CPUFREQ_UPDATE_POLICY_CPU notifications were used only from cpufreq-stats which
doesn't use it anymore. Remove them.

This also decrements values of other notification macros defined after
CPUFREQ_UPDATE_POLICY_CPU by 1 to remove gaps. Hopefully all users are using
macro's instead of direct numbers and so they wouldn't break as macro values are
changed now.
Reviewed-by: NPrarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

'last_cpu' was used only from cpufreq-stats and isn't used anymore. Get rid of
it.
Reviewed-by: NPrarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

We need to initialize completion and work only on policy allocation and not
really on the policy restore side and so we better move this piece of code to
cpufreq_policy_alloc().
Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

CPUFREQ_STICKY flag is set by drivers which don't want to get unregistered
even if cpufreq-core isn't able to initialize policy for any CPU.

When this flag isn't set, we try to unregister the driver. To find out
which CPUs are registered and which are not, we try to check per_cpu
cpufreq_cpu_data for all CPUs. Because we have a list of valid policies
available now, we better check if the list is empty or not instead of
the 'for' loop. That will be much more efficient.
Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

These variables are just used within adjust_jiffies() and so must be
local to it. Also there is no need of a dummy routine for CONFIG_SMP
case as we can take care of all that with help of macros in the same
routine. It doesn't look that ugly.
Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

We just need to check if a 'policy' is already present for the cpu we are
adding. We don't need to take all the locks and do kobject usage updates. Use
the light-weight cpufreq_cpu_get_raw() routine instead.
Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

There is no need of this separate variable, use 'policy' instead.
Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

These are messing up more than the benefit they provide. It isn't
a lot of code anyway, that we will compile without them.

Kill them.
Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

We should first check if a cpufreq driver is already registered or not
before updating driver_data->flags.
Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

There is no point finding out the 'policy' again within __cpufreq_get()
when all the callers already have it. Just make them pass policy instead.
Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

There is no point finding out the 'policy' again within cpufreq_out_of_sync()
when all the callers already have it. Just make them pass policy instead.
Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Either we can be setpolicy or target type, nothing else. And so the
else part of setpolicy will automatically be of has_target() type.
And so we don't need to check it again.
Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Remove unnecessary from find_governor's name.
Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

There are two 'if' blocks here, checking for !cpufreq_driver->setpolicy and
has_target(). Both are actually doing the same thing, merge them.
Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

No need of an unnecessary line break.
Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

We can live without it and so we should.
Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

It doesn't make any sense at all and is a leftover of some earlier commit.
Remove it.
Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

We should stop cpufreq governors when we shut down the system.  If we
don't do this, we can end up with this deadlock:

1. cpufreq governor may be running on a CPU other than CPU0.
2. In machine_restart() we call smp_send_stop() which stops CPUs.
   If one of these CPUs was actively running a cpufreq governor
   then it may have the mutex / spinlock needed to access the main
   PMIC in the system (perhaps over I2C)
3. If a machine needs access to the main PMIC in order to shutdown
   then it will never get it since the mutex was lost when the other
   CPU stopped.
4. We'll hang (possibly eventually hitting the hard lockup detector).

Let's avoid the problem by stopping the cpufreq governor at shutdown,
which is a sensible thing to do anyway.
Signed-off-by: NDoug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

If ACPI _PPC changed notification happens before governor was initiated
while kernel is booting, a NULL pointer dereference will be triggered:

BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000030
 IP: [<ffffffff81470453>] __cpufreq_governor+0x23/0x1e0
 PGD 0
 Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP
 ... ...
 RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff81470453>]  [<ffffffff81470453>]
 __cpufreq_governor+0x23/0x1e0
 RSP: 0018:ffff881fcfbcfbb8  EFLAGS: 00010286
 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff881fd11b3980 RCX: ffff88407fc20000
 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: ffff881fd11b3980
 RBP: ffff881fcfbcfbd8 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 000000000000000f
 R10: ffffffff818068d0 R11: 0000000000000043 R12: 0000000000000004
 R13: 0000000000000000 R14: ffffffff8196cae0 R15: 0000000000000000
 FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff881fffc00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
 CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
 CR2: 0000000000000030 CR3: 00000000018ae000 CR4: 00000000000407f0
 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
 Process kworker/0:3 (pid: 750, threadinfo ffff881fcfbce000, task
 ffff881fcf556400)
 Stack:
  ffff881fffc17d00 ffff881fcfbcfc18 ffff881fd11b3980 0000000000000000
  ffff881fcfbcfc08 ffffffff81470d08 ffff881fd11b3980 0000000000000007
  ffff881fcfbcfc18 ffff881fffc17d00 ffff881fcfbcfd28 ffffffff81472e9a
 Call Trace:
  [<ffffffff81470d08>] __cpufreq_set_policy+0x1b8/0x2e0
  [<ffffffff81472e9a>] cpufreq_update_policy+0xca/0x150
  [<ffffffff81472f20>] ? cpufreq_update_policy+0x150/0x150
  [<ffffffff81324a96>] acpi_processor_ppc_has_changed+0x71/0x7b
  [<ffffffff81320bcd>] acpi_processor_notify+0x55/0x115
  [<ffffffff812f9c29>] acpi_device_notify+0x19/0x1b
  [<ffffffff813084ca>] acpi_ev_notify_dispatch+0x41/0x5f
  [<ffffffff812f64a4>] acpi_os_execute_deferred+0x27/0x34

The root cause is a race conditon -- cpufreq core and acpi-cpufreq driver
were initiated, but cpufreq_governor wasn't and _PPC changed notification
happened, __cpufreq_governor() was called within acpi_os_execute_deferred
kernel thread context.

To fix this panic issue, add pointer checking code in __cpufreq_governor()
before pointer policy->governor is to be dereferenced.
Signed-off-by: NEthan Zhao <ethan.zhao@oracle.com>
Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Currently there is no callback for cpufreq drivers which is called once the
policy is ready to be used. There are some requirements where such a callback is
required.

One of them is registering a cooling device with the help of
of_cpufreq_cooling_register(). This routine tries to get 'struct cpufreq_policy'
for CPUs which isn't yet initialed at the time ->init() is called and so we face
issues while registering the cooling device.

Because we can't register cooling device from ->init(), we need a callback that
is called after the policy is ready to be used and hence we introduce ->ready()
callback.
Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: NEduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
Tested-by: NEduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: NLukasz Majewski <l.majewski@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Do it before it's assigned to cpufreq_cpu_data, otherwise when a driver
tries to get the cpu frequency during initialization the policy kobj is
referenced and we get this warning:

------------[ cut here ]------------
WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 64 at include/linux/kref.h:47 kobject_get+0x64/0x70()
Modules linked in:
CPU: 1 PID: 64 Comm: irq/77-tegra-ac Not tainted 3.18.0-rc4-next-20141114ccu-00050-g3eff942 #326
[<c0016fac>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<c001272c>] (show_stack+0x10/0x14)
[<c001272c>] (show_stack) from [<c06085d8>] (dump_stack+0x98/0xd8)
[<c06085d8>] (dump_stack) from [<c002892c>] (warn_slowpath_common+0x84/0xb4)
[<c002892c>] (warn_slowpath_common) from [<c00289f8>] (warn_slowpath_null+0x1c/0x24)
[<c00289f8>] (warn_slowpath_null) from [<c0220290>] (kobject_get+0x64/0x70)
[<c0220290>] (kobject_get) from [<c03e944c>] (cpufreq_cpu_get+0x88/0xc8)
[<c03e944c>] (cpufreq_cpu_get) from [<c03e9500>] (cpufreq_get+0xc/0x64)
[<c03e9500>] (cpufreq_get) from [<c0285288>] (actmon_thread_isr+0x134/0x198)
[<c0285288>] (actmon_thread_isr) from [<c0069008>] (irq_thread_fn+0x1c/0x40)
[<c0069008>] (irq_thread_fn) from [<c0069324>] (irq_thread+0x134/0x174)
[<c0069324>] (irq_thread) from [<c0040290>] (kthread+0xdc/0xf4)
[<c0040290>] (kthread) from [<c000f4b8>] (ret_from_fork+0x14/0x3c)
---[ end trace b7bd64a81b340c59 ]---
Signed-off-by: NTomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@collabora.com>
Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

