1. 10 5月, 2018 3 次提交
  2. 20 1月, 2018 2 次提交
  3. 02 11月, 2017 1 次提交
    • G
      License cleanup: add SPDX GPL-2.0 license identifier to files with no license · b2441318
      Greg Kroah-Hartman 提交于
      Many source files in the tree are missing licensing information, which
      makes it harder for compliance tools to determine the correct license.
      
      By default all files without license information are under the default
      license of the kernel, which is GPL version 2.
      
      Update the files which contain no license information with the 'GPL-2.0'
      SPDX license identifier.  The SPDX identifier is a legally binding
      shorthand, which can be used instead of the full boiler plate text.
      
      This patch is based on work done by Thomas Gleixner and Kate Stewart and
      Philippe Ombredanne.
      
      How this work was done:
      
      Patches were generated and checked against linux-4.14-rc6 for a subset of
      the use cases:
       - file had no licensing information it it.
       - file was a */uapi/* one with no licensing information in it,
       - file was a */uapi/* one with existing licensing information,
      
      Further patches will be generated in subsequent months to fix up cases
      where non-standard license headers were used, and references to license
      had to be inferred by heuristics based on keywords.
      
      The analysis to determine which SPDX License Identifier to be applied to
      a file was done in a spreadsheet of side by side results from of the
      output of two independent scanners (ScanCode & Windriver) producing SPDX
      tag:value files created by Philippe Ombredanne.  Philippe prepared the
      base worksheet, and did an initial spot review of a few 1000 files.
      
      The 4.13 kernel was the starting point of the analysis with 60,537 files
      assessed.  Kate Stewart did a file by file comparison of the scanner
      results in the spreadsheet to determine which SPDX license identifier(s)
      to be applied to the file. She confirmed any determination that was not
      immediately clear with lawyers working with the Linux Foundation.
      
      Criteria used to select files for SPDX license identifier tagging was:
       - Files considered eligible had to be source code files.
       - Make and config files were included as candidates if they contained >5
         lines of source
       - File already had some variant of a license header in it (even if <5
         lines).
      
      All documentation files were explicitly excluded.
      
      The following heuristics were used to determine which SPDX license
      identifiers to apply.
      
       - when both scanners couldn't find any license traces, file was
         considered to have no license information in it, and the top level
         COPYING file license applied.
      
         For non */uapi/* files that summary was:
      
         SPDX license identifier                            # files
         ---------------------------------------------------|-------
         GPL-2.0                                              11139
      
         and resulted in the first patch in this series.
      
         If that file was a */uapi/* path one, it was "GPL-2.0 WITH
         Linux-syscall-note" otherwise it was "GPL-2.0".  Results of that was:
      
         SPDX license identifier                            # files
         ---------------------------------------------------|-------
         GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note                        930
      
         and resulted in the second patch in this series.
      
       - if a file had some form of licensing information in it, and was one
         of the */uapi/* ones, it was denoted with the Linux-syscall-note if
         any GPL family license was found in the file or had no licensing in
         it (per prior point).  Results summary:
      
         SPDX license identifier                            # files
         ---------------------------------------------------|------
         GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note                       270
         GPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note                      169
         ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-2-Clause)    21
         ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-3-Clause)    17
         LGPL-2.1+ WITH Linux-syscall-note                      15
         GPL-1.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note                       14
         ((GPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-3-Clause)    5
         LGPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note                       4
         LGPL-2.1 WITH Linux-syscall-note                        3
         ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR MIT)              3
         ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) AND MIT)             1
      
         and that resulted in the third patch in this series.
      
       - when the two scanners agreed on the detected license(s), that became
         the concluded license(s).
      
       - when there was disagreement between the two scanners (one detected a
         license but the other didn't, or they both detected different
         licenses) a manual inspection of the file occurred.
      
       - In most cases a manual inspection of the information in the file
         resulted in a clear resolution of the license that should apply (and
         which scanner probably needed to revisit its heuristics).
      
       - When it was not immediately clear, the license identifier was
         confirmed with lawyers working with the Linux Foundation.
      
       - If there was any question as to the appropriate license identifier,
         the file was flagged for further research and to be revisited later
         in time.
      
      In total, over 70 hours of logged manual review was done on the
      spreadsheet to determine the SPDX license identifiers to apply to the
      source files by Kate, Philippe, Thomas and, in some cases, confirmation
      by lawyers working with the Linux Foundation.
      
