- 04 11月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Eric Dumazet 提交于
Adds RCU management to the list of netdevices. Convert some for_each_netdev() users to RCU version, if it can avoid read_lock-ing dev_base_lock Ie: read_lock(&dev_base_loack); for_each_netdev(net, dev) some_action(); read_unlock(&dev_base_lock); becomes : rcu_read_lock(); for_each_netdev_rcu(net, dev) some_action(); rcu_read_unlock(); Signed-off-by: NEric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 27 7月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Ralf Baechle 提交于
The use of a static buffer in rose2asc() to return its result is not threadproof and can result in corruption if multiple threads are trying to use one of the procfs files based on rose2asc(). Signed-off-by: NRalf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 18 6月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Bernard Pidoux 提交于
ROSE network is organized through nodes connected via hamradio or Internet. AX25 packet radio frames sent to a remote ROSE address destination are routed through these nodes. Without the present patch, automatic routing mechanism did not work optimally due to an improper parameter checking. rose_get_neigh() function is called either by rose_connect() or by rose_route_frame(). In the case of a call from rose_connect(), f0 timer is checked to find if a connection is already pending. In that case it returns the address of the neighbour, or returns a NULL otherwise. When called by rose_route_frame() the purpose was to route a packet AX25 frame through an adjacent node given a destination rose address. However, in that case, t0 timer checked does not indicate if the adjacent node is actually connected even if the timer is not null. Thus, for each frame sent, the function often tried to start a new connexion even if the adjacent node was already connected. The patch adds a "new" parameter that is true when the function is called by rose route_frame(). This instructs rose_get_neigh() to check node parameter "restarted". If restarted is true it means that the route to the destination address is opened via a neighbour node already connected. If "restarted" is false the function returns a NULL. In that case the calling function will initiate a new connection as before. This results in a fast routing of frames, from nodes to nodes, until destination is reached, as originaly specified by ROSE protocole. Signed-off-by: NBernard Pidoux <f6bvp@amsat.org> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 03 5月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Bernard Pidoux 提交于
In rose_node_start() as well as in rose_node_stop() __acquires() and spin_lock_bh() were wrongly passing rose_neigh_list_lock instead of rose_node_list_lock arguments. Signed-off-by: NBernard Pidoux <f6bvp@amsat.org> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 21 4月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Bernard Pidoux 提交于
[ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ] 2.6.25 #3 --------------------------------------------- ax25ipd/3811 is trying to acquire lock: (rose_node_list_lock){-+..}, at: [<f8d31f1a>] rose_get_neigh+0x1a/0xa0 [rose] but task is already holding lock: (rose_node_list_lock){-+..}, at: [<f8d31fed>] rose_route_frame+0x4d/0x620 [rose] other info that might help us debug this: 6 locks held by ax25ipd/3811: #0: (&tty->atomic_write_lock){--..}, at: [<c0259a1c>] tty_write_lock+0x1c/0x50 #1: (rcu_read_lock){..--}, at: [<c02aea36>] net_rx_action+0x96/0x230 #2: (rcu_read_lock){..--}, at: [<c02ac5c0>] netif_receive_skb+0x100/0x2f0 #3: (rose_node_list_lock){-+..}, at: [<f8d31fed>] rose_route_frame+0x4d/0x620 [rose] #4: (rose_neigh_list_lock){-+..}, at: [<f8d31ff7>] rose_route_frame+0x57/0x620 [rose] #5: (rose_route_list_lock){-+..