Currently, when unwinding the call stack, we validate the frame pointer
of each frame against frame.sp, whose value is not clearly defined, and
which makes it more difficult to link stack frames together across
different stacks. It is far better to simply check whether the frame
pointer itself points into a valid stack.
Signed-off-by: NArd Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NMark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>

Our IRQ_STACK_PTR() and on_irq_stack() helpers both take a cpu argument,
used to generate a percpu address. In all cases, they are passed
{raw_,}smp_processor_id(), so this parameter is redundant.

Since {raw_,}smp_processor_id() use a percpu variable internally, this
approach means we generate a percpu offset to find the current cpu, then
use this to index an array of percpu offsets, which we then use to find
the current CPU's IRQ stack pointer. Thus, most of the work is
redundant.

Instead, we can consistently use raw_cpu_ptr() to generate the CPU's
irq_stack pointer by simply adding the percpu offset to the irq_stack
address, which is simpler in both respects.
Signed-off-by: NMark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NArd Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>

The kernel watchdog is a great debugging tool for finding tasks that
consume a disproportionate amount of CPU time in contiguous chunks. One
can imagine building a similar watchdog for arbitrary driver threads
using save_stack_trace_tsk() and print_stack_trace(). However, this is
not viable for dynamically loaded driver modules on ARM platforms
because save_stack_trace_tsk() is not exported for those architectures.
Export save_stack_trace_tsk() for the ARM64 architecture to align with
x86 and support various debugging use cases such as arbitrary driver
thread watchdog timers.
Signed-off-by: NDustin Brown <dustinb@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>

We are going to split <linux/sched/task_stack.h> out of <linux/sched.h>, which
will have to be picked up from other headers and a couple of .c files.

Create a trivial placeholder <linux/sched/task_stack.h> file that just
maps to <linux/sched.h> to make this patch obviously correct and
bisectable.

Include the new header in the files that are going to need it.
Acked-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

We are going to split <linux/sched/debug.h> out of <linux/sched.h>, which
will have to be picked up from other headers and a couple of .c files.

Create a trivial placeholder <linux/sched/debug.h> file that just
maps to <linux/sched.h> to make this patch obviously correct and
bisectable.

Include the new header in the files that are going to need it.
Acked-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

When CONFIG_THREAD_INFO_IN_TASK is selected, task stacks may be freed
before a task is destroyed. To account for this, the stacks are
refcounted, and when manipulating the stack of another task, it is
necessary to get/put the stack to ensure it isn't freed and/or re-used
while we do so.

This patch reworks the arm64 stack walking code to account for this.
When CONFIG_THREAD_INFO_IN_TASK is not selected these perform no
refcounting, and this should only be a structural change that does not
affect behaviour.
Signed-off-by: NMark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Tested-by: NLaura Abbott <labbott@redhat.com>
Cc: AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>

The walk_stackframe functions is architecture-specific, with a varying
prototype, and common code should not use it directly. None of its
current users can be built as modules. With THREAD_INFO_IN_TASK, users
will also need to hold a stack reference before calling it.

There's no reason for it to be exported, and it's very easy to misuse,
so unexport it for now.
Signed-off-by: NMark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>

We define current_stack_pointer in <asm/thread_info.h>, though other
files and header relying upon it do not have this necessary include, and
are thus fragile to changes in the header soup.

Subsequent patches will affect the header soup such that directly
including <asm/thread_info.h> may result in a circular header include in
some of these cases, so we can't simply include <asm/thread_info.h>.

Instead, factor current_thread_info into its own header, and have all
existing users include this explicitly.
Signed-off-by: NMark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Tested-by: NLaura Abbott <labbott@redhat.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>

In some places, dump_backtrace() is called with a NULL tsk parameter,
e.g. in bug_handler() in arch/arm64, or indirectly via show_stack() in
core code. The expectation is that this is treated as if current were
passed instead of NULL. Similar is true of unwind_frame().

