1. 09 8月, 2018 11 次提交
    • S
      bcache: trivial - remove tailing backslash in macro BTREE_FLAG · cbb751c0
      Shenghui Wang 提交于
      Remove the tailing backslash in macro BTREE_FLAG in btree.h
      Signed-off-by: NShenghui Wang <shhuiw@foxmail.com>
      Signed-off-by: NColy Li <colyli@suse.de>
      Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
      cbb751c0
    • S
      bcache: make the pr_err statement used for ENOENT only in sysfs_attatch section · e921efeb
      Shenghui Wang 提交于
      The pr_err statement in the code for sysfs_attatch section would run
      for various error codes, which maybe confusing.
      
      E.g,
      
      Run the command twice:
         echo 796b5c05-b03c-4bc7-9cbd-a8df5e8be891 > \
      				/sys/block/bcache0/bcache/attach
         [the backing dev got attached on the first run]
         echo 796b5c05-b03c-4bc7-9cbd-a8df5e8be891 > \
      				/sys/block/bcache0/bcache/attach
      
      In dmesg, after the command run twice, we can get:
      	bcache: bch_cached_dev_attach() Can't attach sda6: already attached
      	bcache: __cached_dev_store() Can't attach 796b5c05-b03c-4bc7-9cbd-\
      a8df5e8be891
                     : cache set not found
      The first statement in the message was right, but the second was
      confusing.
      
      bch_cached_dev_attach has various pr_ statements for various error
      codes, except ENOENT.
      
      After the change, rerun above command twice:
      	echo 796b5c05-b03c-4bc7-9cbd-a8df5e8be891 > \
      			/sys/block/bcache0/bcache/attach
      	echo 796b5c05-b03c-4bc7-9cbd-a8df5e8be891 > \
      			/sys/block/bcache0/bcache/attach
      
      In dmesg we only got:
      	bcache: bch_cached_dev_attach() Can't attach sda6: already attached
      No confusing "cache set not found" message anymore.
      
      And for some not exist SET-UUID:
      	echo 796b5c05-b03c-4bc7-9cbd-a8df5e8be898 > \
      			/sys/block/bcache0/bcache/attach
      In dmesg we can get:
      	bcache: __cached_dev_store() Can't attach 796b5c05-b03c-4bc7-9cbd-\
      a8df5e8be898
      	               : cache set not found
      Signed-off-by: NShenghui Wang <shhuiw@foxmail.com>
      Signed-off-by: NColy Li <colyli@suse.de>
      Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
      e921efeb
    • C
      bcache: set max writeback rate when I/O request is idle · ea8c5356
      Coly Li 提交于
      Commit b1092c9a ("bcache: allow quick writeback when backing idle")
      allows the writeback rate to be faster if there is no I/O request on a
      bcache device. It works well if there is only one bcache device attached
      to the cache set. If there are many bcache devices attached to a cache
      set, it may introduce performance regression because multiple faster
      writeback threads of the idle bcache devices will compete the btree level
      locks with the bcache device who have I/O requests coming.
      
      This patch fixes the above issue by only permitting fast writebac when
      all bcache devices attached on the cache set are idle. And if one of the
      bcache devices has new I/O request coming, minimized all writeback
      throughput immediately and let PI controller __update_writeback_rate()
      to decide the upcoming writeback rate for each bcache device.
      
      Also when all bcache devices are idle, limited wrieback rate to a small
      number is wast of thoughput, especially when backing devices are slower
      non-rotation devices (e.g. SATA SSD). This patch sets a max writeback
      rate for each backing device if the whole cache set is idle. A faster
      writeback rate in idle time means new I/Os may have more available space
      for dirty data, and people may observe a better write performance then.
      
      Please note bcache may change its cache mode in run time, and this patch
      still works if the cache mode is switched from writeback mode and there
      is still dirty data on cache.
      
