- 29 6月, 2020 1 次提交
-
-
由 James Morse 提交于
fix #28612342 commit d44f1b8dd7e66d80cc4205809e5ace866bd851da upstream To split up APEIs in_nmi() path, the caller needs to always be in_nmi(). Add a helper to do the work and claim the notification. When KVM or the arch code takes an exception that might be a RAS notification, it asks the APEI firmware-first code whether it wants to claim the exception. A future kernel-first mechanism may be queried afterwards, and claim the notification, otherwise we fall through to the existing default behaviour. The NOTIFY_SEA code was merged before considering multiple, possibly interacting, NMI-like notifications and the need to consider kernel first in the future. Make the 'claiming' behaviour explicit. Restructuring the APEI code to allow multiple NMI-like notifications means any notification that might interrupt interrupts-masked code must always be wrapped in nmi_enter()/nmi_exit(). This will allow APEI to use in_nmi() to use the right fixmap entries. Mask SError over this window to prevent an asynchronous RAS error arriving and tripping 'nmi_enter()'s BUG_ON(in_nmi()). Signed-off-by: NJames Morse <james.morse@arm.com> Acked-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> Tested-by: NTyler Baicar <tbaicar@codeaurora.org> Acked-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NBaolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com> Reviewed-by: NAlex Shi <alex.shi@linux.alibaba.com> Acked-by: NCaspar Zhang <caspar@linux.alibaba.com> Reviewed-by: Nluanshi <zhangliguang@linux.alibaba.com>
-
- 23 7月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 AKASHI Takahiro 提交于
This is a fix against the issue that crash dump kernel may hang up during booting, which can happen on any ACPI-based system with "ACPI Reclaim Memory." (kernel messages after panic kicked off kdump) (snip...) Bye! (snip...) ACPI: Core revision 20170728 pud=000000002e7d0003, *pmd=000000002e7c0003, *pte=00e8000039710707 Internal error: Oops: 96000021 [#1] SMP Modules linked in: CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 4.14.0-rc6 #1 task: ffff000008d05180 task.stack: ffff000008cc0000 PC is at acpi_ns_lookup+0x25c/0x3c0 LR is at acpi_ds_load1_begin_op+0xa4/0x294 (snip...) Process swapper/0 (pid: 0, stack limit = 0xffff000008cc0000) Call trace: (snip...) [<ffff0000084a6764>] acpi_ns_lookup+0x25c/0x3c0 [<ffff00000849b4f8>] acpi_ds_load1_begin_op+0xa4/0x294 [<ffff0000084ad4ac>] acpi_ps_build_named_op+0xc4/0x198 [<ffff0000084ad6cc>] acpi_ps_create_op+0x14c/0x270 [<ffff0000084acfa8>] acpi_ps_parse_loop+0x188/0x5c8 [<ffff0000084ae048>] acpi_ps_parse_aml+0xb0/0x2b8 [<ffff0000084a8e10>] acpi_ns_one_complete_parse+0x144/0x184 [<ffff0000084a8e98>] acpi_ns_parse_table+0x48/0x68 [<ffff0000084a82cc>] acpi_ns_load_table+0x4c/0xdc [<ffff0000084b32f8>] acpi_tb_load_namespace+0xe4/0x264 [<ffff000008baf9b4>] acpi_load_tables+0x48/0xc0 [<ffff000008badc20>] acpi_early_init+0x9c/0xd0 [<ffff000008b70d50>] start_kernel+0x3b4/0x43c Code: b9008fb9 2a000318 36380054 32190318 (b94002c0) ---[ end trace c46ed37f9651c58e ]--- Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception Rebooting in 10 seconds.. (diagnosis) * This fault is a data abort, alignment fault (ESR=0x96000021) during reading out ACPI table. * Initial ACPI tables are normally stored in system ram and marked as "ACPI Reclaim memory" by the firmware. * After the commit f56ab9a5 ("efi/arm: Don't mark ACPI reclaim memory as MEMBLOCK_NOMAP"), those regions are differently handled as they are "memblock-reserved", without NOMAP bit. * So they are now excluded from device tree's "usable-memory-range" which kexec-tools determines based on a current view of /proc/iomem. * When crash dump kernel boots up, it tries to accesses ACPI tables by mapping them with ioremap(), not ioremap_cache(), in acpi_os_ioremap() since they are no longer part of mapped system ram. * Given that ACPI accessor/helper functions are compiled in without unaligned access support (ACPI_MISALIGNMENT_NOT_SUPPORTED), any unaligned access to ACPI tables can cause a fatal panic. With this patch, acpi_os_ioremap() always honors memory attribute information provided by the firmware (EFI) and retaining cacheability allows the kernel safe access to ACPI tables. Signed-off-by: NAKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: NJames Morse <james.morse@arm.com> Reviewed-by: NArd Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> Reported-by and Tested-by: Bhupesh Sharma <bhsharma@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
-
- 10 7月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 Lorenzo Pieralisi 提交于
