Skip to content

cloud-kernel
cloud-kernel

openanolis / cloud-kernel
1 年多 前同步成功

通知 160
Star 36
Fork 7
cloud-kernel
cloud-kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 24 2月, 2018 5 次提交
    • W
      selftests/net: ignore background traffic in psock_fanout · cc30c93f
      由 Willem de Bruijn 提交于 
      The packet fanout test generates UDP traffic and reads this with
a pair of packet sockets, testing the various fanout algorithms.

Avoid non-determinism from reading unrelated background traffic.
Fanout decisions are made before unrelated packets can be dropped with
a filter, so that is an insufficient strategy [*]. Run the packet
socket tests in a network namespace, similar to msg_zerocopy.

It it still good practice to install a filter on a packet socket
before accepting traffic. Because this is example code, demonstrate
that pattern. Open the socket initially bound to no protocol, install
a filter, and only then bind to ETH_P_IP.

Another source of non-determinism is hash collisions in FANOUT_HASH.
The hash function used to select a socket in the fanout group includes
the pseudorandom number hashrnd, which is not visible from userspace.
To work around this, the test tries to find a pair of UDP source ports
that do not collide. It gives up too soon (5 times, every 32 runs) and
output is confusing. Increase tries to 20 and revise the error msg.

[*] another approach would be to add a third socket to the fanout
    group and direct all unexpected traffic here. This is possible
    only when reimplementing methods like RR or HASH alongside this
    extra catch-all bucket, using the BPF fanout method.
Signed-off-by: NWillem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      cc30c93f
    • C
      atm: idt77252: remove redundant bit-wise or'ing of zero · 3c69f792
      由 Colin Ian King 提交于 
      Zero is being bit-wise or'd in a calculation twice; these are redundant
and can be removed.
Signed-off-by: NColin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      3c69f792
    • S
      rds: rds_msg_zcopy should return error of null rm->data.op_mmp_znotifier · 79a5b972
      由 Sowmini Varadhan 提交于 
      if either or both of MSG_ZEROCOPY and SOCK_ZEROCOPY have not been
specified, the rm->data.op_mmp_znotifier allocation will be skipped.
In this case, it is invalid ot pass down a cmsghdr with
RDS_CMSG_ZCOPY_COOKIE, so return EINVAL from rds_msg_zcopy for this
case.

Reported-by: syzbot+f893ae7bb2f6456dfbc3@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Fixes: 0cebacce ("rds: zerocopy Tx support.")
Signed-off-by: NSowmini Varadhan <sowmini.varadhan@oracle.com>
Acked-by: NWillem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>
Acked-by: NSantosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      79a5b972
    • H
      r8169: simplify and improve check for dash · 9dbe7896
      由 Heiner Kallweit 提交于 
      r8168_check_dash() returns false anyway for all chip versions not
supporting dash. So we can simplify the check conditions.

In addition change the check functions to return bool instead of int,
because they actually return a bool value.
Signed-off-by: NHeiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      9dbe7896
    • H
      r8169: disable WOL per default · 7edf6d31
      由 Heiner Kallweit 提交于 
      Currently, if BIOS enables WOL in the chip, settings are inconsistent
because the device isn't marked as wakeup-enabled (if not done
explicitly via userspace tools). This causes issues with suspend/
resume because mdio_bus_phy_may_suspend() checks whether device is
wakeup-enabled. In detail MDIO bus access in phy_suspend() can fail
because the MDIO bus is disabled.

In the history of the driver we find two competing approaches:
8f9d5138 "r8169: remember WOL preferences on driver load" prefers
to preserve what the BIOS may have set, whilst bde135a6
"r8169: only enable PCI wakeups when WOL is active" disabled PCI
wakeup per default to work around a bug on one platform.

Seems like nobody complained after the latter patch about non-working
WOL, what makes me think that nobody uses WOL w/o configuring it
explicitly.

My opinion:
Vast majority of users doesn't use WOL even if the BIOS enables it in
the chip. And having WOL being active keeps the PHY(s) from powering
down if being idle.
If somebody needs WOL, he can enable it during boot, e.g. by
configuring systemd.link/WakeOnLan.

Therefore, to make WOL consistent again, disable it per default.
Signed-off-by: NHeiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      7edf6d31
  3. 23 2月, 2018 14 次提交
  5. 22 2月, 2018 21 次提交