- 13 4月, 2012 2 次提交
-
-
由 Ilya Dryomov 提交于
This fixes a regression introduced by fc67c450. spin_is_locked() always returns 0 on UP kernels, which caused assert in get_restripe_target() to be fired on every call from btrfs_reduce_alloc_profile() on UP systems. Remove it completely for now, it's not clear if it's going to be needed in future. Reported-by: NBobby Powers <bobbypowers@gmail.com> Reported-by: NMitch Harder <mitch.harder@sabayonlinux.org> Tested-by: NMitch Harder <mitch.harder@sabayonlinux.org> Signed-off-by: NIlya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
由 Chris Mason 提交于
This reverts commit 5500cdbe. We've had a number of complaints of early enospc that bisect down to this patch. We'll hae to fix the reservations differently. CC: stable@kernel.org Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
- 29 3月, 2012 2 次提交
-
-
由 Liu Bo 提交于
This deadlock comes from xfstests 251. We'll hold the chunk_mutex throughout the whole of a chunk allocation. But if we find that we've used up system chunk space, we need to allocate a new system chunk, but this will lead to a recursion of chunk allocation and end up with a deadlock on chunk_mutex. So instead we need to allocate the system chunk first if we find we're in ENOSPC. Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <liubo2009@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
由 Liu Bo 提交于
o For space info, the type of space info is useful for debug. o For transaction handle, its transid is useful. Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <liubo2009@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
- 27 3月, 2012 10 次提交
-
-
由 Ilya Dryomov 提交于
Currently if we don't have enough space allocated we go ahead and loop though devices in the hopes of finding enough space for a chunk of the *same* type as the one we are trying to relocate. The problem with that is that if we are trying to restripe the chunk its target type can be more relaxed than the current one (eg require less devices or less space). So, when restriping, run checks against the target profile instead of the current one. Signed-off-by: NIlya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>
-
由 Ilya Dryomov 提交于
Add __get_block_group_index() helper to be able to derive block group index from an arbitary set of flags. Implement get_block_group_index() in terms of it. Signed-off-by: NIlya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>
-
由 Ilya Dryomov 提交于
Add get_restripe_target() helper and switch everybody to use it. Signed-off-by: NIlya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>
-
由 Ilya Dryomov 提交于
Header file is not a good place to define functions. This also moves a call to alloc_profile_is_valid() down the stack and removes a redundant check from __btrfs_alloc_chunk() - alloc_profile_is_valid() takes it into account. Signed-off-by: NIlya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>
-
由 Ilya Dryomov 提交于
"0" is a valid value for an on-disk chunk profile, but it is not a valid extended profile. (We have a separate bit for single chunks in extended case) Also rename it to alloc_profile_is_valid() for clarity. Signed-off-by: NIlya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>
-
由 Ilya Dryomov 提交于
Add functions to abstract the conversion between chunk and extended allocation profile formats and switch everybody to use them. Signed-off-by: NIlya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>
-
由 Ilya Dryomov 提交于
This has been causing a lot of confusion for quite a while now and a lot of users were surprised by this (some of them were even stuck in a ENOSPC situation which they couldn't easily get out of). The addition of restriper gives users a clear choice between raid0 and drive concat setup so there's absolutely no excuse for us to keep doing this. Signed-off-by: NIlya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
Because btrfs cow's we can end up with extent buffers that are no longer necessary just sitting around in memory. So instead of evicting these pages, we could end up evicting things we actually care about. Thus we have free_extent_buffer_stale for use when we are freeing tree blocks. This will make it so that the ref for the eb being in the radix tree is dropped as soon as possible and then is freed when the refcount hits 0 instead of waiting to be released by releasepage. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
We have been passing nothing but (u64)-1 to find_free_extent for search_end in all of the callers, so it's completely useless, and we've always been passing 0 in as search_start, so just remove them as function arguments and move search_start into find_free_extent. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
This is a relic from before we had the disk space cache and it was to make bootup times when you had btrfs as root not be so damned slow. Now that we have the disk space cache this isn't a problem anymore and really having this code casues uneeded fragmentation and complexity, so just remove it. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
-
- 22 3月, 2012 4 次提交
-
-
由 Jeff Mahoney 提交于
btrfs currently handles most errors with BUG_ON. This patch is a work-in- progress but aims to handle most errors other than internal logic errors and ENOMEM more gracefully. This iteration prevents most crashes but can run into lockups with the page lock on occasion when the timing "works out." Signed-off-by: NJeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
-
由 Jeff Mahoney 提交于
Commit cb1b69f4 (Btrfs: forced readonly when btrfs_drop_snapshot() fails) made btrfs_drop_snapshot return void because there were no callers checking the return value. That is the wrong order to handle error propogation since the caller will have no idea that an error has occured and continue on as if nothing went wrong. Signed-off-by: NJeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
