Skip to content

cloud-kernel
cloud-kernel

openanolis / cloud-kernel
大约 1 年 前同步成功

通知 158
Star 36
Fork 7
cloud-kernel
cloud-kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 05 2月, 2013 2 次提交
  3. 04 2月, 2013 1 次提交
  5. 31 1月, 2013 1 次提交
  7. 27 1月, 2013 1 次提交
    • F
      cputime: Avoid multiplication overflow on utime scaling · 62188451
      由 Frederic Weisbecker 提交于 
      We scale stime, utime values based on rtime (sum_exec_runtime
converted to jiffies). During scaling we multiple rtime * utime,
which seems to be fine, since both values are converted to u64,
but it's not.

Let assume HZ is 1000 - 1ms tick. Process consist of 64 threads,
run for 1 day, threads utilize 100% cpu on user space. Machine
has 64 cpus.

Process rtime = utime will be 64 * 24 * 60 * 60 * 1000 jiffies,
which is 0x149970000. Multiplication rtime * utime result is
0x1a855771100000000, which can not be covered in 64 bits.

Result of overflow is stall of utime values visible in user
space (prev_utime in kernel), even if application still consume
lot of CPU time.

A solution to solve this is to perform the multiplication on
stime instead of utime. It's easy to grow the utime value fast
with a CPU bound thread in userspace for example. Now we assume
that doing so with stime is much harder. In most cases a task
shouldn't ever spend much time in kernel space as it tends to
sleep waiting for jobs completion when they take long to
achieve. IO is the typical example of that.

Hence scaling the cputime by performing the multiplication on
stime instead of utime should considerably reduce the chances of
an overflow on most workloads.

This is largely inspired by a patch from Stanislaw Gruszka:
http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20130107113144.GA7544@redhat.comInspired-by: NStanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@redhat.com>
Reported-by: NStanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@redhat.com>
Acked-by: NStanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NFrederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1359217182-25184-1-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      62188451
  9. 25 1月, 2013 3 次提交
    • Y
      sched/rt: Avoid updating RT entry timeout twice within one tick period · 57d2aa00
      由 Ying Xue 提交于 
      The issue below was found in 2.6.34-rt rather than mainline rt
kernel, but the issue still exists upstream as well.

So please let me describe how it was noticed on 2.6.34-rt:

On this version, each softirq has its own thread, it means there
is at least one RT FIFO task per cpu. The priority of these
tasks is set to 49 by default. If user launches an RT FIFO task
with priority lower than 49 of softirq RT tasks, it's possible
there are two RT FIFO tasks enqueued one cpu runqueue at one
moment. By current strategy of balancing RT tasks, when it comes
to RT tasks, we really need to put them off to a CPU that they
can run on as soon as possible. Even if it means a bit of cache
line flushing, we want RT tasks to be run with the least latency.

When the user RT FIFO task which just launched before is
running, the sched timer tick of the current cpu happens. In this
tick period, the timeout value of the user RT task will be
updated once. Subsequently, we try to wake up one softirq RT
task on its local cpu. As the priority of current user RT task
is lower than the softirq RT task, the current task will be
preempted by the higher priority softirq RT task. Before
preemption, we check to see if current can readily move to a
different cpu. If so, we will reschedule to allow the RT push logic
to try to move current somewhere else. Whenever the woken
softirq RT task runs, it first tries to migrate the user FIFO RT
task over to a cpu that is running a task of lesser priority. If
migration is done, it will send a reschedule request to the found
cpu by IPI interrupt. Once the target cpu responds the IPI
interrupt, it will pick the migrated user RT task to preempt its
current task. When the user RT task is running on the new cpu,
the sched timer tick of the cpu fires. So it will tick the user
RT task again. This also means the RT task timeout value will be
updated again. As the migration may be done in one tick period,
it means the user RT task timeout value will be updated twice
within one tick.

If we set a limit on the amount of cpu time for the user RT task
by setrlimit(RLIMIT_RTTIME), the SIGXCPU signal should be posted
upon reaching the soft limit.

But exactly when the SIGXCPU signal should be sent depends on the
RT task timeout value. In fact the timeout mechanism of sending
the SIGXCPU signal assumes the RT task timeout is increased once
every tick.

However, currently the timeout value may be added twice per
tick. So it results in the SIGXCPU signal being sent earlier
than expected.

To solve this issue, we prevent the timeout value from increasing
twice within one tick time by remembering the jiffies value of
last updating the timeout. As long as the RT task's jiffies is
different with the global jiffies value, we allow its timeout to
be updated.
Signed-off-by: NYing Xue <ying.xue@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: NFan Du <fan.du@windriver.com>
Reviewed-by: NYong Zhang <yong.zhang0@gmail.com>
Acked-by: NSteven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1342508623-2887-1-git-send-email-ying.xue@windriver.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      57d2aa00
    • V
      sched/fair: Set se->vruntime directly in place_entity() · 16c8f1c7
      由 Viresh Kumar 提交于 
      We are first storing the new vruntime in a variable and then
storing it in se->vruntime. Simply update se->vruntime directly.
Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
Cc: patches@linaro.org
Cc: peterz@infradead.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/ae59db1945518d6f6250920d46eb1f1a9cc0024e.1352361704.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.orgSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      16c8f1c7
    • K
      sched/rt: Add reschedule check to switched_from_rt() · 1158ddb5
      由 Kirill Tkhai 提交于 
      Reschedule rq->curr if the first RT task has just been
pulled to the rq.
Signed-off-by: NKirill V Tkhai <tkhai@yandex.ru>
Acked-by: NSteven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Tkhai Kirill <tkhai@yandex.ru>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/118761353614535@web28f.yandex.ruSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      1158ddb5
  11. 24 1月, 2013 11 次提交
  13. 23 1月, 2013 21 次提交