1. 29 5月, 2012 3 次提交
    • M
      edac: move nr_pages to dimm struct · a895bf8b
      Mauro Carvalho Chehab 提交于
      The number of pages is a dimm property. Move it to the dimm struct.
      
      After this change, it is possible to add sysfs nodes for the DIMM's that
      will properly represent the DIMM stick properties, including its size.
      
      A TODO fix here is to properly represent dual-rank/quad-rank DIMMs when
      the memory controller represents the memory via chip select rows.
      Reviewed-by: NAristeu Rozanski <arozansk@redhat.com>
      Acked-by: NBorislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com>
      Acked-by: NChris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com>
      Cc: Doug Thompson <norsk5@yahoo.com>
      Cc: Mark Gross <mark.gross@intel.com>
      Cc: Jason Uhlenkott <juhlenko@akamai.com>
      Cc: Tim Small <tim@buttersideup.com>
      Cc: Ranganathan Desikan <ravi@jetztechnologies.com>
      Cc: "Arvind R." <arvino55@gmail.com>
      Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
      Cc: Egor Martovetsky <egor@pasemi.com>
      Cc: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz>
      Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
      Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
      Cc: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com>
      Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
      Cc: Hitoshi Mitake <h.mitake@gmail.com>
      Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
      Cc: "Niklas Söderlund" <niklas.soderlund@ericsson.com>
      Cc: Shaohui Xie <Shaohui.Xie@freescale.com>
      Cc: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@gmail.com>
      Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
      Signed-off-by: NMauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
      a895bf8b
    • M
      edac: Don't initialize csrow's first_page & friends when not needed · 5e2af0c0
      Mauro Carvalho Chehab 提交于
      Almost all edac	drivers	initialize csrow_info->first_page,
      csrow_info->last_page and csrow_info->page_mask. Those vars are
      used inside the EDAC core, in order to calculate the csrow affected
      by an error, by using the routine edac_mc_find_csrow_by_page().
      
      However, very few drivers actually use it:
              e752x_edac.c
              e7xxx_edac.c
              i3000_edac.c
              i82443bxgx_edac.c
              i82860_edac.c
              i82875p_edac.c
              i82975x_edac.c
              r82600_edac.c
      
      There also a few other drivers that have their own calculus
      formula internally using those vars.
      
      All the others are just wasting time by initializing those
      data.
      
      While initializing data without using them won't cause any troubles, as
      those information is stored at the wrong place (at csrows structure), it
      is better to remove what is unused, in order to simplify the next patch.
      Reviewed-by: NAristeu Rozanski <arozansk@redhat.com>
      Acked-by: NBorislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com>
      Acked-by: NChris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com>
      Cc: Doug Thompson <norsk5@yahoo.com>
      Cc: Hitoshi Mitake <h.mitake@gmail.com>
      Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
      Cc: "Niklas Söderlund" <niklas.soderlund@ericsson.com>
      Cc: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@gmail.com>
      Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
      Signed-off-by: NMauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
      5e2af0c0
    • M
      edac: move dimm properties to struct dimm_info · 084a4fcc
      Mauro Carvalho Chehab 提交于
      On systems based on chip select rows, all channels need to use memories
      with the same properties, otherwise the memories on channels A and B
      won't be recognized.
      
      However, such assumption is not true for all types of memory
      controllers.
      
      Controllers for FB-DIMM's don't have such requirements.
      
      Also, modern Intel controllers seem to be capable of handling such
      differences.
      
      So, we need to get rid of storing the DIMM information into a per-csrow
      data, storing it, instead at the right place.
      
      The first step is to move grain, mtype, dtype and edac_mode to the
      per-dimm struct.
      Reviewed-by: NAristeu Rozanski <arozansk@redhat.com>
      Reviewed-by: NBorislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com>
      Acked-by: NChris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com>
      Cc: Doug Thompson <norsk5@yahoo.com>
      Cc: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com>
      Cc: Mark Gross <mark.gross@intel.com>
      Cc: Jason Uhlenkott <juhlenko@akamai.com>
      Cc: Tim Small <tim@buttersideup.com>
      Cc: Ranganathan Desikan <ravi@jetztechnologies.com>
      Cc: "Arvind R." <arvino55@gmail.com>
      Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
      Cc: Egor Martovetsky <egor@pasemi.com>
      Cc: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz>
      Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
      Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
      Cc: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com>
      Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
      Cc: Hitoshi Mitake <h.mitake@gmail.com>
      Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
      Cc: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@parallels.com>
      Cc: "Niklas Söderlund" <niklas.soderlund@ericsson.com>
      Cc: Shaohui Xie <Shaohui.Xie@freescale.com>
      Cc: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@gmail.com>
      Cc: Mike Williams <mike@mikebwilliams.com>
      Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
      Signed-off-by: NMauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
      084a4fcc
  2. 22 3月, 2012 1 次提交
    • M
      i5400_edac: Avoid calling pci_put_device() twice · 0142877a
      Mauro Carvalho Chehab 提交于
      When i5400_edac driver is removed and re-loaded a few times, it causes
      an OOPS, as it is currently decrementing some PCI device usage two
      times.
      
      When called inside a loop, pci_get_device() will call
      pci_put_device(). That mangles the error count. In this specific
      case, it seems easier to just duplicate the call.
      
      Also fixes the error logic when pci_get_device fails.
      Signed-off-by: NMauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
      0142877a
  3. 19 3月, 2012 1 次提交
  4. 19 4月, 2011 1 次提交
  5. 31 3月, 2011 1 次提交
  6. 11 8月, 2010 1 次提交
  7. 28 5月, 2010 1 次提交
  8. 29 10月, 2009 1 次提交
    • J
      edac: i5400 fix csrow mapping · 156edd4a
      Jeff Roberson 提交于
      The i5400 EDAC driver has several bugs with chip-select row computation
      which most likely lead to bugs in detailed error reporting.  Attempts to
      contact the authors have gone mostly unanswered so I am presenting my diff
      here.  I do not subscribe to lkml and would appreciate being kept in the
      cc.
      
      The most egregious problem was miscalculating the addresses of MTR
      registers after register 0 by assuming they are 32bit rather than 16.
      This caused the driver to miss half of the memories.  Most motherboards
      tend to have only 8 dimm slots and not 16, so this may not have been
      noticed before.
      
      Further, the row calculations multiplied the number of dimms several
      times, ultimately ending up with a maximum row of 32.  The chipset only
      supports 4 dimms in each of 4 channels, so csrow could not be higher than
      4 unless you use a row per-rank with dual-rank dimms.  I opted to
      eliminate this behavior as it is confusing to the user and the error
      reporting works by slot and not rank.  This gives a much clearer view of
      memory by slot and channel in /sys.
      Signed-off-by: NJeff Roberson <jroberson@jroberson.net>
      Signed-off-by: NDoug Thompson <dougthompson@xmission.com>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      156edd4a
  9. 07 1月, 2009 2 次提交