-
由 Jeff Mahoney 提交于
Signed-off-by: NJeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
-
由 Jeff Mahoney 提交于
__find_space_info can return NULL but we don't check it before calling dump_space_info(). Signed-off-by: NJeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
-
- 24 2月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Chris Mason 提交于
The enospc tracing code added some interesting uses of u64 pointer casts. Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
- 23 2月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Liu Bo 提交于
When doing IO with large amounts of data fragmentation, the global block reserve calulations are too low. This increases them to avoid ENOSPC crashes. Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <liubo2009@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
- 17 2月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Liu Bo 提交于
When overcommitting, we should check the sum of pinned space and bytes for delayed item. Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <liubo2009@cn.fujitsu.com>
-
- 15 2月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Liu Bo 提交于
A user reported a bug of btrfs's trim, that is we will trim 0 bytes after a device delete. The reproducer: $ mkfs.btrfs disk1 $ mkfs.btrfs disk2 $ mount disk1 /mnt $ fstrim -v /mnt $ btrfs device add disk2 /mnt $ btrfs device del disk1 /mnt $ fstrim -v /mnt This is because after we delete the device, the block group may start from a non-zero place, which will confuse trim to discard nothing. Reported-by: NLutz Euler <lutz.euler@freenet.de> Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <liubo2009@cn.fujitsu.com>
-
- 27 1月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Miao Xie 提交于
When we did sysbench test for inline files, enospc error happened easily though there was lots of free disk space which could be allocated for new chunks. Reproduce steps: # mkfs.btrfs -b $((2 * 1024 * 1024 * 1024)) <test partition> # mount <test partition> /mnt # ulimit -n 102400 # cd /mnt # sysbench --num-threads=1 --test=fileio --file-num=81920 \ > --file-total-size=80M --file-block-size=1K --file-io-mode=sync \ > --file-test-mode=seqwr prepare # sysbench --num-threads=1 --test=fileio --file-num=81920 \ > --file-total-size=80M --file-block-size=1K --file-io-mode=sync \ > --file-test-mode=seqwr run <soon later, BUG_ON() was triggered by enospc error> The reason of this bug is: Now, we can reserve space which is larger than the free space in the chunks if we have enough free disk space which can be used for new chunks. By this way, the space allocator should allocate a new chunk by force if there is no free space in the free space cache. But there are two wrong checks which break this operation. One is if (ret == -ENOSPC && num_bytes > min_alloc_size) in btrfs_reserve_extent(), it is wrong, we should try to allocate a new chunk even we fail to allocate free space by minimum allocable size. The other is if (space_info->force_alloc) force = space_info->force_alloc; in do_chunk_alloc(). It makes the allocator ignore CHUNK_ALLOC_FORCE If someone sets ->force_alloc to CHUNK_ALLOC_LIMITED, and makes the enospc error happen. Fix these two wrong checks. Especially the second one, we fix it by changing the value of CHUNK_ALLOC_LIMITED and CHUNK_ALLOC_FORCE, and make CHUNK_ALLOC_FORCE greater than CHUNK_ALLOC_LIMITED since CHUNK_ALLOC_FORCE has higher priority. And if the value which is passed in by the caller is greater than ->force_alloc, use the passed value. Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
- 17 1月, 2012 10 次提交
-
-
由 Chris Mason 提交于
system chunks by default are very small. This makes them slightly larger and also fixes the conditional checks to make sure we don't allocate a billion of them at once. Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
I was using i_mutex for this, but we're getting bogus lockdep warnings by doing that and theres no real way to get rid of those, so just stop using i_mutex to protect delalloc metadata reservations and use a delalloc mutex instead. This shouldn't be contended often at all, only if you are writing and mmap writing to the file at the same time. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
This in addition to a script in my btrfs-tracing tree will help track down space leaks when we're getting space left over in block groups on umount. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
I used these tracepoints when figuring out what the cluster stuff was doing, so add them to mainline in case we need to profile this stuff again. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
-
由 Ilya Dryomov 提交于
Profile changing is done by launching a balance with BTRFS_BALANCE_CONVERT bits set and target fields of respective btrfs_balance_args structs initialized. Profile reducing code in this case will pick restriper's target profile if it's available instead of doing a blind reduce. If target profile is not yet available it goes back to a plain reduce. Signed-off-by: NIlya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>
-
由 Ilya Dryomov 提交于
Every caller of do_chunk_alloc() feeds it the reduced allocation profile, so stop trying to reduce it one more time. Instead check the validity of the passed profile. Signed-off-by: NIlya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>
-
由 Ilya Dryomov 提交于
Currently when new chunks are created respective avail_alloc_bits field is updated to reflect profiles of all chunks present in the system. However when chunks are removed profile bits are never cleared. This patch clears profile bit of respective avail_alloc_bits field when the last chunk with that profile is removed. Restriper needs this to properly operate when "downgrading". Signed-off-by: NIlya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>
