- 25 2月, 2012 2 次提交
-
-
由 Oleg Nesterov 提交于
signalfd_cleanup() ensures that ->signalfd_wqh is not used, but this is not enough. eppoll_entry->whead still points to the memory we are going to free, ep_unregister_pollwait()->remove_wait_queue() is obviously unsafe. Change ep_poll_callback(POLLFREE) to set eppoll_entry->whead = NULL, change ep_unregister_pollwait() to check pwq->whead != NULL under rcu_read_lock() before remove_wait_queue(). We add the new helper, ep_remove_wait_queue(), for this. This works because sighand_cachep is SLAB_DESTROY_BY_RCU and because ->signalfd_wqh is initialized in sighand_ctor(), not in copy_sighand. ep_unregister_pollwait()->remove_wait_queue() can play with already freed and potentially reused ->sighand, but this is fine. This memory must have the valid ->signalfd_wqh until rcu_read_unlock(). Reported-by: NMaxime Bizon <mbizon@freebox.fr> Cc: <stable@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Oleg Nesterov 提交于
This patch is intentionally incomplete to simplify the review. It ignores ep_unregister_pollwait() which plays with the same wqh. See the next change. epoll assumes that the EPOLL_CTL_ADD'ed file controls everything f_op->poll() needs. In particular it assumes that the wait queue can't go away until eventpoll_release(). This is not true in case of signalfd, the task which does EPOLL_CTL_ADD uses its ->sighand which is not connected to the file. This patch adds the special event, POLLFREE, currently only for epoll. It expects that init_poll_funcptr()'ed hook should do the necessary cleanup. Perhaps it should be defined as EPOLLFREE in eventpoll. __cleanup_sighand() is changed to do wake_up_poll(POLLFREE) if ->signalfd_wqh is not empty, we add the new signalfd_cleanup() helper. ep_poll_callback(POLLFREE) simply does list_del_init(task_list). This make this poll entry inconsistent, but we don't care. If you share epoll fd which contains our sigfd with another process you should blame yourself. signalfd is "really special". I simply do not know how we can define the "right" semantics if it used with epoll. The main problem is, epoll calls signalfd_poll() once to establish the connection with the wait queue, after that signalfd_poll(NULL) returns the different/inconsistent results depending on who does EPOLL_CTL_MOD/signalfd_read/etc. IOW: apart from sigmask, signalfd has nothing to do with the file, it works with the current thread. In short: this patch is the hack which tries to fix the symptoms. It also assumes that nobody can take tasklist_lock under epoll locks, this seems to be true. Note: - we do not have wake_up_all_poll() but wake_up_poll() is fine, poll/epoll doesn't use WQ_FLAG_EXCLUSIVE. - signalfd_cleanup() uses POLLHUP along with POLLFREE, we need a couple of simple changes in eventpoll.c to make sure it can't be "lost". Reported-by: NMaxime Bizon <mbizon@freebox.fr> Cc: <stable@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 13 1月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jason Baron 提交于
The current epoll code can be tickled to run basically indefinitely in both loop detection path check (on ep_insert()), and in the wakeup paths. The programs that tickle this behavior set up deeply linked networks of epoll file descriptors that cause the epoll algorithms to traverse them indefinitely. A couple of these sample programs have been previously posted in this thread: https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/2/25/297. To fix the loop detection path check algorithms, I simply keep track of the epoll nodes that have been already visited. Thus, the loop detection becomes proportional to the number of epoll file descriptor and links. This dramatically decreases the run-time of the loop check algorithm. In one diabolical case I tried it reduced the run-time from 15 mintues (all in kernel time) to .3 seconds. Fixing the wakeup paths could be done at wakeup time in a similar manner by keeping track of nodes that have already been visited, but the complexity is harder, since there can be multiple wakeups on different cpus...Thus, I've opted to limit the number of possible wakeup paths when the paths are created. This is accomplished, by noting that the end file descriptor points that are found during the loop detection pass (from the newly added link), are actually the sources for wakeup events. I keep a list of these file descriptors and limit the number and length of these paths that emanate from these 'source file descriptors'. In the current implemetation I allow 1000 paths of length 1, 500 of length 2, 100 of length 3, 50 of length 4 and 10 of length 5. Note that it is sufficient to check the 'source file descriptors' reachable from the newly added link, since no other 'source file descriptors' will have newly added links. This allows us to check only the wakeup paths that may have gotten too long, and not re-check all possible wakeup paths on the system. In terms of the path limit selection, I think its first worth noting that the most common case for epoll, is probably the model where you have 1 epoll file descriptor that is monitoring n number of 'source file descriptors'. In this case, each 'source file descriptor' has a 1 path of length 1. Thus, I believe that the limits I'm proposing are quite reasonable and in fact may be too generous. Thus, I'm hoping that the proposed limits will not prevent any workloads that currently work to fail. In terms of locking, I have extended the use of the 'epmutex' to all epoll_ctl add and remove operations. Currently its only used in a subset of the add paths. I need to hold the epmutex, so that we can correctly traverse a coherent graph, to check the number of paths. I believe that this additional locking is probably