1. 18 5月, 2013 2 次提交
    • J
      ceph: add cpu_to_le32() calls when encoding a reconnect capability · c420276a
      Jim Schutt 提交于
      In his review, Alex Elder mentioned that he hadn't checked that
      num_fcntl_locks and num_flock_locks were properly decoded on the
      server side, from a le32 over-the-wire type to a cpu type.
      I checked, and AFAICS it is done; those interested can consult
          Locker::_do_cap_update()
      in src/mds/Locker.cc and src/include/encoding.h in the Ceph server
      code (git://github.com/ceph/ceph).
      
      I also checked the server side for flock_len decoding, and I believe
      that also happens correctly, by virtue of having been declared
      __le32 in struct ceph_mds_cap_reconnect, in src/include/ceph_fs.h.
      
      Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 3.4+
      Signed-off-by: NJim Schutt <jaschut@sandia.gov>
      Reviewed-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
      c420276a
    • A
      libceph: must hold mutex for reset_changed_osds() · 14d2f38d
      Alex Elder 提交于
      An osd client has a red-black tree describing its osds, and
      occasionally we would get crashes due to one of these trees tree
      becoming corrupt somehow.
      
      The problem turned out to be that reset_changed_osds() was being
      called without protection of the osd client request mutex.  That
      function would call __reset_osd() for any osd that had changed, and
      __reset_osd() would call __remove_osd() for any osd with no
      outstanding requests, and finally __remove_osd() would remove the
      corresponding entry from the red-black tree.  Thus, the tree was
      getting modified without having any lock protection, and was
      vulnerable to problems due to concurrent updates.
      
      This appears to be the only osd tree updating path that has this
      problem.  It can be fairly easily fixed by moving the call up
      a few lines, to just before the request mutex gets dropped
      in kick_requests().
      
      This resolves:
          http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/5043
      
      Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 3.4+
      Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
      Reviewed-by: NSage Weil <sage@inktank.com>
      14d2f38d
  2. 14 5月, 2013 13 次提交
    • A
      rbd: re-submit flattened write request (part 2) · 638f5abe
      Alex Elder 提交于
      Add code to rbd_img_obj_exists_callback() to detect when a clone's
      parent image has disappeared, and re-submit the original write
      request in that case.
      
      Kill off some redundant assertions.
      
      This completes the resolution for:
          http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/3763Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
      Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
      638f5abe
    • A
      rbd: re-submit write request for flattened clone · bbea1c1a
      Alex Elder 提交于
      Add code to rbd_img_parent_read_full_callback() to detect when a
      clone's parent image has disappeared, and re-submit the original
      write request in that case.  (See the previous commit for more
      reasoning about why this is appropriate.)
      
      Rename some variables in rbd_img_obj_parent_read_full_callback()
      to match the convention used in the previous patch.
      Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
      Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
      bbea1c1a
    • A
      rbd: re-submit read request for flattened clone · 02c74fba
      Alex Elder 提交于
      If a clone image gets flattened while a parent read request is
      underway, the original rbd object request needs to be resubmitted.
      
      The reason is that by the time we get the response to the parent
      read request, the data read from the parent may be out of date.
      In other words, we could see this sequence of events:
      
          rbd client                      parent image/osd
          ----------                      ----------------
          original object ENOENT;
              issue parent read
                                          respond to parent read
                                          child image flattened
          original image header refresh
                   <--- original object written independently here
          parent read response received
      
      Add code to rbd_img_parent_read_callback() to detect when a clone's
      parent image has disappeared (as evidenced by its parent overlap
      becoming 0), and re-submit the original read request in that case.
      Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
      Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
      02c74fba
    • A
      rbd: detect when clone image is flattened · 392a9dad
      Alex Elder 提交于
      A format 2 clone image can be the subject of a "flatten" operation,
      during which all of its data gets "copied up" from its parent image,
      leaving the image fully populated.  Once this is complete, the
      clone's association with the parent is abolished.
      
      Since this can occur when a clone is mapped, we need to detect when
      it has occurred and handle it accordingly.  We know an image has
      been flattened when we know it at one time had a parent, but we have
      learned (via a "get_parent" object class method call) it no longer
      has one.
      
      There might be in-flight requests at the point we learn an image has
      been flattened, so we can't simply clean up parent data structures
      right away.  Instead, we'll drop the initial parent reference when
      the parent has disappeared (rather than when the image gets
      destroyed), which will allow the last in-flight reference to clean
      things up when it's complete.
      
      We leverage the fact that a zero parent overlap renders an image
      effectively unlayered.  We set the overlap to 0 at the point we
      detect the clone image has flattened, which allows the unlayered
      behavior to take effect immediately, while keeping other parent
      structures in place until in-flight requests to complete.
      
      This and the next few patches resolve:
          http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/3763Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
      Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
      392a9dad
    • A
      rbd: reference count parent requests · a2acd00e
      Alex Elder 提交于
      Keep a reference count for uses of the parent information for an rbd
      device.
      
      An initial reference is set in rbd_img_request_create() if the
      target image has a parent (with non-zero overlap).  Each image
      request for an image with a non-zero parent overlap gets another
      reference when it's created, and that reference is dropped when the
      request is destroyed.
      