      Kate also obtained a third independent scan of the 4.13 code base from
      FOSSology, and compared selected files where the other two scanners
      disagreed against that SPDX file, to see if there was new insights.  The
      Windriver scanner is based on an older version of FOSSology in part, so
      they are related.
      
      Thomas did random spot checks in about 500 files from the spreadsheets
      for the uapi headers and agreed with SPDX license identifier in the
      files he inspected. For the non-uapi files Thomas did random spot checks
      in about 15000 files.
      
      In initial set of patches against 4.14-rc6, 3 files were found to have
      copy/paste license identifier errors, and have been fixed to reflect the
      correct identifier.
      
      Additionally Philippe spent 10 hours this week doing a detailed manual
      inspection and review of the 12,461 patched files from the initial patch
      version early this week with:
       - a full scancode scan run, collecting the matched texts, detected
         license ids and scores
       - reviewing anything where there was a license detected (about 500+
         files) to ensure that the applied SPDX license was correct
       - reviewing anything where there was no detection but the patch license
         was not GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note to ensure that the applied
         SPDX license was correct
      
      This produced a worksheet with 20 files needing minor correction.  This
      worksheet was then exported into 3 different .csv files for the
      different types of files to be modified.
      
      These .csv files were then reviewed by Greg.  Thomas wrote a script to
      parse the csv files and add the proper SPDX tag to the file, in the
      format that the file expected.  This script was further refined by Greg
      based on the output to detect more types of files automatically and to
      distinguish between header and source .c files (which need different
      comment types.)  Finally Greg ran the script using the .csv files to
      generate the patches.
      Reviewed-by: NKate Stewart <kstewart@linuxfoundation.org>
      Reviewed-by: NPhilippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@nexb.com>
      Reviewed-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
      b2441318
  4. 16 3月, 2017 1 次提交
  5. 30 11月, 2016 1 次提交
  6. 27 4月, 2016 1 次提交
  7. 21 1月, 2016 1 次提交
  8. 16 12月, 2015 1 次提交
    • M
      Partial revert of "powerpc: Individual System V IPC system calls" · 2475c362
      Michael Ellerman 提交于
      This partially reverts commit a3423615.
      
      While reviewing the glibc patch to exploit the individual IPC calls,
      Arnd & Andreas noticed that we were still requiring userspace to pass
      IPC_64 in order to get the new style IPC API.
      
      With a bit of cleanup in the kernel we can drop that requirement, and
      instead only provide the new style API, which will simplify things for
      userspace.
      
      Rather than try and sneak that patch into 4.4, instead we will drop the
      individual IPC calls for powerpc, and merge them again in 4.5 once the
      cleanup patch has gone in.
      
      Because we've already added sys_mlock2() as syscall #378, we don't do a
      full revert of the IPC calls. Instead we drop the __NR #defines, and
      send those now undefined syscall numbers to sys_ni_syscall(). This
      leaves a gap in the syscall numbers, but we'll reuse them when we merge
      the individual IPC calls.
      Signed-off-by: NMichael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
      Acked-by: NArnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
      2475c362
  9. 16 11月, 2015 1 次提交
  10. 15 10月, 2015 1 次提交
  11. 21 9月, 2015 1 次提交
  12. 09 9月, 2015 1 次提交
  13. 20 5月, 2015 1 次提交
    • L
      powerpc: Enable sys_kcmp() for CRIU · 7978f76c
      Laurent Dufour 提交于
      The commit 8170a83f ("powerpc: Wireup the kcmp syscall to sys_ni") has
      disabled the kcmp syscall for powerpc.  This has been done due to the use
      of unsigned long parameters which may require a dedicated wrapper to handle
      32bit process on top of 64bit kernel.  However in the kcmp() case, the 2
      unsigned long parameters are currently only used to carry file descriptors
      from user space to the kernel.  Since such a parameter is passed through
      register, and file descriptor doesn't need to get extended, there is,
      today, no need for a wrapper.
      
      In the case there will be a need to pass address in or out of this system
      call, then a wrapper could be required, it will then be to care of it.
      
      As today this is not the case, it is safe to enable kcmp() on powerpc.
      