}, at: [<f8d32001>] rose_route_frame+0x61/0x620 [rose] stack backtrace: Pid: 3811, comm: ax25ipd Not tainted 2.6.25 #3 [<c0147e27>] print_deadlock_bug+0xc7/0xd0 [<c0147eca>] check_deadlock+0x9a/0xb0 [<c0149cd2>] validate_chain+0x1e2/0x310 [<c0149b95>] ? validate_chain+0xa5/0x310 [<c010a7d8>] ? native_sched_clock+0x88/0xc0 [<c0149fa1>] __lock_acquire+0x1a1/0x750 [<c014a5d1>] lock_acquire+0x81/0xa0 [<f8d31f1a>] ? rose_get_neigh+0x1a/0xa0 [rose] [<c03201a3>] _spin_lock_bh+0x33/0x60 [<f8d31f1a>] ? rose_get_neigh+0x1a/0xa0 [rose] [<f8d31f1a>] rose_get_neigh+0x1a/0xa0 [rose] [<f8d32404>] rose_route_frame+0x464/0x620 [rose] [<c031ffdd>] ? _read_unlock+0x1d/0x20 [<f8d31fa0>] ? rose_route_frame+0x0/0x620 [rose] [<f8d1c396>] ax25_rx_iframe+0x66/0x3b0 [ax25] [<f8d1f42f>] ? ax25_start_t3timer+0x1f/0x40 [ax25] [<f8d1e65b>] ax25_std_frame_in+0x7fb/0x890 [ax25] [<c0320005>] ? _spin_unlock_bh+0x25/0x30 [<f8d1bdf6>] ax25_kiss_rcv+0x2c6/0x800 [ax25] [<c02a4769>] ? sock_def_readable+0x59/0x80 [<c014a8a7>] ? __lock_release+0x47/0x70 [<c02a4769>] ? sock_def_readable+0x59/0x80 [<c031ffdd>] ? _read_unlock+0x1d/0x20 [<c02a4769>] ? sock_def_readable+0x59/0x80 [<c02a4d3a>] ? sock_queue_rcv_skb+0x13a/0x1d0 [<c02a4c45>] ? sock_queue_rcv_skb+0x45/0x1d0 [<f8d1bb30>] ? ax25_kiss_rcv+0x0/0x800 [ax25] [<c02ac715>] netif_receive_skb+0x255/0x2f0 [<c02ac5c0>] ? netif_receive_skb+0x100/0x2f0 [<c02af05c>] process_backlog+0x7c/0xf0 [<c02aeb0c>] net_rx_action+0x16c/0x230 [<c02aea36>] ? net_rx_action+0x96/0x230 [<c012bd53>] __do_softirq+0x93/0x120 [<f8d2a68a>] ? mkiss_receive_buf+0x33a/0x3f0 [mkiss] [<c012be37>] do_softirq+0x57/0x60 [<c012c265>] local_bh_enable_ip+0xa5/0xe0 [<c0320005>] _spin_unlock_bh+0x25/0x30 [<f8d2a68a>] mkiss_receive_buf+0x33a/0x3f0 [mkiss] [<c025ea37>] pty_write+0x47/0x60 [<c025c620>] write_chan+0x1b0/0x220 [<c0259a1c>] ? tty_write_lock+0x1c/0x50 [<c011fec0>] ? default_wake_function+0x0/0x10 [<c0259bea>] tty_write+0x12a/0x1c0 [<c025c470>] ? write_chan+0x0/0x220 [<c018bbc6>] vfs_write+0x96/0x130 [<c0259ac0>] ? tty_write+0x0/0x1c0 [<c018c24d>] sys_write+0x3d/0x70 [<c0104d1e>] sysenter_past_esp+0x5f/0xa5 ======================= BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 61s! [ax25ipd:3811] Pid: 3811, comm: ax25ipd Not tainted (2.6.25 #3) EIP: 0060:[<c010a9db>] EFLAGS: 00000246 CPU: 0 EIP is at native_read_tsc+0xb/0x20 EAX: b404aa2c EBX: b404a9c9 ECX: 017f1000 EDX: 0000076b ESI: 00000001 EDI: 00000000 EBP: ecc83afc ESP: ecc83afc DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 00d8 GS: 0033 SS: 0068 CR0: 8005003b CR2: b7f5f000 CR3: 2cd8e000 CR4: 000006f0 DR0: 00000000 DR1: 00000000 DR2: 00000000 DR3: 00000000 DR6: ffff0ff0 DR7: 00000400 [<c0204937>] delay_tsc+0x17/0x30 [<c02048e9>] __delay+0x9/0x10 [<c02127f6>] __spin_lock_debug+0x76/0xf0 [<c0212618>] ? spin_bug+0x18/0x100 [<c0147923>] ? __lock_contended+0xa3/0x110 [<c0212998>] _raw_spin_lock+0x68/0x90 [<c03201bf>] _spin_lock_bh+0x4f/0x60 [<f8d31f1a>] ? rose_get_neigh+0x1a/0xa0 [rose] [<f8d31f1a>] rose_get_neigh+0x1a/0xa0 [rose] [<f8d32404>] rose_route_frame+0x464/0x620 [rose] [<c031ffdd>] ? _read_unlock+0x1d/0x20 [<f8d31fa0>] ? rose_route_frame+0x0/0x620 [rose] [<f8d1c396>] ax25_rx_iframe+0x66/0x3b0 [ax25] [<f8d1f42f>] ? ax25_start_t3timer+0x1f/0x40 [ax25] [<f8d1e65b>] ax25_std_frame_in+0x7fb/0x890 [ax25] [<c0320005>] ? _spin_unlock_bh+0x25/0x30 [<f8d1bdf6>] ax25_kiss_rcv+0x2c6/0x800 [ax25] [<c02a4769>] ? sock_def_readable+0x59/0x80 [<c014a8a7>] ? __lock_release+0x47/0x70 [<c02a4769>] ? sock_def_readable+0x59/0x80 [<c031ffdd>] ? _read_unlock+0x1d/0x20 [<c02a4769>] ? sock_def_readable+0x59/0x80 [<c02a4d3a>] ? sock_queue_rcv_skb+0x13a/0x1d0 [<c02a4c45>] ? sock_queue_rcv_skb+0x45/0x1d0 [<f8d1bb30>] ? ax25_kiss_rcv+0x0/0x800 [ax25] [<c02ac715>] netif_receive_skb+0x255/0x2f0 [<c02ac5c0>] ? netif_receive_skb+0x100/0x2f0 [<c02af05c>] process_backlog+0x7c/0xf0 [<c02aeb0c>] net_rx_action+0x16c/0x230 [<c02aea36>] ? net_rx_action+0x96/0x230 [<c012bd53>] __do_softirq+0x93/0x120 [<f8d2a68a>] ? mkiss_receive_buf+0x33a/0x3f0 [mkiss] [<c012be37>] do_softirq+0x57/0x60 [<c012c265>] local_bh_enable_ip+0xa5/0xe0 [<c0320005>] _spin_unlock_bh+0x25/0x30 [<f8d2a68a>] mkiss_receive_buf+0x33a/0x3f0 [mkiss] [<c025ea37>] pty_write+0x47/0x60 [<c025c620>] write_chan+0x1b0/0x220 [<c0259a1c>] ? tty_write_lock+0x1c/0x50 [<c011fec0>] ? default_wake_function+0x0/0x10 [<c0259bea>] tty_write+0x12a/0x1c0 [<c025c470>] ? write_chan+0x0/0x220 [<c018bbc6>] vfs_write+0x96/0x130 [<c0259ac0>] ? tty_write+0x0/0x1c0 [<c018c24d>] sys_write+0x3d/0x70 [<c0104d1e>] sysenter_past_esp+0x5f/0xa5 ======================= Since rose_route_frame() does not use rose_node_list we can safely remove rose_node_list_lock spin lock here and let it be free for rose_get_neigh(). Signed-off-by: NBernard Pidoux <f6bvp@amsat.org> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 29 1月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Eric Dumazet 提交于
CHECK net/rose/af_rose.c net/rose/af_rose.c:125:11: warning: expensive signed divide net/rose/af_rose.c:976:46: warning: expensive signed divide net/rose/af_rose.c:1379:13: warning: context imbalance in 'rose_info_start' - wrong count at exit net/rose/af_rose.c:1406:13: warning: context imbalance in 'rose_info_stop' - unexpected unlock CHECK net/rose/rose_in.c net/rose/rose_in.c:185:25: warning: expensive signed divide CHECK net/rose/rose_route.c net/rose/rose_route.c:997:46: warning: expensive signed divide net/rose/rose_route.c:1070:13: warning: context imbalance in 'rose_node_start' - wrong count at exit net/rose/rose_route.c:1093:13: warning: context imbalance in 'rose_node_stop' - unexpected unlock net/rose/rose_route.c:1146:13: warning: context imbalance in 'rose_neigh_start' - wrong count at exit net/rose/rose_route.c:1169:13: warning: context imbalance in 'rose_neigh_stop' - unexpected unlock net/rose/rose_route.c:1229:13: warning: context imbalance in 'rose_route_start' - wrong count at exit net/rose/rose_route.c:1252:13: warning: context imbalance in 'rose_route_stop' - unexpected unlock Signed-off-by: NEric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 11 10月, 2007 1 次提交
-
-
由 Eric W. Biederman 提交于
This patch makes most of the generic device layer network namespace safe. This patch makes dev_base_head a network namespace variable, and then it picks up a few associated variables. The functions: dev_getbyhwaddr dev_getfirsthwbytype dev_get_by_flags dev_get_by_name __dev_get_by_name dev_get_by_index __dev_get_by_index dev_ioctl dev_ethtool dev_load wireless_process_ioctl were modified to take a network namespace argument, and deal with it. vlan_ioctl_set and brioctl_set were modified so their hooks will receive a network namespace argument. So basically anthing in the core of the network stack that was affected to by the change of dev_base was modified to handle multiple network namespaces. The rest of the network stack was simply modified to explicitly use &init_net the initial network namespace. This can be fixed when those components of the network stack are modified to handle multiple network namespaces. For now the ifindex generator is left global. Fundametally ifindex numbers are per namespace, or else we will have corner case problems with migration when we get that far. At the same time there are assumptions in the network stack that the ifindex of a network device won't change. Making the ifindex number global seems a good compromise until the network stack can cope with ifindex changes when you change namespaces, and the like. Signed-off-by: NEric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 08 10月, 2007 1 次提交
-
-
由 Alexey Dobriyan 提交于