When the user space tries to set scaling_(max|min)_freq through
sysfs, the cpufreq_set_policy() asks other driver's opinions
for the max/min frequencies. Some device drivers, like Tegra
CPU EDP which is not upstreamed yet though, may constrain the
CPU maximum frequency dynamically because of board design.
So if the user space access happens and some driver is capping
the cpu frequency at the same time, the user_policy->(max|min)
is overridden by the capped value, and that's not expected by
the user space. And if the user space is not invoked again,
the CPU will always be capped by the user_policy->(max|min)
even no drivers limit the CPU frequency any more.

This patch preserves the user specified min/max settings, so that
every time the cpufreq policy is updated, the new max/min can
be re-evaluated correctly based on the user's expection and
the present device drivers' status.
Signed-off-by: NVince Hsu <vinceh@nvidia.com>
Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

When resuming from s2ram on an SMP system without cpufreq operating
points (e.g. there's no "operating-points" property for the CPU node in
DT, or the platform doesn't use DT yet), the kernel crashes when
bringing CPU 1 online:

    Enabling non-boot CPUs ...
    CPU1: Booted secondary processor
    Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 0000003c
    pgd = ee5e6b00
    [0000003c] *pgd=6e579003, *pmd=6e588003, *pte=00000000
    Internal error: Oops: a07 [#1] SMP ARM
    Modules linked in:
    CPU: 0 PID: 1246 Comm: s2ram Tainted: G        W      3.18.0-rc3-koelsch-01614-g0377af242bb175c8-dirty #589
    task: eeec5240 ti: ee704000 task.ti: ee704000
    PC is at __cpufreq_add_dev.isra.24+0x24c/0x77c
    LR is at __cpufreq_add_dev.isra.24+0x244/0x77c
    pc : [<c0298efc>]    lr : [<c0298ef4>]    psr: 60000153
    sp : ee705d48  ip : ee705d48  fp : ee705d84
    r10: c04e0450  r9 : 00000000  r8 : 00000001
    r7 : c05426a8  r6 : 00000001  r5 : 00000001  r4 : 00000000
    r3 : 00000000  r2 : 00000000  r1 : 20000153  r0 : c0542734

Verify that policy is not NULL before dereferencing it to fix this.
Signed-off-by: NGeert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
Fixes: 8414809c (cpufreq: Preserve policy structure across suspend/resume)
Cc: 3.12+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.12+
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Currently the core does not expose scaling_cur_freq for set_policy()
drivers this breaks some userspace monitoring tools.
Change the core to expose this file for all drivers and if the
set_policy() driver supports the get() callback use it to retrieve the
current frequency.

Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=73741
Cc: All applicable <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NDirk Brandewie <dirk.j.brandewie@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

This commit extends the cpufreq_driver structure with an additional
'void *driver_data' field that can be filled by the ->probe() function
of a cpufreq driver to pass additional custom information to the
driver itself.

A new function called cpufreq_get_driver_data() is added to allow a
cpufreq driver to retrieve those driver data, since they are typically
needed from a cpufreq_policy->init() callback, which does not have
access to the cpufreq_driver structure. This function call is similar
to the existing cpufreq_get_current_driver() function call.
Signed-off-by: NThomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Commit 8e30444e ("cpufreq: fix cpufreq suspend/resume for intel_pstate")
introduced a bug where the governors wouldn't be stopped anymore for
->target{_index}() drivers during suspend. This happens because
'cpufreq_suspended' is updated before stopping the governors during suspend
and due to this __cpufreq_governor() would return early due to this check:

	/* Don't start any governor operations if we are entering suspend */
	if (cpufreq_suspended)
		return 0;

Fixes: 8e30444e ("cpufreq: fix cpufreq suspend/resume for intel_pstate")
Cc: 3.15+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.15+: 8e30444e "cpufreq: fix cpufreq suspend/resume for intel_pstate"
Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

The kernel used to contain two functions for length-delimited,
case-insensitive string comparison, strnicmp with correct semantics
and a slightly buggy strncasecmp. The latter is the POSIX name, so
strnicmp was renamed to strncasecmp, and strnicmp made into a wrapper
for the new strncasecmp to avoid breaking existing users.

