- 28 1月, 2008 37 次提交
-
-
由 Paul Mundt 提交于
Signed-off-by: NPaul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
-
由 Paul Mundt 提交于
Signed-off-by: NPaul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
-
由 Paul Mundt 提交于
Signed-off-by: NPaul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
-
由 Paul Mundt 提交于
Signed-off-by: NPaul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
-
由 Paul Mundt 提交于
Signed-off-by: NPaul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
-
由 Paul Mundt 提交于
Signed-off-by: NPaul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
-
由 Paul Mundt 提交于
Signed-off-by: NPaul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
-
由 Paul Mundt 提交于
Signed-off-by: NPaul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
-
由 Paul Mundt 提交于
Signed-off-by: NPaul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
-
由 Paul Mundt 提交于
Signed-off-by: NPaul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
-
由 Paul Mundt 提交于
Signed-off-by: NPaul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
-
由 Paul Mundt 提交于
Signed-off-by: NPaul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
-
由 Paul Mundt 提交于
Signed-off-by: NPaul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
-
由 Paul Mundt 提交于
This is trivial, in that they're both effectively the same for the base relocations anyways. SH-5 doesn't need the unaligned bits, and has a few extra relocations, which are never hit on non-SH5 parts. Signed-off-by: NPaul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
-
由 Paul Mundt 提交于
Signed-off-by: NPaul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
-
由 Paul Mundt 提交于
Signed-off-by: NPaul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
-
由 Paul Mundt 提交于
Signed-off-by: NPaul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
-
由 Paul Mundt 提交于
Signed-off-by: NPaul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
-
由 Paul Mundt 提交于
Signed-off-by: NPaul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
-
由 Paul Mundt 提交于
Signed-off-by: NPaul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
-
由 Paul Mundt 提交于
Signed-off-by: NPaul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
-
由 Paul Mundt 提交于
Signed-off-by: NPaul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
-
由 Paul Mundt 提交于
Signed-off-by: NPaul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
-
由 Paul Mundt 提交于
Signed-off-by: NPaul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
-
由 Paul Mundt 提交于
Signed-off-by: NPaul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
-
由 Paul Mundt 提交于
Signed-off-by: NPaul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
-
由 Paul Mundt 提交于
Signed-off-by: NPaul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
-
由 Paul Mundt 提交于
Signed-off-by: NPaul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
-
由 Paul Mundt 提交于
Signed-off-by: NPaul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
-
由 Paul Mundt 提交于
Signed-off-by: NPaul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
-
由 Paul Mundt 提交于
Signed-off-by: NPaul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
-
由 Paul Mundt 提交于
Signed-off-by: NPaul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
-
由 Paul Mundt 提交于
Signed-off-by: NPaul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
-
由 Paul Mundt 提交于
Signed-off-by: NPaul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
-
由 Paul Mundt 提交于
Signed-off-by: NPaul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
-
由 Paul Mundt 提交于
Signed-off-by: NPaul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
-
由 Paul Mundt 提交于
Signed-off-by: NPaul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
-
- 25 1月, 2008 3 次提交
-
-
由 Kay Sievers 提交于
All kobjects require a dynamically allocated name now. We no longer need to keep track if the name is statically assigned, we can just unconditionally free() all kobject names on cleanup. Signed-off-by: NKay Sievers <kay.sievers@vrfy.org> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
-
由 Greg Kroah-Hartman 提交于
There is no need for kobject_unregister() anymore, thanks to Kay's kobject cleanup changes, so replace all instances of it with kobject_put(). Cc: Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@vrfy.org> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
-
由 Greg Kroah-Hartman 提交于
Stop using kobject_register, as this way we can control the sending of the uevent properly, after everything is properly initialized. Cc: Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@vrfy.org> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
-