Skip to content

cloud-kernel
cloud-kernel

openanolis / cloud-kernel
1 年多 前同步成功

通知 160
Star 36
Fork 7
cloud-kernel
cloud-kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 07 6月, 2017 3 次提交
  3. 28 3月, 2017 2 次提交
  5. 24 2月, 2017 4 次提交
  7. 25 12月, 2016 1 次提交
  9. 15 11月, 2016 1 次提交
  11. 11 11月, 2016 1 次提交
    • T
      sparc64: Fix find_node warning if numa node cannot be found · 74a5ed5c
      由 Thomas Tai 提交于 
      When booting up LDOM, find_node() warns that a physical address
doesn't match a NUMA node.

WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 0 at arch/sparc/mm/init_64.c:835
find_node+0xf4/0x120 find_node: A physical address doesn't
match a NUMA node rule. Some physical memory will be
owned by node 0.Modules linked in:

CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper Not tainted 4.9.0-rc3 #4
Call Trace:
 [0000000000468ba0] __warn+0xc0/0xe0
 [0000000000468c74] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x34/0x60
 [00000000004592f4] find_node+0xf4/0x120
 [0000000000dd0774] add_node_ranges+0x38/0xe4
 [0000000000dd0b1c] numa_parse_mdesc+0x268/0x2e4
 [0000000000dd0e9c] bootmem_init+0xb8/0x160
 [0000000000dd174c] paging_init+0x808/0x8fc
 [0000000000dcb0d0] setup_arch+0x2c8/0x2f0
 [0000000000dc68a0] start_kernel+0x48/0x424
 [0000000000dcb374] start_early_boot+0x27c/0x28c
 [0000000000a32c08] tlb_fixup_done+0x4c/0x64
 [0000000000027f08] 0x27f08

It is because linux use an internal structure node_masks[] to
keep the best memory latency node only. However, LDOM mdesc can
contain single latency-group with multiple memory latency nodes.

If the address doesn't match the best latency node within
node_masks[], it should check for an alternative via mdesc.
The warning message should only be printed if the address
doesn't match any node_masks[] nor within mdesc. To minimize
the impact of searching mdesc every time, the last matched
mask and index is stored in a variable.
Signed-off-by: NThomas Tai <thomas.tai@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: NChris Hyser <chris.hyser@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: NLiam Merwick <liam.merwick@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      74a5ed5c
  13. 06 10月, 2016 1 次提交
  15. 28 9月, 2016 2 次提交
    • A
      sparc64: Fix irq stack bootmem allocation. · ebb99a4c
      由 Atish Patra 提交于 
      Currently, irq stack bootmem is allocated for all possible cpus
before nr_cpus value changes the list of possible cpus. As a result,
there is unnecessary wastage of bootmemory.

Move the irq stack bootmem allocation so that it happens after
possible cpu list is modified based on nr_cpus value.
Signed-off-by: NAtish Patra <atish.patra@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: NBob Picco <bob.picco@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: NVijay Kumar <vijay.ac.kumar@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      ebb99a4c
    • P
      sparc64: fix section mismatch in find_numa_latencies_for_group · bdf2f59e
      由 Paul Gortmaker 提交于 
      To fix:

  WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text.unlikely+0x580): Section mismatch in
  reference from the function find_numa_latencies_for_group() to the
  function .init.text:find_mlgroup()

  The function find_numa_latencies_for_group() references the
  function __init find_mlgroup().  This is often because
  find_numa_latencies_for_group lacks a __init annotation or the
  annotation of find_mlgroup is wrong.

It turns out find_numa_latencies_for_group is only called from:
    static int __init numa_parse_mdesc(void)
and hence we can tag find_numa_latencies_for_group with __init.

In doing so we see that find_best_numa_node_for_mlgroup is only
called from within __init and hence can also be marked with __init.

Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Nitin Gupta <nitin.m.gupta@oracle.com>
Cc: Chris Hyser <chris.hyser@oracle.com>
Cc: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@oracle.com>
Cc: sparclinux@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: NPaul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      bdf2f59e
  17. 30 7月, 2016 1 次提交
  19. 29 7月, 2016 1 次提交
    • M
      sparc64 mm: Fix base TSB sizing when hugetlb pages are used · af1b1a9b
      由 Mike Kravetz 提交于 
      do_sparc64_fault() calculates both the base and huge page RSS sizes and
uses this information in calls to tsb_grow().  The calculation for base
page TSB size is not correct if the task uses hugetlb pages.  hugetlb
pages are not accounted for in RSS, therefore the call to get_mm_rss(mm)
does not include hugetlb pages.  However, the number of pages based on
huge_pte_count (which does include hugetlb pages) is subtracted from
this value.  This will result in an artificially small and often negative
RSS calculation.  The base TSB size is then often set to max_tsb_size
as the passed RSS is unsigned, so a negative value looks really big.

THP pages are also accounted for in huge_pte_count, and THP pages are
accounted for in RSS so the calculation in do_sparc64_fault() is correct
if a task only uses THP pages.

A single huge_pte_count is not sufficient for TSB sizing if both hugetlb
and THP pages can be used.  Instead of a single counter, use two:  one
for hugetlb and one for THP.
Signed-off-by: NMike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      af1b1a9b
  21. 25 6月, 2016 1 次提交
    • M
      tree wide: get rid of __GFP_REPEAT for order-0 allocations part I · 32d6bd90
      由 Michal Hocko 提交于 
      This is the third version of the patchset previously sent [1].  I have
basically only rebased it on top of 4.7-rc1 tree and dropped "dm: get
rid of superfluous gfp flags" which went through dm tree.  I am sending
it now because it is tree wide and chances for conflicts are reduced
considerably when we want to target rc2.  I plan to send the next step
and rename the flag and move to a better semantic later during this
release cycle so we will have a new semantic ready for 4.8 merge window
hopefully.

Motivation:

While working on something unrelated I've checked the current usage of
__GFP_REPEAT in the tree.  It seems that a majority of the usage is and
always has been bogus because __GFP_REPEAT has always been about costly
high order allocations while we are using it for order-0 or very small
orders very often.  It seems that a big pile of them is just a
copy&paste when a code has been adopted from one arch to another.

I think it makes some sense to get rid of them because they are just
making the semantic more unclear.  Please note that GFP_REPEAT is
documented as

* __GFP_REPEAT: Try hard to allocate the memory, but the allocation attempt

* _might_ fail.  This depends upon the particular VM implementation.
  while !costly requests have basically nofail semantic.  So one could
  reasonably expect that order-0 request with __GFP_REPEAT will not loop
  for ever.  This is not implemented right now though.

I would like to move on with __GFP_REPEAT and define a better semantic
for it.

  $ git grep __GFP_REPEAT origin/master | wc -l
  111
  $ git grep __GFP_REPEAT | wc -l
  36

So we are down to the third after this patch series.  The remaining
places really seem to be relying on __GFP_REPEAT due to large allocation
requests.  This still needs some double checking which I will do later
after all the simple ones are sorted out.

I am touching a lot of arch specific code here and I hope I got it right
but as a matter of fact I even didn't compile test for some archs as I
do not have cross compiler for them.  Patches should be quite trivial to
review for stupid compile mistakes though.  The tricky parts are usually
hidden by macro definitions and thats where I would appreciate help from
arch maintainers.

[1] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1461849846-27209-1-git-send-email-mhocko@kernel.org

This patch (of 19):

__GFP_REPEAT has a rather weak semantic but since it has been introduced
around 2.6.12 it has been ignored for low order allocations.  Yet we
have the full kernel tree with its usage for apparently order-0
allocations.  This is really confusing because __GFP_REPEAT is
explicitly documented to allow allocation failures which is a weaker
semantic than the current order-0 has (basically nofail).

