Skip to content

cloud-kernel
cloud-kernel

openanolis / cloud-kernel
大约 1 年 前同步成功

通知 158
Star 36
Fork 7
cloud-kernel
cloud-kernel

体验新版 GitCode，发现更多精彩内容 >>

切换分支/标签
  1. 12 2月, 2015 4 次提交
  3. 11 2月, 2015 1 次提交
  5. 10 2月, 2015 2 次提交
  7. 06 2月, 2015 8 次提交
  9. 29 1月, 2015 4 次提交
  11. 24 1月, 2015 2 次提交
    • S
      blk-mq: add tag allocation policy · 24391c0d
      由 Shaohua Li 提交于 
      This is the blk-mq part to support tag allocation policy. The default
allocation policy isn't changed (though it's not a strict FIFO). The new
policy is round-robin for libata. But it's a try-best implementation. If
multiple tasks are competing, the tags returned will be mixed (which is
unavoidable even with !mq, as requests from different tasks can be
mixed in queue)

Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: NShaohua Li <shli@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>
      24391c0d
    • S
      block: support different tag allocation policy · ee1b6f7a
      由 Shaohua Li 提交于 
      The libata tag allocation is using a round-robin policy. Next patch will
make libata use block generic tag allocation, so let's add a policy to
tag allocation.

Currently two policies: FIFO (default) and round-robin.

Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: NShaohua Li <shli@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>
      ee1b6f7a
  13. 22 1月, 2015 3 次提交
    • B
      block: Remove annoying "unknown partition table" message · bb5c3cdd
      由 Boaz Harrosh 提交于 
      As Christoph put it:
  Can we just get rid of the warnings?  It's fairly annoying as devices
  without partitions are perfectly fine and very useful.

Me too I see this message every VM boot for ages on all my
devices. Would love to just remove it. For me a partition-table
is only needed for a booting BIOS, grub, and stuff.

CC: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: NBoaz Harrosh <boaz@plexistor.com>
Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>
      bb5c3cdd
    • M
      block: Add discard flag to blkdev_issue_zeroout() function · d93ba7a5
      由 Martin K. Petersen 提交于 
      blkdev_issue_discard() will zero a given block range. This is done by
way of explicit writing, thus provisioning or allocating the blocks on
disk.

There are use cases where the desired behavior is to zero the blocks but
unprovision them if possible. The blocks must deterministically contain
zeroes when they are subsequently read back.

This patch adds a flag to blkdev_issue_zeroout() that provides this
variant. If the discard flag is set and a block device guarantees
discard_zeroes_data we will use REQ_DISCARD to clear the block range. If
the device does not support discard_zeroes_data or if the discard
request fails we will fall back to first REQ_WRITE_SAME and then a
regular REQ_WRITE.

Also update the callers of blkdev_issue_zero() to reflect the new flag
and make sb_issue_zeroout() prefer the discard approach.
Signed-off-by: NMartin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>
      d93ba7a5
    • J
      cfq-iosched: fix incorrect filing of rt async cfqq · c6ce1943
      由 Jeff Moyer 提交于 
      Hi,

If you can manage to submit an async write as the first async I/O from
the context of a process with realtime scheduling priority, then a
cfq_queue is allocated, but filed into the wrong async_cfqq bucket.  It
ends up in the best effort array, but actually has realtime I/O
scheduling priority set in cfqq->ioprio.

