Skip to content

cloud-kernel
cloud-kernel

openanolis / cloud-kernel
1 年多 前同步成功

通知 160
Star 36
Fork 7
cloud-kernel
cloud-kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 13 9月, 2015 6 次提交
  3. 12 8月, 2015 2 次提交
  5. 03 8月, 2015 9 次提交
    • Y
      sched/fair: Clean up load average references · 7ea241af
      由 Yuyang Du 提交于 
      For cfs_rq, we have load.weight, runnable_load_avg, and load_avg.
Clean up how they are used:

  - First, as group sched_entity already largely uses load_avg, we now expand
    to use load_avg in all cases.

  - Second, for CPU-wide load balancing, we choose to use runnable_load_avg
    in all cases, which is the same as before this series.
Signed-off-by: NYuyang Du <yuyang.du@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: arjan@linux.intel.com
Cc: bsegall@google.com
Cc: dietmar.eggemann@arm.com
Cc: fengguang.wu@intel.com
Cc: len.brown@intel.com
Cc: morten.rasmussen@arm.com
Cc: pjt@google.com
Cc: rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com
Cc: umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com
Cc: vincent.guittot@linaro.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1436918682-4971-8-git-send-email-yuyang.du@intel.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      7ea241af
    • Y
      sched/fair: Provide runnable_load_avg back to cfs_rq · 13962234
      由 Yuyang Du 提交于 
      The cfs_rq's load_avg is composed of runnable_load_avg and blocked_load_avg.
Before this series, sometimes the runnable_load_avg is used, and sometimes
the load_avg is used. Completely replacing all uses of runnable_load_avg
with load_avg may be too big a leap, i.e., the blocked_load_avg is concerned
to result in overrated load. Therefore, we get runnable_load_avg back.

The new cfs_rq's runnable_load_avg is improved to be updated with all of the
runnable sched_eneities at the same time, so the one sched_entity updated and
the others stale problem is solved.
Signed-off-by: NYuyang Du <yuyang.du@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: arjan@linux.intel.com
Cc: bsegall@google.com
Cc: dietmar.eggemann@arm.com
Cc: fengguang.wu@intel.com
Cc: len.brown@intel.com
Cc: morten.rasmussen@arm.com
Cc: pjt@google.com
Cc: rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com
Cc: umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com
Cc: vincent.guittot@linaro.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1436918682-4971-7-git-send-email-yuyang.du@intel.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      13962234
    • Y
      sched/fair: Remove task and group entity load when they are dead · 12695578
      由 Yuyang Du 提交于 
      When task exits or group is destroyed, the entity's load should be
removed from its parent cfs_rq's load. Otherwise, it will take time
for the parent cfs_rq to decay the dead entity's load to 0, which
is not desired.
Signed-off-by: NYuyang Du <yuyang.du@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: arjan@linux.intel.com
Cc: bsegall@google.com
Cc: dietmar.eggemann@arm.com
Cc: fengguang.wu@intel.com
Cc: len.brown@intel.com
Cc: morten.rasmussen@arm.com
Cc: pjt@google.com
Cc: rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com
Cc: umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com
Cc: vincent.guittot@linaro.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1436918682-4971-6-git-send-email-yuyang.du@intel.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      12695578
    • Y
      sched/fair: Init cfs_rq's sched_entity load average · 540247fb
      由 Yuyang Du 提交于 
      The runnable load and utilization averages of cfs_rq's sched_entity
were not initiated. Like done to a task, give new cfs_rq' sched_entity
start values to heavy its load in infant time.
Signed-off-by: NYuyang Du <yuyang.du@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: arjan@linux.intel.com
Cc: bsegall@google.com
Cc: dietmar.eggemann@arm.com
Cc: fengguang.wu@intel.com
Cc: len.brown@intel.com
Cc: morten.rasmussen@arm.com
Cc: pjt@google.com
Cc: rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com
Cc: umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com
Cc: vincent.guittot@linaro.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1436918682-4971-5-git-send-email-yuyang.du@intel.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      540247fb
    • V
      sched/fair: Implement update_blocked_averages() for CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED=n · 6c1d47c0
      由 Vincent Guittot 提交于 
      The load and the utilization of idle CPUs must be updated periodically in
order to decay the blocked part.

If CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED is not set, the load and util of idle cpus
are not decayed and stay at the values set before becoming idle.
Signed-off-by: NVincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NYuyang Du <yuyang.du@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: arjan@linux.intel.com
Cc: bsegall@google.com
Cc: dietmar.eggemann@arm.com
Cc: fengguang.wu@intel.com
Cc: len.brown@intel.com
Cc: morten.rasmussen@arm.com
Cc: pjt@google.com
Cc: rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com
Cc: umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1436918682-4971-4-git-send-email-yuyang.du@intel.com
[ Fixed up the SOB chain. ]
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      6c1d47c0
    • Y
      sched/fair: Rewrite runnable load and utilization average tracking · 9d89c257
      由 Yuyang Du 提交于 
      The idea of runnable load average (let runnable time contribute to weight)
was proposed by Paul Turner and Ben Segall, and it is still followed by
this rewrite. This rewrite aims to solve the following issues:

1. cfs_rq's load average (namely runnable_load_avg and blocked_load_avg) is
   updated at the granularity of an entity at a time, which results in the
   cfs_rq's load average is stale or partially updated: at any time, only
   one entity is up to date, all other entities are effectively lagging
   behind. This is undesirable.

   To illustrate, if we have n runnable entities in the cfs_rq, as time
   elapses, they certainly become outdated:

     t0: cfs_rq { e1_old, e2_old, ..., en_old }

   and when we update:

     t1: update e1, then we have cfs_rq { e1_new, e2_old, ..., en_old }

     t2: update e2, then we have cfs_rq { e1_old, e2_new, ..., en_old }

     ...

   We solve this by combining all runnable entities' load averages together
   in cfs_rq's avg, and update the cfs_rq's avg as a whole. This is based
   on the fact that if we regard the update as a function, then:

   w * update(e) = update(w * e) and

   update(e1) + update(e2) = update(e1 + e2), then

   w1 * update(e1) + w2 * update(e2) = update(w1 * e1 + w2 * e2)

   therefore, by this rewrite, we have an entirely updated cfs_rq at the
   time we update it:

     t1: update cfs_rq { e1_new, e2_new, ..., en_new }

     t2: update cfs_rq { e1_new, e2_new, ..., en_new }

     ...

2. cfs_rq's load average is different between top rq->cfs_rq and other
   task_group's per CPU cfs_rqs in whether or not blocked_load_average
   contributes to the load.

   The basic idea behind runnable load average (the same for utilization)
   is that the blocked state is taken into account as opposed to only
   accounting for the currently runnable state. Therefore, the average
   should include both the runnable/running and blocked load averages.
   This rewrite does that.

   In addition, we also combine runnable/running and blocked averages
   of all entities into the cfs_rq's average, and update it together at
   once. This is based on the fact that:

     update(runnable) + update(blocked) = update(runnable + blocked)

   This significantly reduces the code as we don't need to separately
   maintain/update runnable/running load and blocked load.

3. How task_group entities' share is calculated is complex and imprecise.

   We reduce the complexity in this rewrite to allow a very simple rule:
   the task_group's load_avg is aggregated from its per CPU cfs_rqs's
   load_avgs. Then group entity's weight is simply proportional to its
   own cfs_rq's load_avg / task_group's load_avg. To illustrate,

   if a task_group has { cfs_rq1, cfs_rq2, ..., cfs_rqn }, then,

   task_group_avg = cfs_rq1_avg + cfs_rq2_avg + ... + cfs_rqn_avg, then

   cfs_rqx's entity's share = cfs_rqx_avg / task_group_avg * task_group's share

To sum up, this rewrite in principle is equivalent to the current one, but
fixes the issues described above. Turns out, it significantly reduces the
code complexity and hence increases clarity and efficiency. In addition,
the new averages are more smooth/continuous (no spurious spikes and valleys)
and updated more consistently and quickly to reflect the load dynamics.