Let's simply drop __GFP_REPEAT from those places.  This would allow to
identify place which really need allocator to retry harder and formulate
a more specific semantic for what the flag is supposed to do actually.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1464599699-30131-2-git-send-email-mhocko@kernel.orgSigned-off-by: NMichal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: "James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@parisc-linux.org>
Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Chen Liqin <liqin.linux@gmail.com>
Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@mellanox.com> [for tile]
Cc: Guan Xuetao <gxt@mprc.pku.edu.cn>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: John Crispin <blogic@openwrt.org>
Cc: Lennox Wu <lennox.wu@gmail.com>
Cc: Ley Foon Tan <lftan@altera.com>
Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk>
Cc: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Cc: Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>
Cc: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      32d6bd90
  23. 26 5月, 2016 1 次提交
  25. 21 5月, 2016 1 次提交
  27. 22 4月, 2016 1 次提交
  29. 30 1月, 2016 1 次提交
    • T
      arch: Set IORESOURCE_SYSTEM_RAM flag for System RAM · 35d98e93
      由 Toshi Kani 提交于 
      Set IORESOURCE_SYSTEM_RAM in flags of resource ranges with
"System RAM", "Kernel code", "Kernel data", and "Kernel bss".

Note that:

 - IORESOURCE_SYSRAM (i.e. modifier bit) is set in flags when
   IORESOURCE_MEM is already set. IORESOURCE_SYSTEM_RAM is defined
   as (IORESOURCE_MEM|IORESOURCE_SYSRAM).

 - Some archs do not set 'flags' for children nodes, such as
   "Kernel code".  This patch does not change 'flags' in this
   case.
Signed-off-by: NToshi Kani <toshi.kani@hpe.com>
Signed-off-by: NBorislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Luis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@suse.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org
Cc: linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Cc: linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-sh@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Cc: sparclinux@vger.kernel.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1453841853-11383-7-git-send-email-bp@alien8.deSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      35d98e93
  31. 15 1月, 2016 1 次提交
  33. 05 11月, 2015 1 次提交
    • N
      sparc64: Fix numa distance values · 52708d69
      由 Nitin Gupta 提交于 
      Orabug: 21896119

Use machine descriptor (MD) to get node latency
values instead of just using default values.

Testing:
On an T5-8 system with:
 - total nodes = 8
 - self latencies = 0x26d18
 - latency to other nodes = 0x3a598
   => latency ratio = ~1.5

output of numactl --hardware

 - before fix:

node distances:
node   0   1   2   3   4   5   6   7
  0:  10  20  20  20  20  20  20  20
  1:  20  10  20  20  20  20  20  20
  2:  20  20  10  20  20  20  20  20
  3:  20  20  20  10  20  20  20  20
  4:  20  20  20  20  10  20  20  20
  5:  20  20  20  20  20  10  20  20
  6:  20  20  20  20  20  20  10  20
  7:  20  20  20  20  20  20  20  10

 - after fix:

node distances:
node   0   1   2   3   4   5   6   7
  0:  10  15  15  15  15  15  15  15
  1:  15  10  15  15  15  15  15  15
  2:  15  15  10  15  15  15  15  15
  3:  15  15  15  10  15  15  15  15
  4:  15  15  15  15  10  15  15  15
  5:  15  15  15  15  15  10  15  15
  6:  15  15  15  15  15  15  10  15
  7:  15  15  15  15  15  15  15  10
Signed-off-by: NNitin Gupta <nitin.m.gupta@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: NChris Hyser <chris.hyser@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: NSantosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      52708d69
  35. 25 6月, 2015 1 次提交
    • T
      mm/memblock: add extra "flags" to memblock to allow selection of memory based on attribute · fc6daaf9
      由 Tony Luck 提交于 
      Some high end Intel Xeon systems report uncorrectable memory errors as a
recoverable machine check.  Linux has included code for some time to
process these and just signal the affected processes (or even recover
completely if the error was in a read only page that can be replaced by
reading from disk).

But we have no recovery path for errors encountered during kernel code
execution.  Except for some very specific cases were are unlikely to ever
be able to recover.

Enter memory mirroring. Actually 3rd generation of memory mirroing.

