- 08 1月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Ben Dooks 提交于
The dc21285 requests a number of IRQs that it doesn't really care whether they get added. Change to use a macro that ensures that at-least the user gets warned if they fail to add, which also stops the warnings from __unused_result on request_irq(). dc21285.c:337: warning: ignoring return value of 'request_irq', declared with attribute warn_unused_result dc21285.c:339: warning: ignoring return value of 'request_irq', declared with attribute warn_unused_result dc21285.c:341: warning: ignoring return value of 'request_irq', declared with attribute warn_unused_result dc21285.c:343: warning: ignoring return value of 'request_irq', declared with attribute warn_unused_result dc21285.c:345: warning: ignoring return value of 'request_irq', declared with attribute warn_unused_result Signed-off-by: NBen Dooks <ben-linux@fluff.org>
-
- 13 12月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Russell King 提交于
Netwinder was using gpio_xxx names which could clash with the GPIO layer. Add a 'nw_' prefix to ensure that these remain separate. Signed-off-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
-
- 06 9月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Russell King 提交于
Signed-off-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
-
- 22 4月, 2007 1 次提交
-
-
由 Russell King 提交于
Lots of places in arch/arm were needlessly including linux/ptrace.h, resumably because we used to pass a struct pt_regs to interrupt handlers. Now that we don't, all these ptrace.h includes are redundant. Signed-off-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
-
- 15 10月, 2006 1 次提交
-
-
由 Russell King 提交于
Some ARM platforms were still broken as a result of the IRQ register passing changes, mostly due to a missing linux/irq.h include. Signed-off-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
-
- 07 10月, 2006 1 次提交
-
-
由 Linus Torvalds 提交于
Untested, but this should fix up the bulk of the totally mechanical issues, and should make the actual detail fixing easier. Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
-
- 20 9月, 2006 1 次提交
-
-
由 Daniel Jacobowitz 提交于
Patch from Daniel Jacobowitz The ARM kernel has several uses of asm("foo%?"). %? is a GCC internal modifier used to output conditional execution predicates. However, no version of GCC supports conditionalizing asm statements. GCC 4.2 will correctly expand %? to the empty string in user asms. Earlier versions may reuse the condition from the previous instruction. In 'if (foo) asm ("bar%?");' this is somewhat likely to be right... but not reliable. So, the only safe thing to do is to remove the uses of %?. I believe the tlbflush.h occurances were supposed to be removed before, based on the comment about %? not working at the top of that file. Old versions of GCC could omit branches around user asms if the asm didn't mark the condition codes as clobbered. This problem hasn't been seen on any recent (3.x or 4.x) GCC, but it could theoretically happen. So, where %? was removed a cc clobber was added. Signed-off-by: NDaniel Jacobowitz <dan@codesourcery.com> Signed-off-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
-
- 28 8月, 2006 1 次提交
-
-
由 Russell King 提交于
Signed-off-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
-
- 03 7月, 2006 1 次提交
-
-
由 Thomas Gleixner 提交于
The irgflags consolidation did conflict with the ARM to generic IRQ conversion and was not applied for ARM. Fix it up. Use the new IRQF_ constants and remove the SA_INTERRUPT define Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
-
- 22 3月, 2006 1 次提交
-
-
由 Russell King 提交于
Convert all uses of kmalloc followed by memset to use kzalloc instead. Signed-off-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
-
- 17 4月, 2005 1 次提交
-
-
由 Linus Torvalds 提交于
Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
-