As a result, we have less load tracking overhead, better performance,
and especially better power efficiency due to more balanced load.
Signed-off-by: NYuyang Du <yuyang.du@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: arjan@linux.intel.com
Cc: bsegall@google.com
Cc: dietmar.eggemann@arm.com
Cc: fengguang.wu@intel.com
Cc: len.brown@intel.com
Cc: morten.rasmussen@arm.com
Cc: pjt@google.com
Cc: rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com
Cc: umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com
Cc: vincent.guittot@linaro.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1436918682-4971-3-git-send-email-yuyang.du@intel.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      9d89c257
    • Y
      sched/fair: Remove rq's runnable avg · cd126afe
      由 Yuyang Du 提交于 
      The current rq->avg is not used at all since its merge into the kernel,
and the code is in the scheduler's hot path, so remove it.
Tested-by: NDietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NYuyang Du <yuyang.du@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: NDietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: arjan@linux.intel.com
Cc: bsegall@google.com
Cc: fengguang.wu@intel.com
Cc: len.brown@intel.com
Cc: morten.rasmussen@arm.com
Cc: pjt@google.com
Cc: rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com
Cc: umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com
Cc: vincent.guittot@linaro.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1436918682-4971-2-git-send-email-yuyang.du@intel.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      cd126afe
    • M
      sched/fair: Beef up wake_wide() · 63b0e9ed
      由 Mike Galbraith 提交于 
      Josef Bacik reported that Facebook sees better performance with their
1:N load (1 dispatch/node, N workers/node) when carrying an old patch
to try very hard to wake to an idle CPU.  While looking at wake_wide(),
I noticed that it doesn't pay attention to the wakeup of a many partner
waker, returning 1 only when waking one of its many partners.

Correct that, letting explicit domain flags override the heuristic.

While at it, adjust task_struct bits, we don't need a 64-bit counter.
Tested-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NMike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com>
[ Tidy things up. ]
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: kernel-team<Kernel-team@fb.com>
Cc: morten.rasmussen@arm.com
Cc: riel@redhat.com
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1436888390.7983.49.camel@gmail.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      63b0e9ed
    • Y
      sched/fair: Avoid pulling all tasks in idle balancing · 985d3a4c
      由 Yuyang Du 提交于 
      In idle balancing where a CPU going idle pulls tasks from another CPU,
a livelock may happen if the CPU pulls all tasks from another, makes
it idle, and this iterates. So just avoid this.
Reported-by: NRabin Vincent <rabin.vincent@axis.com>
Signed-off-by: NYuyang Du <yuyang.du@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com>
Cc: Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com>
Cc: Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150705221151.GF5197@intel.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      985d3a4c
  7. 07 7月, 2015 5 次提交
  9. 06 7月, 2015 1 次提交
  11. 04 7月, 2015 1 次提交
    • S
      sched/numa: Fix numa balancing stats in /proc/pid/sched · 397f2378
      由 Srikar Dronamraju 提交于 
      Commit 44dba3d5 ("sched: Refactor task_struct to use
numa_faults instead of numa_* pointers") modified the way
tsk->numa_faults stats are accounted.

However that commit never touched show_numa_stats() that is displayed
in /proc/pid/sched and thus the numbers displayed in /proc/pid/sched
don't match the actual numbers.

Fix it by making sure that /proc/pid/sched reflects the task
fault numbers. Also add group fault stats too.

Also couple of more modifications are added here:

1. Format changes:

  - Previously we would list two entries per node, one for private
    and one for shared. Also the home node info was listed in each entry.

  - Now preferred node, total_faults and current node are
    displayed separately.

  - Now there is one entry per node, that lists private,shared task and
    group faults.

2. Unit changes:

  - p->numa_pages_migrated was getting reset after every read of
    /proc/pid/sched. It's more useful to have absolute numbers since
    differential migrations between two accesses can be more easily
    calculated.
Signed-off-by: NSrikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: NRik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: Iulia Manda <iulia.manda21@gmail.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1435252903-1081-4-git-send-email-srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      397f2378
  13. 19 6月, 2015 1 次提交
  15. 11 6月, 2015 1 次提交
    • M
      sched, numa: do not hint for NUMA balancing on VM_MIXEDMAP mappings · 8e76d4ee
      由 Mel Gorman 提交于 
      Jovi Zhangwei reported the following problem

  Below kernel vm bug can be triggered by tcpdump which mmaped a lot of pages
  with GFP_COMP flag.

