- 30 5月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 Abhishek Goel 提交于
The names of the idle states in the output of cpupower monitor command are truncated to 4 characters. On POWER9, this creates ambiguity as the states are named "stop0", "stop1", etc. root:~# cpupower monitor |Idle_Stats PKG |CORE|CPU | snoo | stop | stop | stop | stop | stop | stop 0| 0| 0| 0.00| 0.00| 0.00| 0.00| 0.00| 0.00| 1.90 0| 0| 1| 0.00| 0.00| 0.00| 0.00| 0.00| 0.00| 0.00 0| 0| 2| 0.00| 0.00| 0.00| 0.00| 0.00| 0.00| 0.00 0| 0| 3| 0.00| 0.00| 0.00| 0.00| 0.00| 0.00| 0.00 This patch modifies the output to print the state name that results in a legible output. The names will be printed with atmost 1 padding in left. root:~# cpupower monitor | Idle_Stats PKG|CORE| CPU|snooze|stop0L| stop0|stop1L| stop1|stop2L| stop2 0| 0| 0| 0.00| 0.00| 0.00| 0.00| 0.00| 0.00| 0.72 0| 0| 1| 0.00| 0.00| 0.00| 0.00| 0.00| 0.00| 0.00 0| 0| 2| 0.00| 0.00| 0.00| 0.00| 0.00| 0.00| 0.00 0| 0| 3| 0.00| 0.00| 0.00| 0.00| 0.00| 0.00| 0.00 This patch does not affect the output for intel. Output for intel before applying the patch: root:~# cpupower monitor |Idle_Stats CPU | POLL | C1-S | C1E- | C3-S | C6-S | C7s- | C8-S | C9-S | C10- 0| 0.00| 0.14| 0.39| 0.35| 7.41| 0.00| 17.67| 1.01| 70.03 2| 0.00| 0.19| 0.47| 0.10| 6.50| 0.00| 29.66| 2.17| 58.07 1| 0.00| 0.11| 0.50| 1.50| 9.11| 0.18| 18.19| 0.40| 66.63 3| 0.00| 0.67| 0.42| 0.03| 5.84| 0.00| 12.58| 0.77| 77.14 Output for intel after applying the patch: root:~# cpupower monitor | Idle_Stats CPU| POLL | C1-S | C1E- | C3-S | C6-S | C7s- | C8-S | C9-S | C10- 0| 0.03| 0.33| 1.01| 0.27| 3.03| 0.00| 19.18| 0.00| 71.24 2| 0.00| 1.58| 0.58| 0.42| 8.55| 0.09| 21.11| 0.99| 63.32 1| 0.00| 1.26| 0.88| 0.43| 9.00| 0.02| 7.78| 4.65| 71.91 3| 0.00| 0.30| 0.42| 0.06| 13.62| 0.21| 30.29| 0.00| 52.45 Signed-off-by: NAbhishek Goel <huntbag@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NShuah Khan (Samsung OSG) <shuah@kernel.org>
-
- 02 11月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jacob Tanenbaum 提交于
[root@hp-dl980g7-02 linux]# cpupower monitor ... 5472| 0| 1|******|******|******|******|| 0.00| 0.00| 0.00| 0.00| 0.00 *is offline 10567| 0| 159|******|******|******|******|| 0.00| 0.00| 0.00| 0.00| 0.00 *is offline 1661206560|859272560| 150|******|******|******|******|| 0.00| 0.00| 0.00| 0.00| 0.00 *is offline 1661206560|943093104| 140|******|******|******|******|| 0.00| 0.00| 0.00| 0.00| 0.00 *is offline because of this cpupower also holds the incorrect value for the number of physical packages in the machine Changed cpupower to initialize the values of an offline cpu's socket and core to -1, warn the user that one or more cpus is/are offline and not print statistics for offline cpus. This fix hides offlined cores where topology cannot be accessed. With a recent kernel patch suggested from Prarit Bhargava it may be possible that soft offlined cores' topology can still be parsed. This patch would then show which cores in which package/socket are offline, when sane toplogoy information is available. Signed-off-by: NJacob Tanenbaum <jtanenba@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NThomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 28 11月, 2012 2 次提交
-
-
由 Thomas Renninger 提交于