Commit a80a0eb7 ("arm64: make irq_stack_ptr more robust") didn't
take this into account. In dump_backtrace() it compares tsk against
current *before* we check if tsk is NULL, and in unwind_frame() we never
set tsk if it is NULL.

Due to this, we won't initialise irq_stack_ptr in either function. In
dump_backtrace() this results in calling dump_mem() for memory
immediately above the IRQ stack range, rather than for the relevant
range on the task stack. In unwind_frame we'll reject unwinding frames
on the IRQ stack.

In either case this results in incomplete or misleading backtrace
information, but is not otherwise problematic. The initial percpu areas
(including the IRQ stacks) are allocated in the linear map, and dump_mem
uses __get_user(), so we shouldn't access anything with side-effects,
and will handle holes safely.

This patch fixes the issue by having both functions handle the NULL tsk
case before doing anything else with tsk.
Signed-off-by: NMark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Fixes: a80a0eb7 ("arm64: make irq_stack_ptr more robust")
Acked-by: NJames Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: Yang Shi <yang.shi@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>

Currently, enabling stacktrace of a kprobe events generates warning:

  echo stacktrace > /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/trace_options
  echo "p xhci_irq" > /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/kprobe_events
  echo 1 > /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/events/kprobes/enable

save_stack_trace_regs() not implemented yet.
------------[ cut here ]------------
WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 0 at ../kernel/stacktrace.c:74 save_stack_trace_regs+0x3c/0x48
Modules linked in:

CPU: 1 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/1 Not tainted 4.8.0-rc4-dirty #5128
Hardware name: ARM Juno development board (r1) (DT)
task: ffff800975dd1900 task.stack: ffff800975ddc000
PC is at save_stack_trace_regs+0x3c/0x48
LR is at save_stack_trace_regs+0x3c/0x48
pc : [<ffff000008126c64>] lr : [<ffff000008126c64>] pstate: 600003c5
sp : ffff80097ef52c00

Call trace:
   save_stack_trace_regs+0x3c/0x48
   __ftrace_trace_stack+0x168/0x208
   trace_buffer_unlock_commit_regs+0x5c/0x7c
   kprobe_trace_func+0x308/0x3d8
   kprobe_dispatcher+0x58/0x60
   kprobe_breakpoint_handler+0xbc/0x18c
   brk_handler+0x50/0x90
   do_debug_exception+0x50/0xbc

This patch implements save_stack_trace_regs(), so that stacktrace of a
kprobe events can be obtained.

After this patch, there is no warning and we can see the stacktrace for
kprobe events in trace buffer.

more /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/trace
          <idle>-0     [004] d.h.  1356.000496: p_xhci_irq_0:(xhci_irq+0x0/0x9ac)
          <idle>-0     [004] d.h.  1356.000497: <stack trace>
  => xhci_irq
  => __handle_irq_event_percpu
  => handle_irq_event_percpu
  => handle_irq_event
  => handle_fasteoi_irq
  => generic_handle_irq
  => __handle_domain_irq
  => gic_handle_irq
  => el1_irq
  => arch_cpu_idle
  => default_idle_call
  => cpu_startup_entry
  => secondary_start_kernel
  =>
Tested-by: NDavid A. Long <dave.long@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: NJames Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NPratyush Anand <panand@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>

Switching between stacks is only valid if we are tracing ourselves while on the
irq_stack, so it is only valid when in current and non-preemptible context,
otherwise is is just zeroed off.