To allow the compat wrapper strnicmp to be removed at some point in
the future, and to avoid the extra indirection cost, do
s/strnicmp/strncasecmp/g.
Signed-off-by: NRasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Commit 367dc4aa ("cpufreq: Add stop CPU callback to
cpufreq_driver interface") introduced the stop CPU callback for
intel_pstate drivers. During the CPU_DOWN_PREPARE stage, this
callback is invoked so that drivers can take some action on the
pstate of the cpu before it is taken offline. This callback was
assumed to be useful only for those drivers which have implemented
the set_policy CPU callback because they have no other way to take
action about the cpufreq of a CPU which is being hotplugged out
except in the exit callback which is called very late in the offline
process.

The drivers which implement the target/target_index callbacks were
expected to take care of requirements like the ones that commit
367dc4aa addresses in the GOV_STOP notification event. But there
are disadvantages to restricting the usage of stop CPU callback
to cpufreq drivers that implement the set_policy callbacks and who
want to take explicit action on the setting the cpufreq during a
hotplug operation.

1.GOV_STOP gets called for every CPU offline and drivers would usually
want to take action when the last cpu in the policy->cpus mask
is taken offline. As long as there is more than one cpu in the
policy->cpus mask, cpufreq core itself makes sure that the freq
for the other cpus in this mask is set according to the maximum load.
This is sensible and drivers which implement the target_index callback
would mostly not want to modify that. However the cpufreq core leaves a
loose end when the cpu in the policy->cpus mask is the last one to go offline;
it does nothing explicit to the frequency of the core. Drivers may need
a way to take some action here and stop CPU callback mechanism is the
best way to do it today.

2. We cannot implement driver specific actions in the GOV_STOP mechanism.
So we will need another driver callback which is invoked from here which is
unnecessary.

Therefore this patch extends the usage of stop CPU callback to be used
by all cpufreq drivers as long as they have this callback implemented
and irrespective of whether they are set_policy/target_index drivers.
The assumption is if the drivers find the GOV_STOP path to be a suitable
way of implementing what they want to do with the freq of the cpu
going offine,they will not implement the stop CPU callback at all.
Signed-off-by: NPreeti U Murthy <preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

While debugging a cpufreq-related hardware failure on a system I saw the
following lockdep warning:

 =========================
 [ BUG: held lock freed! ] 3.17.0-rc4+ #1 Tainted: G            E
 -------------------------
 insmod/2247 is freeing memory ffff88006e1b1400-ffff88006e1b17ff, with a lock still held there!
  (&policy->rwsem){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffff8156d37d>] __cpufreq_add_dev.isra.21+0x47d/0xb80
 3 locks held by insmod/2247:
  #0:  (subsys mutex#5){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff81485579>] subsys_interface_register+0x69/0x120
  #1:  (cpufreq_rwsem){.+.+.+}, at: [<ffffffff8156cf73>] __cpufreq_add_dev.isra.21+0x73/0xb80
  #2:  (&policy->rwsem){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffff8156d37d>] __cpufreq_add_dev.isra.21+0x47d/0xb80