-
由 Ilya Dryomov 提交于
Right now on-disk BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_* profile bits are used for avail_{data,metadata,system}_alloc_bits fields, which gather info about available allocation profiles in the FS. When chunk is created or read from disk, its profile is OR'ed with the corresponding avail_alloc_bits field. Since SINGLE is denoted by 0 in the on-disk format, currently there is no way to tell when such chunks become avaialble. Restriper needs that information, so add a separate bit for SINGLE profile. This bit is going to be in-memory only, it should never be written out to disk, so it's not a disk format change. However to avoid remappings in future, reserve corresponding on-disk bit. Signed-off-by: NIlya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>
-
由 Ilya Dryomov 提交于
Chunk's type and profile are encoded in u64 flags field. Introduce masks to easily access them. Also fix the type of BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_* constants, it should be ULL. Signed-off-by: NIlya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>
-
由 Ilya Dryomov 提交于
{data,metadata,system}_alloc_profile fields have been unused for a long time now. Get rid of them. Signed-off-by: NIlya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>
-
- 11 1月, 2012 2 次提交
-
-
由 Li Zefan 提交于
A bug was triggered while using seed device: # mkfs.btrfs /dev/loop1 # btrfstune -S 1 /dev/loop1 # mount -o /dev/loop1 /mnt # btrfs dev add /dev/loop2 /mnt btrfs: block rsv returned -28 ------------[ cut here ]------------ WARNING: at fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:5969 btrfs_alloc_free_block+0x166/0x396 [btrfs]() ... Call Trace: ... [<f7b7c31c>] btrfs_cow_block+0x101/0x147 [btrfs] [<f7b7eaa6>] btrfs_search_slot+0x1b8/0x55f [btrfs] [<f7b7f844>] btrfs_insert_empty_items+0x42/0x7f [btrfs] [<f7b7f8c1>] btrfs_insert_item+0x40/0x7e [btrfs] [<f7b8ac02>] btrfs_make_block_group+0x243/0x2aa [btrfs] [<f7bb3f53>] __btrfs_alloc_chunk+0x672/0x70e [btrfs] [<f7bb41ff>] init_first_rw_device+0x77/0x13c [btrfs] [<f7bb5a62>] btrfs_init_new_device+0x664/0x9fd [btrfs] [<f7bbb65a>] btrfs_ioctl+0x694/0xdbe [btrfs] [<c04f55f7>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x496/0x4cc [<c04f5660>] sys_ioctl+0x33/0x4f [<c07b9edf>] sysenter_do_call+0x12/0x38 ---[ end trace 906adac595facc7d ]--- Since seed device is readonly, there's no usable space in the filesystem. Afterwards we add a sprout device to it, and the kernel creates a METADATA block group and a SYSTEM block group where comes free space we can reserve, but we still get revervation failure because the global block_rsv hasn't been updated accordingly. Signed-off-by: NLi Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>
-
由 Li Zefan 提交于
Some functions never use the transaction handle passed to them. Signed-off-by: NLi Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>
-
- 08 1月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Alexandre Oliva 提交于
We store the allocation start and length twice in ins, once right after the other, but with intervening calls that may prevent the duplicate from being optimized out by the compiler. Remove one of the assignments. Signed-off-by: NAlexandre Oliva <oliva@lsd.ic.unicamp.br> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
- 07 1月, 2012 3 次提交
-
-
由 Alexandre Oliva 提交于
Since the clustered allocation may be taking extents from a different block group, there's no point in spin-locking and testing the current block group free space before attempting to allocate space from a cluster, even more so when we might refrain from even trying the cluster in the current block group because, after the cluster was set up, not enough free space remained. Furthermore, cluster creation attempts fail fast when the block group doesn't have enough free space, so the test was completely superfluous. I've move the free space test past the cluster allocation attempt, where it is more useful, and arranged for a cluster in the current block group to be released before trying an unclustered allocation, when we reach the LOOP_NO_EMPTY_SIZE stage, so that the free space in the cluster stands a chance of being combined with additional free space in the block group so as to succeed in the allocation attempt. Signed-off-by: NAlexandre Oliva <oliva@lsd.ic.unicamp.br> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
由 Chris Mason 提交于
The chunk allocation code has tried to keep a pretty tight lid on creating new metadata chunks. This is partially because in the past the reservation code didn't give us an accurate idea of how much space was being used. The new code is much more accurate, so we're able to get rid of some of these checks. Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
由 Chris Mason 提交于
Btrfs tries to batch extent allocation tree changes to improve performance and reduce metadata trashing. But it doesn't allocate new metadata chunks while it is doing allocations for the extent allocation tree. This commit changes the delayed refence code to do chunk allocations if we're getting low on room. It prevents crashes and improves performance. Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
- 04 1月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jan Schmidt 提交于
Now that we may be holding back delayed refs for a limited period, we might end up having no runnable delayed refs. Without this commit, we'd do busy waiting in that thread until another (runnable) ref arives. Instead, we're detecting this situation and use a waitqueue, such that we only try to run more refs after a) another runnable ref was added or b) delayed refs are no longer held back Signed-off-by: NJan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>
-