Current ACPI ARM64 NUMA initialization code in acpi_numa_gicc_affinity_init() carries out NUMA nodes creation and cpu<->node mappings at the same time in the arch backend so that a single SRAT walk is needed to parse both pieces of information. This implies that the cpu<->node mappings must be stashed in an array (sized NR_CPUS) so that SMP code can later use the stashed values to avoid another SRAT table walk to set-up the early cpu<->node mappings. If the kernel is configured with a NR_CPUS value less than the actual processor entries in the SRAT (and MADT), the logic in acpi_numa_gicc_affinity_init() is broken in that the cpu<->node mapping is only carried out (and stashed for future use) only for a number of SRAT entries up to NR_CPUS, which do not necessarily correspond to the possible cpus detected at SMP initialization in acpi_map_gic_cpu_interface() (ie MADT and SRAT processor entries order is not enforced), which leaves the kernel with broken cpu<->node mappings. Furthermore, given the current ACPI NUMA code parsing logic in acpi_numa_gicc_affinity_init(), PXM domains for CPUs that are not parsed because they exceed NR_CPUS entries are not mapped to NUMA nodes (ie the PXM corresponding node is not created in the kernel) leaving the system with a broken NUMA topology. Rework the ACPI ARM64 NUMA initialization process so that the NUMA nodes creation and cpu<->node mappings are decoupled. cpu<->node mappings are moved to SMP initialization code (where they are needed), at the cost of an extra SRAT walk so that ACPI NUMA mappings can be batched before being applied, fixing current parsing pitfalls. Acked-by: NHanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org> Tested-by: NJohn Garry <john.garry@huawei.com> Fixes: d8b47fca ("arm64, ACPI, NUMA: NUMA support based on SRAT and SLIT") Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1527768879-88161-2-git-send-email-xiexiuqi@huawei.comReported-by: NXie XiuQi <xiexiuqi@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: NLorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> Cc: Punit Agrawal <punit.agrawal@arm.com> Cc: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Cc: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com> Cc: Ganapatrao Kulkarni <gkulkarni@caviumnetworks.com> Cc: Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@arm.com> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Xie XiuQi <xiexiuqi@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
-
- 18 5月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jeremy Linton 提交于
Its helpful to be able to lookup the acpi_processor_id associated with a logical cpu. Provide an arm64 helper to do this. Tested-by: NArd Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> Tested-by: NVijaya Kumar K <vkilari@codeaurora.org> Tested-by: NXiongfeng Wang <wangxiongfeng2@huawei.com> Tested-by: NTomasz Nowicki <Tomasz.Nowicki@cavium.com> Acked-by: NArd Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> Acked-by: NSudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NJeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
-
- 07 11月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 James Morse 提交于
Nothing calls arch_apei_flush_tlb_one() anymore, instead relying on __set_fixmap() to do the invalidation. Remove it. Move the IPI-considered-harmful comment to __set_fixmap(). Signed-off-by: NJames Morse <james.morse@arm.com> Acked-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Tested-by: NTyler Baicar <tbaicar@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Cc: All applicable <stable@vger.kernel.org>
-
- 02 6月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Lorenzo Pieralisi 提交于
The BAD_MADT_GICC_ENTRY() macro checks if a GICC MADT entry passes muster from an ACPI specification standpoint. Current macro detects the MADT GICC entry length through ACPI firmware version (it changed from 76 to 80 bytes in the transition from ACPI 5.1 to ACPI 6.0 specification) but always uses (erroneously) the ACPICA (latest) struct (ie struct acpi_madt_generic_interrupt - that is 80-bytes long) length to check if the current GICC entry memory record exceeds the MADT table end in memory as defined by the MADT table header itself, which may result in false negatives depending on the ACPI firmware version and how the MADT entries are laid out in memory (ie on ACPI 5.1 firmware MADT GICC entries are 76 bytes long, so by adding 80 to a GICC entry start address in memory the resulting address may well be past the actual MADT end, triggering a false negative). Fix the BAD_MADT_GICC_ENTRY() macro by reshuffling the condition checks and update them to always use the firmware version specific MADT GICC entry length in order to carry out boundary checks. Fixes: b6cfb277 ("ACPI / ARM64: add BAD_MADT_GICC_ENTRY() macro") Reported-by: NJulien Grall <julien.grall@arm.com> Acked-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Acked-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NLorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> Cc: Julien Grall <julien.grall@arm.com> Cc: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org> Cc: Al Stone <ahs3@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
-
- 11 4月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Mark Rutland 提交于