Commit a3d38402 aka "[AX.25]: Fix unchecked rose_add_loopback_neigh uses" transformed rose_loopback_neigh var into statically allocated one. However, on unload it will be kfree's which can't work. Steps to reproduce: modprobe rose rmmod rose BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 00000008 printing eip: c014c664 *pde = 00000000 Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT DEBUG_PAGEALLOC Modules linked in: rose ax25 fan ufs loop usbhid rtc snd_intel8x0 snd_ac97_codec ehci_hcd ac97_bus uhci_hcd thermal usbcore button processor evdev sr_mod cdrom CPU: 0 EIP: 0060:[<c014c664>] Not tainted VLI EFLAGS: 00210086 (2.6.23-rc9 #3) EIP is at kfree+0x48/0xa1 eax: 00000556 ebx: c1734aa0 ecx: f6a5e000 edx: f7082000 esi: 00000000 edi: f9a55d20 ebp: 00200287 esp: f6a5ef28 ds: 007b es: 007b fs: 0000 gs: 0033 ss: 0068 Process rmmod (pid: 1823, ti=f6a5e000 task=f7082000 task.ti=f6a5e000) Stack: f9a55d20 f9a5200c 00000000 00000000 00000000 f6a5e000 f9a5200c f9a55a00 00000000 bf818cf0 f9a51f3f f9a55a00 00000000 c0132c60 65736f72 00000000 f69f9630 f69f9528 c014244a f6a4e900 00200246 f7082000 c01025e6 00000000 Call Trace: [<f9a5200c>] rose_rt_free+0x1d/0x49 [rose] [<f9a5200c>] rose_rt_free+0x1d/0x49 [rose] [<f9a51f3f>] rose_exit+0x4c/0xd5 [rose] [<c0132c60>] sys_delete_module+0x15e/0x186 [<c014244a>] remove_vma+0x40/0x45 [<c01025e6>] sysenter_past_esp+0x8f/0x99 [<c012bacf>] trace_hardirqs_on+0x118/0x13b [<c01025b6>] sysenter_past_esp+0x5f/0x99 ======================= Code: 05 03 1d 80 db 5b c0 8b 03 25 00 40 02 00 3d 00 40 02 00 75 03 8b 5b 0c 8b 73 10 8b 44 24 18 89 44 24 04 9c 5d fa e8 77 df fd ff <8b> 56 08 89 f8 e8 84 f4 fd ff e8 bd 32 06 00 3b 5c 86 60 75 0f EIP: [<c014c664>] kfree+0x48/0xa1 SS:ESP 0068:f6a5ef28 Signed-off-by: NAlexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 11 7月, 2007 1 次提交
-
-
由 Philippe De Muyter 提交于
Make all initialized struct seq_operations in net/ const Signed-off-by: NPhilippe De Muyter <phdm@macqel.be> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 04 5月, 2007 1 次提交
-
-
由 Pavel Emelianov 提交于
Cleanup of dev_base list use, with the aim to simplify making device list per-namespace. In almost every occasion, use of dev_base variable and dev->next pointer could be easily replaced by for_each_netdev loop. A few most complicated places were converted to using first_netdev()/next_netdev(). Signed-off-by: NPavel Emelianov <xemul@openvz.org> Acked-by: NKirill Korotaev <dev@openvz.org> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 26 4月, 2007 1 次提交
-
-
由 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 提交于
For the common, open coded 'skb->h.raw = skb->data' operation, so that we can later turn skb->h.raw into a offset, reducing the size of struct sk_buff in 64bit land while possibly keeping it as a pointer on 32bit. This one touches just the most simple cases: skb->h.raw = skb->data; skb->h.raw = {skb_push|[__]skb_pull}() The next ones will handle the slightly more "complex" cases. Signed-off-by: NArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 15 2月, 2007 1 次提交
-
-
由 Tim Schmielau 提交于
After Al Viro (finally) succeeded in removing the sched.h #include in module.h recently, it makes sense again to remove other superfluous sched.h includes. There are quite a lot of files which include it but don't actually need anything defined in there. Presumably these includes were once needed for macros that used to live in sched.h, but moved to other header files in the course of cleaning it up. To ease the pain, this time I did not fiddle with any header files and only removed #includes from .c-files, which tend to cause less trouble. Compile tested against 2.6.20-rc2 and 2.6.20-rc2-mm2 (with offsets) on alpha, arm, i386, ia64, mips, powerpc, and x86_64 with allnoconfig, defconfig, allmodconfig, and allyesconfig as well as a few randconfigs on x86_64 and all configs in arch/arm/configs on arm. I also checked that no new warnings were introduced by the patch (actually, some warnings are removed that were emitted by unnecessarily included header files). Signed-off-by: NTim Schmielau <tim@physik3.uni-rostock.de> Acked-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 13 2月, 2007 1 次提交
