This is purely preparation for upcoming commits, there should be no
code changes here.
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

This is purely preparation for upcoming commits, there should be no
code changes here.
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

This is purely preparation for upcoming commits, there should be no
code changes here.
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

This is purely preparation for upcoming commits, there should be no
code changes here.
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

This is purely preparation for upcoming commits, there should be no
code changes here.
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

This is purely preparation for upcoming commits, there should be no
code changes here.
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

This is purely preparation for upcoming commits, there should be no
code changes here.
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

This is purely preparation for upcoming commits, there should be no
code changes here.
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

This is purely preparation for upcoming commits, there should be no
code changes here.
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

This is purely preparation for upcoming commits, there should be no
code changes here.
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

This is purely preparation for upcoming commits, there should be no
code changes here.
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

This is purely preparation for upcoming commits, there should be no
code changes here.
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

This is purely preparation for upcoming commits, there should be no
code changes here.
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

This is purely preparation for upcoming commits, there should be no
code changes here.
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

This is purely preparation for upcoming commits, there should be no
code changes here.
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

This is purely preparation for upcoming commits, there should be no
code changes here.
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

This is purely preparation for upcoming commits, there should be no
code changes here.
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

Pretty much every subdev/engine is going to need access to nvkm_device
shortly to touch registers and/or output messages.

The odd placement of the includes is necessary to work around some
inter-dependencies that currently exist.  This will be fixed later.
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

Will be utilised in upcoming commits to remove the need for heuristics
to lookup the device a subdev belongs to.
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

Only a handful of machines have this enabled by default, where it's been
proven to work.  The workaround can be explicitly enabled with a module
option also.

Still waiting on feedback from NVIDIA for a proper idea of exactly what
this fix is doing, and how to implement it properly.
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

We only need to mask 0x0f on GM2xx, and want to keep the higher bits on
earlier cards.
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

We previously assumed that the values "2" and "4" were new in DCB 4.1,
however, there's at least one GM107 DCB 4.0 board (Quadro K620) that
uses the newer values.
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

Signed-off-by: NIlia Mirkin <imirkin@alum.mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

No known VBIOSes use these, but they are present in the actual VBIOS
table parsing logic. No harm in adding these too.
Signed-off-by: NIlia Mirkin <imirkin@alum.mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

According to the tstate calculation in nvkm_clk_tstate(),
the range of tstate is from -(clk->state_nr - 1) to 0,
it mean the tstate is negative value. But in nvkm_pstate_work(),
it use (clk->state_nr - 1 - clk->tstate) to limit pstate,
it's not correct.
This patch fix it to use (clk->state_nr - 1 + clk->tstate) to
limit pstate.
Signed-off-by: NWei Ni <wni@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

Tested on a few cards. Probably works quite well for most, given they should
all be GDDR3.
Signed-off-by: NRoy Spliet <rspliet@eclipso.eu>
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

Signed-off-by: NRoy Spliet <rspliet@eclipso.eu>
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

This looks surprisingly similar to scripts on earlier cards as well
but they don't seem to work just yet. That... and I don't have any, which
makes it a tough job to reverse engineer.
Signed-off-by: NRoy Spliet <rspliet@eclipso.eu>
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

Signed-off-by: NRoy Spliet <rspliet@eclipso.eu>
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

Some of the bits in there are similar to the bits in the gt215 rammap.
Signed-off-by: NRoy Spliet <rspliet@eclipso.eu>
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

Might need some generalisation to < GT200. For those: use at your own risk!
Signed-off-by: NRoy Spliet <rspliet@eclipso.eu>
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

Signed-off-by: NRoy Spliet <rspliet@eclipso.eu>
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

Like on GT215
Signed-off-by: NRoy Spliet <rspliet@eclipso.eu>
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

In preparation of NV50 reclocking, where there is no version
Signed-off-by: NRoy Spliet <rspliet@eclipso.eu>
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

More analysis shows that this is identical to 0x79 except that it loads
the frequency indirectly from elsewhere in the VBIOS.

Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91025Signed-off-by: NIlia Mirkin <imirkin@alum.mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

Opcode 0x5a is a register write for data looked up from another part of
the VBIOS image. 0x59 is a more complex opcode, but we may as well
recognize it. These occur on a single known instance of Riva TNT2
hardware.

Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91025Signed-off-by: NIlia Mirkin <imirkin@alum.mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

Increase clock timeout for SYS, FPB and GPC in order to avoid operation
failure at high gpcclk rate.
Signed-off-by: NAlexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

This difference can of course be negative too...
Signed-off-by: NRoy Spliet <rspliet@eclipso.eu>
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

This fixes the list_del corruption reported
at <https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1205985>.
Signed-off-by: NKamil Dudka <kdudka@redhat.com>