  [Mon May 25 05:29:33 2015] page:ffffea0015414000 count:66 mapcount:1 mapping:          (null) index:0x0
  [Mon May 25 05:29:33 2015] flags: 0x20047580004000(head)
  [Mon May 25 05:29:33 2015] page dumped because: VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(compound_order(page) && !PageTransHuge(page))
  [Mon May 25 05:29:33 2015] ------------[ cut here ]------------
  [Mon May 25 05:29:33 2015] kernel BUG at mm/migrate.c:1661!
  [Mon May 25 05:29:33 2015] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP

In this case it was triggered by running tcpdump but it's not necessary
reproducible on all systems.

  sudo tcpdump -i bond0.100 'tcp port 4242' -c 100000000000 -w 4242.pcap

Compound pages cannot be migrated and it was not expected that such pages
be marked for NUMA balancing.  This did not take into account that drivers
such as net/packet/af_packet.c may insert compound pages into userspace
with vm_insert_page.  This patch tells the NUMA balancing protection
scanner to skip all VM_MIXEDMAP mappings which avoids the possibility that
compound pages are marked for migration.
Signed-off-by: NMel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Reported-by: NJovi Zhangwei <jovi@cloudflare.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      8e76d4ee
  17. 07 6月, 2015 3 次提交
    • R
      sched/numa: Only consider less busy nodes as numa balancing destinations · 6f9aad0b
      由 Rik van Riel 提交于 
      Changeset a43455a1 ("sched/numa: Ensure task_numa_migrate() checks
the preferred node") fixes an issue where workloads would never
converge on a fully loaded (or overloaded) system.

However, it introduces a regression on less than fully loaded systems,
where workloads converge on a few NUMA nodes, instead of properly
staying spread out across the whole system. This leads to a reduction
in available memory bandwidth, and usable CPU cache, with predictable
performance problems.

The root cause appears to be an interaction between the load balancer
and NUMA balancing, where the short term load represented by the load
balancer differs from the long term load the NUMA balancing code would
like to base its decisions on.

Simply reverting a43455a1 would re-introduce the non-convergence
of workloads on fully loaded systems, so that is not a good option. As
an aside, the check done before a43455a1 only applied to a task's
preferred node, not to other candidate nodes in the system, so the
converge-on-too-few-nodes problem still happens, just to a lesser
degree.

Instead, try to compensate for the impedance mismatch between the load
balancer and NUMA balancing by only ever considering a lesser loaded
node as a destination for NUMA balancing, regardless of whether the
task is trying to move to the preferred node, or to another node.

This patch also addresses the issue that a system with a single
runnable thread would never migrate that thread to near its memory,
introduced by 095bebf6 ("sched/numa: Do not move past the balance
point if unbalanced").

A test where the main thread creates a large memory area, and spawns a
worker thread to iterate over the memory (placed on another node by
select_task_rq_fair), after which the main thread goes to sleep and
waits for the worker thread to loop over all the memory now sees the
worker thread migrated to where the memory is, instead of having all
the memory migrated over like before.

Jirka has run a number of performance tests on several systems: single
instance SpecJBB 2005 performance is 7-15% higher on a 4 node system,
with higher gains on systems with more cores per socket.
Multi-instance SpecJBB 2005 (one per node), linpack, and stream see
little or no changes with the revert of 095bebf6 and this patch.
Reported-by: NArtem Bityutski <dedekind1@gmail.com>
Reported-by: NJirka Hladky <jhladky@redhat.com>
Tested-by: NJirka Hladky <jhladky@redhat.com>
Tested-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NRik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: NMel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150528095249.3083ade0@annuminas.surriel.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      6f9aad0b
    • R
      Revert 095bebf6 ("sched/numa: Do not move past the balance point if unbalanced") · e4991b24
      由 Rik van Riel 提交于 
      Commit 095bebf6 ("sched/numa: Do not move past the balance point
if unbalanced") broke convergence of workloads with just one runnable
thread, by making it impossible for the one runnable thread on the
system to move from one NUMA node to another.

Instead, the thread would remain where it was, and pull all the memory
across to its location, which is much slower than just migrating the
thread to where the memory is.