Currently the ACPI parking protocol code needs to parse each CPU's MADT GICC table to extract the mailbox address and so on. Each time we parse a GICC table, we call back to the parking protocol code to parse it. This has been fine so far, but we're about to have more code that needs to extract data from the GICC tables, and adding a callback for each user is going to get unwieldy. Instead, this patch ensures that we stash a copy of each CPU's GICC table at boot time, such that anything needing to parse it can later request it. This will allow for other parsers of GICC, and for simplification to the ACPI parking protocol code. Note that we must store a copy, rather than a pointer, since the core ACPI code temporarily maps/unmaps tables while iterating over them. Since we parse the MADT before we know how many CPUs we have (and hence before we setup the percpu areas), we must use an NR_CPUS sized array. Signed-off-by: NMark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Reviewed-by: NLorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> Tested-by: NJeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@arm.com> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
-
- 21 12月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Lv Zheng 提交于
Since all users are cleaned up, remove the 2 deprecated APIs due to no users. As a Linux variable rather than an ACPICA variable, acpi_gbl_permanent_mmap is renamed to acpi_permanent_mmap to have a consistent coding style across entire Linux ACPI subsystem. Signed-off-by: NLv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 02 12月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Tomasz Nowicki 提交于
This patch provides APEI arch-specific bits for ARM64 Meanwhile, (1) Move HEST type (ACPI_HEST_TYPE_IA32_CORRECTED_CHECK) checking to a generic place. (2) Select HAVE_ACPI_APEI when EFI and ACPI is set on ARM64, because arch_apei_get_mem_attribute is using efi_mem_attributes() on ARM64. Signed-off-by: NTomasz Nowicki <tomasz.nowicki@linaro.org> Tested-by: NJonathan (Zhixiong) Zhang <zjzhang@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: NFu Wei <fu.wei@linaro.org> [ Fu Wei: improve && upstream ] Acked-by: NHanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org> Tested-by: NTyler Baicar <tbaicar@codeaurora.org> Acked-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Reviewed-by: NBorislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 26 8月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 AKASHI Takahiro 提交于
Kdump(kexec-tools) parses /proc/iomem to identify all the memory regions on the system. Since the current kernel names "nomap" regions, like UEFI runtime services code/data, as "System RAM," kexec-tools sets up elf core header to include them in a crash dump file (/proc/vmcore). Then crash dump kernel parses UEFI memory map again, re-marks those regions as "nomap" and does not create a memory mapping for them unlike the other areas of System RAM. In this case, copying /proc/vmcore through copy_oldmem_page() on crash dump kernel will end up with a kernel abort, as reported in [1]. This patch names all the "nomap" regions explicitly as "reserved" so that we can exclude them from a crash dump file. acpi_os_ioremap() must also be modified because those regions have WB attributes [2]. Apart from kdump, this change also matches x86's use of acpi (and /proc/iomem). [1] http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2016-August/448186.html [2] http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2016-August/450089.htmlReviewed-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Tested-by: NJames Morse <james.morse@arm.com> Reviewed-by: NJames Morse <james.morse@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NAKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
-
- 22 6月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jon Masters 提交于
This patch adds support for ACPI_TABLE_UPGRADE for ARM64 To access initrd image we need to move initialization of linear mapping a bit earlier. The implementation of the feature acpi_table_upgrade() (drivers/acpi/tables.c) works with initrd data represented as an array in virtual memory. It uses some library utility to find the redefined tables in that array and iterates over it to copy the data to new allocated memory. So to access the initrd data via fixmap we need to rewrite it considerably. In x86 arch, kernel memory is already mapped by the time when acpi_table_upgrade() and acpi_boot_table_init() are called so I think that we can just move this mapping one function earlier too. Signed-off-by: NJon Masters <jcm@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NAleksey Makarov <aleksey.makarov@linaro.org> Acked-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 30 5月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Hanjun Guo 提交于
