- 13 2月, 2017 16 次提交
-
-
由 Linus Walleij 提交于
With the coexisting __mmc_start_request(), mmc_start_request() and __mmc_start_req() it is a bit confusing that mmc_start_req() actually does not start a normal request, but an asynchronous request. Rename it to mmc_start_areq() to make it explicit what the function is doing, also fix the kerneldoc for this function while we're at it. Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NUlf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
-
由 Linus Walleij 提交于
In the function mmc_blk_issue_rw_rq() the new request coming in from the block layer is called "rqc" and the old request that was potentially just returned back from the asynchronous mechanism is called "req". This is really confusing when trying to analyze and understand the code, it becomes a perceptual nightmare to me. Maybe others have better parserheads but it is not working for me. Rename "rqc" to "new_req" and "req" to "old_req" to reflect what is semantically going on into the syntax. Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NUlf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
-
由 Linus Walleij 提交于
The goto statements sprinkled over the mmc_blk_issue_rw_rq() function has grown over the years and makes the code pretty hard to read. Inline the calls such that: goto cmd_abort; -> mmc_blk_rw_cmd_abort(card, req); mmc_blk_rw_start_new(mq, card, rqc); return; goto start_new_req; -> mmc_blk_rw_start_new(mq, card, rqc); return; After this it is more clear how we exit the do {} while loop in this function, and it gets possible to split the code apart. Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NUlf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
-
由 Heiner Kallweit 提交于
ida code in block.c can be significantly simplified by switching to the ida_simple_ functions. Signed-off-by: NHeiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NUlf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
-
由 Linus Walleij 提交于
The mmc_blk_issue_rq() function is called in exactly one place in queue.c and there the return value is ignored. So the functions called from that function that also meticulously return 0/1 do so for no good reason. Error reporting on the asynchronous requests are done upward to the block layer when the requests are eventually completed or fail, which may happen during the flow of the mmc_blk_issue_* functions directly (for "special commands") or later, when an asynchronous read/write request is completed. The issuing functions do not give rise to errors on their own, and there is nothing to return back to the caller in queue.c. Drop all return values and make the function return void. Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NUlf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
-
由 Linus Walleij 提交于
Recycling the same variable in an x=x+1 fashion may seem clever here but it makes the code terse and hard to follow for humans. Introduce a new_areq and old_areq variable so we see what is going on. Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NUlf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
-
由 Linus Walleij 提交于
Setting rqc to NULL followed by a goto to cmd_abort is just a way to do unconditional abort without starting any new command. Inline the calls to mmc_blk_rw_cmd_abort() and return immediately in those cases. Add some comments to the code flow so it is clear that this is where the asynchronous requests come back in and the result of them gets handled. Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NUlf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
-
由 Linus Walleij 提交于
The code in mmc_blk_issue_rq_rq() aborts a command if the request is not properly aligned on large sectors. As part of the path jumping out, it assigns the local variable mq_rq reflecting a MMC queue request to the current MMC queue request, which is confusing since the variable is not used after this jump. Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NUlf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
-
由 Linus Walleij 提交于
As a step toward breaking apart the very complex function mmc_blk_issue_rw_rq() we break out the code to start a new request. Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NUlf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
-
由 Linus Walleij 提交于
As a first step toward breaking apart the very complex function mmc_blk_issue_rw_rq() we break out the command abort code. This code assumes "ret" is != 0 and then repeatedly hammers blk_end_request() until the request to the block layer to end the request succeeds. Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NUlf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
-
由 Ulf Hansson 提交于
A significant amount of functions are available through the public mmc host.h header file. Let's slim down this public mmc interface, as to prevent users from abusing it, by moving some of the functions to private mmc host.h header file. This change concentrates on moving the functions into private mmc headers, following changes may continue with additional clean-ups. Signed-off-by: NUlf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: NShawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>
-
由 Ulf Hansson 提交于
A significant amount of functions and other definitions are available through the public mmc card.h header file. Let's slim down this public mmc interface, as to prevent users from abusing it, by moving some of the functions/definitions to private mmc header files. This change concentrates on moving the functions into private mmc headers, following changes may continue with additional clean-ups. Signed-off-by: NUlf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: NShawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>
-
由 Ulf Hansson 提交于
