Skip to content

cloud-kernel
cloud-kernel

openanolis / cloud-kernel
接近 2 年 前同步成功

通知 170
Star 36
Fork 7
cloud-kernel
cloud-kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 08 5月, 2018 2 次提交
  3. 10 4月, 2018 1 次提交
  5. 22 3月, 2018 2 次提交
  7. 02 3月, 2018 1 次提交
  9. 23 2月, 2018 1 次提交
  11. 13 2月, 2018 1 次提交
  13. 07 2月, 2018 1 次提交
  15. 23 1月, 2018 1 次提交
  17. 17 1月, 2018 1 次提交
    • H
      scsi: qla2xxx: Fix recursion while sending terminate exchange · 3efc31f7
      由 himanshu.madhani@cavium.com 提交于 
      During error test case where switch port status is toggled from enable to
disable, following stack trace is seen which indicates recursion trying to
send terminate exchange.  This regression was introduced by commit
82de802a ("scsi: qla2xxx: Preparation for Target MQ.")

BUG: stack guard page was hit at ffffb96488383ff8 (stack is ffffb96488384000..ffffb96488387fff)
BUG: stack guard page was hit at ffffb964886c3ff8 (stack is ffffb964886c4000..ffffb964886c7fff)
kernel stack overflow (double-fault): 0000 [#1] SMP
qlt_term_ctio_exchange+0x9c/0xb0 [qla2xxx]
qlt_term_ctio_exchange+0x9c/0xb0 [qla2xxx]
qlt_term_ctio_exchange+0x9c/0xb0 [qla2xxx]
qlt_term_ctio_exchange+0x9c/0xb0 [qla2xxx]
qlt_term_ctio_exchange+0x9c/0xb0 [qla2xxx]

Fixes: 82de802a ("scsi: qla2xxx: Preparation for Target MQ.")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> #4.10
Signed-off-by: NHimanshu Madhani <himanshu.madhani@cavium.com>
Signed-off-by: NMartin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
      3efc31f7
  19. 04 1月, 2018 12 次提交
  21. 12 12月, 2017 1 次提交
  23. 08 12月, 2017 7 次提交
  25. 25 10月, 2017 1 次提交
    • M
      locking/atomics: COCCINELLE/treewide: Convert trivial ACCESS_ONCE() patterns... · 6aa7de05
      由 Mark Rutland 提交于 
      locking/atomics: COCCINELLE/treewide: Convert trivial ACCESS_ONCE() patterns to READ_ONCE()/WRITE_ONCE()

Please do not apply this to mainline directly, instead please re-run the
coccinelle script shown below and apply its output.

For several reasons, it is desirable to use {READ,WRITE}_ONCE() in
preference to ACCESS_ONCE(), and new code is expected to use one of the
former. So far, there's been no reason to change most existing uses of
ACCESS_ONCE(), as these aren't harmful, and changing them results in
churn.

However, for some features, the read/write distinction is critical to
correct operation. To distinguish these cases, separate read/write
accessors must be used. This patch migrates (most) remaining
ACCESS_ONCE() instances to {READ,WRITE}_ONCE(), using the following
coccinelle script:

----
// Convert trivial ACCESS_ONCE() uses to equivalent READ_ONCE() and
// WRITE_ONCE()

// $ make coccicheck COCCI=/home/mark/once.cocci SPFLAGS="--include-headers" MODE=patch

virtual patch

@ depends on patch @
expression E1, E2;
@@

- ACCESS_ONCE(E1) = E2
+ WRITE_ONCE(E1, E2)

@ depends on patch @
expression E;
@@

- ACCESS_ONCE(E)
+ READ_ONCE(E)
----
Signed-off-by: NMark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net
Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
Cc: mpe@ellerman.id.au
Cc: shuah@kernel.org
Cc: snitzer@redhat.com
Cc: thor.thayer@linux.intel.com
Cc: tj@kernel.org
Cc: viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk
Cc: will.deacon@arm.com
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1508792849-3115-19-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      6aa7de05
  27. 17 10月, 2017 1 次提交
  29. 31 8月, 2017 2 次提交
  31. 25 8月, 2017 5 次提交