1. 15 2月, 2007 1 次提交
    • T
      [PATCH] remove many unneeded #includes of sched.h · cd354f1a
      Tim Schmielau 提交于
      After Al Viro (finally) succeeded in removing the sched.h #include in module.h
      recently, it makes sense again to remove other superfluous sched.h includes.
      There are quite a lot of files which include it but don't actually need
      anything defined in there.  Presumably these includes were once needed for
      macros that used to live in sched.h, but moved to other header files in the
      course of cleaning it up.
      
      To ease the pain, this time I did not fiddle with any header files and only
      removed #includes from .c-files, which tend to cause less trouble.
      
      Compile tested against 2.6.20-rc2 and 2.6.20-rc2-mm2 (with offsets) on alpha,
      arm, i386, ia64, mips, powerpc, and x86_64 with allnoconfig, defconfig,
      allmodconfig, and allyesconfig as well as a few randconfigs on x86_64 and all
      configs in arch/arm/configs on arm.  I also checked that no new warnings were
      introduced by the patch (actually, some warnings are removed that were emitted
      by unnecessarily included header files).
      Signed-off-by: NTim Schmielau <tim@physik3.uni-rostock.de>
      Acked-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      cd354f1a
  2. 13 2月, 2007 1 次提交
  3. 09 12月, 2006 1 次提交
  4. 01 10月, 2006 2 次提交
  5. 23 5月, 2006 1 次提交
  6. 19 5月, 2006 1 次提交
    • D
      [JFFS2] Support new device nodes · aef9ab47
      David Woodhouse 提交于
      Device node major/minor numbers are just stored in the payload of a single
      data node. Just extend that to 4 bytes and use new_encode_dev() for it.
      
      We only use the 4-byte format if we _need_ to, if !old_valid_dev(foo).
      This preserves backwards compatibility with older code as much as
      possible. If we do make devices with major or minor numbers above 255, and
      then mount the file system with the old code, it'll just read the first
      two bytes and get the numbers wrong. If it comes to garbage-collect it,
      it'll then write back those wrong numbers. But that's about the best we
      can expect.
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
      aef9ab47
  7. 13 5月, 2006 1 次提交
    • K
      [JFFS2][XATTR] XATTR support on JFFS2 (version. 5) · aa98d7cf
      KaiGai Kohei 提交于
      This attached patches provide xattr support including POSIX-ACL and
      SELinux support on JFFS2 (version.5).
      
      There are some significant differences from previous version posted
      at last December.
      The biggest change is addition of EBS(Erase Block Summary) support.
      Currently, both kernel and usermode utility (sumtool) can recognize
      xattr nodes which have JFFS2_NODETYPE_XATTR/_XREF nodetype.
      
      In addition, some bugs are fixed.
      - A potential race condition was fixed.
      - Unexpected fail when updating a xattr by same name/value pair was fixed.
      - A bug when removing xattr name/value pair was fixed.
      
      The fundamental structures (such as using two new nodetypes and exclusion
      mechanism by rwsem) are unchanged. But most of implementation were reviewed
      and updated if necessary.
      Espacially, we had to change several internal implementations related to
      load_xattr_datum() to avoid a potential race condition.
      
      [1/2] xattr_on_jffs2.kernel.version-5.patch
      [2/2] xattr_on_jffs2.utils.version-5.patch
      Signed-off-by: NKaiGai Kohei <kaigai@ak.jp.nec.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
      aa98d7cf
  8. 03 5月, 2006 1 次提交
  9. 18 4月, 2006 1 次提交
  10. 29 3月, 2006 1 次提交
  11. 07 11月, 2005 3 次提交
  12. 06 11月, 2005 1 次提交
  13. 06 7月, 2005 1 次提交
  14. 23 5月, 2005 1 次提交
  15. 17 4月, 2005 1 次提交
    • L
      Linux-2.6.12-rc2 · 1da177e4
      Linus Torvalds 提交于
      Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history,
      even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git
      archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about
      3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early
      git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good
      infrastructure for it.
      
      Let it rip!
      1da177e4