A significant amount of functions are available through the public mmc core.h header file. Let's slim down this public mmc interface, as to prevent users from abusing it, by moving some of the functions to private mmc header files. This change concentrates on moving the functions into private mmc headers, following changes may continue with additional clean-ups, as an example some functions can be turned into static. Signed-off-by: NUlf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: NShawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>
-
由 Masahiro Yamada 提交于
In the MMC subsystem, we see such initializers that only clears the first member explicitly. For example, struct mmc_request mrq = {NULL}; sets the first member (.sbc) to NULL explicitly. However, this is an unstable form because we may insert a non-pointer member at the top of the struct mmc_request in the future. (if we do so, the compiler will spit warnings.) So, using a designated initializer is preferred coding style. The expression above is equivalent to: struct mmc_request mrq = { .sbc = NULL }; Of course, this does not express our intention. We want to fill all struct members with zeros. Please note struct members are implicitly zero-cleared unless otherwise specified in the initializer. After all, the most reasonable (and stable) form is: struct mmc_request mrq = {}; Do likewise for mmc_command, mmc_data as well. Signed-off-by: NMasahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> Reviewed-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NUlf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
-
由 Geert Uytterhoeven 提交于
Signed-off-by: NGeert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Signed-off-by: NUlf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
-
由 Geert Uytterhoeven 提交于
With gcc-4.1.2: mmc/core/block.c: In function ‘mmc_blk_issue_discard_rq’: mmc/core/block.c:1150: warning: ‘arg’ may be used uninitialized in this function mmc/core/block.c:1150: warning: ‘nr’ may be used uninitialized in this function mmc/core/block.c:1150: warning: ‘from’ may be used uninitialized in this function While this is a false positive, it can be avoided easily by jumping over the checks for "err" that are always false. Signed-off-by: NGeert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Signed-off-by: NUlf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
-
- 25 12月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Linus Torvalds 提交于
This was entirely automated, using the script by Al: PATT='^[[:blank:]]*#[[:blank:]]*include[[:blank:]]*<asm/uaccess.h>' sed -i -e "s!$PATT!#include <linux/uaccess.h>!" \ $(git grep -l "$PATT"|grep -v ^include/linux/uaccess.h) to do the replacement at the end of the merge window. Requested-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 12 12月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Ulf Hansson 提交于
Once upon a time it made sense to keep the mmc block device driver and its related code, in its own directory called card. Over time, more an more functions/structures have become shared through generic mmc header files, between the core and the card directory. In other words, the relationship between them has become closer. By sharing functions/structures via generic header files, it becomes easy for outside users to abuse them. In a way to avoid that from happen, let's move the files from card directory into the core directory, as it enables us to move definitions of functions/structures into mmc core specific header files. Note, this is only the first step in providing a cleaner mmc interface for outside users. Following changes will do the actual cleanup, as that is not part of this change. Signed-off-by: NUlf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
-
- 05 12月, 2016 3 次提交
-
-
由 Adrian Hunter 提交于
The only time the driver sleeps expecting to be woken upon the arrival of a new request, is when the dispatch queue is empty. The only time that it is known whether the dispatch queue is empty is after NULL is returned from blk_fetch_request() while under the queue lock. Recognizing those facts, simplify the synchronization between the queue thread and the request function. A couple of flags tell the request function what to do, and the queue lock and barriers associated with wake-ups ensure synchronization. The result is simpler and allows the removal of the context_info lock. Signed-off-by: NAdrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: NHarjani Ritesh <riteshh@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: NUlf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
-
由 Adrian Hunter 提交于
The 4K native sector check does not allow for the 'do' loop nor the variables used after the 'cmd_abort' label. 'brq' and 'req' get reassigned in the 'do' loop, so the check must not assume what their values are. After the 'cmd_abort' label, 'mq_rq' and 'req' are used, but 'rqc' must be NULL otherwise it can be started again. Signed-off-by: NAdrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NUlf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
-
由 Adrian Hunter 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAdrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NUlf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
-
- 29 11月, 2016 7 次提交
-
-
由 Linus Walleij 提交于