Fixes: 132cd887 ("arm64: Modify stack trace and dump for use with irq_stack")
Acked-by: NJames Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Tested-by: NJames Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NYang Shi <yang.shi@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>

When boot arm64 kernel with KASAN enabled, the below error is reported by
kasan:

BUG: KASAN: out-of-bounds in unwind_frame+0xec/0x260 at addr ffffffc064d57ba0
Read of size 8 by task pidof/499
page:ffffffbdc39355c0 count:0 mapcount:0 mapping:          (null) index:0x0
flags: 0x0()
page dumped because: kasan: bad access detected
CPU: 2 PID: 499 Comm: pidof Not tainted 4.5.0-rc1 #119
Hardware name: Freescale Layerscape 2085a RDB Board (DT)
Call trace:
[<ffffffc00008d078>] dump_backtrace+0x0/0x290
[<ffffffc00008d32c>] show_stack+0x24/0x30
[<ffffffc0006a981c>] dump_stack+0x8c/0xd8
[<ffffffc0002e4400>] kasan_report_error+0x558/0x588
[<ffffffc0002e4958>] kasan_report+0x60/0x70
[<ffffffc0002e3188>] __asan_load8+0x60/0x78
[<ffffffc00008c92c>] unwind_frame+0xec/0x260
[<ffffffc000087e60>] get_wchan+0x110/0x160
[<ffffffc0003b647c>] do_task_stat+0xb44/0xb68
[<ffffffc0003b7730>] proc_tgid_stat+0x40/0x50
[<ffffffc0003ac840>] proc_single_show+0x88/0xd8
[<ffffffc000345be8>] seq_read+0x370/0x770
[<ffffffc00030aba0>] __vfs_read+0xc8/0x1d8
[<ffffffc00030c0ec>] vfs_read+0x94/0x168
[<ffffffc00030d458>] SyS_read+0xb8/0x128
[<ffffffc000086530>] el0_svc_naked+0x24/0x28
Memory state around the buggy address:
 ffffffc064d57a80: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 f1 f1 f1 f1 00 00 f4 f4
 ffffffc064d57b00: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
>ffffffc064d57b80: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
                                  ^
 ffffffc064d57c00: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
 ffffffc064d57c80: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00

Since the shadow byte pointed by the report is 0, so it may mean it is just hit
oob in non-current task. So, disable the instrumentation to silence these
warnings.
Acked-by: NAndrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com>
Signed-off-by: NYang Shi <yang.shi@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>

Function graph tracer modifies a return address (LR) in a stack frame
to hook a function return. This will result in many useless entries
(return_to_handler) showing up in
 a) a stack tracer's output
 b) perf call graph (with perf record -g)
 c) dump_backtrace (at panic et al.)

For example, in case of a),
  $ echo function_graph > /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/current_tracer
  $ echo 1 > /proc/sys/kernel/stack_trace_enabled
  $ cat /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/stack_trace
        Depth    Size   Location    (54 entries)
        -----    ----   --------
  0)     4504      16   gic_raise_softirq+0x28/0x150
  1)     4488      80   smp_cross_call+0x38/0xb8
  2)     4408      48   return_to_handler+0x0/0x40
  3)     4360      32   return_to_handler+0x0/0x40
  ...

In case of b),
  $ echo function_graph > /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/current_tracer
  $ perf record -e mem:XXX:x -ag -- sleep 10
  $ perf report
                  ...
                  |          |          |--0.22%-- 0x550f8
                  |          |          |          0x10888
                  |          |          |          el0_svc_naked
                  |          |          |          sys_openat
                  |          |          |          return_to_handler
                  |          |          |          return_to_handler
                  ...

In case of c),
  $ echo function_graph > /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/current_tracer
  $ echo c > /proc/sysrq-trigger
  ...
  Call trace:
  [<ffffffc00044d3ac>] sysrq_handle_crash+0x24/0x30
  [<ffffffc000092250>] return_to_handler+0x0/0x40
  [<ffffffc000092250>] return_to_handler+0x0/0x40
  ...