      Tested (by Laurent) on 64-bit, 32-bit, and 32-bit userspace on 64-bit
      kernel using tools/testing/selftests/kcmp [mpe].
      Signed-off-by: NLaurent Dufour <ldufour@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
      Signed-off-by: NMichael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
      7978f76c
  14. 28 3月, 2015 1 次提交
    • M
      powerpc: Add a proper syscall for switching endianness · 529d235a
      Michael Ellerman 提交于
      We currently have a "special" syscall for switching endianness. This is
      syscall number 0x1ebe, which is handled explicitly in the 64-bit syscall
      exception entry.
      
      That has a few problems, firstly the syscall number is outside of the
      usual range, which confuses various tools. For example strace doesn't
      recognise the syscall at all.
      
      Secondly it's handled explicitly as a special case in the syscall
      exception entry, which is complicated enough without it.
      
      As a first step toward removing the special syscall, we need to add a
      regular syscall that implements the same functionality.
      
      The logic is simple, it simply toggles the MSR_LE bit in the userspace
      MSR. This is the same as the special syscall, with the caveat that the
      special syscall clobbers fewer registers.
      
      This version clobbers r9-r12, XER, CTR, and CR0-1,5-7.
      Signed-off-by: NMichael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
      529d235a
  15. 29 12月, 2014 1 次提交
    • P
      powerpc: Wire up sys_execveat() syscall · 1e5d0fdb
      Pranith Kumar 提交于
      Wire up sys_execveat(). This passes the selftests for the system call.
      
      Check success of execveat(3, '../execveat', 0)... [OK]
      Check success of execveat(5, 'execveat', 0)... [OK]
      Check success of execveat(6, 'execveat', 0)... [OK]
      Check success of execveat(-100, '/home/pranith/linux/...ftests/exec/execveat', 0)... [OK]
      Check success of execveat(99, '/home/pranith/linux/...ftests/exec/execveat', 0)... [OK]
      Check success of execveat(8, '', 4096)... [OK]
      Check success of execveat(17, '', 4096)... [OK]
      Check success of execveat(9, '', 4096)... [OK]
      Check success of execveat(14, '', 4096)... [OK]
      Check success of execveat(14, '', 4096)... [OK]
      Check success of execveat(15, '', 4096)... [OK]
      Check failure of execveat(8, '', 0) with ENOENT... [OK]
      Check failure of execveat(8, '(null)', 4096) with EFAULT... [OK]
      Check success of execveat(5, 'execveat.symlink', 0)... [OK]
      Check success of execveat(6, 'execveat.symlink', 0)... [OK]
      Check success of execveat(-100, '/home/pranith/linux/...xec/execveat.symlink', 0)... [OK]
      Check success of execveat(10, '', 4096)... [OK]
      Check success of execveat(10, '', 4352)... [OK]
      Check failure of execveat(5, 'execveat.symlink', 256) with ELOOP... [OK]
      Check failure of execveat(6, 'execveat.symlink', 256) with ELOOP... [OK]
      Check failure of execveat(-100, '/home/pranith/linux/tools/testing/selftests/exec/execveat.symlink', 256) with ELOOP... [OK]
      Check success of execveat(3, '../script', 0)... [OK]
      Check success of execveat(5, 'script', 0)... [OK]
      Check success of execveat(6, 'script', 0)... [OK]
      Check success of execveat(-100, '/home/pranith/linux/...elftests/exec/script', 0)... [OK]
      Check success of execveat(13, '', 4096)... [OK]
      Check success of execveat(13, '', 4352)... [OK]
      Check failure of execveat(18, '', 4096) with ENOENT... [OK]
      Check failure of execveat(7, 'script', 0) with ENOENT... [OK]
      Check success of execveat(16, '', 4096)... [OK]
      Check success of execveat(16, '', 4096)... [OK]
      Check success of execveat(4, '../script', 0)... [OK]
      Check success of execveat(4, 'script', 0)... [OK]
      Check success of execveat(4, '../script', 0)... [OK]
      Check failure of execveat(4, 'script', 0) with ENOENT... [OK]
      Check failure of execveat(5, 'execveat', 65535) with EINVAL... [OK]
      Check failure of execveat(5, 'no-such-file', 0) with ENOENT... [OK]
      Check failure of execveat(6, 'no-such-file', 0) with ENOENT... [OK]
      Check failure of execveat(-100, 'no-such-file', 0) with ENOENT... [OK]
      Check failure of execveat(5, '', 4096) with EACCES... [OK]
      Check failure of execveat(5, 'Makefile', 0) with EACCES... [OK]
      Check failure of execveat(11, '', 4096) with EACCES... [OK]
      Check failure of execveat(12, '', 4096) with EACCES... [OK]
      Check failure of execveat(99, '', 4096) with EBADF... [OK]
      Check failure of execveat(99, 'execveat', 0) with EBADF... [OK]
      Check failure of execveat(8, 'execveat', 0) with ENOTDIR... [OK]
      Invoke copy of 'execveat' via filename of length 4093:
      Check success of execveat(19, '', 4096)... [OK]
      Check success of execveat(5, 'xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx...yyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy', 0)... [OK]
      Invoke copy of 'script' via filename of length 4093:
      Check success of execveat(20, '', 4096)... [OK]
      /bin/sh: 0: Can't open /dev/fd/5/xxxxxxx(... a long line of x's and y's, 0)... [OK]
      Check success of execveat(5, 'xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx...yyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy', 0)... [OK]
      