-
-
由 Arjan van de Ven 提交于
Many struct file_operations in the kernel can be "const". Marking them const moves these to the .rodata section, which avoids false sharing with potential dirty data. In addition it'll catch accidental writes at compile time to these shared resources. Signed-off-by: NArjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 11 2月, 2007 1 次提交
-
-
由 YOSHIFUJI Hideaki 提交于
Signed-off-by: NYOSHIFUJI Hideaki <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 18 12月, 2006 2 次提交
-
-
由 Ralf Baechle 提交于
rose_add_loopback_neigh uses kmalloc and the callers were ignoring the error value. Rewrite to let the caller deal with the allocation. This allows the use of static allocation of kmalloc use entirely. Signed-off-by: NRalf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ralf Baechle 提交于
The recent fix 0506d406 made obvious that error values were not being propagated through the AX.25 stack. To help with that this patch marks all kmalloc users in the AX.25, NETROM and ROSE stacks as __must_check. Signed-off-by: NRalf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 03 12月, 2006 1 次提交
-
-
由 Alexey Dobriyan 提交于
David Binderman's icc logs: net/rose/rose_route.c(399): remark #593: variable "err" was set but never used Signed-off-by: NAlexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 04 5月, 2006 2 次提交
-
-
由 Ralf Baechle 提交于
The locking rule for rose_remove_neigh() are that the caller needs to hold rose_neigh_list_lock, so we better don't take it yet again in rose_neigh_list_lock. Signed-off-by: NRalf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ralf Baechle 提交于
Signed-off-by: NRalf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 09 11月, 2005 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jesper Juhl 提交于
From: Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@gmail.com> This is the net/ part of the big kfree cleanup patch. Remove pointless checks for NULL prior to calling kfree() in net/. Signed-off-by: NJesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@gmail.com> Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@conectiva.com.br> Acked-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> Acked-by: NYOSHIFUJI Hideaki <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
-
- 26 10月, 2005 1 次提交
-
-
由 Ralf Baechle 提交于
Signed-off-by: NRalf Baechle DL5RB <ralf@linux-mips.org> Signed-off-by: NArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@mandriva.com>
-
- 07 9月, 2005 1 次提交
-
-
由 Ralf Baechle 提交于
Ax2asc was still using a static buffer for all invocations which isn't exactly SMP-safe. Change ax2asc to take an additional result buffer as the argument. Change all callers to provide such a buffer. Signed-off-by: NRalf Baechle DL5RB <ralf@linux-mips.org> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 30 8月, 2005 1 次提交
-
-
由 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 提交于
Lots of places just needs the states, not even linux/tcp.h, where this enum was, needs it. This speeds up development of the refactorings as less sources are rebuilt when things get moved from net/tcp.h. Signed-off-by: NArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@ghostprotocols.net> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 24 8月, 2005 2 次提交
-
-
由 David S. Miller 提交于
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 David S. Miller 提交于
Noticed by Coverity checker. Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 17 4月, 2005 1 次提交
-
-
由 Linus Torvalds 提交于
Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
-