This patch replaces such entries with real addresses preserved in
current->ret_stack[] at unwind_frame(). This way, we can cover all
the cases.
Reviewed-by: NJungseok Lee <jungseoklee85@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NAKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org>
[will: fixed minor context changes conflicting with irq stack bits]
Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>

Function graph tracer modifies a return address (LR) in a stack frame
to hook a function's return. This will result in many useless entries
(return_to_handler) showing up in a call stack list.
We will fix this problem in a later patch ("arm64: ftrace: fix a stack
tracer's output under function graph tracer"). But since real return
addresses are saved in ret_stack[] array in struct task_struct,
unwind functions need to be notified of, in addition to a stack pointer
address, which task is being traced in order to find out real return
addresses.

This patch extends unwind functions' interfaces by adding an extra
argument of a pointer to task_struct.
Signed-off-by: NAKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>

The code for switching to irq_stack stores three pieces of information on
the stack, fp+lr, as a fake stack frame (that lets us walk back onto the
interrupted tasks stack frame), and the address of the struct pt_regs that
contains the register values from kernel entry. (which dump_backtrace()
will print in any stack trace).

To reduce this, we store fp, and the pointer to the struct pt_regs.
unwind_frame() can recognise this as the irq_stack dummy frame, (as it only
appears at the top of the irq_stack), and use the struct pt_regs values
to find the missing interrupted link-register.
Suggested-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NJames Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>

When unwind_frame() reaches the bottom of the irq_stack, the last fp
points to the original task stack. unwind_frame() uses
IRQ_STACK_TO_TASK_STACK() to find the sp value. If either values is
wrong, we may end up walking a corrupt stack.

Check these values are sane by testing if they are both on the stack
pointed to by current->stack.
Signed-off-by: NJames Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>

This patch allows unwind_frame() to traverse from interrupt stack to task
stack correctly. It requires data from a dummy stack frame, created
during irq_stack_entry(), added by a later patch.

A similar approach is taken to modify dump_backtrace(), which expects to
find struct pt_regs underneath any call to functions marked __exception.
When on an irq_stack, the struct pt_regs is stored on the old task stack,
the location of which is stored in the dummy stack frame.
Reviewed-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NAKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org>
[james.morse: merged two patches, reworked for per_cpu irq_stacks, and
 no alignment guarantees, added irq_stack definitions]
Signed-off-by: NJames Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>

This reverts commit e306dfd0.

With this patch applied, we were the only architecture making this sort
of adjustment to the PC calculation in the unwinder. This causes
problems for ftrace, where the PC values are matched against the
contents of the stack frames in the callchain and fail to match any
records after the address adjustment.

Whilst there has been some effort to change ftrace to workaround this,
those patches are not yet ready for mainline and, since we're the odd
architecture in this regard, let's just step in line with other
architectures (like arch/arm/) for now.

Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>

Use the global current_stack_pointer to get the value of the stack pointer.
This change supports being able to compile the kernel with both gcc and clang.
Signed-off-by: NBehan Webster <behanw@converseincode.com>
Signed-off-by: NMark Charlebois <charlebm@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: NJan-Simon Möller <dl9pf@gmx.de>
Reviewed-by: NOlof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
Acked-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>

walk_stackframe() calls unwind_frame(), and if walk_stackframe() is
"notrace", unwind_frame() should be also "notrace".
Acked-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NAKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>

The frame PC value in the unwind code used to just take the saved LR
value and use that.  That's incorrect as a stack trace, since it shows
the return path stack, not the call path stack.

In particular, it shows faulty information in case the bl is done as
the very last instruction of one label, since the return point will be
in the next label. That can easily be seen with tail calls to panic(),
which is marked __noreturn and thus doesn't have anything useful after it.

Easiest here is to just correct the unwind code and do a -4, to get the
actual call site for the backtrace instead of the return site.
Signed-off-by: NOlof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>

We need at least 24 bytes above frame pointer.
Signed-off-by: NKonstantin Khlebnikov <k.khlebnikov@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>

The patch contains the exception entry code (kernel/entry.S), pt_regs
structure and related accessors, undefined instruction trapping and
stack tracing.

