1. 28 8月, 2008 1 次提交
  2. 14 7月, 2008 1 次提交
  3. 29 4月, 2008 1 次提交
    • S
      cgroups: implement device whitelist · 08ce5f16
      Serge E. Hallyn 提交于
      Implement a cgroup to track and enforce open and mknod restrictions on device
      files.  A device cgroup associates a device access whitelist with each cgroup.
       A whitelist entry has 4 fields.  'type' is a (all), c (char), or b (block).
      'all' means it applies to all types and all major and minor numbers.  Major
      and minor are either an integer or * for all.  Access is a composition of r
      (read), w (write), and m (mknod).
      
      The root device cgroup starts with rwm to 'all'.  A child devcg gets a copy of
      the parent.  Admins can then remove devices from the whitelist or add new
      entries.  A child cgroup can never receive a device access which is denied its
      parent.  However when a device access is removed from a parent it will not
      also be removed from the child(ren).
      
      An entry is added using devices.allow, and removed using
      devices.deny.  For instance
      
      	echo 'c 1:3 mr' > /cgroups/1/devices.allow
      
      allows cgroup 1 to read and mknod the device usually known as
      /dev/null.  Doing
      
      	echo a > /cgroups/1/devices.deny
      
      will remove the default 'a *:* mrw' entry.
      
      CAP_SYS_ADMIN is needed to change permissions or move another task to a new
      cgroup.  A cgroup may not be granted more permissions than the cgroup's parent
      has.  Any task can move itself between cgroups.  This won't be sufficient, but
      we can decide the best way to adequately restrict movement later.
      
      [akpm@linux-foundation.org: coding-style fixes]
      [akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix may-be-used-uninitialized warning]
      Signed-off-by: NSerge E. Hallyn <serue@us.ibm.com>
      Acked-by: NJames Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
      Looks-good-to: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org>
      Cc: Daniel Hokka Zakrisson <daniel@hozac.com>
      Cc: Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>
      Cc: Paul Menage <menage@google.com>
      Cc: Balbir Singh <balbir@in.ibm.com>
      Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      08ce5f16
  4. 06 2月, 2008 1 次提交
    • C
      Smack: Simplified Mandatory Access Control Kernel · e114e473
      Casey Schaufler 提交于
      Smack is the Simplified Mandatory Access Control Kernel.
      
      Smack implements mandatory access control (MAC) using labels
      attached to tasks and data containers, including files, SVIPC,
      and other tasks. Smack is a kernel based scheme that requires
      an absolute minimum of application support and a very small
      amount of configuration data.
      
      Smack uses extended attributes and
      provides a set of general mount options, borrowing technics used
      elsewhere. Smack uses netlabel for CIPSO labeling. Smack provides
      a pseudo-filesystem smackfs that is used for manipulation of
      system Smack attributes.
      
      The patch, patches for ls and sshd, a README, a startup script,
      and x86 binaries for ls and sshd are also available on
      
          http://www.schaufler-ca.com
      
      Development has been done using Fedora Core 7 in a virtual machine
      environment and on an old Sony laptop.
      
      Smack provides mandatory access controls based on the label attached
      to a task and the label attached to the object it is attempting to
      access. Smack labels are deliberately short (1-23 characters) text
      strings. Single character labels using special characters are reserved
      for system use. The only operation applied to Smack labels is equality
      comparison. No wildcards or expressions, regular or otherwise, are
      used. Smack labels are composed of printable characters and may not
      include "/".
      
      A file always gets the Smack label of the task that created it.
      
      Smack defines and uses these labels:
      
          "*" - pronounced "star"
          "_" - pronounced "floor"
          "^" - pronounced "hat"
          "?" - pronounced "huh"
      
      The access rules enforced by Smack are, in order:
      
      1. Any access requested by a task labeled "*" is denied.
      2. A read or execute access requested by a task labeled "^"
         is permitted.
      3. A read or execute access requested on an object labeled "_"
         is permitted.
      4. Any access requested on an object labeled "*" is permitted.
      5. Any access requested by a task on an object with the same
         label is permitted.
      6. Any access requested that is explicitly defined in the loaded
         rule set is permitted.
      7. Any other access is denied.
      
