Create a new subdirectory for the FPU support code in arch/x86/kernel/fpu/.

Rename 'i387.c' to 'core.c' - as this really collects the core FPU support
code, nothing i387 specific.

We'll better organize this directory in later patches.
Reviewed-by: NBorislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

So init_thread_xstate() is a misnomer in that it's not really related to a specific
thread - it determines, once during initial bootup, the size of the xstate context.

Also improve the comments.
Reviewed-by: NBorislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

fpu_init() is a bit of a misnomer in that it (falsely) creates the
impression that it's related to the (old) fpu_finit() function,
which initializes FPU ctx state.

Rename it to fpu__cpu_init() to make its boot time initialization
clear, and to move it to the fpu__*() namespace.

Also fix and extend its comment block to point out that it's
called not only on the boot CPU, but on secondary CPUs as well.
Reviewed-by: NBorislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

Make it clear that we are initializing the in-memory FPU context area,
no the FPU registers.

Also move it to the fpu__*() namespace.
Reviewed-by: NBorislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

Use the fpu__*() namespace for fpstate_alloc() as well.

Also add a comment about FPU state alignment.
Reviewed-by: NBorislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

This is not a small function, and it's used in several places,
one of them a popular module (KVM).

Move the function out of line. This saves a bit of text,
even with the symbol export overhead:

   text    data     bss     dec     hex filename
   12566052        1619504 1089536 15275092         e91454 vmlinux.before
   12566046        1619504 1089536 15275086         e9144e vmlinux.after
Reviewed-by: NBorislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

Open code the PF_USED_MATH logic, to make the logic more obvious.

(We'll slowly convert the other users of *_used_math() methods as well.)
Reviewed-by: NBorislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

This function is only called for stopped child tasks, so the
fpu__save() branch will never get called - remove it.
Reviewed-by: NBorislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

This function name is a misnomer now that we've split out all the
other users from it. Rename it accordingly: it's used to save
the FPU state of (ptrace-)stopped child tasks.

Add debugging check to double check this intended usage: that this
function is only called for non-current, stopped child tasks.
Reviewed-by: NBorislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

Now that the allocation users have been split off into a separate
function, init_fpu() has become local to i387.c: make it static.
Reviewed-by: NBorislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

Most init_fpu() users don't want the register-saving aspect of the
function, they are calling it for 'current' and when FPU registers
are not allocated and initialized yet.

Split out a simplified API that does just that (and add debug-checks
for these conditions): fpstate_alloc_init().

Use it where appropriate.
Reviewed-by: NBorislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

Use the fpu__*() namespace to organize FPU ops better.

Also document fpu__detect() a bit.
Reviewed-by: NBorislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

Document the function a bit more and add debugging check that we are only
running this with the current task.
Reviewed-by: NBorislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

Add an explanation to fpu__save() and also don't export it to
random modules - we don't want them to futz around with deep kernel
internals.
Reviewed-by: NBorislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

This function is a misnomer on two levels:

1) it doesn't really manipulate TS on modern CPUs anymore, its
   primary purpose is to save FPU state, used:

      - when executing fork()/clone(): to copy current FPU state
        to the child's FPU state.

      - when handling math exceptions: to generate the math error
        si_code in the signal frame.

2) even on legacy CPUs it doesn't actually 'unlazy', if then
   it lazies the FPU state: as a side effect of the old FNSAVE
   instruction which clears (destroys) FPU state it's necessary
   to set CR0::TS.

So rename it to fpu__save() to better reflect its purpose.
Reviewed-by: NBorislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

So I was playing with gdb today and did this simple thing:

	gdb /bin/ls

	...

	(gdb) run

Box exploded with this splat:

	BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 00000000000001d0
	IP: [<ffffffff8100fe5a>] xstateregs_get+0x7a/0x120
	[...]

