Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>

Ensure that we pass down the inode of the file being deleted so
that we can return any delegation being held.
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>

Even then it isn't really necessary. The reason why we may not want to
pass in a stateid in other cases is that we cannot use the delegation
credential.
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>

Having these exist as two functions doesn't seem to add anything useful,
and I think merging them together makes this easier to follow.
Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>

We currently have a separate function just to set this, but I think it
makes more sense to set it at the same time as the other values in
nfs4_init_sequence()
Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>

Rather than doing this in the generic NFS client code.  Let's put this
with the other v4 stuff so it's all in one place.
Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>

This doesn't really need to be in the generic NFS client code, and I
think it makes more sense to keep the v4 code in one place.
Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>

When we use EXCLUSIVE4_1 mode, the server returns an attribute mask where
all the bits indicate which attributes were set, and where the verifier
was stored. In order to figure out which attribute we have to resend,
we need to clear out the attributes that are set in exclcreat_bitmask.
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
[Anna: Fixed typo NFS4_CREATE_EXCLUSIVE4 -> NFS4_CREATE_EXCLUSIVE]
Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>

Neither nfs_inode_set_delegation() nor nfs_inode_reclaim_delegation() are
generic code. They have no business delving into NFSv4 OPEN xdr structures,
so let's replace the "struct nfs_openres" parameter.
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>

If we hold a delegation, then the results of the ACCESS call are protected
anyway.
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>

Currently, if the NFS_INO_INVALID_ATTR flag is set, for instance by
a call to nfs_post_op_update_inode_locked(), then it will not be cleared
until all the attributes have been revalidated. This means, for instance,
that NFSv4 writes will always force a full attribute revalidation.

Track the ctime, mtime, size and change attribute separately from the
other attributes so that we can have nfs_post_op_update_inode_locked()
set them correctly, and later have the cache consistency bitmask be
able to clear them.
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>

Starting with NFSv4.1, the server is able to deduce the client id from
the SEQUENCE op which means it can always figure out whether or not
the client is holding a delegation on a file that is being changed.
For that reason, RFC5661 does not require a delegation to be unconditionally
recalled on operations such as SETATTR, RENAME, or REMOVE.

Note that for now, we continue to return READ delegations since that is
still expected by the Linux knfsd server.
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>

Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>

Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>

Ensure that when we do finally delete the file, then we return the
delegation.
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>

Move the delegation recall out of the generic code, and into the NFSv4
specific callback.
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>

Move the delegation return out of generic code and down into the
NFSv4 specific unlink code.
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>

Move the delegation return out of generic code.
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>

The 'fmode' argument can take an FMODE_EXEC value, which we want to
filter out before comparing to the delegation type.
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>

If we have a RECLAIM_COMPLETE with a populated cl_lock_waitq, then
that implies that a reconnect has occurred. Since we can't expect a
CB_NOTIFY_LOCK callback at that point, just wake up the entire queue
so that all the tasks can re-poll for their locks.
Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>

The task is expected to sleep for a while here, and it's possible that
a new EXCHANGE_ID has occurred in the interim, and we were assigned a
new clientid. Since this is a per-client list, there isn't a lot of
value in vetting the clientid on the incoming request.
Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>

We may get a notification and lose the race to another client. Ensure
that we wait again for a notification in that case.
Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>

For NFS, we just use the "raw" API since the i_version is mostly
managed by the server. The exception there is when the client
holds a write delegation, but we only need to bump it once
there anyway to handle CB_GETATTR.
Tested-by: NKrzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>

There are 2 comments in the NFSv4 code which suggest that
SIGLOST should possibly be sent to a process.  In these
cases a lock has been lost.
The current practice is to set NFS_LOCK_LOST so that
read/write returns EIO when a lock is lost.
So change these comments to code when sets NFS_LOCK_LOST.

One case is when lock recovery after apparent server restart
fails with NFS4ERR_DENIED, NFS4ERR_RECLAIM_BAD, or
NFS4ERRO_RECLAIM_CONFLICT.  The other case is when a lock
attempt as part of lease recovery fails with NFS4ERR_DENIED.

In an ideal world, these should not happen.  However I have
a packet trace showing an NFSv4.1 session getting
NFS4ERR_BADSESSION after an extended network parition.  The
NFSv4.1 client treats this like server reboot until/unless
it get NFS4ERR_NO_GRACE, in which case it switches over to
"nograce" recovery mode.  In this network trace, the client
attempts to recover a lock and the server (incorrectly)
reports NFS4ERR_DENIED rather than NFS4ERR_NO_GRACE.  This
leads to the ineffective comment and the client then
continues to write using the OPEN stateid.
Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>

Convert CLOSE so that it specifies the correct stateid and
inode for the error handling.
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>

Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>

Convert CLOSE so that it specifies the correct stateid, state and
inode for the error handling.
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>

Commit e1293727 "NFS: Move the flock open mode check into nfs_flock()"
changed NFSv3 behavior for flock() such that the open mode must match the
lock type, however that requirement shouldn't be enforced for flock().
Signed-off-by: NBenjamin Coddington <bcodding@redhat.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v4.12
Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>

Before traversing a referral and performing a mount, the mounted-on
directory looks strange:

dr-xr-xr-x. 2 4294967294 4294967294 0 Dec 31  1969 dir.0

nfs4_get_referral is wiping out any cached attributes with what was
returned via GETATTR(fs_locations), but the bit mask for that
operation does not request any file attributes.