      The initial reference is dropped when the image gets torn down.
      Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
      Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
      a2acd00e
    • A
      rbd: define parent image request routines · e93f3152
      Alex Elder 提交于
      Define rbd_parent_request_create() and rbd_parent_request_destroy()
      to handle the creation of parent image requests submitted for
      layered image objects.  For simplicity, let rbd_img_request_put()
      handle dropping the reference to any image request (parent or not),
      and call whichever destructor is appropriate on the last put.
      Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
      Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
      e93f3152
    • A
      rbd: define rbd_dev_unparent() · fb65d228
      Alex Elder 提交于
      Define rbd_dev_unparent() to encapsulate cleaning up parent data
      structures from a layered rbd image.
      Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
      Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
      fb65d228
    • A
      rbd: don't release write request until necessary · 8785b1d4
      Alex Elder 提交于
      Previously when a layered write was going to involve a copyup
      request, the original osd request was released before submitting the
      parent full-object read.  The osd request for the copyup would then
      be allocated in rbd_img_obj_parent_read_full_callback().
      
      Shortly we will be handling the event of mapped layered images
      getting flattened, and when that occurs we need to resubmit the
      original request.  We therefore don't want to release the osd
      request until we really konw we're going to replace it--in the
      callback function.
      Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
      Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
      8785b1d4
    • A
      rbd: get parent info on refresh · 642a2537
      Alex Elder 提交于
      Get parent info for format 2 images on every refresh (rather than
      just during the initial probe).  This will be needed to detect the
      disappearance of the parent image in the event a mapped image
      becomes unlayered (i.e., flattened).  Avoid leaking the previous
      parent spec on the second and subsequent times this information is
      requested by dropping the previous one (if any) before updating it.
      (Also, extract the pool id into a local variable before assigning
      it into the parent spec.)
      
      Switch to using a non-zero parent overlap value rather than the
      existence of a parent (a non-null parent_spec pointer) to determine
      whether to mark a request layered.  It will soon be possible for
      a layered image to become unlayered while a request is in flight.
      
      This means that the layered flag for an image request indicates that
      there was a non-zero parent overlap at the time the image request
      was created.  The parent overlap can change thereafter, which may
      lead to special handling at request submission or completion time.
      
      This and the next several patches are related to:
          http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/3763
      
      NOTE:
      If an error occurs while refreshing the parent info (i.e.,
      requesting it after initial probe), the old parent info will
      persist.  This is not really correct, and is a scenario that needs
      to be addressed.  For now we'll assert that the failure mode is
      unlikely, but the issue has been documented in tracker issue 5040.
      Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
      Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
      642a2537
    • A
      rbd: ignore zero-overlap parent · 70cf49cf
      Alex Elder 提交于
      An rbd clone image that has an overlap with its parent of 0 is
      effectively not a layered image at all.  Detect this case and treat
      such an image as non-layered.  Issue a warning to be sure the user
      knows what's going on.
      
      This resolves:
          http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/5028Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
      Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
      70cf49cf
    • A
      rbd: support reading parent page data for writes · b91f09f1
      Alex Elder 提交于
      Currently, rbd_img_obj_parent_read_full() assumes the incoming
      object request contains bio data.  But if a layered image is part of
      a multi-layer stack of images it will result in read requests of
      page data to parent images.
      
      This is handling the same kind of issue as was resolved by this
      commit:
          5b2ab72d  rbd: support reading parent page data
      
      This resolves:
          http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/5027Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
      Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
      b91f09f1
    • A
      rbd: fix parent request size assumption · ebda6408
      Alex Elder 提交于
      The code that reads object data from the parent for a copyup on
      write request currently assumes that the size of that request is the
      size of a "full" object from the original target image.
      
      That is not necessarily the case.  The parent overlap could reduce
      the request size below that.  To fix that assumption we need to
      record the number of pages in the copyup_pages array, for both an
      image request and an object request.  Rename a local variable in
      rbd_img_obj_parent_read_full_callback() to reflect we're recording
      the length of the parent read request, not the size of the target
      object.
      
      This resolves:
          http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/5038Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
      Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
      ebda6408
    • A
      libceph: init sent and completed when starting · c10ebbf5
      Alex Elder 提交于
      The rbd code has a need to be able to restart an osd request that
      has already been started and completed once before.  This currently
      wouldn't work right because the osd client code assumes an osd
      request will be started exactly once  Certain fields in a request
      are never cleared and this leads to trouble if you try to reuse it.
      
      Specifically, the r_sent, r_got_reply, and r_completed fields are
      never cleared.  The r_sent field records the osd incarnation at the
      time the request was sent to that osd.  If that's non-zero, the
      message won't get re-mapped to a target osd properly, and won't be
      put on the unsafe requests list the first time it's sent as it
      should.  The r_got_reply field is used in handle_reply() to ensure
      the reply to a request is processed only once.  And the r_completed
      field is used for lingering requests to avoid calling the callback
      function every time the osd client re-sends the request on behalf of
      its initiator.
      
      Each osd request passes through ceph_osdc_start_request() when
      responsibility for the request is handed over to the osd client for
      completion.  We can safely zero these three fields there each time a
      request gets started.
      
      One last related change--clear the r_linger flag when a request
      is no longer registered as a linger request.
      
      This resolves:
          http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/5026Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
      Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
      c10ebbf5
  3. 09 5月, 2013 12 次提交
  4. 08 5月, 2013 8 次提交
  5. 03 5月, 2013 5 次提交