Currently we have two rb-trees, one for delayed ref heads and one for all of the
delayed refs, including the delayed ref heads.  When we process the delayed refs
we have to hold onto the delayed ref lock for all of the selecting and merging
and such, which results in quite a bit of lock contention.  This was solved by
having a waitqueue and only one flusher at a time, however this hurts if we get
a lot of delayed refs queued up.

So instead just have an rb tree for the delayed ref heads, and then attach the
delayed ref updates to an rb tree that is per delayed ref head.  Then we only
need to take the delayed ref lock when adding new delayed refs and when
selecting a delayed ref head to process, all the rest of the time we deal with a
per delayed ref head lock which will be much less contentious.

The locking rules for this get a little more complicated since we have to lock
up to 3 things to properly process delayed refs, but I will address that problem
later.  For now this passes all of xfstests and my overnight stress tests.
Thanks,
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>

We may return early in btrfs_drop_snapshot(), we shouldn't
call btrfs_std_err() for this case, fix it.

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: NWang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>

@full is not protected within global_rsv.lock, so we may think global_rsv
is already full but in fact it's not, so we miss the opportunity to return
free space to global_rsv directly when we release other block_rsvs.
Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>

We can starve out the transaction commit with a bunch of caching threads all
running at the same time.  This is because we will only drop the
extent_commit_sem if we need_resched(), which isn't likely to happen since we
will be reading a lot from the disk so have already schedule()'ed plenty.  Alex
observed that he could starve out a transaction commit for up to a minute with
32 caching threads all running at once.  This will allow us to drop the
extent_commit_sem to allow the transaction commit to swap the commit_root out
and then all the cachers will start back up. Here is an explanation provided by
Igno

So, just to fill in what happens in this loop:

                                mutex_unlock(&caching_ctl->mutex);
                                cond_resched();
                                goto again;

where 'again:' takes caching_ctl->mutex and fs_info->extent_commit_sem
again:

        again:
                mutex_lock(&caching_ctl->mutex);
                /* need to make sure the commit_root doesn't disappear */
                down_read(&fs_info->extent_commit_sem);

So, if I'm reading the code correct, there can be a fair amount of
concurrency here: there may be multiple 'caching kthreads' per filesystem
active, while there's one fs_info->extent_commit_sem per filesystem
AFAICS.

So, what happens if there are a lot of CPUs all busy holding the
->extent_commit_sem rwsem read-locked and a writer arrives? They'd all
rush to try to release the fs_info->extent_commit_sem, and they'd block in
the down_read() because there's a writer waiting.

So there's a guarantee of forward progress. This should answer akpm's
concern I think.

Thanks,
Acked-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>

Convert all applicable cases of printk and pr_* to the btrfs_* macros.

Fix all uses of the BTRFS prefix.
Signed-off-by: NFrank Holton <fholton@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>

We met the following oops when doing space balance:
 kobject (ffff88081b590278): tried to init an initialized object, something is seriously wrong.
 ...
 Call Trace:
  [<ffffffff81937262>] dump_stack+0x49/0x5f
  [<ffffffff8137d259>] kobject_init+0x89/0xa0
  [<ffffffff8137d36a>] kobject_init_and_add+0x2a/0x70
  [<ffffffffa009bd79>] ? clear_extent_bit+0x199/0x470 [btrfs]
  [<ffffffffa005e82c>] __link_block_group+0xfc/0x120 [btrfs]
  [<ffffffffa006b9db>] btrfs_make_block_group+0x24b/0x370 [btrfs]
  [<ffffffffa00a899b>] __btrfs_alloc_chunk+0x54b/0x7e0 [btrfs]
  [<ffffffffa00a8c6f>] btrfs_alloc_chunk+0x3f/0x50 [btrfs]
  [<ffffffffa0060123>] do_chunk_alloc+0x363/0x440 [btrfs]
  [<ffffffffa00633d4>] btrfs_check_data_free_space+0x104/0x310 [btrfs]
  [<ffffffffa0069f4d>] btrfs_write_dirty_block_groups+0x48d/0x600 [btrfs]
  [<ffffffffa007aad4>] commit_cowonly_roots+0x184/0x250 [btrfs]
  ...