      Fixes: Commit b1092c9a ("bcache: allow quick writeback when backing idle")
      Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org #4.16+
      Signed-off-by: NColy Li <colyli@suse.de>
      Tested-by: NKai Krakow <kai@kaishome.de>
      Tested-by: NStefan Priebe <s.priebe@profihost.ag>
      Cc: Michael Lyle <mlyle@lyle.org>
      Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
      ea8c5356
    • C
      bcache: add code comments for bset.c · b467a6ac
      Coly Li 提交于
      This patch tries to add code comments in bset.c, to make some
      tricky code and designment to be more comprehensible. Most information
      of this patch comes from the discussion between Kent and I, he
      offers very informative details. If there is any mistake
      of the idea behind the code, no doubt that's from me misrepresentation.
      Signed-off-by: NColy Li <colyli@suse.de>
      Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
      b467a6ac
    • C
      bcache: fix mistaken comments in request.c · 0cba2e71
      Coly Li 提交于
      This patch updates code comment in bch_keylist_realloc() by fixing
      incorrected function names, to make the code to be more comprehennsible.
      Signed-off-by: NColy Li <colyli@suse.de>
      Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
      0cba2e71
    • C
      bcache: fix mistaken code comments in bcache.h · cb329dec
      Coly Li 提交于
      This patch updates the code comment in struct cache with correct array
      names, to make the code to be more comprehensible.
      Signed-off-by: NColy Li <colyli@suse.de>
      Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
      cb329dec
    • C
      bcache: add a comment in super.c · e57fd746
      Coly Li 提交于
      This patch adds a line of code comment in super.c:register_bdev(), to
      make code to be more comprehensible.
      Signed-off-by: NColy Li <colyli@suse.de>
      Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
      e57fd746
    • C
      bcache: avoid unncessary cache prefetch bch_btree_node_get() · c2e8dcf7
      Coly Li 提交于
      In bch_btree_node_get() the read-in btree node will be partially
      prefetched into L1 cache for following bset iteration (if there is).
      But if the btree node read is failed, the perfetch operations will
      waste L1 cache space. This patch checkes whether read operation and
      only does cache prefetch when read I/O succeeded.
      Signed-off-by: NColy Li <colyli@suse.de>
      Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
      c2e8dcf7
    • C
      bcache: display rate debug parameters to 0 when writeback is not running · b4cb6efc
      Coly Li 提交于
      When writeback is not running, writeback rate should be 0, other value is
      misleading. And the following dyanmic writeback rate debug parameters
      should be 0 too,
      	rate, proportional, integral, change
      otherwise they are misleading when writeback is not running.
      Signed-off-by: NColy Li <colyli@suse.de>
      Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
      b4cb6efc
    • C
      bcache: do not check return value of debugfs_create_dir() · 78ac2107
      Coly Li 提交于
      Greg KH suggests that normal code should not care about debugfs. Therefore
      no matter successful or failed of debugfs_create_dir() execution, it is
      unncessary to check its return value.
      
      There are two functions called debugfs_create_dir() and check the return
      value, which are bch_debug_init() and closure_debug_init(). This patch
      changes these two functions from int to void type, and ignore return values
      of debugfs_create_dir().
      
      This patch does not fix exact bug, just makes things work as they should.
      Signed-off-by: NColy Li <colyli@suse.de>
      Suggested-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
      Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
      Cc: Kai Krakow <kai@kaishome.de>
      Cc: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
      Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
      78ac2107
    • Z
      drivers/block/drbd: remove the null check for kmem_cache_destroy · a12fc00b
      zhong jiang 提交于
      kmem_cache_destroy has taken null pointer into account. So it is
      safe to drop the null check before calling the function.
      Signed-off-by: Nzhong jiang <zhongjiang@huawei.com>
      Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
      a12fc00b
  2. 08 8月, 2018 5 次提交
    • Z
      drivers/block/aoe/aoedev: NULL check is not needed for mempool_destroy · 69daf897
      zhong jiang 提交于
      mempool_destroy has taken the null pointer into account. So it is safe
      to remove the null check.
      Signed-off-by: Nzhong jiang <zhongjiang@huawei.com>
      Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
      69daf897
    • Z
      drivers/block/mtip32xx: remove the null check for debugfs_remove_recursive · d5fcc4e4
      zhong jiang 提交于
      debugfs_remove_recursive has taken null pointer into account. So it is
      safe to drop the null check before calling the function.
      Signed-off-by: Nzhong jiang <zhongjiang@huawei.com>
      Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
      d5fcc4e4
    • B
      cfq: Suppress compiler warnings about comparisons · f7ecb1b1
      Bart Van Assche 提交于
      This patch does not change any functionality but avoids that gcc
      reports the following warnings when building with W=1:
      