	Call Trace:
	 ptrace_regset
	 ptrace_request
	 ? wait_task_inactive
	 ? preempt_count_sub
	 arch_ptrace
	 ? ptrace_get_task_struct
	 SyS_ptrace
	 system_call_fastpath

... because we do cache &target->thread.fpu.state->xsave into the
local variable xsave but that pointer is NULL at that time and
it gets initialized later, in init_fpu(), see:

	e7f180dc ("x86/fpu: Change xstateregs_get()/set() to use ->xsave.i387 rather than ->fxsave")

The fix is simple: load xsave *after* init_fpu() has run.

Also do the same in xstateregs_set(), as suggested by Oleg Nesterov.
Signed-off-by: NBorislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Acked-by: NOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: Tavis Ormandy <taviso@google.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1429209697-5902-1-git-send-email-bp@alien8.deSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

user_mode_vm() and user_mode() are now the same.  Change all callers
of user_mode_vm() to user_mode().

The next patch will remove the definition of user_mode_vm.
Signed-off-by: NAndy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Brad Spengler <spender@grsecurity.net>
Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/43b1f57f3df70df5a08b0925897c660725015554.1426728647.git.luto@kernel.org
[ Merged to a more recent kernel. ]
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

Call it what it does and in accordance with the context where it is
used: we reset the FPU state either because we were unable to restore it
from the one saved in the task or because we simply want to reset it.
Signed-off-by: NBorislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Acked-by: NOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

fx_finit() has two users but only fpu_finit() needs to clear
xstate, alloc_bootmem_align() in setup_init_fpu_buf() returns
zero-filled memory.

And note that both memset()'s look confusing. Yes, offsetof() is
0 for ->fxsave or ->fsave, but it would be cleaner to turn
them into a single memset() which zeroes fpu->state.
Signed-off-by: NOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NBorislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Acked-by: NRik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Tavis Ormandy <taviso@google.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1425967585-4725-2-git-send-email-bp@alien8.de
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150302183257.GC23085@redhat.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

This is a cosmetic change: xstateregs_get() and xstateregs_set()
abuse ->fxsave to access xsave->i387.sw_reserved.

This practice is correct, ->fxsave and xsave->i387 share the same memory,
but IMHO this looks confusing.

And we can make this code more readable if we add a
"struct xsave_struct *" local variable as well.
Signed-off-by: NOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NBorislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: NRik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Tavis Ormandy <taviso@google.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1425967585-4725-1-git-send-email-bp@alien8.de
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150302183237.GB23085@redhat.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

The __thread_has_fpu() check in interrupted_kernel_fpu_idle() was needed
to prevent the nested kernel_fpu_begin(). Now that we have in_kernel_fpu
and !__thread_has_fpu() case in __kernel_fpu_begin() does not depend on
use_eager_fpu() (except clts) we can remove it.

__thread_has_fpu() can be false even if use_eager_fpu(), but this case
does not differ from !use_eager_fpu() case except we should not worry
about X86_CR0_TS, __kernel_fpu_begin()/end() will not touch this bit.

Note: I think we can kill all irq_fpu_usable() checks except in_kernel_fpu,
just we need to record the state of X86_CR0_TS in __kernel_fpu_begin() and
conditionalize stts() in __kernel_fpu_end(), but this needs another patch.
Signed-off-by: NOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: NRik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Acked-by: NAndy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Suresh Siddha <sbsiddha@gmail.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150119185151.GC16427@redhat.comSigned-off-by: NBorislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>

__kernel_fpu_begin() does nothing if !__thread_has_fpu() && use_eager_fpu(),
perhaps it assumes that this case is simply impossible. This is certainly
not possible if in_interrupt() == T; interrupted_user_mode() should have
FPU, and interrupted_kernel_fpu_idle() should fail if !__thread_has_fpu().