ok, since its in the setup/teardown paths, and doesn't affect the running paths, but it certainly is going to add some extra overhead. Also, worth noting is that the epmuex was recently added to the ep_ctl add operations in the initial path loop detection code using the argument that it was not on a critical path. Another thing to note here, is the length of epoll chains that is allowed. Currently, eventpoll.c defines: /* Maximum number of nesting allowed inside epoll sets */ #define EP_MAX_NESTS 4 This basically means that I am limited to a graph depth of 5 (EP_MAX_NESTS + 1). However, this limit is currently only enforced during the loop check detection code, and only when the epoll file descriptors are added in a certain order. Thus, this limit is currently easily bypassed. The newly added check for wakeup paths, stricly limits the wakeup paths to a length of 5, regardless of the order in which ep's are linked together. Thus, a side-effect of the new code is a more consistent enforcement of the graph depth. Thus far, I've tested this, using the sample programs previously mentioned, which now either return quickly or return -EINVAL. I've also testing using the piptest.c epoll tester, which showed no difference in performance. I've also created a number of different epoll networks and tested that they behave as expectded. I believe this solves the original diabolical test cases, while still preserving the sane epoll nesting. Signed-off-by: NJason Baron <jbaron@redhat.com> Cc: Nelson Elhage <nelhage@ksplice.com> Cc: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 01 11月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Nelson Elhage 提交于
epoll can acquire recursively acquire ep->mtx on multiple "struct eventpoll"s at once in the case where one epoll fd is monitoring another epoll fd. This is perfectly OK, since we're careful about the lock ordering, but it causes spurious lockdep warnings. Annotate the recursion using mutex_lock_nested, and add a comment explaining the nesting rules for good measure. Recent versions of systemd are triggering this, and it can also be demonstrated with the following trivial test program: --------------------8<-------------------- int main(void) { int e1, e2; struct epoll_event evt = { .events = EPOLLIN }; e1 = epoll_create1(0); e2 = epoll_create1(0); epoll_ctl(e1, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, e2, &evt); return 0; } --------------------8<-------------------- Reported-by: NPaul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl> Tested-by: NPaul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl> Signed-off-by: NNelson Elhage <nelhage@nelhage.com> Acked-by: NJason Baron <jbaron@redhat.com> Cc: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com> Cc: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Cc: <stable@kernel.org> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 27 7月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Arun Sharma 提交于
This allows us to move duplicated code in <asm/atomic.h> (atomic_inc_not_zero() for now) to <linux/atomic.h> Signed-off-by: NArun Sharma <asharma@fb.com> Reviewed-by: NEric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> Acked-by: NMike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 26 7月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Paul Bolle 提交于
Signed-off-by: NPaul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl> Signed-off-by: NJiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
-
- 31 3月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Lucas De Marchi 提交于
Fixes generated by 'codespell' and manually reviewed. Signed-off-by: NLucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@profusion.mobi>
-
- 23 3月, 2011 2 次提交
-
-
由 Shawn Bohrer 提交于
Add a comment to ep_poll(), rename labels a bit clearly, fix a warning of unused variable from gcc and optimize the non-blocking path a little. Hinted-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NDavide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> hannes@cmpxchg.org: : The non-blocking ep_poll path optimization introduced skipping over the : return value setup. : : Initialize it properly, my userspace gets upset by epoll_wait() returning : random things. : : In addition, remove the reinitialization at the fetch_events label, the : return value is garuanteed to be zero when execution reaches there. [hannes@cmpxchg.org: fix initialization] Signed-off-by: NJohannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Shawn Bohrer <shawn.bohrer@gmail.com> Acked-by: NDavide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Davide Libenzi 提交于
Move the event readiness check into a proper inline, and use it uniformly inside ep_poll() code. Events in the ->ovflist are no less ready than the ones in ->rdllist. Signed-off-by: NDavide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Cc: Shawn Bohrer <shawn.bohrer@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 26 2月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Davide Libenzi 提交于