Gen1: All memory is mirrored
	Pro: No s/w enabling - h/w just gets good data from other side of the
	     mirror
	Con: Halves effective memory capacity available to OS/applications

Gen2: Partial memory mirror - just mirror memory begind some memory controllers
	Pro: Keep more of the capacity
	Con: Nightmare to enable. Have to choose between allocating from
	     mirrored memory for safety vs. NUMA local memory for performance

Gen3: Address range partial memory mirror - some mirror on each memory
      controller
	Pro: Can tune the amount of mirror and keep NUMA performance
	Con: I have to write memory management code to implement

The current plan is just to use mirrored memory for kernel allocations.
This has been broken into two phases:

1) This patch series - find the mirrored memory, use it for boot time
   allocations

2) Wade into mm/page_alloc.c and define a ZONE_MIRROR to pick up the
   unused mirrored memory from mm/memblock.c and only give it out to
   select kernel allocations (this is still being scoped because
   page_alloc.c is scary).

This patch (of 3):

Add extra "flags" to memblock to allow selection of memory based on
attribute.  No functional changes
Signed-off-by: NTony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Cc: Xishi Qiu <qiuxishi@huawei.com>
Cc: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com>
Cc: Xiexiuqi <xiexiuqi@huawei.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: Naoya Horiguchi <nao.horiguchi@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      fc6daaf9
  37. 01 6月, 2015 1 次提交
    • K
      sparc: Resolve conflict between sparc v9 and M7 on usage of bit 9 of TTE · 494e5b6f
      由 Khalid Aziz 提交于 
      sparc: Resolve conflict between sparc v9 and M7 on usage of bit 9 of TTE

Bit 9 of TTE is CV (Cacheable in V-cache) on sparc v9 processor while
the same bit 9 is MCDE (Memory Corruption Detection Enable) on M7
processor. This creates a conflicting usage of the same bit. Kernel
sets TTE.cv bit on all pages for sun4v architecture which works well
for sparc v9 but enables memory corruption detection on M7 processor
which is not the intent. This patch adds code to determine if kernel
is running on M7 processor and takes steps to not enable memory
corruption detection in TTE erroneously.
Signed-off-by: NKhalid Aziz <khalid.aziz@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      494e5b6f
  39. 19 5月, 2015 1 次提交
    • D
      mm/fault, arch: Use pagefault_disable() to check for disabled pagefaults in the handler · 70ffdb93
      由 David Hildenbrand 提交于 
      Introduce faulthandler_disabled() and use it to check for irq context and
disabled pagefaults (via pagefault_disable()) in the pagefault handlers.

Please note that we keep the in_atomic() checks in place - to detect
whether in irq context (in which case preemption is always properly
disabled).

In contrast, preempt_disable() should never be used to disable pagefaults.
With !CONFIG_PREEMPT_COUNT, preempt_disable() doesn't modify the preempt
counter, and therefore the result of in_atomic() differs.
We validate that condition by using might_fault() checks when calling
might_sleep().

Therefore, add a comment to faulthandler_disabled(), describing why this
is needed.

faulthandler_disabled() and pagefault_disable() are defined in
linux/uaccess.h, so let's properly add that include to all relevant files.

This patch is based on a patch from Thomas Gleixner.
Reviewed-and-tested-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: David.Laight@ACULAB.COM
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: airlied@linux.ie
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: benh@kernel.crashing.org
Cc: bigeasy@linutronix.de
Cc: borntraeger@de.ibm.com
Cc: daniel.vetter@intel.com
Cc: heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com
Cc: herbert@gondor.apana.org.au
Cc: hocko@suse.cz
Cc: hughd@google.com
Cc: mst@redhat.com
Cc: paulus@samba.org
Cc: ralf@linux-mips.org
Cc: schwidefsky@de.ibm.com
Cc: yang.shi@windriver.com
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1431359540-32227-7-git-send-email-dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      70ffdb93
  41. 19 3月, 2015 1 次提交
  43. 14 12月, 2014 1 次提交
    • J
      mm/debug-pagealloc: make debug-pagealloc boottime configurable · 031bc574
      由 Joonsoo Kim 提交于 
      Now, we have prepared to avoid using debug-pagealloc in boottime.  So
introduce new kernel-parameter to disable debug-pagealloc in boottime, and
makes related functions to be disabled in this case.

