- 13 1月, 2017 3 次提交
-
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
If a file is renamed, but stays in the same directory, we will still receive 2 change_info4 structures describing the change to that directory, but we only want to apply it once. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
We don't want to invalidate the directory attribute and data cache unless we know that a file was created, or the change attribute differs from the one in our cache. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
由 Benjamin Coddington 提交于
I have reports of a crash that look like __fput() was called twice for a NFSv4.0 file. It seems possible that the state manager could try to reclaim a lock and take a reference on the fl->fl_file at the same time the file is being released if, during the close(), a signal interrupts the wait for outstanding IO while removing locks which then skips the removal of that lock. Since 83bfff23 ("nfs4: have do_vfs_lock take an inode pointer") has removed the need to traverse fl->fl_file->f_inode in nfs4_lock_done(), taking that reference is no longer necessary. Signed-off-by: NBenjamin Coddington <bcodding@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
- 20 12月, 2016 6 次提交
-
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
If our DELEGRETURN RPC call is rejected with an EACCES call, then we should remove the GETATTR call from the compound RPC and retry. This could potentially happen when there is a conflict between an ACL denying attribute reads and our use of SP4_MACH_CRED. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
If our CLOSE RPC call is rejected with an EACCES call, then we should remove the GETATTR call from the compound RPC and retry. This could potentially happen when there is a conflict between an ACL denying attribute reads and our use of SP4_MACH_CRED. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
In order to benefit from the DENY share lock protection, we should put the GETATTR operation before the CLOSE. Otherwise, we might race with a Windows machine that thinks it is now safe to modify the file. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
If we're downgrading from a READ+WRITE mode to a READ-only mode, then ask for cache consistency attributes so that we avoid the revalidation in nfs_close_context() Fixes: 3947b74d ("NFSv4: Don't request a GETATTR on open_downgrade.") Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
DELEGRETURN will always carry a reference to the inode except when the latter is being freed, so let's ensure that we always use that inode information to ensure close-to-open cache consistency, even when the DELEGRETURN call is asynchronous. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
If we successfully updated the change attribute, we should timestamp the cache. While we do know that the other attributes are not completely up to date, we have the NFS_INO_INVALID_ATTR flag that let us know that, so it is valid to say that the cache has not timed out. We can also clear NFS_INO_REVAL_PAGECACHE, since our change attribute is now known to be valid. Conversely, if the change attribute did not match, we should make sure to also revalidate the access and ACL caches. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
- 10 12月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Andreas Gruenbacher 提交于
Clients can set the umask attribute when creating files to cause the server to apply it always except when inheriting permissions from the parent directory. That way, the new files will end up with the same permissions as files created locally. See https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-nfsv4-umask-02 for more details. Signed-off-by: NAndreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
- 08 12月, 2016 2 次提交
-
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
The layout-private data may depend on the layout and/or the inode still existing when it does post-processing and frees its data, so we need to free them after calling lrp->ld_private.ops->free(). This fixes a mirror list corruption issue in the flexfiles driver. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
由 NeilBrown 提交于
Otherwise the lock context won't be freed when we're done with it. From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com> Fixes: 5bd3f817 ("NFSv4: change nfs4_select_rw_stateid to take a lock_context inplace of lock_owner") Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@netapp.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
- 05 12月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
In the case where SEQUENCE receives a NFS4ERR_BADSESSION or NFS4ERR_DEADSESSION error, we just want to report the session as needing recovery, and then we want to retry the operation. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
- 03 12月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Cleanup to allow layout drivers to attach private data to layoutreturn, and manage the data. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
- 02 12月, 2016 13 次提交
-
-
由 NeilBrown 提交于
The only time that a lock_context is not immediately available is in setattr, and now that it has an open_context, it can easily find one with nfs_get_lock_context. This removes the need for the on-stack nfs_lockowner. This change is preparation for correctly support flock stateids. Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.com> Reviewed-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
由 NeilBrown 提交于
The open_context can always lead directly to the state, and is always easily available, so this is a straightforward change. Doing this makes more information available to _nfs4_do_setattr() for use in the next patch. Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.com> Reviewed-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
由 NeilBrown 提交于
An open file description (struct file) in a given process can be associated with two different lock owners. It can have a Posix lock owner which will be different in each process that has a fd on the file. It can have a Flock owner which will be the same in all processes. When searching for a lock stateid to use, we need to consider both of these owners So add a new "flock_owner" to the "nfs_open_context" (of which there is one for each open file description). This flock_owner does not need to be reference-counted as there is a 1-1 relation between 'struct file' and nfs open contexts, and it will never be part of a list of contexts. So there is no need for a 'flock_context' - just the owner is enough. The io_count included in the (Posix) lock_context provides no guarantee that all read-aheads that could use the state have completed, so not supporting it for flock locks in not a serious problem. Synchronization between flock and read-ahead can be added later if needed. When creating an open_context for a non-openning create call, we don't have a 'struct file' to pass in, so the lock context gets initialized with a NULL owner, but this will never be used. The flock_owner is not used at all in this patch, that will come later. Acked-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.com> Reviewed-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
由 NeilBrown 提交于
this field is not used in any important way and probably should have been removed by Commit: 8003d3c4 ("nfs4: treat lock owners as opaque values") which removed the pid argument from nfs4_get_lock_state. Except in unusual and uninteresting cases, two threads with the same ->tgid will have the same ->files pointer, so keeping them both for comparison brings no benefit. Acked-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.com> Reviewed-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