In several places, an epoll fd can call another file's ->f_op->poll() method with ep->mtx held. This is in general unsafe, because that other file could itself be an epoll fd that contains the original epoll fd. The code defends against this possibility in its own ->poll() method using ep_call_nested, but there are several other unsafe calls to ->poll elsewhere that can be made to deadlock. For example, the following simple program causes the call in ep_insert recursively call the original fd's ->poll, leading to deadlock: #include <unistd.h> #include <sys/epoll.h> int main(void) { int e1, e2, p[2]; struct epoll_event evt = { .events = EPOLLIN }; e1 = epoll_create(1); e2 = epoll_create(2); pipe(p); epoll_ctl(e2, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, e1, &evt); epoll_ctl(e1, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, p[0], &evt); write(p[1], p, sizeof p); epoll_ctl(e1, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, e2, &evt); return 0; } On insertion, check whether the inserted file is itself a struct epoll, and if so, do a recursive walk to detect whether inserting this file would create a loop of epoll structures, which could lead to deadlock. [nelhage@ksplice.com: Use epmutex to serialize concurrent inserts] Signed-off-by: NDavide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Signed-off-by: NNelson Elhage <nelhage@ksplice.com> Reported-by: NNelson Elhage <nelhage@ksplice.com> Tested-by: NNelson Elhage <nelhage@ksplice.com> Cc: <stable@kernel.org> [2.6.34+, possibly earlier] Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 18 2月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Daniel Baluta 提交于
eventpoll.c has wonderful comments but some annoying typos sneaked in: * toepoll_ctl -> to epoll_ctl * rapresent -> represents * sructure -> structure * machanism -> mechanism * trasfering -> transferring Signed-off-by: NDaniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
-
- 03 2月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Eric Dumazet 提交于
commit 95aac7b1 ("epoll: make epoll_wait() use the hrtimer range feature") added a performance regression because it uses timespec_add_ns() with potential very large 'ns' values. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: s/epoll_set_mstimeout/ep_set_mstimeout/, per Davide] Reported-by: NSimon Kirby <sim@hostway.ca> Signed-off-by: NEric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> Cc: Shawn Bohrer <shawn.bohrer@gmail.com> Acked-by: NDavide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Cc: <stable@kernel.org> [2.6.37.x] Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 14 1月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Robin Holt 提交于
On a 16TB machine, max_user_watches has an integer overflow. Convert it to use a long and handle the associated fallout. Signed-off-by: NRobin Holt <holt@sgi.com> Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com> Acked-by: NDavide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 28 10月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Shawn Bohrer 提交于
This make epoll use hrtimers for the timeout value which prevents epoll_wait() from timing out up to a millisecond early. This mirrors the behavior of select() and poll(). Signed-off-by: NShawn Bohrer <shawn.bohrer@gmail.com> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Acked-by: NDavide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 15 10月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Arnd Bergmann 提交于
All file_operations should get a .llseek operation so we can make nonseekable_open the default for future file operations without a .llseek pointer. The three cases that we can automatically detect are no_llseek, seq_lseek and default_llseek. For cases where we can we can automatically prove that the file offset is always ignored, we use noop_llseek, which maintains the current behavior of not returning an error from a seek. New drivers should normally not use noop_llseek but instead use no_llseek and call nonseekable_open at open time. Existing drivers can be converted to do the same when the maintainer knows for certain that no user code relies on calling seek on the device file. The generated code is often incorrectly indented and right now contains comments that clarify for each added line why a specific variant was chosen. In the version that gets submitted upstream, the comments will be gone and I will manually fix the indentation, because there does not seem to be a way to do that using coccinelle. Some amount of new code is currently sitting in linux-next that should get the same modifications, which I will do at the end of the merge window. Many thanks to Julia Lawall for helping me learn to write a semantic patch that does all this. ===== begin semantic patch ===== // This adds an llseek= method to all file operations, // as a preparation for making no_llseek the default. // // The rules are // - use no_llseek explicitly if we do nonseekable_open // - use seq_lseek for sequential files // - use default_llseek if we know we access f_pos // - use noop_llseek if we know we don't access f_pos, // but we still want to allow users to call lseek // @ open1 exists @ identifier nested_open; @@ nested_open(...) { <+... nonseekable_open(...) ...+> } @ open exists@ identifier open_f; identifier i, f; identifier open1.nested_open; @@ int open_f(struct inode *i, struct file *f) { <+... ( nonseekable_open(...) | nested_open(...) ) ...+> } @ read disable optional_qualifier exists @ identifier read_f; identifier f, p, s, off; type ssize_t, size_t, loff_t; expression E; identifier func; @@ ssize_t read_f(struct file *f, char *p, size_t s, loff_t *off) { <+... ( *off = E | *off += E | func(..., off, ...) | E = *off ) ...+> } @ read_no_fpos disable optional_qualifier exists @ identifier read_f; identifier f, p, s, off; type ssize_t, size_t, loff_t; @@ ssize_t read_f(struct file *f, char *p, size_t s, loff_t *off) { ... when != off } @ write @ identifier write_f; identifier f, p, s, off; type ssize_t, size_t, loff_t; expression E; identifier func; @@ ssize_t write_f(struct file *f, const char *p, size_t s, loff_t *off) { <+... ( *off = E | *off += E | func(..., off, ...) | E = *off ) ...