Only non-intuitive part is change of guard page functions.  Because guard
page is effective only if debug-pagealloc is enabled, turning off
according to debug-pagealloc is reasonable thing to do.
Signed-off-by: NJoonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave@sr71.net>
Cc: Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@mina86.com>
Cc: Jungsoo Son <jungsoo.son@lge.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      031bc574
  45. 06 10月, 2014 8 次提交
  47. 05 10月, 2014 1 次提交
    • D
      sparc64: Fix reversed start/end in flush_tlb_kernel_range() · 473ad7f4
      由 David S. Miller 提交于 
      When we have to split up a flush request into multiple pieces
(in order to avoid the firmware range) we don't specify the
arguments in the right order for the second piece.

Fix the order, or else we get hangs as the code tries to
flush "a lot" of entries and we get lockups like this:

[ 4422.981276] NMI watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#12 stuck for 23s! [expect:117032]
[ 4422.996130] Modules linked in: ipv6 loop usb_storage igb ptp sg sr_mod ehci_pci ehci_hcd pps_core n2_rng rng_core
[ 4423.016617] CPU: 12 PID: 117032 Comm: expect Not tainted 3.17.0-rc4+ #1608
[ 4423.030331] task: fff8003cc730e220 ti: fff8003d99d54000 task.ti: fff8003d99d54000
[ 4423.045282] TSTATE: 0000000011001602 TPC: 00000000004521e8 TNPC: 00000000004521ec Y: 00000000    Not tainted
[ 4423.064905] TPC: <__flush_tlb_kernel_range+0x28/0x40>
[ 4423.074964] g0: 000000000052fd10 g1: 00000001295a8000 g2: ffffff7176ffc000 g3: 0000000000002000
[ 4423.092324] g4: fff8003cc730e220 g5: fff8003dfedcc000 g6: fff8003d99d54000 g7: 0000000000000006
[ 4423.109687] o0: 0000000000000000 o1: 0000000000000000 o2: 0000000000000003 o3: 00000000f0000000
[ 4423.127058] o4: 0000000000000080 o5: 00000001295a8000 sp: fff8003d99d56d01 ret_pc: 000000000052ff54
[ 4423.145121] RPC: <__purge_vmap_area_lazy+0x314/0x3a0>
[ 4423.155185] l0: 0000000000000000 l1: 0000000000000000 l2: 0000000000a38040 l3: 0000000000000000
[ 4423.172559] l4: fff8003dae8965e0 l5: ffffffffffffffff l6: 0000000000000000 l7: 00000000f7e2b138
[ 4423.189913] i0: fff8003d99d576a0 i1: fff8003d99d576a8 i2: fff8003d99d575e8 i3: 0000000000000000
[ 4423.207284] i4: 0000000000008008 i5: fff8003d99d575c8 i6: fff8003d99d56df1 i7: 0000000000530c24
[ 4423.224640] I7: <free_vmap_area_noflush+0x64/0x80>
[ 4423.234193] Call Trace:
[ 4423.239051]  [0000000000530c24] free_vmap_area_noflush+0x64/0x80
[ 4423.251029]  [0000000000531a7c] remove_vm_area+0x5c/0x80
[ 4423.261628]  [0000000000531b80] __vunmap+0x20/0x120
[ 4423.271352]  [000000000071cf18] n_tty_close+0x18/0x40
[ 4423.281423]  [00000000007222b0] tty_ldisc_close+0x30/0x60
[ 4423.292183]  [00000000007225a4] tty_ldisc_reinit+0x24/0xa0
[ 4423.303120]  [0000000000722ab4] tty_ldisc_hangup+0xd4/0x1e0
[ 4423.314232]  [0000000000719aa0] __tty_hangup+0x280/0x3c0
[ 4423.324835]  [0000000000724cb4] pty_close+0x134/0x1a0
[ 4423.334905]  [000000000071aa24] tty_release+0x104/0x500
[ 4423.345316]  [00000000005511d0] __fput+0x90/0x1e0
[ 4423.354701]  [000000000047fa54] task_work_run+0x94/0xe0
[ 4423.365126]  [0000000000404b44] __handle_signal+0xc/0x2c