      Tested on a 32-bit powerpc system.
      Signed-off-by: NPranith Kumar <bobby.prani@gmail.com>
      Signed-off-by: NMichael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
      1e5d0fdb
  16. 22 10月, 2014 1 次提交
    • P
      powerpc: Wire up sys_bpf() syscall · fcbb539f
      Pranith Kumar 提交于
      This patch wires up the new syscall sys_bpf() on powerpc.
      
      Passes the tests in samples/bpf:
      
          #0 add+sub+mul OK
          #1 unreachable OK
          #2 unreachable2 OK
          #3 out of range jump OK
          #4 out of range jump2 OK
          #5 test1 ld_imm64 OK
          #6 test2 ld_imm64 OK
          #7 test3 ld_imm64 OK
          #8 test4 ld_imm64 OK
          #9 test5 ld_imm64 OK
          #10 no bpf_exit OK
          #11 loop (back-edge) OK
          #12 loop2 (back-edge) OK
          #13 conditional loop OK
          #14 read uninitialized register OK
          #15 read invalid register OK
          #16 program doesn't init R0 before exit OK
          #17 stack out of bounds OK
          #18 invalid call insn1 OK
          #19 invalid call insn2 OK
          #20 invalid function call OK
          #21 uninitialized stack1 OK
          #22 uninitialized stack2 OK
          #23 check valid spill/fill OK
          #24 check corrupted spill/fill OK
          #25 invalid src register in STX OK
          #26 invalid dst register in STX OK
          #27 invalid dst register in ST OK
          #28 invalid src register in LDX OK
          #29 invalid dst register in LDX OK
          #30 junk insn OK
          #31 junk insn2 OK
          #32 junk insn3 OK
          #33 junk insn4 OK
          #34 junk insn5 OK
          #35 misaligned read from stack OK
          #36 invalid map_fd for function call OK
          #37 don't check return value before access OK
          #38 access memory with incorrect alignment OK
          #39 sometimes access memory with incorrect alignment OK
          #40 jump test 1 OK
          #41 jump test 2 OK
          #42 jump test 3 OK
          #43 jump test 4 OK
      Signed-off-by: NPranith Kumar <bobby.prani@gmail.com>
      [mpe: test using samples/bpf]
      Signed-off-by: NMichael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
      fcbb539f
  17. 09 9月, 2014 1 次提交
  18. 28 7月, 2014 1 次提交
    • M
      powerpc: Use standard macros for sys_sigpending() & sys_old_getrlimit() · 2061f7be
      Michael Ellerman 提交于
      Currently we have sys_sigpending and sys_old_getrlimit defined to use
      COMPAT_SYS() in systbl.h, but then both are #defined to sys_ni_syscall
      in systbl.S.
      
      This seems to have been done when ppc and ppc64 were merged, in commit
      9994a338 "Introduce entry_{32,64}.S, misc_{32,64}.S, systbl.S".
      
      AFAICS there's no longer (or never was) any need for this, we can just
      use SYSX() for both and remove the #defines to sys_ni_syscall.
      