      block/cfq-iosched.c: In function ?cfq_back_seek_max_store?:
      block/cfq-iosched.c:4741:13: warning: comparison of unsigned expression < 0 is always false [-Wtype-limits]
        if (__data < (MIN))      \
                   ^
      block/cfq-iosched.c:4756:1: note: in expansion of macro ?STORE_FUNCTION?
       STORE_FUNCTION(cfq_back_seek_max_store, &cfqd->cfq_back_max, 0, UINT_MAX, 0);
       ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
      block/cfq-iosched.c: In function ?cfq_slice_idle_store?:
      block/cfq-iosched.c:4741:13: warning: comparison of unsigned expression < 0 is always false [-Wtype-limits]
        if (__data < (MIN))      \
                   ^
      block/cfq-iosched.c:4759:1: note: in expansion of macro ?STORE_FUNCTION?
       STORE_FUNCTION(cfq_slice_idle_store, &cfqd->cfq_slice_idle, 0, UINT_MAX, 1);
       ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
      block/cfq-iosched.c: In function ?cfq_group_idle_store?:
      block/cfq-iosched.c:4741:13: warning: comparison of unsigned expression < 0 is always false [-Wtype-limits]
        if (__data < (MIN))      \
                   ^
      block/cfq-iosched.c:4760:1: note: in expansion of macro ?STORE_FUNCTION?
       STORE_FUNCTION(cfq_group_idle_store, &cfqd->cfq_group_idle, 0, UINT_MAX, 1);
       ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
      block/cfq-iosched.c: In function ?cfq_low_latency_store?:
      block/cfq-iosched.c:4741:13: warning: comparison of unsigned expression < 0 is always false [-Wtype-limits]
        if (__data < (MIN))      \
                   ^
      block/cfq-iosched.c:4765:1: note: in expansion of macro ?STORE_FUNCTION?
       STORE_FUNCTION(cfq_low_latency_store, &cfqd->cfq_latency, 0, 1, 0);
       ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
      block/cfq-iosched.c: In function ?cfq_slice_idle_us_store?:
      block/cfq-iosched.c:4775:13: warning: comparison of unsigned expression < 0 is always false [-Wtype-limits]
        if (__data < (MIN))      \
                   ^
      block/cfq-iosched.c:4782:1: note: in expansion of macro ?USEC_STORE_FUNCTION?
       USEC_STORE_FUNCTION(cfq_slice_idle_us_store, &cfqd->cfq_slice_idle, 0, UINT_MAX);
       ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
      block/cfq-iosched.c: In function ?cfq_group_idle_us_store?:
      block/cfq-iosched.c:4775:13: warning: comparison of unsigned expression < 0 is always false [-Wtype-limits]
        if (__data < (MIN))      \
                   ^
      block/cfq-iosched.c:4783:1: note: in expansion of macro ?USEC_STORE_FUNCTION?
       USEC_STORE_FUNCTION(cfq_group_idle_us_store, &cfqd->cfq_group_idle, 0, UINT_MAX);
       ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
      Signed-off-by: NBart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@wdc.com>
      Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
      f7ecb1b1
    • B
      cfq: Annotate fall-through in a switch statement · 9b4f4346
      Bart Van Assche 提交于
      This patch avoids that gcc complains about fall-through when building
      with W=1.
      Signed-off-by: NBart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@wdc.com>
      Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
      9b4f4346
    • A
      blk-wbt: Avoid lock contention and thundering herd issue in wbt_wait · 2887e41b
      Anchal Agarwal 提交于
      I am currently running a large bare metal instance (i3.metal)
      on EC2 with 72 cores, 512GB of RAM and NVME drives, with a
      4.18 kernel. I have a workload that simulates a database
      workload and I am running into lockup issues when writeback
      throttling is enabled,with the hung task detector also
      kicking in.
      
      Crash dumps show that most CPUs (up to 50 of them) are
      all trying to get the wbt wait queue lock while trying to add
      themselves to it in __wbt_wait (see stack traces below).
      
