And return an error to avoid NULL pointer access by the caller
Lin Ming's patch avoids corrupted mem access when
BIOS has invalid references included, the handle is now zero
instead of corrupted.
Signed-off-by: NThomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: NLin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

replace acpi_util_eval_error macro with static function.

Avoid these sparse warnings due to using buffer within the macro.
drivers/acpi/utils.c:273:3: warning: symbol 'buffer' shadows an earlier one
drivers/acpi/utils.c:259:21: originally declared here
drivers/acpi/utils.c:279:3: warning: symbol 'buffer' shadows an earlier one
drivers/acpi/utils.c:259:21: originally declared here
drivers/acpi/utils.c:368:3: warning: symbol 'buffer' shadows an earlier one
drivers/acpi/utils.c:348:21: originally declared here
drivers/acpi/utils.c:375:3: warning: symbol 'buffer' shadows an earlier one
drivers/acpi/utils.c:348:21: originally declared here
drivers/acpi/utils.c:382:3: warning: symbol 'buffer' shadows an earlier one
drivers/acpi/utils.c:348:21: originally declared here
drivers/acpi/utils.c:402:4: warning: symbol 'buffer' shadows an earlier one
drivers/acpi/utils.c:348:21: originally declared here
Signed-off-by: NHarvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

cosmetic only

Make "module name" actually match the file name.
Invoke with ';' as leaving it off confuses Lindent and gcc doesn't care.
Fix indentation where Lindent did get confused.
Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

Signed-off-by: NJan Engelhardt <jengelh@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

__might_sleep+0x8e/0x93
acpi_os_wait_semaphore+0x50/0xa3
acpi_ut_acquire_mutex+0x28/0x6a
acpi_ns_get_node+0x46/0x88
acpi_ns_evaluate+0x2d/0xfc
acpi_rs_set_srs_method_data+0xc5/0xe1
acpi_set_current_resources+0x31/0x3f
acpi_pci_link_set+0xfc/0x1a5
irqrouter_resume+0x48/0x5f

and

__might_sleep+0x8e/0x93
kmem_cache_alloc+0x2a/0x8f
acpi_evaluate_integer+0x32/0x96
acpi_bus_get_status+0x30/0x84
acpi_pci_link_set+0x12a/0x1a5
irqrouter_resume+0x48/0x5f

http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6810Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

Signed-off-by: NThomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

Signed-off-by: NVasily Averin <vvs@sw.ru>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history,
even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git
archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about
3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early
git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good
infrastructure for it.

Let it rip!