However, even if use_eager_fpu() == T a task can do drop_fpu(), then switch
to another thread which becomes fpu_owner_task, then resume and call some
function which does kernel_fpu_begin(). Say, an exiting task does a lot of
things after exit_thread(), it is not safe to assume that it can't use FPU
in these paths.
Signed-off-by: NOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: NRik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Suresh Siddha <sbsiddha@gmail.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Cc: Pekka Riikonen <priikone@iki.fi>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150119185132.GB16427@redhat.comSigned-off-by: NBorislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>

Replace magic assignments of fpu.last_cpu = ~0 with more explicit
task_disable_lazy_fpu_restore() calls.
Signed-off-by: NRik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1423252925-14451-8-git-send-email-riel@redhat.comSigned-off-by: NBorislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>

unlazy_fpu()->__thread_fpu_end() doesn't look right if use_eager_fpu().
Unconditional __thread_fpu_end() is only correct if we know that this
thread can't return to user-mode and use FPU.

Fortunately it has only 2 callers. fpu_copy() checks use_eager_fpu(),
and init_fpu(current) can be only called by the coredumping thread via
regset->get(). But it is exported to modules, and imo this should be
fixed anyway.

And if we check use_eager_fpu() we can use __save_fpu() like fpu_copy()
and save_init_fpu() do.

- It seems that even !use_eager_fpu() case doesn't need the unconditional
  __thread_fpu_end(), we only need it if __save_init_fpu() returns 0.

- It is still not clear to me if __save_init_fpu() can safely nest with
  another save + restore from __kernel_fpu_begin(). If not, we can use
  kernel_fpu_disable() to fix the race.
Signed-off-by: NOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NRik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1423252925-14451-3-git-send-email-riel@redhat.comSigned-off-by: NBorislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>

The "else" branch clears ->fpu_counter as a remnant of the lazy FPU
usage counting:

  e07e23e1 ("[PATCH] non lazy "sleazy" fpu implementation")

However, switch_fpu_prepare() does this now so that else branch is
superfluous.

If we do use_eager_fpu(), then this has no effect. Otherwise, if we
actually wanted to prevent fpu preload after the context switch we would
need to reset it unconditionally, even if __thread_has_fpu().
Signed-off-by: NOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NRik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1423252925-14451-2-git-send-email-riel@redhat.comSigned-off-by: NBorislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>

CR4 manipulation was split, seemingly at random, between direct
(write_cr4) and using a helper (set/clear_in_cr4).  Unfortunately,
the set_in_cr4 and clear_in_cr4 helpers also poke at the boot code,
which only a small subset of users actually wanted.

This patch replaces all cr4 access in functions that don't leave cr4
exactly the way they found it with new helpers cr4_set_bits,
cr4_clear_bits, and cr4_set_bits_and_update_boot.
Signed-off-by: NAndy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Reviewed-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Cc: Vince Weaver <vince@deater.net>
Cc: "hillf.zj" <hillf.zj@alibaba-inc.com>
Cc: Valdis Kletnieks <Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/495a10bdc9e67016b8fd3945700d46cfd5c12c2f.1414190806.git.luto@amacapital.netSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

math_state_restore() can race with kernel_fpu_begin() if irq comes
right after __thread_fpu_begin(), __save_init_fpu() will overwrite
fpu->state we are going to restore.

Add 2 simple helpers, kernel_fpu_disable() and kernel_fpu_enable()
which simply set/clear in_kernel_fpu, and change math_state_restore()
to exclude kernel_fpu_begin() in between.

Alternatively we could use local_irq_save/restore, but probably these
new helpers can have more users.

Perhaps they should disable/enable preemption themselves, in this case
we can remove preempt_disable() in __restore_xstate_sig().
Signed-off-by: NOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: NRik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: matt.fleming@intel.com
Cc: bp@suse.de
Cc: pbonzini@redhat.com
Cc: luto@amacapital.net
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Suresh Siddha <sbsiddha@gmail.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150115192028.GD27332@redhat.comSigned-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

Now that we have in_kernel_fpu we can remove __thread_clear_has_fpu()
in __kernel_fpu_begin(). And this allows to replace the asymmetrical
and nontrivial use_eager_fpu + tsk_used_math check in kernel_fpu_end()
with the same __thread_has_fpu() check.

The logic becomes really simple; if _begin() does save() then _end()
needs restore(), this is controlled by __thread_has_fpu(). Otherwise
they do clts/stts unless use_eager_fpu().