      Rules may be explicitly defined by writing subject,object,access
      triples to /smack/load.
      
      Smack rule sets can be easily defined that describe Bell&LaPadula
      sensitivity, Biba integrity, and a variety of interesting
      configurations. Smack rule sets can be modified on the fly to
      accommodate changes in the operating environment or even the time
      of day.
      
      Some practical use cases:
      
      Hierarchical levels. The less common of the two usual uses
      for MLS systems is to define hierarchical levels, often
      unclassified, confidential, secret, and so on. To set up smack
      to support this, these rules could be defined:
      
         C        Unclass rx
         S        C       rx
         S        Unclass rx
         TS       S       rx
         TS       C       rx
         TS       Unclass rx
      
      A TS process can read S, C, and Unclass data, but cannot write it.
      An S process can read C and Unclass. Note that specifying that
      TS can read S and S can read C does not imply TS can read C, it
      has to be explicitly stated.
      
      Non-hierarchical categories. This is the more common of the
      usual uses for an MLS system. Since the default rule is that a
      subject cannot access an object with a different label no
      access rules are required to implement compartmentalization.
      
      A case that the Bell & LaPadula policy does not allow is demonstrated
      with this Smack access rule:
      
      A case that Bell&LaPadula does not allow that Smack does:
      
          ESPN    ABC   r
          ABC     ESPN  r
      
      On my portable video device I have two applications, one that
      shows ABC programming and the other ESPN programming. ESPN wants
      to show me sport stories that show up as news, and ABC will
      only provide minimal information about a sports story if ESPN
      is covering it. Each side can look at the other's info, neither
      can change the other. Neither can see what FOX is up to, which
      is just as well all things considered.
      
      Another case that I especially like:
      
          SatData Guard   w
          Guard   Publish w
      
      A program running with the Guard label opens a UDP socket and
      accepts messages sent by a program running with a SatData label.
      The Guard program inspects the message to ensure it is wholesome
      and if it is sends it to a program running with the Publish label.
      This program then puts the information passed in an appropriate
      place. Note that the Guard program cannot write to a Publish
      file system object because file system semanitic require read as
      well as write.
      
      The four cases (categories, levels, mutual read, guardbox) here
      are all quite real, and problems I've been asked to solve over
      the years. The first two are easy to do with traditonal MLS systems
      while the last two you can't without invoking privilege, at least
      for a while.
      Signed-off-by: NCasey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
      Cc: Joshua Brindle <method@manicmethod.com>
      Cc: Paul Moore <paul.moore@hp.com>
      Cc: Stephen Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov>
      Cc: Chris Wright <chrisw@sous-sol.org>
      Cc: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
      Cc: "Ahmed S. Darwish" <darwish.07@gmail.com>
      Cc: Andrew G. Morgan <morgan@kernel.org>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      e114e473
  5. 30 9月, 2006 1 次提交
  6. 09 7月, 2005 1 次提交
    • G
      [PATCH] add securityfs for all LSMs to use · b67dbf9d
      Greg KH 提交于
      Here's a small patch against 2.6.13-rc2 that adds securityfs, a virtual
      fs that all LSMs can use instead of creating their own.  The fs should
      be mounted at /sys/kernel/security, and the fs creates that mount point.
      This will make the LSB people happy that we aren't creating a new
      /my_lsm_fs directory in the root for every different LSM.
      
      It has changed a bit since the last version, thanks to comments from
      Mike Waychison.
      Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
      Signed-off-by: NChris Wright <chrisw@osdl.org>
      b67dbf9d
  7. 17 4月, 2005 1 次提交
    • L
      Linux-2.6.12-rc2 · 1da177e4
      Linus Torvalds 提交于
      Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history,
      even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git
      archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about
      3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early
      git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good
      infrastructure for it.
      
      Let it rip!
      1da177e4