      The expansion before was:
      
        #define COMPAT_SYS(func)	.llong	.sys_##func,.compat_sys_##func
        #define sys_old_getrlimit sys_ni_syscall
        COMPAT_SYS(old_getrlimit)
        =>
        .llong	.sys_old_getrlimit,.compat_sys_old_getrlimit
        =>
        .llong	.sys_ni_syscall,.compat_sys_old_getrlimit
      
      After is:
      
        #define SYSX(f, f3264, f32)	.llong	.f,.f3264
        SYSX(sys_ni_syscall, compat_sys_old_getrlimit, sys_old_getrlimit)
        =>
        .llong	.sys_ni_syscall,.compat_sys_old_getrlimit
      
      ie. they are equivalent.
      
      Finally both COMPAT_SYS() and SYSX() evaluate to sys_ni_syscall in the
      Cell SPU code.
      Signed-off-by: NMichael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
      Signed-off-by: NBenjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
      2061f7be
  19. 05 6月, 2014 1 次提交
  20. 02 6月, 2014 1 次提交
  21. 23 4月, 2014 1 次提交
  22. 29 1月, 2014 1 次提交
  23. 05 3月, 2013 1 次提交
  24. 04 3月, 2013 3 次提交
  25. 24 2月, 2013 1 次提交
  26. 04 2月, 2013 2 次提交
  27. 18 12月, 2012 1 次提交
  28. 14 12月, 2012 1 次提交
  29. 03 10月, 2012 1 次提交
    • C
      compat: fs: Generic compat_sys_sendfile implementation · 8f9c0119
      Catalin Marinas 提交于
      This function is used by sparc, powerpc and arm64 for compat support.
      The patch adds a generic implementation which calls do_sendfile()
      directly and avoids set_fs().
      
      The sparc architecture has wrappers for the sign extensions while
      powerpc relies on the compiler to do the this. The patch adds wrappers
      for powerpc to handle the u32->int type conversion.
      
      compat_sys_sendfile64() can be replaced by a sys_sendfile() call since
      compat_loff_t has the same size as off_t on a 64-bit system.
      
      On powerpc, the patch also changes the 64-bit sendfile call from
      sys_sendile64 to sys_sendfile.
      Signed-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
      Acked-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
      Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
      Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
      Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
      Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
      Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
      8f9c0119
  30. 01 11月, 2011 1 次提交
    • C
      Cross Memory Attach · fcf63409
      Christopher Yeoh 提交于
      The basic idea behind cross memory attach is to allow MPI programs doing
      intra-node communication to do a single copy of the message rather than a
      double copy of the message via shared memory.
      
      The following patch attempts to achieve this by allowing a destination
      process, given an address and size from a source process, to copy memory
      directly from the source process into its own address space via a system
      call.  There is also a symmetrical ability to copy from the current
      process's address space into a destination process's address space.
      
      - Use of /proc/pid/mem has been considered, but there are issues with
        using it:
        - Does not allow for specifying iovecs for both src and dest, assuming
          preadv or pwritev was implemented either the area read from or
        written to would need to be contiguous.
        - Currently mem_read allows only processes who are currently
        ptrace'ing the target and are still able to ptrace the target to read
        from the target. This check could possibly be moved to the open call,
        but its not clear exactly what race this restriction is stopping
        (reason  appears to have been lost)
        - Having to send the fd of /proc/self/mem via SCM_RIGHTS on unix
        domain socket is a bit ugly from a userspace point of view,
        especially when you may have hundreds if not (eventually) thousands
        of processes  that all need to do this with each other
        - Doesn't allow for some future use of the interface we would like to
        consider adding in the future (see below)
        - Interestingly reading from /proc/pid/mem currently actually
        involves two copies! (But this could be fixed pretty easily)
      
      As mentioned previously use of vmsplice instead was considered, but has
      problems.  Since you need the reader and writer working co-operatively if
      the pipe is not drained then you block.  Which requires some wrapping to
      do non blocking on the send side or polling on the receive.  In all to all
      communication it requires ordering otherwise you can deadlock.  And in the
      example of many MPI tasks writing to one MPI task vmsplice serialises the
      copying.
      
      There are some cases of MPI collectives where even a single copy interface
      does not get us the performance gain we could.  For example in an
      MPI_Reduce rather than copy the data from the source we would like to
      instead use it directly in a mathops (say the reduce is doing a sum) as
      this would save us doing a copy.  We don't need to keep a copy of the data
      from the source.  I haven't implemented this, but I think this interface
      could in the future do all this through the use of the flags - eg could
      specify the math operation and type and the kernel rather than just
      copying the data would apply the specified operation between the source
      and destination and store it in the destination.
      
