1. 28 5月, 2010 2 次提交
  2. 30 3月, 2010 1 次提交
    • T
      include cleanup: Update gfp.h and slab.h includes to prepare for breaking... · 5a0e3ad6
      Tejun Heo 提交于
      include cleanup: Update gfp.h and slab.h includes to prepare for breaking implicit slab.h inclusion from percpu.h
      
      percpu.h is included by sched.h and module.h and thus ends up being
      included when building most .c files.  percpu.h includes slab.h which
      in turn includes gfp.h making everything defined by the two files
      universally available and complicating inclusion dependencies.
      
      percpu.h -> slab.h dependency is about to be removed.  Prepare for
      this change by updating users of gfp and slab facilities include those
      headers directly instead of assuming availability.  As this conversion
      needs to touch large number of source files, the following script is
      used as the basis of conversion.
      
        http://userweb.kernel.org/~tj/misc/slabh-sweep.py
      
      The script does the followings.
      
      * Scan files for gfp and slab usages and update includes such that
        only the necessary includes are there.  ie. if only gfp is used,
        gfp.h, if slab is used, slab.h.
      
      * When the script inserts a new include, it looks at the include
        blocks and try to put the new include such that its order conforms
        to its surrounding.  It's put in the include block which contains
        core kernel includes, in the same order that the rest are ordered -
        alphabetical, Christmas tree, rev-Xmas-tree or at the end if there
        doesn't seem to be any matching order.
      
      * If the script can't find a place to put a new include (mostly
        because the file doesn't have fitting include block), it prints out
        an error message indicating which .h file needs to be added to the
        file.
      
      The conversion was done in the following steps.
      
      1. The initial automatic conversion of all .c files updated slightly
         over 4000 files, deleting around 700 includes and adding ~480 gfp.h
         and ~3000 slab.h inclusions.  The script emitted errors for ~400
         files.
      
      2. Each error was manually checked.  Some didn't need the inclusion,
         some needed manual addition while adding it to implementation .h or
         embedding .c file was more appropriate for others.  This step added
         inclusions to around 150 files.
      
      3. The script was run again and the output was compared to the edits
         from #2 to make sure no file was left behind.
      
      4. Several build tests were done and a couple of problems were fixed.
         e.g. lib/decompress_*.c used malloc/free() wrappers around slab
         APIs requiring slab.h to be added manually.
      
      5. The script was run on all .h files but without automatically
         editing them as sprinkling gfp.h and slab.h inclusions around .h
         files could easily lead to inclusion dependency hell.  Most gfp.h
         inclusion directives were ignored as stuff from gfp.h was usually
         wildly available and often used in preprocessor macros.  Each
         slab.h inclusion directive was examined and added manually as
         necessary.
      
      6. percpu.h was updated not to include slab.h.
      
      7. Build test were done on the following configurations and failures
         were fixed.  CONFIG_GCOV_KERNEL was turned off for all tests (as my
         distributed build env didn't work with gcov compiles) and a few
         more options had to be turned off depending on archs to make things
         build (like ipr on powerpc/64 which failed due to missing writeq).
      
         * x86 and x86_64 UP and SMP allmodconfig and a custom test config.
         * powerpc and powerpc64 SMP allmodconfig
         * sparc and sparc64 SMP allmodconfig
         * ia64 SMP allmodconfig
         * s390 SMP allmodconfig
         * alpha SMP allmodconfig
         * um on x86_64 SMP allmodconfig
      
      8. percpu.h modifications were reverted so that it could be applied as
         a separate patch and serve as bisection point.
      
      Given the fact that I had only a couple of failures from tests on step
      6, I'm fairly confident about the coverage of this conversion patch.
      If there is a breakage, it's likely to be something in one of the arch
      headers which should be easily discoverable easily on most builds of
      the specific arch.
      Signed-off-by: NTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
      Guess-its-ok-by: NChristoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>
      Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
      Cc: Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com>
      5a0e3ad6
  3. 15 9月, 2009 2 次提交
  4. 10 9月, 2009 1 次提交
    • A
      UBIFS: do not print scary error messages needlessly · 348709ba
      Artem Bityutskiy 提交于
      At the moment UBIFS print large and scary error messages and
      flash dumps in case of nearly any corruption, even if it is
      a recoverable corruption. For example, if the master node is
      corrupted, ubifs_scan() prints error dumps, then UBIFS recovers
      just fine and goes on.
      