 stack backtrace:
 CPU: 0 PID: 2247 Comm: insmod Tainted: G            E  3.17.0-rc4+ #1
 Hardware name: HP ProLiant MicroServer Gen8, BIOS J06 08/24/2013
  0000000000000000 000000008f3063c4 ffff88006f87bb30 ffffffff8171b358
  ffff88006bcf3750 ffff88006f87bb68 ffffffff810e09e1 ffff88006e1b1400
  ffffea0001b86c00 ffffffff8156d327 ffff880073003500 0000000000000246
 Call Trace:
  [<ffffffff8171b358>] dump_stack+0x4d/0x66
  [<ffffffff810e09e1>] debug_check_no_locks_freed+0x171/0x180
  [<ffffffff8156d327>] ? __cpufreq_add_dev.isra.21+0x427/0xb80
  [<ffffffff8121412b>] kfree+0xab/0x2b0
  [<ffffffff8156d327>] __cpufreq_add_dev.isra.21+0x427/0xb80
  [<ffffffff81724cf7>] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x27/0x40
  [<ffffffffa003517f>] ? pcc_cpufreq_do_osc+0x17f/0x17f [pcc_cpufreq]
  [<ffffffff8156da8e>] cpufreq_add_dev+0xe/0x10
  [<ffffffff814855d1>] subsys_interface_register+0xc1/0x120
  [<ffffffff8156bcf2>] cpufreq_register_driver+0x112/0x340
  [<ffffffff8121415a>] ? kfree+0xda/0x2b0
  [<ffffffffa003517f>] ? pcc_cpufreq_do_osc+0x17f/0x17f [pcc_cpufreq]
  [<ffffffffa003562e>] pcc_cpufreq_init+0x4af/0xe81 [pcc_cpufreq]
  [<ffffffffa003517f>] ? pcc_cpufreq_do_osc+0x17f/0x17f [pcc_cpufreq]
  [<ffffffff81002144>] do_one_initcall+0xd4/0x210
  [<ffffffff811f7472>] ? __vunmap+0xd2/0x120
  [<ffffffff81127155>] load_module+0x1315/0x1b70
  [<ffffffff811222a0>] ? store_uevent+0x70/0x70
  [<ffffffff811229d9>] ? copy_module_from_fd.isra.44+0x129/0x180
  [<ffffffff81127b86>] SyS_finit_module+0xa6/0xd0
  [<ffffffff81725b69>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
 cpufreq: __cpufreq_add_dev: ->get() failed
insmod: ERROR: could not insert module pcc-cpufreq.ko: No such device

The warning occurs in the __cpufreq_add_dev() code which does

        down_write(&policy->rwsem);
	...
        if (cpufreq_driver->get && !cpufreq_driver->setpolicy) {
                policy->cur = cpufreq_driver->get(policy->cpu);
                if (!policy->cur) {
                        pr_err("%s: ->get() failed\n", __func__);
                        goto err_get_freq;
                }

If cpufreq_driver->get(policy->cpu) returns an error we execute the
code at err_get_freq, which does not up the policy->rwsem.  This causes
the lockdep warning.

Trivial patch to up the policy->rwsem in the error path.

After the patch has been applied, and an error occurs in the
cpufreq_driver->get(policy->cpu) call we will now see

cpufreq: __cpufreq_add_dev: ->get() failed
cpufreq: __cpufreq_add_dev: ->get() failed
modprobe: ERROR: could not insert 'pcc_cpufreq': No such device

Fixes: 4e97b631 (cpufreq: Initialize governor for a new policy under policy->rwsem)
Signed-off-by: NPrarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>
Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: 3.14+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.14+
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Cpufreq core introduces cpufreq_suspended flag to let cpufreq sysfs nodes
across S2RAM/S2DISK. But the flag is only set in the cpufreq_suspend()
for cpufreq drivers which have target or target_index callback. This
skips intel_pstate driver. This patch is to set the flag before checking
target or target_index callback.

Fixes: 2f0aea93 (cpufreq: suspend governors on system suspend/hibernate)
Signed-off-by: NLan Tianyu <tianyu.lan@intel.com>
Cc: 3.15+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.15+
[rjw: Subject]
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

We are calling kobject_move() from two separate places currently and both these
places share another routine update_policy_cpu() which is handling everything
around updating policy->cpu. Moving ownership of policy->kobj also lies under
the role of update_policy_cpu() routine and must be handled from there.

So, Lets move kobject_move() to update_policy_cpu() and get rid of
cpufreq_nominate_new_policy_cpu() as it doesn't have anything significant left.
Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

We are returning -EINVAL instead of the error returned from kobject_move() when
it fails. Propagate the actual error number.