+> } @ write_no_fpos @ identifier write_f; identifier f, p, s, off; type ssize_t, size_t, loff_t; @@ ssize_t write_f(struct file *f, const char *p, size_t s, loff_t *off) { ... when != off } @ fops0 @ identifier fops; @@ struct file_operations fops = { ... }; @ has_llseek depends on fops0 @ identifier fops0.fops; identifier llseek_f; @@ struct file_operations fops = { ... .llseek = llseek_f, ... }; @ has_read depends on fops0 @ identifier fops0.fops; identifier read_f; @@ struct file_operations fops = { ... .read = read_f, ... }; @ has_write depends on fops0 @ identifier fops0.fops; identifier write_f; @@ struct file_operations fops = { ... .write = write_f, ... }; @ has_open depends on fops0 @ identifier fops0.fops; identifier open_f; @@ struct file_operations fops = { ... .open = open_f, ... }; // use no_llseek if we call nonseekable_open //////////////////////////////////////////// @ nonseekable1 depends on !has_llseek && has_open @ identifier fops0.fops; identifier nso ~= "nonseekable_open"; @@ struct file_operations fops = { ... .open = nso, ... +.llseek = no_llseek, /* nonseekable */ }; @ nonseekable2 depends on !has_llseek @ identifier fops0.fops; identifier open.open_f; @@ struct file_operations fops = { ... .open = open_f, ... +.llseek = no_llseek, /* open uses nonseekable */ }; // use seq_lseek for sequential files ///////////////////////////////////// @ seq depends on !has_llseek @ identifier fops0.fops; identifier sr ~= "seq_read"; @@ struct file_operations fops = { ... .read = sr, ... +.llseek = seq_lseek, /* we have seq_read */ }; // use default_llseek if there is a readdir /////////////////////////////////////////// @ fops1 depends on !has_llseek && !nonseekable1 && !nonseekable2 && !seq @ identifier fops0.fops; identifier readdir_e; @@ // any other fop is used that changes pos struct file_operations fops = { ... .readdir = readdir_e, ... +.llseek = default_llseek, /* readdir is present */ }; // use default_llseek if at least one of read/write touches f_pos ///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// @ fops2 depends on !fops1 && !has_llseek && !nonseekable1 && !nonseekable2 && !seq @ identifier fops0.fops; identifier read.read_f; @@ // read fops use offset struct file_operations fops = { ... .read = read_f, ... +.llseek = default_llseek, /* read accesses f_pos */ }; @ fops3 depends on !fops1 && !fops2 && !has_llseek && !nonseekable1 && !nonseekable2 && !seq @ identifier fops0.fops; identifier write.write_f; @@ // write fops use offset struct file_operations fops = { ... .write = write_f, ... + .llseek = default_llseek, /* write accesses f_pos */ }; // Use noop_llseek if neither read nor write accesses f_pos /////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// @ fops4 depends on !fops1 && !fops2 && !fops3 && !has_llseek && !nonseekable1 && !nonseekable2 && !seq @ identifier fops0.fops; identifier read_no_fpos.read_f; identifier write_no_fpos.write_f; @@ // write fops use offset struct file_operations fops = { ... .write = write_f, .read = read_f, ... +.llseek = noop_llseek, /* read and write both use no f_pos */ }; @ depends on has_write && !has_read && !fops1 && !fops2 && !has_llseek && !nonseekable1 && !nonseekable2 && !seq @ identifier fops0.fops; identifier write_no_fpos.write_f; @@ struct file_operations fops = { ... .write = write_f, ... +.llseek = noop_llseek, /* write uses no f_pos */ }; @ depends on has_read && !has_write && !fops1 && !fops2 && !has_llseek && !nonseekable1 && !nonseekable2 && !seq @ identifier fops0.fops; identifier read_no_fpos.read_f; @@ struct file_operations fops = { ... .read = read_f, ... +.llseek = noop_llseek, /* read uses no f_pos */ }; @ depends on !has_read && !has_write && !fops1 && !fops2 && !has_llseek && !nonseekable1 && !nonseekable2 && !seq @ identifier fops0.fops; @@ struct file_operations fops = { ... +.llseek = noop_llseek, /* no read or write fn */ }; ===== End semantic patch ===== Signed-off-by: NArnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
-
- 11 5月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Changli Gao 提交于
epoll should not touch flags in wait_queue_t. This patch introduces a new function __add_wait_queue_exclusive(), for the users, who use wait queue as a LIFO queue. __add_wait_queue_tail_exclusive() is introduced too instead of add_wait_queue_exclusive_locked(). remove_wait_queue_locked() is removed, as it is a duplicate of __remove_wait_queue(), disliked by users, and with less users. Signed-off-by: NChangli Gao <xiaosuo@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Paul Menage <menage@google.com> Cc: Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com> Cc: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Cc: <containers@lists.linux-foundation.org> LKML-Reference: <1273214006-2979-1-git-send-email-xiaosuo@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
-
- 23 12月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Roland Dreier 提交于
It seems a couple places such as arch/ia64/kernel/perfmon.c and drivers/infiniband/core/uverbs_main.c could use anon_inode_getfile() instead of a private pseudo-fs + alloc_file(), if only there were a way to get a read-only file. So provide this by having anon_inode_getfile() create a read-only file if we pass O_RDONLY in flags. Signed-off-by: NRoland Dreier <rolandd@cisco.com> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
- 19 11月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Eric W. Biederman 提交于
For consistency drop & in front of every proc_handler. Explicity taking the address is unnecessary and it prevents optimizations like stubbing the proc_handlers to NULL. Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Signed-off-by: NEric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
-
- 12 11月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Eric W. Biederman 提交于
Now that sys_sysctl is a generic wrapper around /proc/sys .ctl_name and .strategy members of sysctl tables are dead code. Remove them. Cc: Jan Harkes <jaharkes@cs.cmu.edu> Signed-off-by: NEric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