Introduce a new file to hold ACPI based NUMA information parsing from SRAT and SLIT. SRAT includes the CPU ACPI ID to Proximity Domain mappings and memory ranges to Proximity Domain mapping. SLIT has the information of inter node distances(relative number for access latency). Signed-off-by: NHanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NGanapatrao Kulkarni <gkulkarni@caviumnetworks.com> [rrichter@cavium.com Reworked for numa v10 series ] Signed-off-by: NRobert Richter <rrichter@cavium.com> [david.daney@cavium.com reorderd and combinded with other patches in Hanjun Guo's original set, removed get_mpidr_in_madt() and use acpi_map_madt_entry() instead.] Signed-off-by: NDavid Daney <david.daney@cavium.com> Reviewed-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Tested-by: NDennis Chen <dennis.chen@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 16 2月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Lorenzo Pieralisi 提交于
The SBBR and ACPI specifications allow ACPI based systems that do not implement PSCI (eg systems with no EL3) to boot through the ACPI parking protocol specification[1]. This patch implements the ACPI parking protocol CPU operations, and adds code that eases parsing the parking protocol data structures to the ARM64 SMP initializion carried out at the same time as cpus enumeration. To wake-up the CPUs from the parked state, this patch implements a wakeup IPI for ARM64 (ie arch_send_wakeup_ipi_mask()) that mirrors the ARM one, so that a specific IPI is sent for wake-up purpose in order to distinguish it from other IPI sources. Given the current ACPI MADT parsing API, the patch implements a glue layer that helps passing MADT GICC data structure from SMP initialization code to the parking protocol implementation somewhat overriding the CPU operations interfaces. This to avoid creating a completely trasparent DT/ACPI CPU operations layer that would require creating opaque structure handling for CPUs data (DT represents CPU through DT nodes, ACPI through static MADT table entries), which seems overkill given that ACPI on ARM64 mandates only two booting protocols (PSCI and parking protocol), so there is no need for further protocol additions. Based on the original work by Mark Salter <msalter@redhat.com> [1] https://acpica.org/sites/acpica/files/MP%20Startup%20for%20ARM%20platforms.docxSigned-off-by: NLorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> Tested-by: NLoc Ho <lho@apm.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Cc: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org> Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: Mark Salter <msalter@redhat.com> Cc: Al Stone <ahs3@redhat.com> [catalin.marinas@arm.com: Added WARN_ONCE(!acpi_parking_protocol_valid() on the IPI] Signed-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
-
- 01 10月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Marc Zyngier 提交于
Now that we have a basic infrastructure to register irqchips and call them on discovery of a matching entry in MADT, convert the GIC driver to this new probing method. It ends up being a code deletion party, which is a rather good thing. Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> Acked-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Reviewed-by: NHanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org> Acked-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Tested-by: NHanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 14 9月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
Table 8 of UEFI 2.5 section 2.3.6.1 defines mappings from EFI memory types to MAIR attribute encodings for arm64. If the physical address has memory attributes defined by EFI memmap as EFI_MEMORY_[UC|WC|WT], return approprate page protection type according to the UEFI spec. Otherwise, return PAGE_KERNEL. Signed-off-by: NJonathan (Zhixiong) Zhang <zjzhang@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: NMatt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com> [ Small stylistic tweaks. ] Reviewed-by: NMatt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NArd Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Acked-by: NHanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1441372302-23242-2-git-send-email-matt@codeblueprint.co.ukSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
- 03 8月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Mark Rutland 提交于
To enable sharing with arm, move the core PSCI framework code to drivers/firmware. This results in a minor gain in lines of code, but this will quickly be amortised by the removal of code currently duplicated in arch/arm. Signed-off-by: NMark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Acked-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Reviewed-by: NHanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org> Tested-by: NHanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org> Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
-
- 07 7月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Al Stone 提交于