Also add a meaningful print when sysfs_create_link() fails.
Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

While hot-unplugging policy->cpu, we call cpufreq_nominate_new_policy_cpu() to
nominate next owner of policy, i.e. policy->cpu. If we fail to move policy
kobject under the new policy->cpu, we try to update policy->cpus with the old
policy->cpu.

This would have been required in case old-CPU is removed from policy->cpus in
the first place. But its not done before calling
cpufreq_nominate_new_policy_cpu(), but during the POST_DEAD notification which
happens quite late in the hot-unplugging path.

So, this is just some useless code hanging around, get rid of it.
Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

This is only relevant to implementations with multiple clusters, where clusters
have separate clock lines but all CPUs within a cluster share it.

Consider a dual cluster platform with 2 cores per cluster. During suspend we
start hot unplugging CPUs in order 1 to 3. When CPU2 is removed, policy->kobj
would be moved to CPU3 and when CPU3 goes down we wouldn't free policy or its
kobj as we want to retain permissions/values/etc.

Now on resume, we will get CPU2 before CPU3 and will call __cpufreq_add_dev().
We will recover the old policy and update policy->cpu from 3 to 2 from
update_policy_cpu().

But the kobj is still tied to CPU3 and isn't moved to CPU2. We wouldn't create a
link for CPU2, but would try that for CPU3 while bringing it online. Which will
report errors as CPU3 already has kobj assigned to it.

This bug got introduced with commit 42f921a6, which overlooked this scenario.

To fix this, lets move kobj to the new policy->cpu while bringing first CPU of a
cluster back. Also do a WARN_ON() if kobject_move failed, as we would reach here
only for the first CPU of a non-boot cluster. And we can't recover from this
situation, if kobject_move() fails.

Fixes: 42f921a6 (cpufreq: remove sysfs files for CPUs which failed to come back after resume)
Cc:  3.13+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.13+
Reported-and-tested-by: NBu Yitian <ybu@qti.qualcomm.com>
Reported-by: NSaravana Kannan <skannan@codeaurora.org>
Reviewed-by: NSrivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Commit bd0fa9bb introduced a failure path to cpufreq_update_policy() if
cpufreq_driver->get(cpu) returns NULL.  However, it jumps to the 'no_policy'
label, which exits without unlocking any of the locks the function acquired
earlier.  This causes later calls into cpufreq to hang.

Fix this by creating a new 'unlock' label and jumping to that instead.

Fixes: bd0fa9bb ("cpufreq: Return error if ->get() failed in cpufreq_update_policy()")
Link: https://devtalk.nvidia.com/default/topic/751903/kernel-3-15-and-nv-drivers-337-340-failed-to-initialize-the-nvidia-kernel-module-gtx-550-ti-/Signed-off-by: NAaron Plattner <aplattner@nvidia.com>
Cc: 3.15+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.15+
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Douglas Anderson, recently pointed out an interesting problem due to which
udelay() was expiring earlier than it should.

While transitioning between frequencies few platforms may temporarily switch to
a stable frequency, waiting for the main PLL to stabilize.

For example: When we transition between very low frequencies on exynos, like
between 200MHz and 300MHz, we may temporarily switch to a PLL running at 800MHz.
No CPUFREQ notification is sent for that. That means there's a period of time
when we're running at 800MHz but loops_per_jiffy is calibrated at between 200MHz
and 300MHz. And so udelay behaves badly.

To get this fixed in a generic way, introduce another set of callbacks
get_intermediate() and target_intermediate(), only for drivers with
target_index() and CPUFREQ_ASYNC_NOTIFICATION unset.

get_intermediate() should return a stable intermediate frequency platform wants
to switch to, and target_intermediate() should set CPU to that frequency,
before jumping to the frequency corresponding to 'index'. Core will take care of
sending notifications and driver doesn't have to handle them in
target_intermediate() or target_index().