AArch64 Linux kernel (including kernel threads) runs in EL1 mode using
the SP1 stack. The vectors don't have a fixed address, only alignment
(2^11) requirements.
Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Acked-by: NTony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Acked-by: NNicolas Pitre <nico@linaro.org>
Acked-by: NOlof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
Acked-by: NSantosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
Acked-by: NArnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>

This patch implements process/thread related codes. Backtrace and stacktrace are here.
Signed-off-by: NGuan Xuetao <gxt@mprc.pku.edu.cn>
Reviewed-by: NArnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>

Rabin Vincent reports:
| On SMP, this BUG() in save_stack_trace_tsk() can be easily triggered
| from user space by reading /proc/$PID/stack, where $PID is any pid but
| the current process:
|
|	if (tsk != current) {
| #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
|		/*
|		 * What guarantees do we have here that 'tsk'
|		 * is not running on another CPU?
|		 */
|		BUG();
| #else

Fix this by replacing the BUG() with an entry to terminate the stack
trace, returning an empty trace - I'd rather not expose the dwarf
unwinder to a volatile stack of a running thread.
Reported-by: NRabin Vincent <rabin@rab.in>
Tested-by: NRabin Vincent <rabin@rab.in>
Signed-off-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>

When unwinding stack frames we must take care not to unwind
areas of memory that lie outside of the known extent of the stack.

This patch fixes an incorrect calculation of the stack base where
THREAD_SIZE is added to the stack pointer after it has already
been aligned to this value. Since the ALIGN macro performs this
addition internally, we end up overshooting the base by 8k.
Acked-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>

From: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>

As __builtin_return_address(n) doesn't work for ARM with n > 0, the
kernel needs its own implementation.

This fixes many warnings saying:

	warning: unsupported argument to '__builtin_return_address'

The new methods and walk_stackframe must not be instrumented because
CALLER_ADDRESSx is used in the various tracers and tracing the tracer is
a bad idea.

What's currently missing is an implementation using unwind tables.  This
is not fatal though, it's just that the tracers don't get enough
information to be really useful.

Note that if both ARM_UNWIND and FRAME_POINTER are enabled,
walk_stackframe uses unwind information.  So in this case the same
implementation is used as when FRAME_POINTER is disabled.

Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NUwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>

This patch changes the walk_stacktrace and its callers for easier
integration of stack unwinding. The arch/arm/kernel/stacktrace.h file is
also moved to arch/arm/include/asm/stacktrace.h.
Signed-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>

Andrew Morton reported this against linux-next:

ERROR: ".save_stack_trace" [tests/backtracetest.ko] undefined!
Reported-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>

Available for !SMP only at the moment.

From Russell:

|Basically, if a thread is running on a CPU, thread_saved_fp() is invalid.
|So, the question is: what guarantees do we have here that 'tsk' is not
|running on another CPU?
Signed-off-by: NNicolas Pitre <nico@marvell.com>
Tested-by: NLennert Buytenhek <buytenh@marvell.com>
Signed-off-by: NLennert Buytenhek <buytenh@marvell.com>

Fix an oops in the stacktrace code, caused by improper range checking.
We subtract 12 off 'fp' before testing to see if it's below the low
bound.  However, if 'fp' were zero before, it becomes a very large
positive number, causing this test to succeed where it should fail.
Signed-off-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>

oprofile depends on having it
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

ab1b6f03 said

 - remove the unused task argument to save_stack_trace, it's always current

then broke arm:

arch/arm/kernel/stacktrace.c:56: error: conflicting types for 'save_stack_trace'
include/linux/stacktrace.h:11: error: previous declaration of 'save_stack_trace' was here
arch/arm/kernel/stacktrace.c:56: error: conflicting types for 'save_stack_trace'
include/linux/stacktrace.h:11: error: previous declaration of 'save_stack_trace' was here

Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>

Add support for stacktrace.  Use the new stacktrace code with
oprofile instead of it's version; there's no point having
multiple versions of stacktracing in the kernel.
Signed-off-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>