I've had it with this code now. The packed command support is a complex hurdle in the MMC/SD block layer, around 500+ lines of code which was introduced in 2013 in commit ce39f9d1 ("mmc: support packed write command for eMMC4.5 devices") commit abd9ac14 ("mmc: add packed command feature of eMMC4.5") ...and since then it has been rotting. The original author of the code has disappeared from the community and the mail address is bouncing. For the code to be exercised the host must flag that it supports packed commands, so in mmc_blk_prep_packed_list() which is called for every single request, the following construction appears: u8 max_packed_rw = 0; if ((rq_data_dir(cur) == WRITE) && mmc_host_packed_wr(card->host)) max_packed_rw = card->ext_csd.max_packed_writes; if (max_packed_rw == 0) goto no_packed; This has the following logical deductions: - Only WRITE commands can really be packed, so the solution is only half-done: we support packed WRITE but not packed READ. The packed command support has not been finalized by supporting reads in three years! - mmc_host_packed_wr() is just a static inline that checks host->caps2 & MMC_CAP2_PACKED_WR. The problem with this is that NO upstream host sets this capability flag! No driver in the kernel is using it, and we can't test it. Packed command may be supported in out-of-tree code, but I doubt it. I doubt that the code is even working anymore due to other refactorings in the MMC block layer, who would notice if patches affecting it broke packed commands? No one. - There is no Device Tree binding or code to mark a host as supporting packed read or write commands, just this flag in caps2, so for sure there are not any DT systems using it either. It has other problems as well: mmc_blk_prep_packed_list() is speculatively picking requests out of the request queue with blk_fetch_request() making the MMC/SD stack harder to convert to the multiqueue block layer. By this we get rid of an obstacle. The way I see it this is just cruft littering the MMC/SD stack. Cc: Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@samsung.com> Cc: Maya Erez <qca_merez@qca.qualcomm.com> Acked-by: NJaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NUlf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
-
由 Linus Walleij 提交于
By moving the mmc_packed_init() and mmc_packed_clean() into the only file in the kernel where they are used, we save two exported functions and can staticize those to the block.c file. Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NUlf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
-
由 Linus Walleij 提交于
The struct mmc_blk_request contains an opaque void *data that is actually only used to store a pointer to a per-request struct mmc_blk_data. This is confusing, so rename the member to blkdata and forward-declare the block.c local struct. Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NUlf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
-
由 Linus Walleij 提交于
Instead of open coding the check for the same thing that the helper checks: use the helper. Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NUlf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
-
由 Linus Walleij 提交于
There were several instances of code using the enum mmc_blk_status by arbitrarily converting it to an int and throwing it around to different functions. This makes the code hard to understand to may give rise to strange errors. Especially the function prototype mmc_start_req() had to be modified to take a pointer to an enum mmc_blk_status and the function pointer .err_check() inside struct mmc_async_req needed to return an enum mmc_blk_status. In every case: instead of assigning the block layer error code to an int, use the enum, also change the signature of all functions actually passing this enum to use the enum. To make it possible to use the enum everywhere applicable, move it to <linux/mmc/core.h> so that all code actually using it can also see it. An interesting case was encountered in the MMC test code which did not return a enum mmc_blk_status at all in the .err_check function supposed to check whether asynchronous requests worked or not: instead it returned a normal -ERROR or even the test frameworks internal error codes. The test code would also pass on enum mmc_blk_status codes as error codes inside the test code instead of converting them to the local RESULT_* codes. I have tried to fix all instances properly and run some tests on the result. Cc: Chunyan Zhang <zhang.chunyan@linaro.org> Cc: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NUlf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
-
由 Linus Walleij 提交于
The ecc_err flag is only assigned 0 or 1 and treated as a bool, so convert it to a bool. Cc: Chunyan Zhang <zhang.chunyan@linaro.org> Cc: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NUlf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
-
由 Linus Walleij 提交于
This gen_err flag is only assigned 0 or 1 and treated as a bool, so convert it to a bool. Cc: Chunyan Zhang <zhang.chunyan@linaro.org> Cc: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NUlf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
-
- 28 10月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Christoph Hellwig 提交于
A lot of the REQ_* flags are only used on struct requests, and only of use to the block layer and a few drivers that dig into struct request internals. This patch adds a new req_flags_t rq_flags field to struct request for them, and thus dramatically shrinks the number of common requests. It also removes the unfortunate situation where we have to fit the fields from the same enum into 32 bits for struct bio and 64 bits for struct request. Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Reviewed-by: NShaun Tancheff <shaun.tancheff@seagate.com> Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>
-
- 10 10月, 2016 2 次提交
-
-
由 Jiri Slaby 提交于
Commit f68381a7 (mmc: block: fix packed command header endianness) correctly fixed endianness handling of packed_cmd_hdr in mmc_blk_packed_hdr_wrq_prep. But now, sparse complains about incorrect types: drivers/mmc/card/block.c:1613:27: sparse: incorrect type in assignment (different base types) drivers/mmc/card/block.c:1613:27: expected unsigned int [unsigned] [usertype] <noident> drivers/mmc/card/block.c:1613:27: got restricted __le32 [usertype] <noident> ... So annotate cmd_hdr properly using __le32 to make everyone happy. Signed-off-by: NJiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz> Fixes: f68381a7 (mmc: block: fix packed command header endianness) Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: NUlf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
-
由 Baoyou Xie 提交于