If an MSR based monitor is run in parallel this is not needed. This is the default case on all/most Intel machines. But when only sysfs info is read via cpupower monitor -m Idle_Stats (typically the case for non root users) or when other monitors are PCI based (AMD), Idle_Stats, read from sysfs can be totally bogus: cpupower monitor -m Idle_Stats PKG |CORE|CPU | POLL | C1-N | C3-N | C6-N 0| 0| 0| 0.00| 0.00| 0.24| 99.81 0| 0| 32| 0.00| 0.00| 0.00| 100.7 ... 0| 17| 20| 0.00| 0.00| 0.00| 173.1 0| 17| 52| 0.00| 0.00| 0.07| 173.0 0| 18| 68| 0.00| 0.00| 0.00| 0.00 0| 18| 76| 0.00| 0.00| 0.00| 0.00 ... With the -c option all cores are woken up and the kernel did update cpuidle statistics before reading out sysfs. This causes some overhead. Therefore avoid if possible, use if needed: cpupower monitor -c -m Idle_Stats PKG |CORE|CPU | POLL | C1-N | C3-N | C6-N 0| 0| 0| 0.00| 0.00| 0.00| 100.2 0| 0| 32| 0.00| 0.00| 0.00| 100.2 ... 0| 8| 8| 0.00| 0.00| 0.00| 99.82 0| 8| 40| 0.00| 0.00| 0.00| 99.81 0| 9| 24| 0.00| 0.00| 0.00| 100.3 0| 9| 56| 0.00| 0.00| 0.00| 100.2 0| 16| 4| 0.00| 0.00| 0.00| 99.75 0| 16| 36| 0.00| 0.00| 0.00| 99.38 ... Signed-off-by: NThomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Palmer Cox 提交于
Fix minor warnings reported with GCC 4.6: * The sysfs_write_file function is unused - remove it. * The pr_mon_len in the print_header function is unsed - remove it. Signed-off-by: NPalmer Cox <p@lmercox.com> Signed-off-by: NThomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 19 8月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Dominik Brodowski 提交于
Instead of printing something non-formatted to stdout, call man(1) to show the man page for the proper subcommand. Signed-off-by: NDominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net>
-
- 16 8月, 2011 2 次提交
-
-
由 Thomas Renninger 提交于
This allows for example: cpupower -c 2-4,6 monitor -m Mperf |Mperf PKG |CORE|CPU | C0 | Cx | Freq 0| 8| 4| 2.42| 97.58| 1353 0| 16| 2| 14.38| 85.62| 1928 0| 24| 6| 1.76| 98.24| 1442 1| 16| 3| 15.53| 84.47| 1650 CPUs always get resorted for package, core then cpu id if it could get read out (or however you name these topology levels...). Still this is a nice way to keep the overview if a test binary is bound to a specific CPU or if one wants to show all CPUs inside a package or similar. Still missing: Do not measure not available cores to reduce the overhead and achieve better results. Signed-off-by: NThomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NDominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net>
-
由 Thomas Renninger 提交于
Before, checking for offlined CPUs was done dirty and it was checked whether topology parsing returned -1 values. But this is a valid case on a Xen (and possibly other) kernels. Do proper online/offline checking, also take CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU option into account (no /sys/devices/../cpuX/online file). Signed-off-by: NThomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NDominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net>
-
- 30 7月, 2011 2 次提交
-
-
由 Dominik Brodowski 提交于
Signed-off-by: NDominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net>
-
由 Dominik Brodowski 提交于
CPU power consumption vs performance tuning is no longer limited to CPU frequency switching anymore: deep sleep states, traditional dynamic frequency scaling and hidden turbo/boost frequencies are tied close together and depend on each other. The first two exist on different architectures like PPC, Itanium and ARM, the latter (so far) only on X86. On X86 the APU (CPU+GPU) will only run most efficiently if CPU and GPU has proper power management in place. Users and Developers want to have *one* tool to get an overview what their system supports and to monitor and debug CPU power management in detail. The tool should compile and work on as many architectures as possible. Once this tool stabilizes a bit, it is intended to replace the Intel-specific tools in tools/power/x86 Signed-off-by: NDominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net>
-