- 16 5月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Mauro Carvalho Chehab 提交于
DocBook is mentioned several times at the documentation. Update the obsolete references from it at the DocBook. Acked-by: NSeongJae Park <sj38.park@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NMauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@s-opensource.com>
-
- 20 11月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Mauro Carvalho Chehab 提交于
Having the kernel-documentation at the topmost level doesn't allow generating a separate PDF file for it. Also, makes harder to add extra contents. So, place it on a sub-dir. Signed-off-by: NMauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@s-opensource.com> Signed-off-by: NJonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
-
- 21 7月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jonathan Corbet 提交于
Now that the new Sphinx world order is taking over, the information in kernel-doc-nano-HOWTO.txt is outmoded. I hate to remove it altogether, since it's one of those files that people expect to find. But we can add a warning and fix all the other pointers to it. Reminded-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Signed-off-by: NJonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
-
- 15 7月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Peter Huewe 提交于
docproc.c was moved in 2011 from scripts/basic to scripts -> updated the references accordingly Signed-off-by: NPeter Huewe <peterhuewe@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: NJonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
-
- 28 5月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Robert P. J. Day 提交于
Since the "sgmldocs" target is simply a pointer to the newer "xmldocs" target, update the documentation to reflect this. Signed-off-by: NRobert P. J. Day <rpjday@crashcourse.ca> Signed-off-by: NJiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
-
- 06 12月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Yacine Belkadi 提交于
Non-void functions should describe their return values in their kernel-doc comments. Currently, some don't, others do in various forms. For example: * Return the result. * Return: The result. * Returns the result. * Returns: the result. * Return Value: The result. * @return: the result. * This function returns the result. * It will return the result. Defining a convention would improve consistency of kernel-doc comments. It would also help scripts/kernel-doc identify the text describing the return value of a function. Thus allowing additional checks on the comments, and suitable highlighting in the generated docs (man pages, html, etc). So, as a convention, use a section named "Return" to describe the return value of a function. Signed-off-by: NYacine Belkadi <yacine.belkadi.1@gmail.com> Acked-by: NRandy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: NMichal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz>
-
- 28 11月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Yacine Belkadi 提交于
Non-void functions should describe their return values in their kernel-doc comments. Currently, some don't, others do in various forms. For example: * Return the result. * Return: The result. * Returns the result. * Returns: the result. * Return Value: The result. * @return: the result. * This function returns the result. * It will return the result. Defining a convention would improve consistency of kernel-doc comments. It would also help scripts/kernel-doc identify the text describing the return value of a function. Thus allowing additional checks on the comments, and suitable highlighting in the generated docs (man pages, html, etc). So, as a convention, use a section named "Return" to describe the return value of a function. Signed-off-by: NYacine Belkadi <yacine.belkadi.1@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NRob Landley <rob@landley.net> Signed-off-by: NJiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
-
- 12 9月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Johannes Berg 提交于
When you don't use !E or !I but only !F, then it's very easy to miss including some functions, structs etc. in documentation. To help finding which ones were missed, allow printing out the unused ones as warnings. For example, using this on mac80211 yields a lot of warnings like this: Warning: didn't use docs for DOC: mac80211 workqueue Warning: didn't use docs for ieee80211_max_queues Warning: didn't use docs for ieee80211_bss_change Warning: didn't use docs for ieee80211_bss_conf when generating the documentation for it. Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NRandy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 12 1月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Randy Dunlap 提交于
Remove comments about function short descriptions not allowed to be on multiple lines (that was fixed/changed recently). Add comments that function "section header:" names need to be unique per function/struct/union/typedef/enum. Signed-off-by: NRandy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 19 9月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Johannes Weiner 提交于
Allow the short description after symbol name and dash in a kernel-doc comment to span multiple lines, e.g. like this: /** * unmap_mapping_range - unmap the portion of all mmaps in the * specified address_space corresponding to the specified * page range in the underlying file. * @mapping: the address space containing mmaps to be unmapped. * ... */ The short description ends with a parameter description, an empty line or the end of the comment block. Signed-off-by: NJohannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Signed-off-by: NRandy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 03 5月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Randy Dunlap 提交于
scripts/kernel-doc can (incorrectly) delete struct members that are surrounded by /* ... */ <struct members> /* ... */ if there is a /* private: */ comment in there somewhere also. Fix that by making the "/* private:" only allow whitespace between /* and "private:", not anything/everything in the world. This fixes some erroneous kernel-doc warnings that popped up while processing include/linux/usb/composite.h. Signed-off-by: NRandy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 12 2月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Randy Dunlap 提交于
Fix kernel-doc-nano-HOWTO.txt to use */ as the ending marker in kernel-doc examples and state that */ is the preferred ending marker. Signed-off-by: NRandy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com> Reported-by: NRobert Love <robert.w.love@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 07 1月, 2009 2 次提交
-
-
由 Randy Dunlap 提交于
Add info on how to use DOC: sections in kernel-doc. DOC: sections enable the addition of inline source file comments that are general in nature instead of being specific to a function, struct, union, enum, or typedef. Signed-off-by: NRandy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com> Cc: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Randy Dunlap 提交于
Add documentation on how to use kernel-doc for function parameters that are "..." (varargs). Signed-off-by: NRandy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com> Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 26 8月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Kevin Diggs 提交于
This patch adds kernel doc for the completion feature. An error in the split-man.pl PERL snippet in kernel-doc-nano-HOWTO.txt is also fixed. Signed-off-by: NKevin Diggs <kevdig@hypersurf.com> Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
-
- 07 6月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Paul Jackson 提交于
Provide documentation of the kernel-doc documentation conventions oriented to kernel hackers. Since I figure that there will be more people reading this kernel-doc-nano-HOWTO.txt file who are kernel developers focused on the rest of the kernel, than there will be readers of this file who are documentation developers extracting that embedded kernel-doc documentation, I have taken the liberty of making the new section added here: How to format kernel-doc comments the first section of the kernel-doc-nano-HOWTO.txt file. This first section is intended to introduce, motivate and provide basic usage of the kernel-doc mechanism for kernel hackers developing other portions of the kernel. Signed-off-by: NPaul Jackson <pj@sgi.com> Acked-by: NRandy Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net> Cc: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 12 2月, 2007 2 次提交
-
-
由 Robert P. J. Day 提交于
Explain a couple of the most common errors in kernel-doc usage. Signed-off-by: NRobert P. J. Day <rpjday@mindspring.com> Acked-by: NRandy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Randy Dunlap 提交于
In kernel-doc syntax, be a little flexible: allow whitespace between a function parameter name and the colon that must follow it, such as: @pdev : PCI device to unplug (This allows lots of megaraid kernel-doc to work without tons of editing.) Signed-off-by: NRandy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 04 11月, 2006 1 次提交
-
-
由 Randy Dunlap 提交于
Correct a few comments in kernel-doc Doc and source files. (akpm: note: the patch removes a non-ascii character and might have to be applied by hand..) Signed-off-by: NRandy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
-
- 02 2月, 2006 1 次提交
-
-
由 Randy Dunlap 提交于
- Add info that structs, unions, enums, and typedefs are supported. - Add doc about "private:" and "public:" tags for struct fields. - Fix some typos. - Remove some trailing whitespace. Signed-off-by: NRandy Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
-
- 17 4月, 2005 1 次提交
-
-
由 Linus Torvalds 提交于
Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
-