The BAD_MADT_ENTRY() macro is designed to work for all of the subtables of the MADT. In the ACPI 5.1 version of the spec, the struct for the GICC subtable (struct acpi_madt_generic_interrupt) is 76 bytes long; in ACPI 6.0, the struct is 80 bytes long. But, there is only one definition in ACPICA for this struct -- and that is the 6.0 version. Hence, when BAD_MADT_ENTRY() compares the struct size to the length in the GICC subtable, it fails if 5.1 structs are in use, and there are systems in the wild that have them. This patch adds the BAD_MADT_GICC_ENTRY() that checks the GICC subtable only, accounting for the difference in specification versions that are possible. The BAD_MADT_ENTRY() will continue to work as is for all other MADT subtables. This code is being added to an arm64 header file since that is currently the only architecture using the GICC subtable of the MADT. As a GIC is specific to ARM, it is also unlikely the subtable will be used elsewhere. Fixes: aeb823bb ("ACPICA: ACPI 6.0: Add changes for FADT table.") Signed-off-by: NAl Stone <al.stone@linaro.org> Acked-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Acked-by: N"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> [catalin.marinas@arm.com: extra brackets around macro arguments] Signed-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
-
- 27 5月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Mark Rutland 提交于
The 32-bit ARM port doesn't have ACPI headers, and conditionally including them is going to look horrendous. In preparation for sharing the PSCI invocation code with 32-bit, move the acpi_psci_* function declarations and definitions such that the PSCI client code need not include ACPI headers. While it would seem like we could simply hide the ACPI includes in psci.h, the ACPI headers have hilarious circular dependencies which make this infeasible without reorganising most of ACPICA. So rather than doing that, move the acpi_psci_* prototypes into psci.h. The psci_acpi_init function is made dependent on CONFIG_ACPI (with a stub implementation in asm/psci.h) such that it need not be built for 32-bit ARM or kernels without ACPI support. The currently missing __init annotations are added to the prototypes in the header. Signed-off-by: NMark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Acked-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Acked-by: NHanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: NAl Stone <al.stone@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: NAshwin Chaugule <ashwin.chaugule@linaro.org> Tested-by: NHanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org> Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
-
- 19 5月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Lorenzo Pieralisi 提交于
The code that initializes cpus on arm64 is currently split in two different code paths that carry out DT and ACPI cpus initialization. Most of the code executing SMP initialization is common and should be merged to reduce discrepancies between ACPI and DT initialization and to have code initializing cpus in a single common place in the kernel. This patch refactors arm64 SMP cpus initialization code to merge ACPI and DT boot paths in a common file and to create sanity checks that can be reused by both boot methods. Current code assumes PSCI is the only available boot method when arm64 boots with ACPI; this can be easily extended if/when the ACPI parking protocol is merged into the kernel. Signed-off-by: NSudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NLorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> Acked-by: NHanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org> Acked-by: NMark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Tested-by: NHanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org> Tested-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> [DT] Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
-
- 26 3月, 2015 4 次提交
-
-
由 Lorenzo Pieralisi 提交于
If acpi=force is passed on the command line, it forces ACPI to be the only available boot method, hence it must be left enabled even if the initialization and sanity checks on ACPI tables fails. This patch refactors ACPI initialization to prevent disabling ACPI if acpi=force is passed on the command line. Signed-off-by: NLorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> Acked-by: NArd Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> Acked-by: NHanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org> Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> Cc: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
-
由 Hanjun Guo 提交于
Since the policy is that once we pass acpi=force in the early param, we will not unflatten device tree even if ACPI is disabled in ACPI table init fails, so fix the code by comparinging both acpi_disabled and param_acpi_force before the device tree is unflattened. CC: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NHanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
-
由 Tomasz Nowicki 提交于
