1. 01 7月, 2006 5 次提交
  2. 28 6月, 2006 2 次提交
  3. 23 6月, 2006 1 次提交
    • O
      [PATCH] writeback: fix range handling · 111ebb6e
      OGAWA Hirofumi 提交于
      When a writeback_control's `start' and `end' fields are used to
      indicate a one-byte-range starting at file offset zero, the required
      values of .start=0,.end=0 mean that the ->writepages() implementation
      has no way of telling that it is being asked to perform a range
      request.  Because we're currently overloading (start == 0 && end == 0)
      to mean "this is not a write-a-range request".
      
      To make all this sane, the patch changes range of writeback_control.
      
      So caller does: If it is calling ->writepages() to write pages, it
      sets range (range_start/end or range_cyclic) always.
      
      And if range_cyclic is true, ->writepages() thinks the range is
      cyclic, otherwise it just uses range_start and range_end.
      
      This patch does,
      
          - Add LLONG_MAX, LLONG_MIN, ULLONG_MAX to include/linux/kernel.h
            -1 is usually ok for range_end (type is long long). But, if someone did,
      
      		range_end += val;		range_end is "val - 1"
      		u64val = range_end >> bits;	u64val is "~(0ULL)"
      
            or something, they are wrong. So, this adds LLONG_MAX to avoid nasty
            things, and uses LLONG_MAX for range_end.
      
          - All callers of ->writepages() sets range_start/end or range_cyclic.
      
          - Fix updates of ->writeback_index. It seems already bit strange.
            If it starts at 0 and ended by check of nr_to_write, this last
            index may reduce chance to scan end of file.  So, this updates
            ->writeback_index only if range_cyclic is true or whole-file is
            scanned.
      Signed-off-by: NOGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp>
      Cc: Nathan Scott <nathans@sgi.com>
      Cc: Anton Altaparmakov <aia21@cantab.net>
      Cc: Steven French <sfrench@us.ibm.com>
      Cc: "Vladimir V. Saveliev" <vs@namesys.com>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
      111ebb6e
  4. 11 4月, 2006 1 次提交
  5. 02 4月, 2006 1 次提交
  6. 24 3月, 2006 4 次提交
  7. 19 1月, 2006 1 次提交
  8. 07 1月, 2006 1 次提交
    • A
      identify multipage ->writepages() calls · 22905f77
      Andrew Morton 提交于
       NFS needs to be able to distinguish between single-page ->writepage() calls and
       multipage ->writepages() calls.
      
       For the single-page writepage calls NFS can kick off the I/O within the
       context of ->writepage().
      
       For multipage ->writepages calls, nfs_writepage() will leave the I/O pending
       and nfs_writepages() will kick off the I/O when it all has been queued up
       within NFS.
      
       Cc: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
      Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
      22905f77
  9. 18 11月, 2005 1 次提交
  10. 07 11月, 2005 1 次提交
  11. 10 9月, 2005 1 次提交
  12. 29 6月, 2005 1 次提交
  13. 01 5月, 2005 1 次提交
  14. 17 4月, 2005 1 次提交
    • L
      Linux-2.6.12-rc2 · 1da177e4
      Linus Torvalds 提交于
      Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history,
      even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git
      archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about
      3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early
      git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good
      infrastructure for it.
      
      Let it rip!
      1da177e4