Skip to content

cloud-kernel
cloud-kernel

openanolis / cloud-kernel
大约 1 年 前同步成功

通知 153
Star 36
Fork 7
cloud-kernel
cloud-kernel

体验新版 GitCode，发现更多精彩内容 >>

切换分支/标签
  1. 21 7月, 2010 3 次提交
  3. 20 7月, 2010 1 次提交
  5. 19 7月, 2010 4 次提交
    • S
      [S390] cio: fix potential overflow in chpid descriptor · 878c4956
      由 Sebastian Ott 提交于 
      The length filed in the chsc response block (if valid)
has a value of n*(sizeof(chp_desc))+8 (for the response
block header). When we memcopied from the response block
to the actual descriptor we copied 8 bytes too much.
The bug was not revealed since the descriptor is embedded
in struct channel_path.
Since we only write one descriptor at a time ignore the
length value and use sizeof(*desc).
Signed-off-by: NSebastian Ott <sebott@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NMartin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
      878c4956
    • S
      [S390] add missing device put · 0abccf77
      由 Stefan Haberland 提交于 
      The dasd_alias_show function does not return a device reference
in case the device is an alias.
Signed-off-by: NStefan Haberland <stefan.haberland@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NMartin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
      0abccf77
    • D
      mm: add context argument to shrinker callback · 7f8275d0
      由 Dave Chinner 提交于 
      The current shrinker implementation requires the registered callback
to have global state to work from. This makes it difficult to shrink
caches that are not global (e.g. per-filesystem caches). Pass the shrinker
structure to the callback so that users can embed the shrinker structure
in the context the shrinker needs to operate on and get back to it in the
callback via container_of().
Signed-off-by: NDave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
      7f8275d0
    • L
      drm/i915: add 'reclaimable' to i915 self-reclaimable page allocations · cd9f040d
      由 Linus Torvalds 提交于 
      The hibernate issues that got fixed in commit 985b823b ("drm/i915:
fix hibernation since i915 self-reclaim fixes") turn out to have been
incomplete.  Vefa Bicakci tested lots of hibernate cycles, and without
the __GFP_RECLAIMABLE flag the system eventually fails to resume.

With the flag added, Vefa can apparently hibernate forever (or until he
gets bored running his automated scripts, whichever comes first).

The reclaimable flag was there originally, and was one of the flags that
were dropped (unintentionally) by commit 4bdadb97 ("drm/i915:
Selectively enable self-reclaim") that introduced all these problems,
but I didn't want to just blindly add back all the flags in commit
985b823b, and it looked like __GFP_RECLAIM wasn't necessary.  It
clearly was.

I still suspect that there is some subtle reason we're missing that
causes the problems, but __GFP_RECLAIMABLE is certainly not wrong to use
in this context, and is what the code historically used.  And we have no
idea what the causes the corruption without it.
Reported-and-tested-by: NM. Vefa Bicakci <bicave@superonline.com>
Cc: Dave Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hugh.dickins@tiscali.co.uk>
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      cd9f040d
  7. 17 7月, 2010 1 次提交
    • B
      PCI: fall back to original BIOS BAR addresses · 58c84eda
      由 Bjorn Helgaas 提交于 
      If we fail to assign resources to a PCI BAR, this patch makes us try the
original address from BIOS rather than leaving it disabled.

Linux tries to make sure all PCI device BARs are inside the upstream
PCI host bridge or P2P bridge apertures, reassigning BARs if necessary.
Windows does similar reassignment.

Before this patch, if we could not move a BAR into an aperture, we left
the resource unassigned, i.e., at address zero.  Windows leaves such BARs
at the original BIOS addresses, and this patch makes Linux do the same.

This is a bit ugly because we disable the resource long before we try to
reassign it, so we have to keep track of the BIOS BAR address somewhere.
For lack of a better place, I put it in the struct pci_dev.

I think it would be cleaner to attempt the assignment immediately when the
claim fails, so we could easily remember the original address.  But we
currently claim motherboard resources in the middle, after attempting to
claim PCI resources and before assigning new PCI resources, and changing
that is a fairly big job.

Addresses https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16263Reported-by: NAndrew <nitr0@seti.kr.ua>
Tested-by: NAndrew <nitr0@seti.kr.ua>
Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
      58c84eda
  9. 16 7月, 2010 1 次提交
  11. 15 7月, 2010 1 次提交
  13. 12 7月, 2010 5 次提交
  15. 10 7月, 2010 2 次提交
  17. 09 7月, 2010 14 次提交
  19. 08 7月, 2010 6 次提交
  21. 07 7月, 2010 2 次提交