1. 27 9月, 2005 1 次提交
  2. 15 9月, 2005 1 次提交
  3. 14 9月, 2005 2 次提交
  4. 13 9月, 2005 5 次提交
  5. 12 9月, 2005 1 次提交
  6. 11 9月, 2005 5 次提交
  7. 10 9月, 2005 8 次提交
  8. 08 9月, 2005 15 次提交
  9. 05 9月, 2005 2 次提交
    • P
      [PATCH] uml: SYSEMU: slight cleanup and speedup · 640aa46e
      Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso 提交于
      As a follow-up to "UML Support - Ptrace: adds the host SYSEMU support, for
      UML and general usage" (i.e.  uml-support-* in current mm).
      
      Avoid unconditionally jumping to work_pending and code copying, just reuse
      the already existing resume_userspace path.
      
      One interesting note, from Charles P.  Wright, suggested that the API is
      improvable with no downsides for UML (except that it will have to support
      yet another host API, since dropping support for the current API, for UML,
      is not reasonable from users' point of view).
      Signed-off-by: NPaolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso <blaisorblade@yahoo.it>
      CC: Charles P. Wright <cwright@cs.sunysb.edu>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
      640aa46e
    • B
      [PATCH] SYSEMU: fix sysaudit / singlestep interaction · ab1c23c2
      Bodo Stroesser 提交于
            Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso <blaisorblade@yahoo.it>
      
      This is simply an adjustment for "Ptrace - i386: fix Syscall Audit interaction
      with singlestep" to work on top of SYSEMU patches, too.  On this patch, I have
      some doubts: I wonder why we need to alter that way ptrace_disable().
      
      I left the patch this way because it has been extensively tested, but I don't
      understand the reason.
      
      The current PTRACE_DETACH handling simply clears child->ptrace; actually this
      is not enough because entry.S just looks at the thread_flags; actually,
      do_syscall_trace checks current->ptrace but I don't think depending on that is
      good, at least for performance, so I think the clearing is done elsewhere.
      For instance, on PTRACE_CONT it's done, but doing PTRACE_DETACH without
      PTRACE_CONT is possible (and happens when gdb crashes and one kills it
      manually).
      Signed-off-by: NPaolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso <blaisorblade@yahoo.it>
      CC: Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>
      Cc: Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
      ab1c23c2