- 09 5月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
- 16 4月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 David Howells 提交于
that's the bulk of filesystem drivers dealing with inodes of their own Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
- 29 6月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
- 23 2月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
- 14 7月, 2012 2 次提交
-
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
boolean "does it have to be exclusive?" flag is passed instead; Local filesystem should just ignore it - the object is guaranteed not to be there yet. Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Just the flags; only NFS cares even about that, but there are legitimate uses for such argument. And getting rid of that completely would require splitting ->lookup() into a couple of methods (at least), so let's leave that alone for now... Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
- 04 1月, 2012 3 次提交
-
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
vfs_create() ignores everything outside of 16bit subset of its mode argument; switching it to umode_t is obviously equivalent and it's the only caller of the method Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
vfs_mkdir() gets int, but immediately drops everything that might not fit into umode_t and that's the only caller of ->mkdir()... Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
- 27 7月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
granted, on a filesystem that has only regular files and directories it happens to work, but really should be S_ISDIR(mode)... Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
- 28 5月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Sage Weil 提交于
omfs does not have problems with references to unlinked directories. CC: Bob Copeland <me@bobcopeland.com> CC: linux-karma-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Signed-off-by: NSage Weil <sage@newdream.net> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
- 26 5月, 2011 2 次提交
-
-
由 Sage Weil 提交于
Only a few file systems need this. Start by pushing it down into each rename method (except gfs2 and xfs) so that it can be dealt with on a per-fs basis. Acked-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: NSage Weil <sage@newdream.net> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Sage Weil 提交于
Only a few file systems need this. Start by pushing it down into each fs rmdir method (except gfs2 and xfs) so it can be dealt with on a per-fs basis. This does not change behavior for any in-tree file systems. Acked-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: NSage Weil <sage@newdream.net> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
- 06 3月, 2011 4 次提交
-
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
filldir returning an error does *not* mean "skip this entry, try the next one"... Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: NBob Copeland <me@bobcopeland.com>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
In case of directory-overwriting rename(), omfs forgot to mark the victim doomed, so omfs_evict_inode() didn't free it. We could fix that by calling omfs_rmdir() for directory victims instead of doing omfs_unlink(), but it's easier to merge omfs_unlink() and omfs_rmdir() instead. Note that we have no hardlinks here. It also makes the checks in omfs_rename() go away - they fold into what omfs_remove() does when it runs into a directory. Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: NBob Copeland <me@bobcopeland.com>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Since omfs directories are hashes of inodes and name is part of inode, we have to remove inode from old directory before we can put it into new one / under new name. So instead of bump i_nlink call omfs_unlink, which does omfs_delete_entry() decrement i_nlink and mark parent dirty in case of success decrement i_nlink if omfs_unlink failed and hadn't done it itself let's just call omfs_delete_entry() and dirty the parent ourselves... Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: NBob Copeland <me@bobcopeland.com>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
we *do* mark it dirty before, but it doesn't guarantee that we don't get preempted just before assignment to ->i_ctime, with inode getting written out before we get CPU back... Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: NBob Copeland <me@bobcopeland.com>
-
- 11 7月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Bob Copeland 提交于
In case of filesystem corruption, passing unchecked block numbers into sb_bread can result in an infinite loop in __getblk(). Introduce a wrapper function omfs_sbread() to check the block numbers and to also perform the clus_to_blk() scaling. Signed-off-by: NBob Copeland <me@bobcopeland.com>
-
- 02 10月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Alexey Dobriyan 提交于
[akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix KVM] Signed-off-by: NAlexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com> Acked-by: NMike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 22 9月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Alexey Dobriyan 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAlexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 23 10月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Christoph Hellwig 提交于
With this patch all directory fops instances that have a readdir that doesn't take the BKL are switched to generic_file_llseek. Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
-
- 31 7月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Harvey Harrison 提交于
Missing cpu_to_be64 on some constant assignments. fs/omfs/dir.c:107:16: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different base types) fs/omfs/dir.c:107:16: expected restricted __be64 [usertype] i_sibling fs/omfs/dir.c:107:16: got unsigned long long fs/omfs/file.c:33:13: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different base types) fs/omfs/file.c:33:13: expected restricted __be64 [usertype] e_next fs/omfs/file.c:33:13: got unsigned long long fs/omfs/file.c:36:24: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different base types) fs/omfs/file.c:36:24: expected restricted __be64 [usertype] e_cluster fs/omfs/file.c:36:24: got unsigned long long fs/omfs/file.c:37:23: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different base types) fs/omfs/file.c:37:23: expected restricted __be64 [usertype] e_blocks fs/omfs/file.c:37:23: got unsigned long long fs/omfs/bitmap.c:74:18: warning: incorrect type in argument 2 (different signedness) fs/omfs/bitmap.c:74:18: expected unsigned long volatile *addr fs/omfs/bitmap.c:74:18: got long *<noident> fs/omfs/bitmap.c:77:20: warning: incorrect type in argument 2 (different signedness) fs/omfs/bitmap.c:77:20: expected unsigned long volatile *addr fs/omfs/bitmap.c:77:20: got long *<noident> fs/omfs/bitmap.c:112:17: warning: incorrect type in argument 2 (different signedness) fs/omfs/bitmap.c:112:17: expected unsigned long volatile *addr fs/omfs/bitmap.c:112:17: got long *<noident> Signed-off-by: NHarvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@gmail.com> Acked-by: NBob Copeland <me@bobcopeland.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 27 7月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Bob Copeland 提交于
Add lookup and directory management routines for OMFS. The filesystem uses hashing based on the filename and stores collisions, unordered, in siblings of files' inode structures. To support telldir, the current position in the hash table is encoded in fpos. Signed-off-by: NBob Copeland <me@bobcopeland.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-