-
- 19 6月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Davide Libenzi 提交于
This fixes a regression in 2.6.30. I unfortunately accepted a patch time ago, to drop the "current" usage from possible IRQ context, w/out proper thought over it. The patch switched to using the CPU id by bounding the nested call callback with a get_cpu()/put_cpu(). Unfortunately the ep_call_nested() function can be called with a callback that grabs sleepy locks (from own f_op->poll()), that results in epic fails. The following patch uses the proper "context" depending on the path where it is called, and on the kind of callback. This has been reported by Stefan Richter, that has also verified the patch is his previously failing environment. Signed-off-by: NDavide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Reported-by: NStefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de> Cc: <stable@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 13 5月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Davide Libenzi 提交于
Fix a size check WRT the manual pages. This was inadvertently broken by commit 9fe5ad9c ("flag parameters add-on: remove epoll_create size param"). Signed-off-by: NDavide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Cc: <Hiroyuki.Mach@gmail.com> Cc: rohit verma <rohit.170309@gmail.com> Cc: Ulrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com> Cc: <stable@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 01 4月, 2009 9 次提交
-
-
由 Davide Libenzi 提交于
Use the events hint now sent by some devices, to avoid unnecessary wakeups for events that are of no interest for the caller. This code handles both devices that are sending keyed events, and the ones that are not (and event the ones that sometimes send events, and sometimes don't). [akpm@linux-foundation.org: coding-style fixes] Signed-off-by: NDavide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Cc: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: William Lee Irwin III <wli@movementarian.org> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Tony Battersby 提交于
eventpoll.c uses void * in one place for no obvious reason; change it to use the real type instead. Signed-off-by: NTony Battersby <tonyb@cybernetics.com> Acked-by: NDavide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Tony Battersby 提交于
ep_modify() doesn't need to set event.data from within the ep->lock spinlock as the comment suggests. The only place event.data is used is ep_send_events_proc(), and this is protected by ep->mtx instead of ep->lock. Also update the comment for mutex_lock() at the top of ep_scan_ready_list(), which mentions epoll_ctl(EPOLL_CTL_DEL) but not epoll_ctl(EPOLL_CTL_MOD). ep_modify() can also use spin_lock_irq() instead of spin_lock_irqsave(). Signed-off-by: NTony Battersby <tonyb@cybernetics.com> Acked-by: NDavide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Tony Battersby 提交于
xchg in ep_unregister_pollwait() is unnecessary because it is protected by either epmutex or ep->mtx (the same protection as ep_remove()). If xchg was necessary, it would be insufficient to protect against problems: if multiple concurrent calls to ep_unregister_pollwait() were possible then a second caller that returns without doing anything because nwait == 0 could return before the waitqueues are removed by the first caller, which looks like it could lead to problematic races with ep_poll_callback(). So remove xchg and add comments about the locking. Signed-off-by: NTony Battersby <tonyb@cybernetics.com> Acked-by: NDavide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Tony Battersby 提交于
If epoll_wait returns -EFAULT, the event that was being returned when the fault was encountered will be forgotten. This is not a big deal since EFAULT will happen only if a buggy userspace program passes in a bad address, in which case what happens later usually doesn't matter. However, it is easy to remember the event for later, and this patch makes a simple change to do that. Signed-off-by: NTony Battersby <tonyb@cybernetics.com> Acked-by: NDavide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Tony Battersby 提交于
ep_call_nested() (formerly ep_poll_safewake()) uses "current" (without dereferencing it) to detect callback recursion, but it may be called from irq context where the use of current is generally discouraged. It would be better to use get_cpu() and put_cpu() to detect the callback recursion. Signed-off-by: NTony Battersby <tonyb@cybernetics.com> Acked-by: NDavide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Davide Libenzi 提交于
Remove debugging code from epoll. There's no need for it to be included into mainline code. Signed-off-by: NDavide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Davide Libenzi 提交于
Signed-off-by: NDavide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Cc: Pavel Pisa <pisa@cmp.felk.cvut.cz> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Davide Libenzi 提交于