Steps to reproduce:
 # mkfs.btrfs -f <dev>
 # mount -o nospace_cache <dev> <mnt>
 # btrfs balance start <mnt>
 # dd if=/dev/zero of=<mnt>/tmpfile bs=1M count=1

The reason of this problem is that we initialized the raid kobject when we added
a block group into a empty raid list. As we know, when we mounted a btrfs filesystem,
the raid list was empty, we would initialize the raid kobject when we added the first
block group. But if there was not data stored in the block group, the block group
would be freed when doing balance, and the raid list would be empty. And then if we
allocated a new block group and added it into the raid list, we would initialize
the raid kobject again, the oops happened.

Fix this problem by initializing the raid kobject just when mounting the fs.
Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reported-by: NWang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>

This patch fixes the following warnings:
fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:6201:12: sparse: symbol 'get_raid_name' was not declared. Should it be static?
fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:8430:9: error: format not a string literal and no format arguments [-Werror=format-security] get_raid_name(index));
Signed-off-by: NJeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: NKees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>

The variable found_uncached_bg in find_free_extent is not used since commit
285ff5af
(Btrfs: remove the ideal caching code)
Signed-off-by: NValentina Giusti <valentina.giusti@microon.de>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>

While trying to debug ENOSPC issues, it's helpful to understand what the
kernel's view of the available space is. We export this information
via ioctl, but sysfs files are more easily used.
Signed-off-by: NJeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>

The way how we process delayed refs is
1) get a bunch of head refs,
2) pick up one head ref,
3) go one node back for any delayed ref updates.

The head ref is also linked in the same rbtree as the delayed ref is,
so in 1) stage, we have to walk one by one including not only head refs, but
delayed refs.

When we have a great number of delayed refs pending to process,
this'll cost time a lot.

Here we introduce a head ref specific rbtree, it only has head refs, so troubles
go away.
Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>

Currently extent-tree.c:btrfs_lookup_extent_info() can miss the lookup
of skinny extent items. This can happen when the execution flow is the
following:

* We do an extent tree lookup and fail to find a skinny extent item;

* As a result, we attempt to see if a non-skinny extent item exists,
  either by looking at previous item in the leaf or by doing another
  full extent tree search;

* We have a transaction and then we check for a matching delayed ref
  head in the transaction's delayed refs rbtree;

* We find such delayed ref head and then we try to lock it with a
  call to mutex_trylock();

* The lock was contended so we jump to the label "again", which repeats
  the extent tree search but for a non-skinny extent item, because we set
  previously metadata variable to 0 and the search key to look for a
  non-skinny extent-item;

* After the jump (and after releasing the transaction's delayed refs
  lock), a skinny extent item might have been added to the extent tree
  but we will miss it because metadata is set to 0 and the search key
  is set for a non-skinny extent-item.

The fix here is to not reset metadata to 0 and to jump to the initial search
key setup if the delayed ref head is contended, instead of jumping directly
to the extent tree search label ("again").

This issue was found while investigating the issue reported at Bugzilla 64961.

David Sterba suspected this function was missing extent items, and that
this could be caused by the last change to this function, which was made
in the following patch:

    [PATCH] Btrfs: optimize btrfs_lookup_extent_info()
    (commit 74be9510)

But in fact this issue already existed before, because after failing to find
a skinny extent item, the code set the search key for a non-skinny extent
item, and on contention of a matching delayed ref head it would not search
the extent tree for a skinny extent item anymore.
Signed-off-by: NFilipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>

rename the function -- btrfs_start_all_delalloc_inodes(), and make its
name be compatible to btrfs_wait_ordered_roots(), since they are always
used at the same place.
Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>

It is very likely that there are lots of ordered extents in the filesytem,
if we wait for the completion of all of them when we want to reclaim some
space for the metadata space reservation, we would be blocked for a long
time. The performance would drop down suddenly for a long time.
Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>

It was very likely that there were lots of async delalloc pages in the
filesystem, if we waited until all the pages were flushed, we would be
blocked for a long time, and the performance would also drop down.
Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>

In shrink_delalloc(), what we need reclaim is the metadata space, so
flushing pages by to_reclaim is not reasonable, it is very likely that
the pages we flush are not enough. And then we had to invoke the flush
function for several times, at the worst, we need call flush_space for
several times. It wasted time.