Not only this makes begin/end symmetrical and imo more understandable,
potentially this allows to change irq_fpu_usable() to avoid all other
checks except "in_kernel_fpu".

Also, with this patch __kernel_fpu_end() does restore_fpu_checking()
and WARNs if it fails instead of math_state_restore(). I think this
looks better because we no longer need __thread_fpu_begin(), and it
would be better to report the failure in this case.
Signed-off-by: NOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Acked-by: NRik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: matt.fleming@intel.com
Cc: bp@suse.de
Cc: pbonzini@redhat.com
Cc: luto@amacapital.net
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Suresh Siddha <sbsiddha@gmail.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150115192005.GC27332@redhat.comSigned-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

interrupted_kernel_fpu_idle() tries to detect if kernel_fpu_begin()
is safe or not. In particular it should obviously deny the nested
kernel_fpu_begin() and this logic looks very confusing.

If use_eager_fpu() == T we rely on a) __thread_has_fpu() check in
interrupted_kernel_fpu_idle(), and b) on the fact that _begin() does
__thread_clear_has_fpu().

Otherwise we demand that the interrupted task has no FPU if it is in
kernel mode, this works because __kernel_fpu_begin() does clts() and
interrupted_kernel_fpu_idle() checks X86_CR0_TS.

Add the per-cpu "bool in_kernel_fpu" variable, and change this code
to check/set/clear it. This allows to do more cleanups and fixes, see
the next changes.

The patch also moves WARN_ON_ONCE() under preempt_disable() just to
make this_cpu_read() look better, this is not really needed. And in
fact I think we should move it into __kernel_fpu_begin().
Signed-off-by: NOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: NRik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: matt.fleming@intel.com
Cc: bp@suse.de
Cc: pbonzini@redhat.com
Cc: luto@amacapital.net
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Suresh Siddha <sbsiddha@gmail.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150115191943.GB27332@redhat.comSigned-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

The reserved bits (128~511) in the xsave header must be zero according to
X86 SDM. Clear the bits in this patch.
Signed-off-by: NFenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1401387164-43416-12-git-send-email-fenghua.yu@intel.comSigned-off-by: NH. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>

For non-eager fpu mode, thread's fpu state is allocated during the first
fpu usage (in the context of device not available exception). This
(math_state_restore()) can be a blocking call and hence we enable
interrupts (which were originally disabled when the exception happened),
allocate memory and disable interrupts etc.

But the eager-fpu mode, call's the same math_state_restore() from
kernel_fpu_end(). The assumption being that tsk_used_math() is always
set for the eager-fpu mode and thus avoid the code path of enabling
interrupts, allocating fpu state using blocking call and disable
interrupts etc.

But the below issue was noticed by Maarten Baert, Nate Eldredge and
few others:

If a user process dumps core on an ecrypt fs while aesni-intel is loaded,
we get a BUG() in __find_get_block() complaining that it was called with
interrupts disabled; then all further accesses to our ecrypt fs hang
and we have to reboot.

The aesni-intel code (encrypting the core file that we are writing) needs
the FPU and quite properly wraps its code in kernel_fpu_{begin,end}(),
the latter of which calls math_state_restore(). So after kernel_fpu_end(),
interrupts may be disabled, which nobody seems to expect, and they stay
that way until we eventually get to __find_get_block() which barfs.

For eager fpu, most the time, tsk_used_math() is true. At few instances
during thread exit, signal return handling etc, tsk_used_math() might
be false.

In kernel_fpu_end(), for eager-fpu, call math_state_restore()
only if tsk_used_math() is set. Otherwise, don't bother. Kernel code
path which cleared tsk_used_math() knows what needs to be done
with the fpu state.
Reported-by: NMaarten Baert <maarten-baert@hotmail.com>
Reported-by: NNate Eldredge <nate@thatsmathematics.com>
Suggested-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NSuresh Siddha <sbsiddha@gmail.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1391410583.3801.6.camel@europa
Cc: George Spelvin <linux@horizon.com>
Signed-off-by: NH. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>

Only a couple of arches (sh/x86) use fpu_counter in task_struct so it can
be moved out into ARCH specific thread_struct, reducing the size of
task_struct for other arches.