Fix a bug inside the epoll's f_op->poll() code, that returns POLLIN even though there are no actual ready monitored fds. The bug shows up if you add an epoll fd inside another fd container (poll, select, epoll). The problem is that callback-based wake ups used by epoll does not carry (patches will follow, to fix this) any information about the events that actually happened. So the callback code, since it can't call the file* ->poll() inside the callback, chains the file* into a ready-list. So, suppose you added an fd with EPOLLOUT only, and some data shows up on the fd, the file* mapped by the fd will be added into the ready-list (via wakeup callback). During normal epoll_wait() use, this condition is sorted out at the time we're actually able to call the file*'s f_op->poll(). Inside the old epoll's f_op->poll() though, only a quick check !list_empty(ready-list) was performed, and this could have led to reporting POLLIN even though no ready fds would show up at a following epoll_wait(). In order to correctly report the ready status for an epoll fd, the ready-list must be checked to see if any really available fd+event would be ready in a following epoll_wait(). Operation (calling f_op->poll() from inside f_op->poll()) that, like wake ups, must be handled with care because of the fact that epoll fds can be added to other epoll fds. Test code: /* * epoll_test by Davide Libenzi (Simple code to test epoll internals) * Copyright (C) 2008 Davide Libenzi * * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by * the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or * (at your option) any later version. * * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the * GNU General Public License for more details. * * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License * along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software * Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307 USA * * Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> * */ #include <sys/types.h> #include <unistd.h> #include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <string.h> #include <errno.h> #include <signal.h> #include <limits.h> #include <poll.h> #include <sys/epoll.h> #include <sys/wait.h> #define EPWAIT_TIMEO (1 * 1000) #ifndef POLLRDHUP #define POLLRDHUP 0x2000 #endif #define EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN 100L #define EPOLL_TF_LOOP (1 << 0) struct epoll_test_cfg { long size; long flags; }; static int xepoll_create(int n) { int epfd; if ((epfd = epoll_create(n)) == -1) { perror("epoll_create"); exit(2); } return epfd; } static void xepoll_ctl(int epfd, int cmd, int fd, struct epoll_event *evt) { if (epoll_ctl(epfd, cmd, fd, evt) < 0) { perror("epoll_ctl"); exit(3); } } static void xpipe(int *fds) { if (pipe(fds)) { perror("pipe"); exit(4); } } static pid_t xfork(void) { pid_t pid; if ((pid = fork()) == (pid_t) -1) { perror("pipe"); exit(5); } return pid; } static int run_forked_proc(int (*proc)(void *), void *data) { int status; pid_t pid; if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) exit((*proc)(data)); if (waitpid(pid, &status, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return WIFEXITED(status) ? WEXITSTATUS(status): -2; } static int check_events(int fd, int timeo) { struct pollfd pfd; fprintf(stdout, "Checking events for fd %d\n", fd); memset(&pfd, 0, sizeof(pfd)); pfd.fd = fd; pfd.events = POLLIN | POLLOUT; if (poll(&pfd, 1, timeo) < 0) { perror("poll()"); return 0; } if (pfd.revents & POLLIN) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLIN\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLOUT) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLOUT\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLERR) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLERR\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLHUP) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLHUP\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLRDHUP) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLRDHUP\n"); return pfd.revents; } static int epoll_test_tty(void *data) { int epfd, ifd = fileno(stdin), res; struct epoll_event evt; if (check_events(ifd, 0) != POLLOUT) { fprintf(stderr, "Something is cooking on STDIN (%d)\n", ifd); return 1; } epfd = xepoll_create(1); fprintf(stdout, "Created epoll fd (%d)\n", epfd); memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; xepoll_ctl(epfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, ifd, &evt); if (check_events(epfd, 0) & POLLIN) { res = epoll_wait(epfd, &evt, 1, 0); if (res == 0) { fprintf(stderr, "Epoll fd (%d) is ready when it shouldn't!\n", epfd); return 2; } } return 0; } static int epoll_wakeup_chain(void *data) { struct epoll_test_cfg *tcfg = data; int i, res, epfd, bfd, nfd, pfds[2]; pid_t pid; struct epoll_event evt; memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; epfd = bfd = xepoll_create(1); for (i = 0; i < tcfg->size; i++) { nfd = xepoll_create(1); xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, nfd, &evt); bfd = nfd; } xpipe(pfds); if (tcfg->flags & EPOLL_TF_LOOP) { xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, epfd, &evt); /* * If we're testing for loop, we want that the wakeup * triggered by the write to the pipe done in the child * process, triggers a fake event. So we add the pipe * read size with EPOLLOUT events. This will trigger * an addition to the ready-list, but no real events * will be there. The the epoll kernel code will proceed * in calling f_op->poll() of the epfd, triggering the * loop we want to test. */ evt.events = EPOLLOUT; } xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, pfds[0], &evt); /* * The pipe write must come after the poll(2) call inside * check_events(). This tests the nested wakeup code in * fs/eventpoll.c:ep_poll_safewake() * By having the check_events() (hence poll(2)) happens first, * we have poll wait queue filled up, and the write(2) in the * child will trigger the wakeup chain. */ if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) { sleep(1); write(pfds[1], "w", 1); exit(0); } res = check_events(epfd, 2000) & POLLIN; if (waitpid(pid, NULL, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return res; } static int epoll_poll_chain(void *data) { struct epoll_test_cfg *tcfg = data; int i, res, epfd, bfd, nfd, pfds[2]; pid_t pid; struct epoll_event evt; memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; epfd = bfd = xepoll_create(1); for (i = 0; i < tcfg->size; i++) { nfd = xepoll_create(1); xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, nfd, &evt); bfd = nfd; } xpipe(pfds); if (tcfg->flags & EPOLL_TF_LOOP) { xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, epfd, &evt); /* * If we're testing for loop, we want that the wakeup * triggered by the write to the pipe done in the child * process, triggers a fake event. So we add the pipe * read size with EPOLLOUT events. This will trigger * an addition to the ready-list, but no real events * will be there. The the epoll kernel code will proceed * in calling f_op->poll() of the epfd, triggering the * loop we want to test. */ evt.events = EPOLLOUT; } xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, pfds[0], &evt); /* * The pipe write mush come before the poll(2) call inside * check_events(). This tests the nested f_op->poll calls code in * fs/eventpoll.c:ep_eventpoll_poll() * By having the pipe write(2) happen first, we make the kernel * epoll code to load the ready lists, and the following poll(2) * done inside check_events() will test nested poll code in * ep_eventpoll_poll(). */ if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) { write(pfds[1], "w", 1); exit(0); } sleep(1); res = check_events(epfd, 1000) & POLLIN; if (waitpid(pid, NULL, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return res; } int main(int ac, char **av) { int error; struct epoll_test_cfg tcfg; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing TTY events\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_test_tty, NULL); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing short wakeup chain\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == POLLIN ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing long wakeup chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing short poll chain\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == POLLIN ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing long poll chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = EPOLL_TF_LOOP; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing loopy wakeup chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = EPOLL_TF_LOOP; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing loopy poll chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); return 0; } Signed-off-by: NDavide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Cc: Pavel Pisa <pisa@cmp.felk.cvut.cz> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 16 3月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jonathan Corbet 提交于
This lock moves out of the CONFIG_EPOLL ifdef and becomes f_lock. For now, epoll remains the only user, but a future patch will use it to protect f_flags as well. Cc: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Reviewed-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: NJonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
-
- 30 1月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Davide Libenzi 提交于
Linus suggested to put limits where the money is, and max_user_watches already does that w/out the need of max_user_instances. That has the advantage to mitigate the potential DoS while allowing pretty generous default behavior. Allowing top 4% of low memory (per user) to be allocated in epoll watches, we have: LOMEM MAX_WATCHES (per user) 512MB ~178000 1GB ~356000 2GB ~712000 A box with 512MB of lomem, will meet some challenge in hitting 180K watches, socket buffers math teaches us. No more max_user_instances limits then. Signed-off-by: NDavide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Cc: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu> Cc: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@googlemail.com> Cc: Bron Gondwana <brong@fastmail.fm> Cc: <stable@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 14 1月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Heiko Carstens 提交于
Signed-off-by: NHeiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
-
- 02 12月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Davide Libenzi 提交于
It has been thought that the per-user file descriptors limit would also limit the resources that a normal user can request via the epoll interface. Vegard Nossum reported a very simple program (a modified version attached) that can make a normal user to request a pretty large amount of kernel memory, well within the its maximum number of fds. To solve such problem, default limits are now imposed, and /proc based configuration has been introduced. A new directory has been created, named /proc/sys/fs/epoll/ and inside there, there are two configuration points: max_user_instances = Maximum number of devices - per user max_user_watches = Maximum number of "watched" fds - per user The current default for "max_user_watches" limits the memory used by epoll to store "watches", to 1/32 of the amount of the low RAM. As example, a 256MB 32bit machine, will have "max_user_watches" set to roughly 90000. That should be enough to not break existing heavy epoll users. The default value for "max_user_instances" is set to 128, that should be enough too. This also changes the userspace, because a new error code can now come out from EPOLL_CTL_ADD (-ENOSPC). The EMFILE from epoll_create() was already listed, so that should be ok. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: use get_current_user()] Signed-off-by: NDavide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Cc: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com> Cc: <stable@kernel.org> Cc: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com> Reported-by: NVegard Nossum <vegardno@ifi.uio.no> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 27 10月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Davide Libenzi 提交于
