- 15 11月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Frederic Weisbecker 提交于
The IRQ_WORK_BUSY flag is set right before we execute the work. Once this flag value is set, the work enters a claimable state again. So if we have specific data to compute in our work, we ensure it's either handled by another CPU or locally by enqueuing the work again. This state machine is guanranteed by atomic operations on the flags. So when we set IRQ_WORK_BUSY without using an xchg-like operation, we break this guarantee as in the following summarized scenario: CPU 1 CPU 2 ----- ----- (flags = 0) old_flags = flags; (flags = 0) cmpxchg(flags, old_flags, old_flags | IRQ_WORK_FLAGS) (flags = 3) [...] flags = IRQ_WORK_BUSY (flags = 2) func() (sees flags = 3) cmpxchg(flags, old_flags, old_flags | IRQ_WORK_FLAGS) (give up) cmpxchg(flags, 2, 0); (flags = 0) CPU 1 claims a work and executes it, so it sets IRQ_WORK_BUSY and the work is again in a claimable state. Now CPU 2 has new data to process and try to claim that work but it may see a stale value of the flags and think the work is still pending somewhere that will handle our data. This is because CPU 1 doesn't set IRQ_WORK_BUSY atomically. As a result, the data expected to be handle by CPU 2 won't get handled. To fix this, use xchg() to set IRQ_WORK_BUSY, this way we ensure the CPU 2 will see the correct value with cmpxchg() using the expected ordering. Changelog-heavily-inspired-by: NSteven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Signed-off-by: NFrederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Acked-by: NSteven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> Cc: Anish Kumar <anish198519851985@gmail.com>
-
- 14 4月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Chris Metcalf 提交于
Building with IRQ_WORK configured results in kernel/irq_work.c: In function ‘irq_work_run’: kernel/irq_work.c:110: error: implicit declaration of function ‘irqs_disabled’ The appropriate header just needs to be included. Signed-off-by: NChris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com> Signed-off-by: NPaul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
-
- 02 4月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Paul Gortmaker 提交于
Builds of the MIPS platform ip32_defconfig fails as of commit 0195c002 ("Merge tag 'split-asm_system_h ...") because MIPS xchg() macro uses BUILD_BUG_ON and it was moved in commit b81947c6 ("Disintegrate asm/system.h for MIPS"). The root cause is that the system.h split wasn't tested on a baseline with commit 6c03438e ("kernel.h: doesn't explicitly use bug.h, so don't include it.") Since this file uses BUG code in several other places besides the xchg call, simply make the inclusion explicit. Signed-off-by: NPaul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> Acked-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 31 10月, 2011 2 次提交
-
-
由 Paul Gortmaker 提交于
Up until now, this file was getting percpu.h because nearly every file was implicitly getting module.h (and all its sub-includes). But we want to clean that up, so call out percpu.h explicitly. Otherwise we'll get things like this on an ARM build: kernel/irq_work.c:48: error: expected declaration specifiers or '...' before 'irq_work_list' kernel/irq_work.c:48: warning: type defaults to 'int' in declaration of 'DEFINE_PER_CPU' The same thing was happening for builds on ARM for asm/processor.h kernel/irq_work.c: In function 'irq_work_sync': kernel/irq_work.c:166: error: implicit declaration of function 'cpu_relax' Signed-off-by: NPaul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
-
由 Paul Gortmaker 提交于
The changed files were only including linux/module.h for the EXPORT_SYMBOL infrastructure, and nothing else. Revector them onto the isolated export header for faster compile times. Nothing to see here but a whole lot of instances of: -#include <linux/module.h> +#include <linux/export.h> This commit is only changing the kernel dir; next targets will probably be mm, fs, the arch dirs, etc. Signed-off-by: NPaul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
-
- 04 10月, 2011 2 次提交
-
-
由 Peter Zijlstra 提交于
So we don't have to expose the struct list_node member. Cc: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1315836348.26517.41.camel@twinsSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
-
由 Huang Ying 提交于
Use llist in irq_work instead of the lock-less linked list implementation in irq_work to avoid the code duplication. Signed-off-by: NHuang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1315461646-1379-6-git-send-email-ying.huang@intel.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
-
- 18 12月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Christoph Lameter 提交于
The irq work queue is a per cpu object and it is sufficient for synchronization if per cpu atomics are used. Doing so simplifies the code and reduces the overhead of the code. Before: christoph@linux-2.6$ size kernel/irq_work.o text data bss dec hex filename 451 8 1 460 1cc kernel/irq_work.o After: christoph@linux-2.6$ size kernel/irq_work.o text data bss dec hex filename 438 8 1 447 1bf kernel/irq_work.o Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Signed-off-by: NChristoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
-
- 18 11月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Sergio Aguirre 提交于
The compiler warned us about: kernel/irq_work.c: In function 'irq_work_run': kernel/irq_work.c:148: warning: value computed is not used Dropping the cmpxchg() result is indeed weird, but correct - so annotate away the warning. Signed-off-by: NSergio Aguirre <saaguirre@ti.com> Cc: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com> Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> Cc: Kyle McMartin <kyle@mcmartin.ca> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> LKML-Reference: <1289930567-17828-1-git-send-email-saaguirre@ti.com> Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
-
- 19 10月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Peter Zijlstra 提交于
Provide a mechanism that allows running code in IRQ context. It is most useful for NMI code that needs to interact with the rest of the system -- like wakeup a task to drain buffers. Perf currently has such a mechanism, so extract that and provide it as a generic feature, independent of perf so that others may also benefit. The IRQ context callback is generated through self-IPIs where possible, or on architectures like powerpc the decrementer (the built-in timer facility) is set to generate an interrupt immediately. Architectures that don't have anything like this get to do with a callback from the timer tick. These architectures can call irq_work_run() at the tail of any IRQ handlers that might enqueue such work (like the perf IRQ handler) to avoid undue latencies in processing the work. Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Acked-by: NKyle McMartin <kyle@mcmartin.ca> Acked-by: NMartin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> [ various fixes ] Signed-off-by: NHuang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com> LKML-Reference: <1287036094.7768.291.camel@yhuang-dev> Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
-