      Although we don't have a "second user" of the interface (though I've had
      some nibbles from people who may be interested in using it for intra
      process messaging which is not MPI).  This interface is something which
      hardware vendors are already doing for their custom drivers to implement
      fast local communication.  And so in addition to this being useful for
      OpenMPI it would mean the driver maintainers don't have to fix things up
      when the mm changes.
      
      There was some discussion about how much faster a true zero copy would
      go. Here's a link back to the email with some testing I did on that:
      
      http://marc.info/?l=linux-mm&m=130105930902915&w=2
      
      There is a basic man page for the proposed interface here:
      
      http://ozlabs.org/~cyeoh/cma/process_vm_readv.txt
      
      This has been implemented for x86 and powerpc, other architecture should
      mainly (I think) just need to add syscall numbers for the process_vm_readv
      and process_vm_writev. There are 32 bit compatibility versions for
      64-bit kernels.
      
      For arch maintainers there are some simple tests to be able to quickly
      verify that the syscalls are working correctly here:
      
      http://ozlabs.org/~cyeoh/cma/cma-test-20110718.tgzSigned-off-by: NChris Yeoh <yeohc@au1.ibm.com>
      Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
      Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
      Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
      Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
      Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
      Cc: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
      Cc: <linux-man@vger.kernel.org>
      Cc: <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      fcf63409
  31. 30 8月, 2011 1 次提交
  32. 29 5月, 2011 1 次提交
    • E
      ns: Wire up the setns system call · 7b21fddd
      Eric W. Biederman 提交于
      32bit and 64bit on x86 are tested and working.  The rest I have looked
      at closely and I can't find any problems.
      
      setns is an easy system call to wire up.  It just takes two ints so I
      don't expect any weird architecture porting problems.
      
      While doing this I have noticed that we have some architectures that are
      very slow to get new system calls.  cris seems to be the slowest where
      the last system calls wired up were preadv and pwritev.  avr32 is weird
      in that recvmmsg was wired up but never declared in unistd.h.  frv is
      behind with perf_event_open being the last syscall wired up.  On h8300
      the last system call wired up was epoll_wait.  On m32r the last system
      call wired up was fallocate.  mn10300 has recvmmsg as the last system
      call wired up.  The rest seem to at least have syncfs wired up which was
      new in the 2.6.39.
      
      v2: Most of the architecture support added by Daniel Lezcano <dlezcano@fr.ibm.com>
      v3: ported to v2.6.36-rc4 by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
      v4: Moved wiring up of the system call to another patch
      v5: ported to v2.6.39-rc6
      v6: rebased onto parisc-next and net-next to avoid syscall  conflicts.
      v7: ported to Linus's latest post 2.6.39 tree.
      
      >  arch/blackfin/include/asm/unistd.h     |    3 ++-
      >  arch/blackfin/mach-common/entry.S      |    1 +
      Acked-by: NMike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
      
      Oh - ia64 wiring looks good.
      Acked-by: NTony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
      Signed-off-by: NEric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      7b21fddd
  33. 06 5月, 2011 1 次提交
    • A
      net: Add sendmmsg socket system call · 228e548e
      Anton Blanchard 提交于
      This patch adds a multiple message send syscall and is the send
      version of the existing recvmmsg syscall. This is heavily
      based on the patch by Arnaldo that added recvmmsg.
      
      I wrote a microbenchmark to test the performance gains of using
      this new syscall:
      
      http://ozlabs.org/~anton/junkcode/sendmmsg_test.c
      
      The test was run on a ppc64 box with a 10 Gbit network card. The
      benchmark can send both UDP and RAW ethernet packets.
      
      64B UDP
      
      batch   pkts/sec
      1       804570
      2       872800 (+ 8 %)
      4       916556 (+14 %)
      8       939712 (+17 %)
      16      952688 (+18 %)
      32      956448 (+19 %)
      64      964800 (+20 %)
      
      64B raw socket
      
      batch   pkts/sec
      1       1201449
      2       1350028 (+12 %)
      4       1461416 (+22 %)
      8       1513080 (+26 %)
      16      1541216 (+28 %)
      32      1553440 (+29 %)
      64      1557888 (+30 %)
      
      We see a 20% improvement in throughput on UDP send and 30%
      on raw socket send.
      
      [ Add sparc syscall entries. -DaveM ]
      Signed-off-by: NAnton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      228e548e
  34. 30 3月, 2011 1 次提交