We improve this problem by converting the metadata space size we need
reserve to the delalloc bytes, By this way, we can flush the pages
by a reasonable number.

(Now we use a fixed number to do conversion, it is not flexible, maybe
 we can find a good way to improve it in the future.)
Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>

This patch picked up the code that was used to calculate the number of
the items for which we need reserve space, and we will use it in the next
patch.
Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>

Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>

Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>

Fix spacing issues detected via checkpatch.pl in accordance with the
kernel style guidelines.
Signed-off-by: NDulshani Gunawardhana <dulshani.gunawardhana89@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>

Use WARN_ON()'s return value in place of WARN_ON(1) for cleaner source
code that outputs a more descriptive warnings. Also fix the styling
warning of redundant braces that came up as a result of this fix.
Signed-off-by: NDulshani Gunawardhana <dulshani.gunawardhana89@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: NZach Brown <zab@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>

After running space balance on a new fs, the fs check program outputed the
following warning message:
 free space inode generation (0) did not match free space cache generation (20)

Steps to reproduce:
 # mkfs.btrfs -f <dev>
 # mount <dev> <mnt>
 # btrfs balance start <mnt>
 # umount <mnt>
 # btrfs check <dev>

It was because there was no data space after the space balance, and the free
space write out task didn't try to allocate a new data chunk for the free space
inode when doing the reservation. So the data space reservation failed, and in
order to tell the free space loader that this free space inode could not be
trusted, the generation of the free space inode wasn't updated. Then the check
program found this problem and outputed the above message.

But in fact, it is safe that we try to allocate a new data chunk when we find
the data space is not enough. The patch fixes the above problem by this way.
Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>

Instead of doing another extent tree search if the first search failed
to find a metadata item, check if the previous item in the leaf is an
extent item and use it if it is, otherwise do the second tree search
for an extent item.
Signed-off-by: NFilipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>

When debugging ENOSPC issues, it's nice to be able to see which
reservations failed as well as the ones which succeeded.
Signed-off-by: NJeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>

fs/btrfs/compat.h only contained trivial macro wrappers of drop_nlink()
and inc_nlink().  This doesn't belong in mainline.
Signed-off-by: NZach Brown <zab@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>

When we fail to add a reference after a non-inline insertion by some reasons,
eg. ENOSPC, we'll abort the transaction, but we don't return this error to
the caller who has to walk around again to find something wrong, that's
unnecessary.

Also fixup other error paths to keep it simple.
Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>

While trying to track down a reserved space leak I noticed a few places where we
won't properly clean up reserved space if we have an error, this patch fixes
those up.  Thanks,
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>

In trying to track down where we were leaking reserved space I noticed our
reserve extent tracepoints are a little off.  First we were saying that the
reserved space had been alloced in btrfs_reserve_extent, which isn't the case,
this needs to be triggered when we actually allocate the space when we run the
delayed ref.  We were also missing a few places where we should have been
tracing the btrfs_reserve_extent_free tracepoint.  With these in place I was
able to put together where we were leaking reserved space.  Thanks,
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>

In extent-tree.c:btrfs_write_dirty_block_groups(), if the call to
write_one_cache_group() failed, we would return without putting
the block group first.
Signed-off-by: NFilipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>

Not used for anything, and removing it avoids caller's need to
allocate a path structure.
Signed-off-by: NFilipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>

This isn't used for anything anymore, just remove it.
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>