Compile tested i386_defconfig + gcc 4.7.3
Signed-off-by: NVineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com>
Acked-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Paul Mundt <paul.mundt@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

GCC will optimize mxcsr_feature_mask_init in arch/x86/kernel/i387.c:

		memset(&fx_scratch, 0, sizeof(struct i387_fxsave_struct));
		asm volatile("fxsave %0" : : "m" (fx_scratch));
		mask = fx_scratch.mxcsr_mask;
		if (mask == 0)
			mask = 0x0000ffbf;

to

		memset(&fx_scratch, 0, sizeof(struct i387_fxsave_struct));
		asm volatile("fxsave %0" : : "m" (fx_scratch));
		mask = 0x0000ffbf;

since asm statement doesn’t say it will update fx_scratch.  As the
result, the DAZ bit will be cleared.  This patch fixes it. This bug
dates back to at least kernel 2.6.12.
Signed-off-by: NH. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>

The __cpuinit type of throwaway sections might have made sense
some time ago when RAM was more constrained, but now the savings
do not offset the cost and complications.  For example, the fix in
commit 5e427ec2 ("x86: Fix bit corruption at CPU resume time")
is a good example of the nasty type of bugs that can be created
with improper use of the various __init prefixes.

After a discussion on LKML[1] it was decided that cpuinit should go
the way of devinit and be phased out.  Once all the users are gone,
we can then finally remove the macros themselves from linux/init.h.

Note that some harmless section mismatch warnings may result, since
notify_cpu_starting() and cpu_up() are arch independent (kernel/cpu.c)
are flagged as __cpuinit  -- so if we remove the __cpuinit from
arch specific callers, we will also get section mismatch warnings.
As an intermediate step, we intend to turn the linux/init.h cpuinit
content into no-ops as early as possible, since that will get rid
of these warnings.  In any case, they are temporary and harmless.

This removes all the arch/x86 uses of the __cpuinit macros from
all C files.  x86 only had the one __CPUINIT used in assembly files,
and it wasn't paired off with a .previous or a __FINIT, so we can
delete it directly w/o any corresponding additional change there.

[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/5/20/589

Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: x86@kernel.org
Acked-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Acked-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: NH. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NPaul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>

Reimplement FPU detection code in C and drop old, not-so-recommended
detection method in asm. Move all the relevant stuff into i387.c where
it conceptually belongs. Finally drop cpuinfo_x86.hard_math.

[ hpa: huge thanks to Borislav for taking my original concept patch
  and productizing it ]

[ Boris, note to self: do not use static_cpu_has before alternatives! ]
Signed-off-by: NH. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1367244262-29511-2-git-send-email-bp@alien8.de
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1365436666-9837-2-git-send-email-bp@alien8.deSigned-off-by: NBorislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: NH. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>

With the addition of eagerfpu the irq_fpu_usable() now returns false
negatives especially in the case of ksoftirqd and interrupted idle task,
two common cases for FPU use for example in networking/crypto.  With
eagerfpu=off FPU use is possible in those contexts.  This is because of
the eagerfpu check in interrupted_kernel_fpu_idle():

...
  * For now, with eagerfpu we will return interrupted kernel FPU
  * state as not-idle. TBD: Ideally we can change the return value
  * to something like __thread_has_fpu(current). But we need to
  * be careful of doing __thread_clear_has_fpu() before saving
  * the FPU etc for supporting nested uses etc. For now, take
  * the simple route!
...
 	if (use_eager_fpu())
 		return 0;

As eagerfpu is automatically "on" on those CPUs that also have the
features like AES-NI this patch changes the eagerfpu check to return 1 in
case the kernel_fpu_begin() has not been said yet.  Once it has been the
__thread_has_fpu() will start returning 0.

Notice that with eagerfpu the __thread_has_fpu is always true initially.
FPU use is thus always possible no matter what task is under us, unless
the state has already been saved with kernel_fpu_begin().