Retrieve owner and timestamp information so that the memcpy in
nfs4_get_referral fills in more attributes.

Changes since v1:
- Don't request attributes that the client unconditionally replaces
- Request only MOUNTED_ON_FILEID or FILEID attribute, not both
- encode_fs_locations() doesn't use the third bitmask word

Fixes: 6b97fd3d ("NFSv4: Follow a referral")
Suggested-by: NPradeep Thomas <pradeepthomas@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>

In nfs_set_open_stateid_locked, we must ignore stateids from closed state.
Reported-by: NAndrew W Elble <aweits@rit.edu>
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>

Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>

Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>

If our layoutreturn returns an NFS4ERR_OLD_STATEID, then try to
update the stateid and retry.
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>

If our layoutreturn on close operation returns an NFS4ERR_OLD_STATEID,
then try to update the stateid and retry. We know that there should
be no further LAYOUTGET requests being launched.
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>

If the stateid is no longer recognised on the server, either due to a
restart, or due to a competing CLOSE call, then we do not have to
retry. Any open contexts that triggered a reopen of the file, will
also act as triggers for any CLOSE for the updated stateids.
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>

If we're racing with an OPEN, then retry the operation instead of
declaring it a success.
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
[Andrew W Elble: Fix a typo in nfs4_refresh_open_stateid]
Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>

If the server that does not implement NFSv4.1 persistent session
semantics reboots while we are performing an exclusive create,
then the return value of NFS4ERR_DELAY when we replay the open
during the grace period causes us to lose the verifier.
When the grace period expires, and we present a new verifier,
the server will then correctly reply NFS4ERR_EXIST.

This commit ensures that we always present the same verifier when
replaying the OPEN.
Reported-by: NTigran Mkrtchyan <tigran.mkrtchyan@desy.de>
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>

Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>

Ben Coddington has noted the following race between OPEN and CLOSE
on a single client.

Process 1		Process 2		Server
=========		=========		======

1)  OPEN file
2)			OPEN file
3)						Process OPEN (1) seqid=1
4)						Process OPEN (2) seqid=2
5)						Reply OPEN (2)
6)			Receive reply (2)
7)			new stateid, seqid=2

8)			CLOSE file, using
			stateid w/ seqid=2
9)						Reply OPEN (1)
10(						Process CLOSE (8)
11)						Reply CLOSE (8)
12)						Forget stateid
						file closed

13)			Receive reply (7)
14)			Forget stateid
			file closed.

15) Receive reply (1).
16) New stateid seqid=1
    is really the same
    stateid that was
    closed.

IOW: the reply to the first OPEN is delayed. Since "Process 2" does
not wait before closing the file, and it does not cache the closed
stateid, then when the delayed reply is finally received, it is treated
as setting up a new stateid by the client.

The fix is to ensure that the client processes the OPEN and CLOSE calls
in the same order in which the server processed them.

This commit ensures that we examine the seqid of the stateid
returned by OPEN. If it is a new stateid, we assume the seqid
must be equal to the value 1, and that each state transition
increments the seqid value by 1 (See RFC7530, Section 9.1.4.2,
and RFC5661, Section 8.2.2).

If the tracker sees that an OPEN returns with a seqid that is greater
than the cached seqid + 1, then it bumps a flag to ensure that the
caller waits for the RPCs carrying the missing seqids to complete.

Note that there can still be pathologies where the server crashes before
it can even send us the missing seqids. Since the OPEN call is still
holding a slot when it waits here, that could cause the recovery to
stall forever. To avoid that, we time out after a 5 second wait.
Reported-by: NBenjamin Coddington <bcodding@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>

atomic_t variables are currently used to implement reference
counters with the following properties:
 - counter is initialized to 1 using atomic_set()
 - a resource is freed upon counter reaching zero
 - once counter reaches zero, its further
   increments aren't allowed
 - counter schema uses basic atomic operations
   (set, inc, inc_not_zero, dec_and_test, etc.)

Such atomic variables should be converted to a newly provided
refcount_t type and API that prevents accidental counter overflows
and underflows. This is important since overflows and underflows
can lead to use-after-free situation and be exploitable.

The variable nfs_client.cl_count is used as pure reference counter.
Convert it to refcount_t and fix up the operations.
Suggested-by: NKees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Windsor <dwindsor@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: NHans Liljestrand <ishkamiel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NElena Reshetova <elena.reshetova@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>