1. 30 1月, 2008 3 次提交
    • N
      spinlock: lockbreak cleanup · 95c354fe
      Nick Piggin 提交于
      The break_lock data structure and code for spinlocks is quite nasty.
      Not only does it double the size of a spinlock but it changes locking to
      a potentially less optimal trylock.
      
      Put all of that under CONFIG_GENERIC_LOCKBREAK, and introduce a
      __raw_spin_is_contended that uses the lock data itself to determine whether
      there are waiters on the lock, to be used if CONFIG_GENERIC_LOCKBREAK is
      not set.
      
      Rename need_lockbreak to spin_needbreak, make it use spin_is_contended to
      decouple it from the spinlock implementation, and make it typesafe (rwlocks
      do not have any need_lockbreak sites -- why do they even get bloated up
      with that break_lock then?).
      Signed-off-by: NNick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
      Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      95c354fe
    • A
      x86: PIE executable randomization, checkpatch fixes · bb1ad820
      Andrew Morton 提交于
      #39: FILE: arch/ia64/ia32/binfmt_elf32.c:229:
      +elf32_map (struct file *filep, unsigned long addr, struct elf_phdr *eppnt, int prot, int type, unsigned long unused)
      
      WARNING: no space between function name and open parenthesis '('
      #39: FILE: arch/ia64/ia32/binfmt_elf32.c:229:
      +elf32_map (struct file *filep, unsigned long addr, struct elf_phdr *eppnt, int prot, int type, unsigned long unused)
      
      WARNING: line over 80 characters
      #67: FILE: arch/x86/kernel/sys_x86_64.c:80:
      +			new_begin = randomize_range(*begin, *begin + 0x02000000, 0);
      
      ERROR: use tabs not spaces
      #110: FILE: arch/x86/kernel/sys_x86_64.c:185:
      + ^I        mm->cached_hole_size = 0;$
      
      ERROR: use tabs not spaces
      #111: FILE: arch/x86/kernel/sys_x86_64.c:186:
      + ^I^Imm->free_area_cache = mm->mmap_base;$
      
      ERROR: use tabs not spaces
      #112: FILE: arch/x86/kernel/sys_x86_64.c:187:
      + ^I}$
      
      ERROR: use tabs not spaces
      #141: FILE: arch/x86/kernel/sys_x86_64.c:216:
      + ^I^I/* remember the largest hole we saw so far */$
      
      ERROR: use tabs not spaces
      #142: FILE: arch/x86/kernel/sys_x86_64.c:217:
      + ^I^Iif (addr + mm->cached_hole_size < vma->vm_start)$
      
      ERROR: use tabs not spaces
      #143: FILE: arch/x86/kernel/sys_x86_64.c:218:
      + ^I^I        mm->cached_hole_size = vma->vm_start - addr;$
      
      ERROR: use tabs not spaces
      #157: FILE: arch/x86/kernel/sys_x86_64.c:232:
      +  ^Imm->free_area_cache = TASK_UNMAPPED_BASE;$
      
      ERROR: need a space before the open parenthesis '('
      #291: FILE: arch/x86/mm/mmap_64.c:101:
      +	} else if(mmap_is_legacy()) {
      
      WARNING: braces {} are not necessary for single statement blocks
      #302: FILE: arch/x86/mm/mmap_64.c:112:
      +	if (current->flags & PF_RANDOMIZE) {
      +		mm->mmap_base += ((long)rnd) << PAGE_SHIFT;
      +	}
      
      WARNING: line over 80 characters
      #314: FILE: fs/binfmt_elf.c:48:
      +static unsigned long elf_map (struct file *, unsigned long, struct elf_phdr *, int, int, unsigned long);
      
      WARNING: no space between function name and open parenthesis '('
      #314: FILE: fs/binfmt_elf.c:48:
      +static unsigned long elf_map (struct file *, unsigned long, struct elf_phdr *, int, int, unsigned long);
      
      WARNING: line over 80 characters
      #429: FILE: fs/binfmt_elf.c:438:
      +					   eppnt, elf_prot, elf_type, total_size);
      
      ERROR: need space after that ',' (ctx:VxV)
      #480: FILE: fs/binfmt_elf.c:939:
      +				elf_prot, elf_flags,0);
       				                   ^
      
      total: 9 errors, 7 warnings, 461 lines checked
      Your patch has style problems, please review.  If any of these errors
      are false positives report them to the maintainer, see
      CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS.
      
      Please run checkpatch prior to sending patches
      
      Cc: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com>
      Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
      Cc: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
      Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
      Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
      Cc: Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
      Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      bb1ad820
    • J
      x86: PIE executable randomization · cc503c1b
      Jiri Kosina 提交于
      main executable of (specially compiled/linked -pie/-fpie) ET_DYN binaries
      onto a random address (in cases in which mmap() is allowed to perform a
      randomization).
      
      The code has been extraced from Ingo's exec-shield patch
      http://people.redhat.com/mingo/exec-shield/
      
      [akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix used-uninitialsied warning]
      [kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com: fixed ia32 ELF on x86_64 handling]
      Signed-off-by: NJiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
      Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
      Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
      Cc: Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>
      Cc: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
      Cc: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
      Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      cc503c1b
  2. 29 1月, 2008 2 次提交
  3. 26 1月, 2008 2 次提交
  4. 25 1月, 2008 2 次提交
  5. 16 1月, 2008 1 次提交
    • L
      [IA64] Fix unaligned handler for floating point instructions with base update · 1a499150
      Luck, Tony 提交于
      The compiler team did the hard work for this distilling a problem in
      large fortran application which showed up when applied to a 290MB input
      data set down to this instruction:
      
      	ldfd f34=[r17],-8
      
      Which they noticed incremented r17 by 0x10 rather than decrementing it
      by 8 when the value in r17 caused an unaligned data fault.  I tracked
      it down to some bad instruction decoding in unaligned.c. The code
      assumes that the 'x' bit can determine whether the instruction is
      an "ldf" or "ldfp" ... which it is for opcode=6 (see table 4-29 on
      page 3:302 of the SDM).  But for opcode=7 the 'x' bit is irrelevent,
      all variants are "ldf" instructions (see table 4-36 on page 3:306).
      
      Note also that interpreting the instruction as "ldfp" means that the
      "paired" floating point register (f35 in the example here) will also
      be corrupted.
      Signed-off-by: NTony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
      1a499150
  6. 04 1月, 2008 1 次提交
  7. 20 12月, 2007 7 次提交
  8. 19 12月, 2007 5 次提交
  9. 08 12月, 2007 12 次提交
  10. 15 11月, 2007 1 次提交
  11. 10 11月, 2007 4 次提交