      [    0.948118] CPU: 45 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/45 Not tainted 4.14.51-62.38.amzn1.x86_64 #1
      [    0.948119] Hardware name: Amazon EC2 i3.metal/Not Specified, BIOS 1.0 10/16/2017
      [    0.948120] task: ffff883f7878c000 task.stack: ffffc9000c69c000
      [    0.948124] RIP: 0010:native_queued_spin_lock_slowpath+0xf8/0x1a0
      [    0.948125] RSP: 0018:ffff883f7fcc3dc8 EFLAGS: 00000046
      [    0.948126] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff887f7709ca68 RCX: ffff883f7fce2a00
      [    0.948128] RDX: 000000000000001c RSI: 0000000000740001 RDI: ffff887f7709ca68
      [    0.948129] RBP: 0000000000000002 R08: 0000000000b80000 R09: 0000000000000000
      [    0.948130] R10: ffff883f7fcc3d78 R11: 000000000de27121 R12: 0000000000000002
      [    0.948131] R13: 0000000000000003 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000
      [    0.948132] FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff883f7fcc0000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
      [    0.948134] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
      [    0.948135] CR2: 000000c424c77000 CR3: 0000000002010005 CR4: 00000000003606e0
      [    0.948136] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
      [    0.948137] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
      [    0.948138] Call Trace:
      [    0.948139]  <IRQ>
      [    0.948142]  do_raw_spin_lock+0xad/0xc0
      [    0.948145]  _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x44/0x4b
      [    0.948149]  ? __wake_up_common_lock+0x53/0x90
      [    0.948150]  __wake_up_common_lock+0x53/0x90
      [    0.948155]  wbt_done+0x7b/0xa0
      [    0.948158]  blk_mq_free_request+0xb7/0x110
      [    0.948161]  __blk_mq_complete_request+0xcb/0x140
      [    0.948166]  nvme_process_cq+0xce/0x1a0 [nvme]
      [    0.948169]  nvme_irq+0x23/0x50 [nvme]
      [    0.948173]  __handle_irq_event_percpu+0x46/0x300
      [    0.948176]  handle_irq_event_percpu+0x20/0x50
      [    0.948179]  handle_irq_event+0x34/0x60
      [    0.948181]  handle_edge_irq+0x77/0x190
      [    0.948185]  handle_irq+0xaf/0x120
      [    0.948188]  do_IRQ+0x53/0x110
      [    0.948191]  common_interrupt+0x87/0x87
      [    0.948192]  </IRQ>
      ....
      [    0.311136] CPU: 4 PID: 9737 Comm: run_linux_amd64 Not tainted 4.14.51-62.38.amzn1.x86_64 #1
      [    0.311137] Hardware name: Amazon EC2 i3.metal/Not Specified, BIOS 1.0 10/16/2017
      [    0.311138] task: ffff883f6e6a8000 task.stack: ffffc9000f1ec000
      [    0.311141] RIP: 0010:native_queued_spin_lock_slowpath+0xf5/0x1a0
      [    0.311142] RSP: 0018:ffffc9000f1efa28 EFLAGS: 00000046
      [    0.311144] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff887f7709ca68 RCX: ffff883f7f722a00
      [    0.311145] RDX: 0000000000000035 RSI: 0000000000d80001 RDI: ffff887f7709ca68
      [    0.311146] RBP: 0000000000000202 R08: 0000000000140000 R09: 0000000000000000
      [    0.311147] R10: ffffc9000f1ef9d8 R11: 000000001a249fa0 R12: ffff887f7709ca68
      [    0.311148] R13: ffffc9000f1efad0 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: ffff887f7709ca00
      [    0.311149] FS:  000000c423f30090(0000) GS:ffff883f7f700000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
      [    0.311150] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
      [    0.311151] CR2: 00007feefcea4000 CR3: 0000007f7016e001 CR4: 00000000003606e0
      [    0.311152] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
      [    0.311153] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
      [    0.311154] Call Trace:
      [    0.311157]  do_raw_spin_lock+0xad/0xc0
      [    0.311160]  _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x44/0x4b
      [    0.311162]  ? prepare_to_wait_exclusive+0x28/0xb0
      [    0.311164]  prepare_to_wait_exclusive+0x28/0xb0
      [    0.311167]  wbt_wait+0x127/0x330
      [    0.311169]  ? finish_wait+0x80/0x80
      [    0.311172]  ? generic_make_request+0xda/0x3b0
      [    0.311174]  blk_mq_make_request+0xd6/0x7b0
      [    0.311176]  ? blk_queue_enter+0x24/0x260
      [    0.311178]  ? generic_make_request+0xda/0x3b0
      [    0.311181]  generic_make_request+0x10c/0x3b0
      [    0.311183]  ? submit_bio+0x5c/0x110
      [    0.311185]  submit_bio+0x5c/0x110
      [    0.311197]  ? __ext4_journal_stop+0x36/0xa0 [ext4]
      [    0.311210]  ext4_io_submit+0x48/0x60 [ext4]
      [    0.311222]  ext4_writepages+0x810/0x11f0 [ext4]
      [    0.311229]  ? do_writepages+0x3c/0xd0
      [    0.311239]  ? ext4_mark_inode_dirty+0x260/0x260 [ext4]
      [    0.311240]  do_writepages+0x3c/0xd0
      [    0.311243]  ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x24/0x30
      [    0.311245]  ? wbc_attach_and_unlock_inode+0x165/0x280
      [    0.311248]  ? __filemap_fdatawrite_range+0xa3/0xe0
      [    0.311250]  __filemap_fdatawrite_range+0xa3/0xe0
      [    0.311253]  file_write_and_wait_range+0x34/0x90
      [    0.311264]  ext4_sync_file+0x151/0x500 [ext4]
      [    0.311267]  do_fsync+0x38/0x60
      [    0.311270]  SyS_fsync+0xc/0x10
      [    0.311272]  do_syscall_64+0x6f/0x170
      [    0.311274]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x42/0xb7
      
