ("io-wq: small threadpool implementation for io_uring")
Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Signed-off-by: NXiaoguang Wang <xiaoguang.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
Acked-by: NJoseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com>
      4c628e9d
  7. 19 3月, 2020 3 次提交
  9. 18 3月, 2020 29 次提交