We get 1 warning when building kernel with W=1: drivers/mmc/card/block.c:2147:5: warning: no previous prototype for 'mmc_blk_issue_rq' [-Wmissing-prototypes] In fact, this function is declared in drivers/mmc/card/block.h, so this patch adds missing header dependencies. Signed-off-by: NBaoyou Xie <baoyou.xie@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NUlf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
-
- 27 9月, 2016 3 次提交
-
-
由 Linus Walleij 提交于
We have enough vtables in the kernel as it is, we don't need this one to create even more artificial separation of concerns. As is proved by the Makefile: obj-$(CONFIG_MMC_BLOCK) += mmc_block.o mmc_block-objs := block.o queue.o block.c and queue.c are baked into the same mmc_block.o object. So why would one of these objects access a function in the other object by dereferencing a pointer? Create a new block.h header file for the single shared function from block to queue and remove the function pointer and just call the queue request function. Apart from making the code more readable, this also makes link optimizations possible and probably speeds up the call as well. Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NUlf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
-
由 Daniel Glöckner 提交于
CMD23 aka SET_BLOCK_COUNT was introduced with MMC v3.1. Older versions of the specification allowed to terminate multi-block transfers only with CMD12. The patch fixes the following problem: mmc0: new MMC card at address 0001 mmcblk0: mmc0:0001 SDMB-16 15.3 MiB mmcblk0: timed out sending SET_BLOCK_COUNT command, card status 0x400900 ... blk_update_request: I/O error, dev mmcblk0, sector 0 Buffer I/O error on dev mmcblk0, logical block 0, async page read mmcblk0: unable to read partition table Signed-off-by: NDaniel Glöckner <dg@emlix.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NUlf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
-
由 Shawn Lin 提交于
packed should always exist without calling its cleanup function explicitly. Moreover, we have use it when preparing packed list. So I don't believe we should ever fall into this check again when doing mmc_blk_packed_hdr_wrq_prep or mmc_blk_end_packed_req,etc. And the code of mmc_blk_end_packed_req is trying to use packed before checking it which makes it quite weird. This patch is trying to remove these two checks and move it to the mmc_blk_prep_packed_list. If we find packed is null, then we should never use MMC_BLK_PACKED_CMD. By doing this, we could fall back to non-packed request if finding null packed, though it's impossible theoretically. After removing these two BUG_ONs, we also remove all other similar checks within the routine of mmc_blk_issue_rw_rq which checks the error handling of packed request. Signed-off-by: NShawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com> Signed-off-by: NUlf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
-
- 26 8月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Adrian Hunter 提交于
We call mmc_req_is_special() after having processed a request, but it could be freed after that. Check that ahead of time, and use the cached value. Reported-by: NHans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> Tested-by: NHans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> Fixes: c2df40df ("drivers: use req op accessor") Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>
-
- 16 8月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Adrian Hunter 提交于
Commit 288dab8a ("block: add a separate operation type for secure erase") split REQ_OP_SECURE_ERASE from REQ_OP_DISCARD without considering all the places REQ_OP_DISCARD was being used to mean either. Fix those. Signed-off-by: NAdrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> Fixes: 288dab8a ("block: add a separate operation type for secure erase") Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>
-
- 25 7月, 2016 3 次提交
-
-
由 Adrian Hunter 提交于
Apparently a cut-and-paste error, 'do_data_tag' is using 'brq' for data size even though 'brq' has not been set up. Instead use blk_rq_sectors(). Signed-off-by: NAdrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NShawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com> Signed-off-by: NUlf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
-
由 Pratibhasagar V 提交于
Certain Hynix eMMC 4.41 cards might get broken when HPI feature is used and hence this patch disables the HPI feature for such buggy cards. As some of the other features like BKOPs/Cache/Sanitize are dependent on HPI feature, those features would also get disabled if HPI is disabled. Signed-off-by: NPratibhasagar V <pratibha@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: NSubhash Jadavani <subhashj@codeaurora.org> [gdavis: Forward port and cleanup] Signed-off-by: NGeorge G. Davis <george_davis@mentor.com> Signed-off-by: NUlf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
-
由 Yuan, Juntao 提交于
In sectors alignment check, brq->data.blocks means sectors of the previous mqrq since data.blocks for mqrq_cur hasn't been updated yet. data.blocks will be updated later in mmc_blk_packed_hdr_wrq_prep or mmc_blk_rw_rq_prep. static int mmc_blk_issue_rw_rq(struct mmc_queue *mq, ...... ...... struct mmc_blk_request *brq = &mq->mqrq_cur->brq; Signed-off-by: NYuan Juntao <juntao.yuan@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NUlf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
-
- 18 7月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Taras Kondratiuk 提交于
The code that fills packed command header assumes that CPU runs in little-endian mode. Hence the header is malformed in big-endian mode and causes MMC data transfer errors: [ 563.200828] mmcblk0: error -110 transferring data, sector 2048, nr 8, cmd response 0x900, card status 0xc40 [ 563.219647] mmcblk0: packed cmd failed, nr 2, sectors 16, failure index: -1 Convert header data to LE. Signed-off-by: NTaras Kondratiuk <takondra@cisco.com> Fixes: ce39f9d1 ("mmc: support packed write command for eMMC4.5 devices") Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NUlf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
-