The reason is that cfq_get_queue assumes the default scheduling class and
priority when there is no information present (i.e. when the async cfqq
is created):

static struct cfq_queue *
cfq_get_queue(struct cfq_data *cfqd, bool is_sync, struct cfq_io_cq *cic,
	      struct bio *bio, gfp_t gfp_mask)
{
	const int ioprio_class = IOPRIO_PRIO_CLASS(cic->ioprio);
	const int ioprio = IOPRIO_PRIO_DATA(cic->ioprio);

cic->ioprio starts out as 0, which is "invalid".  So, class of 0
(IOPRIO_CLASS_NONE) is passed to cfq_async_queue_prio like so:

		async_cfqq = cfq_async_queue_prio(cfqd, ioprio_class, ioprio);

static struct cfq_queue **
cfq_async_queue_prio(struct cfq_data *cfqd, int ioprio_class, int ioprio)
{
        switch (ioprio_class) {
        case IOPRIO_CLASS_RT:
                return &cfqd->async_cfqq[0][ioprio];
        case IOPRIO_CLASS_NONE:
                ioprio = IOPRIO_NORM;
                /* fall through */
        case IOPRIO_CLASS_BE:
                return &cfqd->async_cfqq[1][ioprio];
        case IOPRIO_CLASS_IDLE:
                return &cfqd->async_idle_cfqq;
        default:
                BUG();
        }
}

Here, instead of returning a class mapped from the process' scheduling
priority, we get back the bucket associated with IOPRIO_CLASS_BE.

Now, there is no queue allocated there yet, so we create it:

		cfqq = cfq_find_alloc_queue(cfqd, is_sync, cic, bio, gfp_mask);

That function ends up doing this:

			cfq_init_cfqq(cfqd, cfqq, current->pid, is_sync);
			cfq_init_prio_data(cfqq, cic);

cfq_init_cfqq marks the priority as having changed.  Then, cfq_init_prio
data does this:

	ioprio_class = IOPRIO_PRIO_CLASS(cic->ioprio);
	switch (ioprio_class) {
	default:
		printk(KERN_ERR "cfq: bad prio %x\n", ioprio_class);
	case IOPRIO_CLASS_NONE:
		/*
		 * no prio set, inherit CPU scheduling settings
		 */
		cfqq->ioprio = task_nice_ioprio(tsk);
		cfqq->ioprio_class = task_nice_ioclass(tsk);
		break;

So we basically have two code paths that treat IOPRIO_CLASS_NONE
differently, which results in an RT async cfqq filed into a best effort
bucket.

Attached is a patch which fixes the problem.  I'm not sure how to make
it cleaner.  Suggestions would be welcome.
Signed-off-by: NJeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>
Tested-by: NHidehiro Kawai <hidehiro.kawai.ez@hitachi.com>
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>
      c6ce1943
  15. 14 1月, 2015 2 次提交
    • J
      blk-mq: fix false negative out-of-tags condition · 0bf36498
      由 Jens Axboe 提交于 
      The blk-mq tagging tries to maintain some locality between CPUs and
the tags issued. The tags are split into groups of words, and the
words may not be fully populated. When searching for a new free tag,
blk-mq may look at partial words, hence it passes in an offset/size
to find_next_zero_bit(). However, it does that wrong, the size must
always be the full length of the number of tags in that word,
otherwise we'll potentially miss some near the end.

Another issue is when __bt_get() goes from one word set to the next.
It bumps the index, but not the last_tag associated with the
previous index. Bump that to be in the range of the new word.

Finally, clean up __bt_get() and __bt_get_word() a bit and get
rid of the goto in there, and the unnecessary 'wrap' variable.
Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>
      0bf36498
    • M
      block: Change direct_access calling convention · dd22f551
      由 Matthew Wilcox 提交于 
      In order to support accesses to larger chunks of memory, pass in a
'size' parameter (counted in bytes), and return the amount available at
that address.

Add a new helper function, bdev_direct_access(), to handle common
functionality including partition handling, checking the length requested
is positive, checking for the sector being page-aligned, and checking
the length of the request does not pass the end of the partition.
Signed-off-by: NMatthew Wilcox <matthew.r.wilcox@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Reviewed-by: NBoaz Harrosh <boaz@plexistor.com>
Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>
      dd22f551
  17. 03 1月, 2015 3 次提交
  19. 01 1月, 2015 1 次提交
  21. 29 12月, 2014 3 次提交
  23. 28 12月, 2014 5 次提交
  25. 27 12月, 2014 2 次提交