The next patch has a better fix for the issue that 095bebf6 tried
to address.
Reported-by: NJirka Hladky <jhladky@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NRik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: dedekind1@gmail.com
Cc: mgorman@suse.de
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1432753468-7785-2-git-send-email-riel@redhat.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      e4991b24
    • B
      sched/fair: Prevent throttling in early pick_next_task_fair() · 54d27365
      由 Ben Segall 提交于 
      The optimized task selection logic optimistically selects a new task
to run without first doing a full put_prev_task(). This is so that we
can avoid a put/set on the common ancestors of the old and new task.

Similarly, we should only call check_cfs_rq_runtime() to throttle
eligible groups if they're part of the common ancestry, otherwise it
is possible to end up with no eligible task in the simple task
selection.

Imagine:
		/root
	/prev		/next
	/A		/B

If our optimistic selection ends up throttling /next, we goto simple
and our put_prev_task() ends up throttling /prev, after which we're
going to bug out in set_next_entity() because there aren't any tasks
left.

Avoid this scenario by only throttling common ancestors.
Reported-by: NMohammed Naser <mnaser@vexxhost.com>
Reported-by: NKonstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@yandex-team.ru>
Signed-off-by: NBen Segall <bsegall@google.com>
[ munged Changelog ]
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Roman Gushchin <klamm@yandex-team.ru>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: pjt@google.com
Fixes: 678d5718 ("sched/fair: Optimize cgroup pick_next_task_fair()")
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/xm26wq1oswoq.fsf@sword-of-the-dawn.mtv.corp.google.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      54d27365
  19. 19 5月, 2015 1 次提交
  21. 18 5月, 2015 1 次提交
    • P
      sched,perf: Fix periodic timers · 4cfafd30
      由 Peter Zijlstra 提交于 
      In the below two commits (see Fixes) we have periodic timers that can
stop themselves when they're no longer required, but need to be
(re)-started when their idle condition changes.

Further complications is that we want the timer handler to always do
the forward such that it will always correctly deal with the overruns,
and we do not want to race such that the handler has already decided
to stop, but the (external) restart sees the timer still active and we
end up with a 'lost' timer.

The problem with the current code is that the re-start can come before
the callback does the forward, at which point the forward from the
callback will WARN about forwarding an enqueued timer.

Now, conceptually its easy to detect if you're before or after the fwd
by comparing the expiration time against the current time. Of course,
that's expensive (and racy) because we don't have the current time.

Alternatively one could cache this state inside the timer, but then
everybody pays the overhead of maintaining this extra state, and that
is undesired.

The only other option that I could see is the external timer_active
variable, which I tried to kill before. I would love a nicer interface
for this seemingly simple 'problem' but alas.

Fixes: 272325c4 ("perf: Fix mux_interval hrtimer wreckage")
Fixes: 77a4d1a1 ("sched: Cleanup bandwidth timers")
Cc: pjt@google.com
Cc: tglx@linutronix.de
Cc: klamm@yandex-team.ru
Cc: mingo@kernel.org
Cc: bsegall@google.com
Cc: hpa@zytor.com
Cc: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150514102311.GX21418@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net
      4cfafd30
  23. 17 5月, 2015 1 次提交
    • N
      sched: Fix function declaration return type mismatch · 58ac93e4
      由 Nicholas Mc Guire 提交于 
      static code checking was unhappy with:

  ./kernel/sched/fair.c:162 WARNING: return of wrong type
                int != unsigned int

get_update_sysctl_factor() is declared to return int but is
currently  returning an unsigned int. The first few preprocessed
lines are:

 static int get_update_sysctl_factor(void)
 {
 unsigned int cpus = ({ int __min1 = (cpumask_weight(cpu_online_mask));
 int __min2 = (8); __min1 < __min2 ? __min1: __min2; });
 unsigned int factor;

The type used by min_t() should be 'unsigned int' and the return type
of get_update_sysctl_factor() should also be 'unsigned int' as its
call-site update_sysctl() is expecting 'unsigned int' and the values
utilizing:

  'factor'
  'sysctl_sched_min_granularity'
  'sched_nr_latency'
  'sysctl_sched_wakeup_granularity'

... are also all 'unsigned int', plus cpumask_weight() is also
returning 'unsigned int'.