      This patch makes UBIFS print scary error messages only in
      real cases, which are not recoverable. It adds 'quiet' argument
      to the 'ubifs_scan()' function, so the caller may ask 'ubi_scan()'
      not to print error messages if the caller is able to do recovery.
      Signed-off-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>
      Reviewed-by: NAdrian Hunter <Adrian.Hunter@nokia.com>
      348709ba
  5. 05 7月, 2009 3 次提交
  6. 08 6月, 2009 1 次提交
    • A
      UBIFS: start using hrtimers · f2c5dbd7
      Artem Bityutskiy 提交于
      UBIFS uses timers for write-buffer write-back. It is not
      crucial for us to write-back exactly on time. We are fine
      to write-back a little earlier or later. And this means
      we may optimize UBIFS timer so that it could be groped
      with a close timer event, so that the CPU would not be
      waken up just to do the write back. This is optimization
      to lessen power consumption, which is important in
      embedded devices UBIFS is used for.
      
      hrtimers have a nice feature: they are effectively range
      timers, and we may defind the soft and hard limits for
      it. Standard timers do not have these feature. They may
      only be made deferrable, but this means there is effectively
      no hard limit. So, we will better use hrtimers.
      Signed-off-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>
      f2c5dbd7
  7. 26 3月, 2009 1 次提交
  8. 16 3月, 2009 1 次提交
  9. 08 3月, 2009 1 次提交
  10. 29 1月, 2009 2 次提交
  11. 27 1月, 2009 1 次提交
    • A
      UBIFS: fix no_chk_data_crc · 6f7ab6d4
      Artem Bityutskiy 提交于
      When data CRC checking is disabled, UBIFS returns incorrect return
      code from the 'try_read_node()' function (0 instead of 1, which means
      CRC error), which make the caller re-read the data node again, but using
      a different code patch, so the second read is fine. Thus, we read the
      same node twice. And the result of this is that UBIFS is slower
      with no_chk_data_crc option than it is with chk_data_crc option.
      This patches fixes the problem.
      Reported-by: NReuben Dowle <Reuben.Dowle@navico.com>
      Signed-off-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>
      6f7ab6d4
  12. 26 1月, 2009 3 次提交
  13. 20 1月, 2009 1 次提交
  14. 18 1月, 2009 1 次提交
  15. 31 12月, 2008 2 次提交
  16. 23 12月, 2008 4 次提交
  17. 04 12月, 2008 1 次提交
  18. 03 12月, 2008 5 次提交
  19. 22 11月, 2008 3 次提交
    • A
      UBIFS: pre-allocate bulk-read buffer · 3477d204
      Artem Bityutskiy 提交于
      To avoid memory allocation failure during bulk-read, pre-allocate
      a bulk-read buffer, so that if there is only one bulk-reader at
      a time, it would just use the pre-allocated buffer and would not
      do any memory allocation. However, if there are more than 1 bulk-
      reader, then only one reader would use the pre-allocated buffer,
      while the other reader would allocate the buffer for itself.
      Signed-off-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>
      3477d204
    • A
      UBIFS: do not allocate too much · 6c0c42cd
      Artem Bityutskiy 提交于
      Bulk-read allocates 128KiB or more using kmalloc. The allocation
      starts failing often when the memory gets fragmented. UBIFS still
      works fine in this case, because it falls-back to standard
      (non-optimized) read method, though. This patch teaches bulk-read
      to allocate exactly the amount of memory it needs, instead of
      allocating 128KiB every time.
      
      This patch is also a preparation to the further fix where we'll
      have a pre-allocated bulk-read buffer as well. For example, now
      the @bu object is prepared in 'ubifs_bulk_read()', so we could
      path either pre-allocated or allocated information to
      'ubifs_do_bulk_read()' later. Or teaching 'ubifs_do_bulk_read()'
      not to allocate 'bu->buf' if it is already there.
      Signed-off-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>
      6c0c42cd
    • A
      UBIFS: do not print scary memory allocation warnings · 39ce81ce
      Artem Bityutskiy 提交于
      Bulk-read allocates a lot of memory with 'kmalloc()', and when it
      is/gets fragmented 'kmalloc()' fails with a scarry warning. But
      because bulk-read is just an optimization, UBIFS keeps working fine.
      Supress the warning by passing __GFP_NOWARN option to 'kmalloc()'.
      
      This patch also introduces a macro for the magic 128KiB constant.
      This is just neater.
      
      Note, this is not really fixes the problem we had, but just hides
      the warnings. The further patches fix the problem.
      Signed-off-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>
      39ce81ce
  20. 30 9月, 2008 4 次提交