In commit f337b9c5 ("epoll: drop unnecessary test") Thomas found that there is an unnecessary (always true) test in ep_send_events(). The callback never inserts into ->rdllink while the send loop is performed, and also does the ~EP_PRIVATE_BITS test. Given we're holding the mutex during this time, the conditions tested inside the loop are always true. HOWEVER. The test "!ep_is_linked(&epi->rdllink)" wasn't there because we insert into ->rdllink, but because the send-events loop might terminate before the whole list is scanned (-EFAULT). In such cases, when the loop terminates early, and when a (leftover) file received an event while we're performing the lockless loop, we need such test to avoid to double insert the epoll items. The list_splice() done a few steps below, will correctly re-insert the ones that were left on "txlist". This should fix the kenrel.org bugzilla entry 11831. Signed-off-by: NDavide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 17 10月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Davide Libenzi 提交于
Thomas found that there is an unnecessary (always true) test in ep_send_events(). The callback never inserts into ->rdllink while the send loop is performed, and also does the ~EP_PRIVATE_BITS test. Given we're holding the mutex during this time, the conditions tested inside the loop are always true. This patch drops the test done inside the re-insertion loop. Signed-off-by: NDavide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 13 8月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Andrew Morton 提交于
The `size' argument was removed. Reported-by: NGeert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Ulrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com> Cc: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 25 7月, 2008 3 次提交
-
-
由 Ulrich Drepper 提交于
Remove the size parameter from the new epoll_create syscall and renames the syscall itself. The updated test program follows. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ #include <fcntl.h> #include <stdio.h> #include <time.h> #include <unistd.h> #include <sys/syscall.h> #ifndef __NR_epoll_create2 # ifdef __x86_64__ # define __NR_epoll_create2 291 # elif defined __i386__ # define __NR_epoll_create2 329 # else # error "need __NR_epoll_create2" # endif #endif #define EPOLL_CLOEXEC O_CLOEXEC int main (void) { int fd = syscall (__NR_epoll_create2, 0); if (fd == -1) { puts ("epoll_create2(0) failed"); return 1; } int coe = fcntl (fd, F_GETFD); if (coe == -1) { puts ("fcntl failed"); return 1; } if (coe & FD_CLOEXEC) { puts ("epoll_create2(0) set close-on-exec flag"); return 1; } close (fd); fd = syscall (__NR_epoll_create2, EPOLL_CLOEXEC); if (fd == -1) { puts ("epoll_create2(EPOLL_CLOEXEC) failed"); return 1; } coe = fcntl (fd, F_GETFD); if (coe == -1) { puts ("fcntl failed"); return 1; } if ((coe & FD_CLOEXEC) == 0) { puts ("epoll_create2(EPOLL_CLOEXEC) set close-on-exec flag"); return 1; } close (fd); puts ("OK"); return 0; } ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Signed-off-by: NUlrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com> Acked-by: NDavide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Cc: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@googlemail.com> Cc: <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Ulrich Drepper 提交于
This patch adds test that ensure the boundary conditions for the various constants introduced in the previous patches is met. No code is generated. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix alpha] Signed-off-by: NUlrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com> Acked-by: NDavide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Cc: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@googlemail.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Ulrich Drepper 提交于
This patch adds the new epoll_create2 syscall. It extends the old epoll_create syscall by one parameter which is meant to hold a flag value. In this patch the only flag support is EPOLL_CLOEXEC which causes the close-on-exec flag for the returned file descriptor to be set. A new name EPOLL_CLOEXEC is introduced which in this implementation must have the same value as O_CLOEXEC. The following test must be adjusted for architectures other than x86 and x86-64 and in case the syscall numbers changed. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ #include <fcntl.h> #include <stdio.h> #include <time.h> #include <unistd.h> #include <sys/syscall.h> #ifndef __NR_epoll_create2 # ifdef __x86_64__ # define __NR_epoll_create2 291 # elif defined __i386__ # define __NR_epoll_create2 329 # else # error "need __NR_epoll_create2" # endif #endif #define EPOLL_CLOEXEC O_CLOEXEC int main (void) { int fd = syscall (__NR_epoll_create2, 1, 0); if (fd == -1) { puts ("epoll_create2(0) failed"); return 1; } int coe = fcntl (fd, F_GETFD); if (coe == -1) { puts ("fcntl failed"); return 1; } if (coe & FD_CLOEXEC) { puts ("epoll_create2(0) set close-on-exec flag"); return 1; } close (fd); fd = syscall (__NR_epoll_create2, 1, EPOLL_CLOEXEC); if (fd == -1) { puts ("epoll_create2(EPOLL_CLOEXEC) failed"); return 1; } coe = fcntl (fd, F_GETFD); if (coe == -1) { puts ("fcntl failed"); return 1; } if ((coe & FD_CLOEXEC) == 0) { puts ("epoll_create2(EPOLL_CLOEXEC) set close-on-exec flag"); return 1; } close (fd); puts ("OK"); return 0; } ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Signed-off-by: NUlrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com> Acked-by: NDavide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Cc: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@googlemail.com> Cc: <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-