So the natural type to use around here is 'unsigned int'.

( Patch was compile tested with x86_64_defconfig +
  CONFIG_SCHED_DEBUG=y and the changed sections in
  kernel/sched/fair.i were reviewed. )
Signed-off-by: NNicholas Mc Guire <hofrat@osadl.org>
[ Improved the changelog a bit. ]
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1431716742-11077-1-git-send-email-hofrat@osadl.orgSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      58ac93e4
  25. 08 5月, 2015 3 次提交
  27. 22 4月, 2015 2 次提交
  29. 08 4月, 2015 1 次提交
  31. 27 3月, 2015 2 次提交
    • P
      sched: Improve load balancing in the presence of idle CPUs · d4573c3e
      由 Preeti U Murthy 提交于 
      When a CPU is kicked to do nohz idle balancing, it wakes up to do load
balancing on itself, followed by load balancing on behalf of idle CPUs.
But it may end up with load after the load balancing attempt on itself.
This aborts nohz idle balancing. As a result several idle CPUs are left
without tasks till such a time that an ILB CPU finds it unfavorable to
pull tasks upon itself. This delays spreading of load across idle CPUs
and worse, clutters only a few CPUs with tasks.

The effect of the above problem was observed on an SMT8 POWER server
with 2 levels of numa domains. Busy loops equal to number of cores were
spawned. Since load balancing on fork/exec is discouraged across numa
domains, all busy loops would start on one of the numa domains. However
it was expected that eventually one busy loop would run per core across
all domains due to nohz idle load balancing. But it was observed that it
took as long as 10 seconds to spread the load across numa domains.

Further investigation showed that this was a consequence of the
following:

 1. An ILB CPU was chosen from the first numa domain to trigger nohz idle
    load balancing [Given the experiment, upto 6 CPUs per core could be
    potentially idle in this domain.]

 2. However the ILB CPU would call load_balance() on itself before
    initiating nohz idle load balancing.

 3. Given cores are SMT8, the ILB CPU had enough opportunities to pull
    tasks from its sibling cores to even out load.

 4. Now that the ILB CPU was no longer idle, it would abort nohz idle
    load balancing

As a result the opportunities to spread load across numa domains were
lost until such a time that the cores within the first numa domain had
equal number of tasks among themselves.  This is a pretty bad scenario,
since the cores within the first numa domain would have as many as 4
tasks each, while cores in the neighbouring numa domains would all
remain idle.

Fix this, by checking if a CPU was woken up to do nohz idle load
balancing, before it does load balancing upon itself. This way we allow
idle CPUs across the system to do load balancing which results in
quicker spread of load, instead of performing load balancing within the
local sched domain hierarchy of the ILB CPU alone under circumstances
such as above.
Signed-off-by: NPreeti U Murthy <preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: NJason Low <jason.low2@hp.com>
Cc: benh@kernel.crashing.org
Cc: daniel.lezcano@linaro.org
Cc: efault@gmx.de
Cc: iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com
Cc: morten.rasmussen@arm.com
Cc: pjt@google.com
Cc: riel@redhat.com
Cc: srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com
Cc: vincent.guittot@linaro.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150326130014.21532.17158.stgit@preeti.in.ibm.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      d4573c3e
    • P
      sched: Optimize freq invariant accounting · dfbca41f
      由 Peter Zijlstra 提交于 
      Currently the freq invariant accounting (in
__update_entity_runnable_avg() and sched_rt_avg_update()) get the
scale factor from a weak function call, this means that even for archs
that default on their implementation the compiler cannot see into this
function and optimize the extra scaling math away.

This is sad, esp. since its a 64-bit multiplication which can be quite
costly on some platforms.

So replace the weak function with #ifdef and __always_inline goo. This
is not quite as nice from an arch support PoV but should at least
result in compile time errors if done wrong.
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>
Cc: Morten.Rasmussen@arm.com
Cc: Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>
Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Cc: dietmar.eggemann@arm.com
Cc: efault@gmx.de
Cc: kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: nicolas.pitre@linaro.org
Cc: preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: riel@redhat.com
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150323131905.GF23123@twins.programming.kicks-ass.netSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      dfbca41f