This is a left over of how we used to wait for ordered extents, which was to
grab the inode and then run filemap flush on it.  However if we have an ordered
extent then we already are holding a ref on the inode, and we just use
btrfs_start_ordered_extent anyway, so there is no reason to have an extra ref on
the inode to start work on the ordered extent.  Thanks,
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>

This reverts commit 70afa399.  It is causing
performance issues and wasn't actually correct.  There were problems with the
way we flushed delalloc and that was the real cause of the early enospc.
Thanks,
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>

By the current code, if the requested size is very large, and all the extents
in the free space cache are small, we will waste lots of the cpu time to cut
the requested size in half and search the cache again and again until it gets
down to the size the allocator can return. In fact, we can know the max extent
size in the cache after the first search, so we needn't cut the size in half
repeatedly, and just use the max extent size directly. This way can save
lots of cpu time and make the performance grow up when there are only fragments
in the free space cache.

According to my test, if there are only 4KB free space extents in the fs,
and the total size of those extents are 256MB, we can reduce the execute
time of the following test from 5.4s to 1.4s.
  dd if=/dev/zero of=<testfile> bs=1MB count=1 oflag=sync

Changelog v2 -> v3:
- fix the problem that we skip the block group with the space which is
  less than we need.

Changelog v1 -> v2:
- address the problem that we return a wrong start position when searching
  the free space in a bitmap.
Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>

A user was reporting weird warnings from btrfs_put_delayed_ref() and I noticed
that we were doing this list_del_init() on our head ref outside of
delayed_refs->lock.  This is a problem if we have people still on the list, we
could end up modifying old pointers and such.  Fix this by removing us from the
list before we do our run_delayed_ref on our head ref.  Thanks,
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>

u64 is "unsigned long long" on all architectures now, so there's no need to
cast it when formatting it using the "ll" length modifier.
Signed-off-by: NGeert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>

This tree is not created by mkfs.btrfs. Therefore when a filesystem
is mounted writable and the UUID tree does not exist, this tree is
created if required. The tree is also added to the fs_info structure
and initialized, but this commit does not yet read or write UUID tree
elements.
Signed-off-by: NStefan Behrens <sbehrens@giantdisaster.de>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>

I noticed while looking at a deadlock that we are always starting a transaction
in cow_file_range().  This isn't really needed since we only need a transaction
if we are doing an inline extent, or if the allocator needs to allocate a chunk.
So push down all the transaction start stuff to be closer to where we actually
need a transaction in all of these cases.  This will hopefully reduce our write
latency when we are committing often.  Thanks,
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>

In extent-tree.c:do_chunk_alloc(), early on we returned 0 (success)
when the target space was full and when chunk allocation is needed.
However, later on in that same function we return ENOSPC if
btrfs_alloc_chunk() fails (and chunk allocation was needed) and
set the space's full flag.

This was inconsistent, as -ENOSPC should be returned if the space
is full and a chunk allocation needs to performed. If the space is
full but no chunk allocation is needed, just return 0 (success).
Signed-off-by: NFilipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>

Alex Lyakas reported a bug where wait_block_group_cache_progress() would wait
forever if a drive failed.  This is because we just bail out if there is an
error while trying to cache a block group, we don't update anybody who may be
waiting.  So this introduces a new enum for the cache state in case of error and
makes everybody bail out if we have an error.  Alex tested and verified this
patch fixed his problem.  This fixes bz 59431.  Thanks,
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>

I was hitting the BUG_ON() at the end of merge_reloc_roots() because we were
aborting the transaction at some point previously and then getting an error when
we tried to drop the reloc root.  I fixed btrfs_drop_snapshot to re-add us to
the dead roots list if we failed, but this isn't the right thing to do for reloc
roots since it uses root->root_list for it's own stuff in order to know what
needs to be cleaned up.  So fix btrfs_drop_snapshot to only do the re-add if we
aren't dropping for reloc, and handle errors from merge_reloc_root() by dropping
the reloc root we are processing since it won't be on the list of roots to
cleanup.  With this patch my reproducer no longer panics.  Thanks,
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>