      In the original patch, wbt_done is waking up all the exclusive
      processes in the wait queue, which can cause a thundering herd
      if there is a large number of writer threads in the queue. The
      original intention of the code seems to be to wake up one thread
      only however, it uses wake_up_all() in __wbt_done(), and then
      uses the following check in __wbt_wait to have only one thread
      actually get out of the wait loop:
      
      if (waitqueue_active(&rqw->wait) &&
                  rqw->wait.head.next != &wait->entry)
                      return false;
      
      The problem with this is that the wait entry in wbt_wait is
      define with DEFINE_WAIT, which uses the autoremove wakeup function.
      That means that the above check is invalid - the wait entry will
      have been removed from the queue already by the time we hit the
      check in the loop.
      
      Secondly, auto-removing the wait entries also means that the wait
      queue essentially gets reordered "randomly" (e.g. threads re-add
      themselves in the order they got to run after being woken up).
      Additionally, new requests entering wbt_wait might overtake requests
      that were queued earlier, because the wait queue will be
      (temporarily) empty after the wake_up_all, so the waitqueue_active
      check will not stop them. This can cause certain threads to starve
      under high load.
      
      The fix is to leave the woken up requests in the queue and remove
      them in finish_wait() once the current thread breaks out of the
      wait loop in __wbt_wait. This will ensure new requests always
      end up at the back of the queue, and they won't overtake requests
      that are already in the wait queue. With that change, the loop
      in wbt_wait is also in line with many other wait loops in the kernel.
      Waking up just one thread drastically reduces lock contention, as
      does moving the wait queue add/remove out of the loop.
      
      A significant drop in lockdep's lock contention numbers is seen when
      running the test application on the patched kernel.
      Signed-off-by: NAnchal Agarwal <anchalag@amazon.com>
      Signed-off-by: NFrank van der Linden <fllinden@amazon.com>
      Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
      2887e41b
  3. 07 8月, 2018 1 次提交
  4. 06 8月, 2018 4 次提交
  5. 03 8月, 2018 11 次提交
  6. 02 8月, 2018 2 次提交
  7. 01 8月, 2018 4 次提交
  8. 31 7月, 2018 1 次提交
  9. 30 7月, 2018 1 次提交