If we cannot grab the inode or superblock, then we cannot pin the layout header, and so we cannot send a layoutreturn as part of an async delegreturn call. In this case, we currently end up sending an extra layoutreturn after the delegreturn. Since the layout was implicitly returned by the delegreturn, that just gets a BAD_STATEID. The fix is to simply complete the return-on-close immediately. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Amend the pnfs return on close helper functions to enable sending the layoutreturn op in CLOSE/DELEGRETURN. This closes a potential race between CLOSE/DELEGRETURN and parallel OPEN calls to the same file, and allows the client and the server to agree on whether or not there is an outstanding layout. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Add XDR encoding for the layoutreturn op, and storage for the layoutreturn arguments to the DELEGRETURN compound. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Add XDR encoding for the layoutreturn op, and storage for the layoutreturn arguments to the CLOSE compound. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Fix a potential race with CB_LAYOUTRECALL in which the server recalls the remaining layout segments while our LAYOUTRETURN is still in transit. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
We may want to process and transmit layout stat information for the layout segments that are being returned, so we should defer freeing them until after the layoutreturn has completed. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
If holding a delegation, we do not need to ask the server to return close-to-open cache consistency attributes as part of the CLOSE compound. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
We don't need to ask for the change attribute when returning a delegation or recovering from a server reboot, and it could actually cause us to obtain an incorrect value if we're using a pNFS flavour that requires LAYOUTCOMMIT. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
If we're reclaiming state after a reboot, or as part of returning a delegation, we don't need to check access modes again. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
- 22 11月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Benjamin Coddington 提交于
While walking the list of lock_states, keep a reference on each nfs4_lock_state to be checked, otherwise the lock state could be removed while the check performs TEST_STATEID and possible FREE_STATEID. Signed-off-by: NBenjamin Coddington <bcodding@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
- 19 11月, 2016 3 次提交
-
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Ensure we test to see if the open stateid is actually set, before we send a CLOSE. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
If the reply to a successful CLOSE call races with an OPEN to the same file, we can end up scribbling over the stateid that represents the new open state. The race looks like: Client Server ====== ====== CLOSE stateid A on file "foo" CLOSE stateid A, return stateid C OPEN file "foo" OPEN "foo", return stateid B Receive reply to OPEN Reset open state for "foo" Associate stateid B to "foo" Receive CLOSE for A Reset open state for "foo" Replace stateid B with C The fix is to examine the argument of the CLOSE, and check for a match with the current stateid "other" field. If the two do not match, then the above race occurred, and we should just ignore the CLOSE. Reported-by: NBenjamin Coddington <bcodding@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
We don't want to call nfs4_free_revoked_stateid() in the case where the delegreturn was successful. Reported-by: NBenjamin Coddington <bcodding@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
- 20 10月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Arnd Bergmann 提交于
A bugfix introduced a harmless warning for update_open_stateid: fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c:1548:2: error: missing braces around initializer [-Werror=missing-braces] Removing the zero in the initializer will do the right thing here and initialize the entire structure to zero. Fixes: 1393d961 ("NFSv4: Fix a race when updating an open_stateid") Signed-off-by: NArnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
- 08 10月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Andreas Gruenbacher 提交于
These inode operations are no longer used; remove them. Signed-off-by: NAndreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
- 05 10月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Deepa Dinamani 提交于
boot_time is represented as a struct timespec. struct timespec and CURRENT_TIME are not y2038 safe. Overall, the plan is to use timespec64 and ktime_t for all internal kernel representation of timestamps. CURRENT_TIME will also be removed. boot_time is used to construct the nfs client boot verifier. Use ktime_t to represent boot_time and ktime_get_real() for the boot_time value. Following Trond's request https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/6/9/22 , use ktime_t instead of converting to struct timespec64. Use higher and lower 32 bit parts of ktime_t for the boot verifier. Use the lower 32 bit part of ktime_t for the authsys_parms stamp field. Signed-off-by: NDeepa Dinamani <deepa.kernel@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: NArnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com> Cc: Anna Schumaker <anna.schumaker@netapp.com> Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
- 30 9月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Olga Kornievskaia 提交于
If an operation got interrupted, then since we don't know if the server processed it on not, we keep the seq#. Upon reuse of slot and seq# if we get reply from the cache (ie EREMOTEIO) then we need to retry the operation after bumping the seq# Signed-off-by: NOlga Kornievskaia <kolga@netapp.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
- 28 9月, 2016 5 次提交
-
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Fix the code so that we always mark the atime as invalid in nfs4_read_done(). Currently, the expectation appears to be that the pNFS drivers should always do this, with the result that most of them don't. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
TEST_STATEID only tells you that you have a valid open stateid. It doesn't tell the client anything about whether or not it holds the required share locks. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com> Tested-by: NOleg Drokin <green@linuxhacker.ru> [Anna: Wrap nfs_open_stateid_recover_openmode in CONFIG_NFS_V4_1 checks] Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
_nfs41_free_stateid() needs to be cached by the session, but nfs41_test_stateid() may return NFS4ERR_RETRY_UNCACHED_REP (in which case we should just retry). Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com> Tested-by: NOleg Drokin <green@linuxhacker.ru> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com> Tested-by: NOleg Drokin <green@linuxhacker.ru> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
We need to test the NFS_OPEN_STATE flag for whether or not the open_stateid is valid. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com> Tested-by: NOleg Drokin <green@linuxhacker.ru> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-