[ hpa: this is a performance regression, not a correctness regression,
  but since it can be quite serious on CPUs which need encryption at
  interrupt time I am marking this for urgent/stable. ]
Signed-off-by: NPekka Riikonen <priikone@iki.fi>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/alpine.GSO.2.00.1305131356320.18@git.silcnet.org
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> v3.7+
Signed-off-by: NH. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>

init_thread_xstate() is only called once to avoid overriding xstate_size during
boot time or during CPU hotplug.
Signed-off-by: NFenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1352835171-3958-14-git-send-email-fenghua.yu@intel.comSigned-off-by: NH. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>

Preemption is disabled between kernel_fpu_begin/end() and as such
it is not a good idea to use these routines in kvm_load/put_guest_fpu()
which can be very far apart.

kvm_load/put_guest_fpu() routines are already called with
preemption disabled and KVM already uses the preempt notifier to save
the guest fpu state using kvm_put_guest_fpu().

So introduce __kernel_fpu_begin/end() routines which don't touch
preemption and use them instead of kernel_fpu_begin/end()
for KVM's use model of saving/restoring guest FPU state.

Also with this change (and with eagerFPU model), fix the host cr0.TS vm-exit
state in the case of VMX. For eagerFPU case, host cr0.TS is always clear.
So no need to worry about it. For the traditional lazyFPU restore case,
change the cr0.TS bit for the host state during vm-exit to be always clear
and cr0.TS bit is set in the __vmx_load_host_state() when the FPU
(guest FPU or the host task's FPU) state is not active. This ensures
that the host/guest FPU state is properly saved, restored
during context-switch and with interrupts (using irq_fpu_usable()) not
stomping on the active FPU state.
Signed-off-by: NSuresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1348164109.26695.338.camel@sbsiddha-desk.sc.intel.com
Cc: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NH. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>

Decouple non-lazy/eager fpu restore policy from the existence of the xsave
feature. Introduce a synthetic CPUID flag to represent the eagerfpu
policy. "eagerfpu=on" boot paramter will enable the policy.
Requested-by: NH. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Requested-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NSuresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1347300665-6209-2-git-send-email-suresh.b.siddha@intel.comSigned-off-by: NH. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>

Fundamental model of the current Linux kernel is to lazily init and
restore FPU instead of restoring the task state during context switch.
This changes that fundamental lazy model to the non-lazy model for
the processors supporting xsave feature.

Reasons driving this model change are:

i. Newer processors support optimized state save/restore using xsaveopt and
xrstor by tracking the INIT state and MODIFIED state during context-switch.
This is faster than modifying the cr0.TS bit which has serializing semantics.

ii. Newer glibc versions use SSE for some of the optimized copy/clear routines.
With certain workloads (like boot, kernel-compilation etc), application
completes its work with in the first 5 task switches, thus taking upto 5 #DNA
traps with the kernel not getting a chance to apply the above mentioned
pre-load heuristic.

iii. Some xstate features (like AMD's LWP feature) don't honor the cr0.TS bit
and thus will not work correctly in the presence of lazy restore. Non-lazy
state restore is needed for enabling such features.

Some data on a two socket SNB system:
 * Saved 20K DNA exceptions during boot on a two socket SNB system.
 * Saved 50K DNA exceptions during kernel-compilation workload.
 * Improved throughput of the AVX based checksumming function inside the
   kernel by ~15% as xsave/xrstor is faster than the serializing clts/stts
   pair.

Also now kernel_fpu_begin/end() relies on the patched
alternative instructions. So move check_fpu() which uses the
kernel_fpu_begin/end() after alternative_instructions().
Signed-off-by: NSuresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1345842782-24175-7-git-send-email-suresh.b.siddha@intel.com
Merge 32-bit boot fix from,
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1347300665-6209-4-git-send-email-suresh.b.siddha@intel.com
Cc: Jim Kukunas <james.t.kukunas@linux.intel.com>
Cc: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Cc: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NH. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>