NOTE: ->target_index() should restore to policy->restore_freq in case of
failures as core would send notifications for that.
Tested-by: NStephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: NDoug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Handling calls to ->target_index() has got complex over time and might become
more complex. So, its better to take target_index() bits out in another routine
__target_index() for better code readability. Shouldn't have any functional
impact.
Tested-by: NStephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: NDoug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

On platforms that use cpufreq_for_each_* macros, build fails if
CONFIG_CPU_FREQ=n, e.g. ARM/shmobile/koelsch/non-multiplatform:

drivers/built-in.o: In function `clk_round_parent':
clkdev.c:(.text+0xcf168): undefined reference to `cpufreq_next_valid'
drivers/built-in.o: In function `clk_rate_table_find':
clkdev.c:(.text+0xcf820): undefined reference to `cpufreq_next_valid'
make[3]: *** [vmlinux] Error 1

Fix this making cpufreq_next_valid function inline and move it to
cpufreq.h.

Fixes: 27e289dc (cpufreq: Introduce macros for cpufreq_frequency_table iteration)
Reported-and-tested-by: NGeert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Signed-off-by: NStratos Karafotis <stratosk@semaphore.gr>
Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Some cpufreq drivers were redundantly invoking the _begin() and _end()
APIs around frequency transitions, and this double invocation (one from
the cpufreq core and the other from the cpufreq driver) used to result
in a self-deadlock, leading to system hangs during boot. (The _begin()
API makes contending callers wait until the previous invocation is
complete. Hence, the cpufreq driver would end up waiting on itself!).

Now all such drivers have been fixed, but debugging this issue was not
very straight-forward (even lockdep didn't catch this). So let us add a
debug infrastructure to the cpufreq core to catch such issues more easily
in the future.

We add a new field called 'transition_task' to the policy structure, to keep
track of the task which is performing the frequency transition. Using this
field, we make note of this task during _begin() and print a warning if we
find a case where the same task is calling _begin() again, before completing
the previous frequency transition using the corresponding _end().

We have left out ASYNC_NOTIFICATION drivers from this debug infrastructure
for 2 reasons:

1. At the moment, we have no way to avoid a particular scenario where this
   debug infrastructure can emit false-positive warnings for such drivers.
   The scenario is depicted below:

         Task A						Task B

    /* 1st freq transition */
    Invoke _begin() {
            ...
            ...
    }

    Change the frequency

    /* 2nd freq transition */
    Invoke _begin() {
	    ...	//waiting for B to
            ... //finish _end() for
	    ... //the 1st transition
	    ...	      |				Got interrupt for successful
	    ...	      |				change of frequency (1st one).
	    ...       |
	    ...	      |				/* 1st freq transition */
	    ...	      |				Invoke _end() {
	    ...	      |					...
	    ...	      V				}
	    ...
	    ...
    }

   This scenario is actually deadlock-free because, once Task A changes the
   frequency, it is Task B's responsibility to invoke the corresponding
   _end() for the 1st frequency transition. Hence it is perfectly legal for
   Task A to go ahead and attempt another frequency transition in the meantime.
   (Of course it won't be able to proceed until Task B finishes the 1st _end(),
   but this doesn't cause a deadlock or a hang).

   The debug infrastructure cannot handle this scenario and will treat it as
   a deadlock and print a warning. To avoid this, we exclude such drivers
   from the purview of this code.

2. Luckily, we don't _need_ this infrastructure for ASYNC_NOTIFICATION drivers
   at all! The cpufreq core does not automatically invoke the _begin() and
   _end() APIs during frequency transitions in such drivers. Thus, the driver
   alone is responsible for invoking _begin()/_end() and hence there shouldn't
   be any conflicts which lead to double invocations. So, we can skip these
   drivers, since the probability that such drivers will hit this problem is
   extremely low, as outlined above.
Signed-off-by: NSrivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Many cpufreq drivers need to iterate over the cpufreq_frequency_table
for various tasks.

This patch introduces two macros which can be used for iteration over
cpufreq_frequency_table keeping a common coding style across drivers:

- cpufreq_for_each_entry: iterate over each entry of the table
- cpufreq_for_each_valid_entry: iterate over each entry that contains
a valid frequency.

It should have no functional changes.
Signed-off-by: NStratos Karafotis <stratosk@semaphore.gr>
Acked-by: NLad, Prabhakar <prabhakar.csengg@gmail.com>
Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>