Fixes: 4ca9a237 ("sparc64: Guard against flushing openfirmware mappings.")
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      473ad7f4
  49. 17 9月, 2014 2 次提交
    • B
      sparc64: mem boot option correction · 7c21d533
      由 bob picco 提交于 
      The "mem" boot option can result in many unexpected consequences. This patch
attempts to prevent boot hangs which have been experienced on T4-4 and T5-8.
Basically the boot loader allocates vmlinuz and initrd higher in available
OBP physical memory. For example, on a 2Tb T5-8 it isn't possible to boot
with mem=20G.

The patch utilizes memblock to avoid reserved regions and trim memory which
is only free. Other improvements are possible for a multi-node machine.

This is a snippet of the boot log with mem=20G on T5-8 with the patch applied:
MEMBLOCK configuration:	<- before memory reduction
 memory size = 0x1ffad6ce000 reserved size = 0xa1adf44
 memory.cnt  = 0xb
 memory[0x0]    [0x00000030400000-0x00003fdde47fff], 0x3fada48000 bytes
 memory[0x1]    [0x00003fdde4e000-0x00003fdde4ffff], 0x2000 bytes
 memory[0x2]    [0x00080000000000-0x00083fffffffff], 0x4000000000 bytes
 memory[0x3]    [0x00100000000000-0x00103fffffffff], 0x4000000000 bytes
 memory[0x4]    [0x00180000000000-0x00183fffffffff], 0x4000000000 bytes
 memory[0x5]    [0x00200000000000-0x00203fffffffff], 0x4000000000 bytes
 memory[0x6]    [0x00280000000000-0x00283fffffffff], 0x4000000000 bytes
 memory[0x7]    [0x00300000000000-0x00303fffffffff], 0x4000000000 bytes
 memory[0x8]    [0x00380000000000-0x00383fffc71fff], 0x3fffc72000 bytes
 memory[0x9]    [0x00383fffc92000-0x00383fffca1fff], 0x10000 bytes
 memory[0xa]    [0x00383fffcb4000-0x00383fffcb5fff], 0x2000 bytes
 reserved.cnt  = 0x2
 reserved[0x0]  [0x00380000000000-0x0038000117e7f8], 0x117e7f9 bytes
 reserved[0x1]  [0x00380004000000-0x0038000d02f74a], 0x902f74b bytes
...
MEMBLOCK configuration:	<- after reduction of memory
 memory size = 0x50a1adf44 reserved size = 0xa1adf44
 memory.cnt  = 0x4
 memory[0x0]    [0x00380000000000-0x0038000117e7f8], 0x117e7f9 bytes
 memory[0x1]    [0x00380004000000-0x0038050d01d74a], 0x50901d74b bytes
 memory[0x2]    [0x00383fffc92000-0x00383fffca1fff], 0x10000 bytes
 memory[0x3]    [0x00383fffcb4000-0x00383fffcb5fff], 0x2000 bytes
 reserved.cnt  = 0x2
 reserved[0x0]  [0x00380000000000-0x0038000117e7f8], 0x117e7f9 bytes
 reserved[0x1]  [0x00380004000000-0x0038000d02f74a], 0x902f74b bytes
...
Early memory node ranges
  node   7: [mem 0x380000000000-0x38000117dfff]
  node   7: [mem 0x380004000000-0x380f0d01bfff]
  node   7: [mem 0x383fffc92000-0x383fffca1fff]
  node   7: [mem 0x383fffcb4000-0x383fffcb5fff]
Could not find start_pfn for node 0
Could not find start_pfn for node 1
Could not find start_pfn for node 2
Could not find start_pfn for node 3
Could not find start_pfn for node 4
Could not find start_pfn for node 5
Could not find start_pfn for node 6
.

The patch was tested on T4-1, T5-8 and Jalap?no.