ACPI kernel uses MADT table for proper GIC initialization. It needs to parse GIC related subtables, collect CPU interface and distributor addresses and call driver initialization function (which is hardware abstraction agnostic). In a similar way, FDT initialize GICv1/2. NOTE: This commit allow to initialize GICv1/2 basic functionality. While now simple GICv2 init call is used, any further GIC features require generic infrastructure for proper ACPI irqchip initialization. That mechanism and stacked irqdomains to support GICv2 MSI/virtualization extension, GICv3/4 and its ITS are considered as next steps. CC: Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net> CC: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> CC: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Tested-by: NSuravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com> Tested-by: NYijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com> Tested-by: NMark Langsdorf <mlangsdo@redhat.com> Tested-by: NJon Masters <jcm@redhat.com> Tested-by: NTimur Tabi <timur@codeaurora.org> Tested-by: NRobert Richter <rrichter@cavium.com> Acked-by: NRobert Richter <rrichter@cavium.com> Acked-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> Acked-by: NJason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net> Reviewed-by: NGrant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NTomasz Nowicki <tomasz.nowicki@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NHanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
-
由 Hanjun Guo 提交于
Introduce a new function map_gicc_mpidr() to allow MPIDRs to be obtained from the GICC Structure introduced by ACPI 5.1, since MPIDR for ARM64 is 64-bit, so typedef u64 for phys_cpuid_t. The ARM architecture defines the MPIDR register as the CPU hardware identifier. This patch adds the code infrastructure to retrieve the MPIDR values from the ARM ACPI GICC structure in order to look-up the kernel CPU hardware ids required by the ACPI core code to identify CPUs. CC: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net> CC: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> CC: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Tested-by: NSuravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com> Tested-by: NYijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com> Tested-by: NMark Langsdorf <mlangsdo@redhat.com> Tested-by: NJon Masters <jcm@redhat.com> Tested-by: NTimur Tabi <timur@codeaurora.org> Tested-by: NRobert Richter <rrichter@cavium.com> Acked-by: NRobert Richter <rrichter@cavium.com> Acked-by: NLorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> Acked-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NGrant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NHanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
-
- 25 3月, 2015 5 次提交
-
-
由 Hanjun Guo 提交于
MADT contains the information for MPIDR which is essential for SMP initialization, parse the GIC cpu interface structures to get the MPIDR value and map it to cpu_logical_map(), and add enabled cpu with valid MPIDR into cpu_possible_map. ACPI 5.1 only has two explicit methods to boot up SMP, PSCI and Parking protocol, but the Parking protocol is only specified for ARMv7 now, so make PSCI as the only way for the SMP boot protocol before some updates for the ACPI spec or the Parking protocol spec. Parking protocol patches for SMP boot will be sent to upstream when the new version of Parking protocol is ready. CC: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> CC: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> CC: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> CC: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Tested-by: NSuravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com> Tested-by: NYijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com> Tested-by: NMark Langsdorf <mlangsdo@redhat.com> Tested-by: NJon Masters <jcm@redhat.com> Tested-by: NTimur Tabi <timur@codeaurora.org> Tested-by: NRobert Richter <rrichter@cavium.com> Acked-by: NRobert Richter <rrichter@cavium.com> Acked-by: NOlof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> Reviewed-by: NGrant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NHanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NTomasz Nowicki <tomasz.nowicki@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
-
由 Graeme Gregory 提交于
There are two flags: PSCI_COMPLIANT and PSCI_USE_HVC. When set, the former signals to the OS that the firmware is PSCI compliant. The latter selects the appropriate conduit for PSCI calls by toggling between Hypervisor Calls (HVC) and Secure Monitor Calls (SMC). FADT table contains such information in ACPI 5.1, FADT table was parsed in ACPI table init and copy to struct acpi_gbl_FADT, so use the flags in struct acpi_gbl_FADT for PSCI init. Since ACPI 5.1 doesn't support self defined PSCI function IDs, which means that only PSCI 0.2+ is supported in ACPI. CC: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> CC: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> CC: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Tested-by: NSuravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com> Tested-by: NYijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com> Tested-by: NMark Langsdorf <mlangsdo@redhat.com> Tested-by: NJon Masters <jcm@redhat.com> Tested-by: NTimur Tabi <timur@codeaurora.org> Tested-by: NRobert Richter <rrichter@cavium.com> Acked-by: NRobert Richter <rrichter@cavium.com> Acked-by: NOlof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> Acked-by: NGrant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NGraeme Gregory <graeme.gregory@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NTomasz Nowicki <tomasz.nowicki@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NHanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