Cc: sparclinux@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: NBob Picco <bob.picco@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      7c21d533
    • B
      sparc64: find_node adjustment · 3dee9df5
      由 bob picco 提交于 
      We have seen an issue with guest boot into LDOM that causes early boot failures
because of no matching rules for node identitity of the memory. I analyzed this
on my T4 and concluded there might not be a solution. I saw the issue in
mainline too when booting into the control/primary domain - with guests
configured.  Note, this could be a firmware bug on some older machines.

I'll provide a full explanation of the issues below. Should we not find a
matching BEST latency group for a real address (RA) then we will assume node 0.
On the T4-2 here with the information provided I can't see an alternative.

Technically the LDOM shown below should match the MBLOCK to the
favorable latency group. However other factors must be considered too. Were
the memory controllers configured "fine" grained interleave or "coarse"
grain interleaved -  T4. Also should a "group" MD node be considered a NUMA
node?

There has to be at least one Machine Description (MD) "group" and hence one
NUMA node. The group can have one or more latency groups (lg) - more than one
memory controller. The current code chooses the smallest latency as the most
favorable per group. The latency and lg information is in MLGROUP below.
MBLOCK is the base and size of the RAs for the machine as fetched from OBP
/memory "available" property. My machine has one MBLOCK but more would be
possible - with holes?

For a T4-2 the following information has been gathered:
with LDOM guest
MEMBLOCK configuration:
 memory size = 0x27f870000
 memory.cnt  = 0x3
 memory[0x0]    [0x00000020400000-0x0000029fc67fff], 0x27f868000 bytes
 memory[0x1]    [0x0000029fd8a000-0x0000029fd8bfff], 0x2000 bytes
 memory[0x2]    [0x0000029fd92000-0x0000029fd97fff], 0x6000 bytes
 reserved.cnt  = 0x2
 reserved[0x0]  [0x00000020800000-0x000000216c15c0], 0xec15c1 bytes
 reserved[0x1]  [0x00000024800000-0x0000002c180c1e], 0x7980c1f bytes
MBLOCK[0]: base[20000000] size[280000000] offset[0]
(note: "base" and "size" reported in "MBLOCK" encompass the "memory[X]" values)
(note: (RA + offset) & mask = val is the formula to detect a match for the
memory controller. should there be no match for find_node node, a return
value of -1 resulted for the node - BAD)

There is one group. It has these forward links
MLGROUP[1]: node[545] latency[1f7e8] match[200000000] mask[200000000]
MLGROUP[2]: node[54d] latency[2de60] match[0] mask[200000000]
NUMA NODE[0]: node[545] mask[200000000] val[200000000] (latency[1f7e8])
(note: "val" is the best lg's (smallest latency) "match")

no LDOM guest - bare metal
MEMBLOCK configuration:
 memory size = 0xfdf2d0000
 memory.cnt  = 0x3
 memory[0x0]    [0x00000020400000-0x00000fff6adfff], 0xfdf2ae000 bytes
 memory[0x1]    [0x00000fff6d2000-0x00000fff6e7fff], 0x16000 bytes
 memory[0x2]    [0x00000fff766000-0x00000fff771fff], 0xc000 bytes
 reserved.cnt  = 0x2
 reserved[0x0]  [0x00000020800000-0x00000021a04580], 0x1204581 bytes
 reserved[0x1]  [0x00000024800000-0x0000002c7d29fc], 0x7fd29fd bytes
MBLOCK[0]: base[20000000] size[fe0000000] offset[0]

there are two groups
group node[16d5]
MLGROUP[0]: node[1765] latency[1f7e8] match[0] mask[200000000]
MLGROUP[3]: node[177d] latency[2de60] match[200000000] mask[200000000]
NUMA NODE[0]: node[1765] mask[200000000] val[0] (latency[1f7e8])
group node[171d]
MLGROUP[2]: node[1775] latency[2de60] match[0] mask[200000000]
MLGROUP[1]: node[176d] latency[1f7e8] match[200000000] mask[200000000]
NUMA NODE[1]: node[176d] mask[200000000] val[200000000] (latency[1f7e8])
(note: for this two "group" bare metal machine, 1/2 memory is in group one's
lg and 1/2 memory is in group two's lg).

Cc: sparclinux@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: NBob Picco <bob.picco@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      3dee9df5