-
由 Al Stone 提交于
This implements the following policy to decide whether ACPI should be used to boot the system: - acpi=off: ACPI will not be used to boot the system, even if there is no alternative available (e.g., device tree is empty) - acpi=force: only ACPI will be used to boot the system; if that fails, there will be no fallback to alternative methods (such as device tree) - otherwise, ACPI will be used as a fallback if the device tree turns out to lack a platform description; the heuristic to decide this is whether /chosen is the only node present at depth 1 CC: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> CC: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> CC: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net> Acked-by: NOlof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> Acked-by: NGrant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org> Tested-by: NTimur Tabi <timur@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: NAl Stone <al.stone@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NGraeme Gregory <graeme.gregory@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NHanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NArd Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
-
由 Mark Salter 提交于
The acpi_os_ioremap() function may be used to map normal RAM or IO regions. The current implementation simply uses ioremap_cache(). This will work for some architectures, but arm64 ioremap_cache() cannot be used to map IO regions which don't support caching. So for arm64, use ioremap() for non-RAM regions. CC: Rafael J Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net> CC: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Tested-by: NRobert Richter <rrichter@cavium.com> Tested-by: NTimur Tabi <timur@codeaurora.org> Acked-by: NRobert Richter <rrichter@cavium.com> Acked-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NGrant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NMark Salter <msalter@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NHanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
-
由 Al Stone 提交于
As we want to get ACPI tables to parse and then use the information for system initialization, we should get the RSDP (Root System Description Pointer) first, it then locates Extended Root Description Table (XSDT) which contains all the 64-bit physical address that pointer to other boot-time tables. Introduce acpi.c and its related head file in this patch to provide fundamental needs of extern variables and functions for ACPI core, and then get boot-time tables as needed. - asm/acenv.h for arch specific ACPICA environments and implementation, It is needed unconditionally by ACPI core; - asm/acpi.h for arch specific variables and functions needed by ACPI driver core; - acpi.c for ARM64 related ACPI implementation for ACPI driver core; acpi_boot_table_init() is introduced to get RSDP and boot-time tables, it will be called in setup_arch() before paging_init(), so we should use eary_memremap() mechanism here to get the RSDP and all the table pointers. FADT Major.Minor version was introduced in ACPI 5.1, it is the same as ACPI version. In ACPI 5.1, some major gaps are fixed for ARM, such as updates in MADT table for GIC and SMP init, without those updates, we can not get the MPIDR for SMP init, and GICv2/3 related init information, so we can't boot arm64 ACPI properly with table versions predating 5.1. If firmware provides ACPI tables with ACPI version less than 5.1, OS has no way to retrieve the configuration data that is necessary to init SMP boot protocol and the GIC properly, so disable ACPI if we get an FADT table with version less that 5.1 when acpi_boot_table_init() called. CC: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> CC: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> CC: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> Tested-by: NSuravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com> Tested-by: NYijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com> Tested-by: NMark Langsdorf <mlangsdo@redhat.com> Tested-by: NJon Masters <jcm@redhat.com> Tested-by: NTimur Tabi <timur@codeaurora.org> Tested-by: NRobert Richter <rrichter@cavium.com> Acked-by: NRobert Richter <rrichter@cavium.com> Acked-by: NOlof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> Acked-by: NGrant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NAl Stone <al.stone@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NGraeme Gregory <graeme.gregory@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NTomasz Nowicki <tomasz.nowicki@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NHanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
-